62,682
edits
Changes
no edit summary
| 1996 || || {{w|Daniel Kahneman}} and {{w|Amos Tversky}} argue that cognitive biases have efficient practical implications for areas including clinical judgment, entrepreneurship, finance, and management.<ref>{{cite journal|author1=Kahneman, D. |author2=Tversky, A. |last-author-amp=yes |title=On the reality of cognitive illusions|journal=Psychological Review|year=1996|volume=103|issue=3|pages=582–591|doi=10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582|pmid=8759048|url=http://psy.ucsd.edu/%7Emckenzie/KahnemanTversky1996PsychRev.pdf|citeseerx=10.1.1.174.5117 }}</ref><ref name="S.X. Zhang and J. Cueto 2015">{{cite journal |author1=S.X. Zhang |author2=J. Cueto |title=The Study of Bias in Entrepreneurship |journal= Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice |volume=41 |issue=3 |pages=419–454 |doi= 10.1111/etap.12212 |year=2015 }}</ref>
|-
| 1999 1998 || Experiment || The psychological phenomenon of illusory superiority known as {{w|Dunning–Kruger effectImpact bias}} is identified as . "In Gilbert et al., 1998, there was a conducted study on individuals participating in a form [[job interview]]. The participants were separated into two groups; the ''unfair decision condition'' (where the decision of cognitive bias in Kruger being hired was left up to a single MBA student with sole authority listening to the interview) and Dunningthe ''s 1999 study, fair decision condition''Unskilled (where the decision was made by a team of MBA students who had to independently and Unaware unanimously decide the fate of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead the interviewee). Then, certain participants were chosen to forecast how they would feel if they were chosen or not chosen for the job immediately after learning if they had been hired or fired and then they had to predict how they would feel ten minutes after hearing the news. Then following the interview, all participants were given letters notifying them they had not been selected for the job. All participants were then required to fill out a questionnaire that reported their current happiness. Then after waiting ten minutes, the experimenter presented all the participants with another questionnaire that once again asked them to Inflated Self-Assessments''report their current level of happiness.<ref name="Kruger"/>
|-
| 2002 1999 || Concept introduction || "In a 2002 revision The psychological phenomenon of the theory, Kahneman and illusory superiority known as {{w|Shane Frederick}} proposed {{w|attribute substitutionDunning–Kruger effect}} is identified as a process underlying these form of cognitive bias in Kruger and Dunning's 1999 study, ''Unskilled and other effectsUnaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments''."<ref name="revisitedKruger">{{cite book |last= Kahneman |first=Daniel |first2=Shane |last2=Frederick |title=Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment |editor=Thomas Gilovich |editor2=Dale Griffin |editor3=Daniel Kahneman |publisher =Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |year=2002 |pages=49–81 |chapter=Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment |isbn=978-0-521-79679-8 |oclc=47364085}}</ref>
|-
| 2002 || Concept introduction || "In a 2002 revision of the theory, Kahneman and {{w|Shane Frederick}} proposed {{w|attribute substitution}} as a process underlying these and other effects."<ref name="revisited">{{cite book |last= Kahneman |first=Daniel |first2=Shane |last2=Frederick |title=Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment |editor=Thomas Gilovich |editor2=Dale Griffin |editor3=Daniel Kahneman |publisher =Cambridge University Press |location=Cambridge |year=2002 |pages=49–81 |chapter=Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment |isbn=978-0-521-79679-8 |oclc=47364085}}</ref>|-| 2002 || Research || {{w|Bystander effect}}. Research indicates that priming a social context may inhibit helping behavior. Imagining being around one other person or being around a group of people can affect a person's willingness to help.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = Garcia | first1 = S.M. | last2 = Weaver | first2 = K. | last3 = Darley | first3 = J.M. | last4 = Moskowitz | first4 = G.B. | year = 2002 | title = Crowded minds: the implicit bystander effect | url = | journal = Journal of Personality and Social Psychology | volume = 83 | issue = 4| pages = 843–853 | doi=10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.843| pmid = 12374439 }}</ref>
|-
| 2004 || || "One of the most common anchors is personal experience, which is the basis of ego-centric decision-making. Estimating the behaviors, attitudes and thoughts of other people is complex and effortful; anchoring and adjustment makes this process simpler by substituting one’s own perspective and adjusting until a reasonable estimate has been achieved (Epley et al., 2004). "<ref name="One of the common"/>
