Difference between revisions of "Timeline of existential risk"

Latest revision as of 21:50, 20 November 2023

This is a timeline of existential risk. According to the Future of Life Institute, "an existential risk is any risk that has the potential to eliminate all of humanity or, at the very least, kill large swaths of the global population, leaving the survivors without sufficient means to rebuild society to current standards of living".^[1]

Sample questions

The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:

What risk types are described in this timeline?
- Sort the full timeline by "Risk type".
- You will see both multiple risk types covered in one event, and single types, often impact events and nuclear weapons. Scientific concepts, such as entropy, are also included in this column.
What are some notable or sample conducted studies in the field of existential risk or directly related fields and sub-fields?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Research".
What are some organizations engaged in the study and prevention of global catastrophic risks?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Organization".
- You will mostly see organizations engaged in preventing existential risks from multiple causes, but also some organizations specialized in one risk type.
What are some notable cases of incidents representing the possibility of global catastrophic risks at a major scale?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Sample case".
What are some events describing the probability of occurrence of a global catastrophic risks?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Probability".
- You will see some calculations of risk, mainly on nuclear warfare and artificial intellicence.
What are some notable or sample publications on the topic?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Literature".
- You will see a variety of publications, some treating the entire field of existential risk, and others specializing in one risk type.
What are some notable comments from prominent personalities, regarding the topic of existential risk?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Notable comment".
- You will see comments by prominent people in the field of existential risk, such as Nick Bostrom, but also prominent personalities, like Albert Einstein and H.G. Wells.
What are some concepts introduced in relation to the topic of existential risk?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Concept development".
- You will see the emergence of concepts related to the field, such as "existential risk", "supervolcano", etc.
What are some programs aimed to preserve species, data, and information, in case a catastrofic risk threatens their existence?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Preservation effort".
- You will see some notable projects, such as the Svalbard Global Seed Vault.
What are other programs launched by competitive entities with the purpose to combat existential risks?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Program launch".
- You will mostly see programs launched to prevent impact events. Programs adressing other existential risks are also described.
Other events are described under the following types: "Budget", "Conference", "Document", "Field development", "Field growth", "Filmmaking", "International law", "Milestone event", "Open leter", "Policy", "Politics", "Project launch", "Scientific wager", "Space colonization", and "Statistics".

Big picture

Time period	Development summary	More details
19th century–1945	Early development	Concerns about human extinction can be traced back to the 19th century^[2], with geology unveiling a radically nonhuman past.^[3] French scientist Georges Cuvier popularizes the concept of catastrophism in the early 1800s. The first near-Earth asteroid is discovered. Toward the first half of the twentieth century, chemical and biological weapons become a case of concern.
1945 onwards	Atomic Age/anthropocene	The nuclear holocaust becomes a theoretical scenario shortly after the beginning of this age, which starts following the detonation of the first nuclear weapon. In the 1950s, humanity enters a new age, facing not only existential risks from our natural environment, but also the possibility that we might be able to extinguish ourselves. During the 1960s, mutual assured destruction leads to the expansion of nuclear-armed submarines by both Cold War adversaries.^[4] In the same decade, the anti-nuclear movement launches, and the environmentalist movement soon adopts the cause of fighting climate change.^[5] Supervolcanoes are discovered in the early 1970s.^[6] Global warming becomes widely recognized as a risk in the 1980s.^[7] The term "existential threat", beginning to spread around the 1960–80s during the Cold War, takes off in the 1990s and early 2000s.^[8]
21st century	Field of study consolidation	Nick Bostrom introduces the term "existential risk", which emerges as a unified field of study.^[2] By the early 2000s, scientists identify many other threats to human survival, including threats associated with artificial intelligence, biological weapons, nanotechnology, and high energy physics experiments.^[2] Unaligned artificial intelligence is recognized by some as the main threat within a century.^[7] Today, it is understood that the natural risks are dwarfed by the human-caused ones, turning the risk of extinction into an especially urgent issue.^[5]

Full timeline

Year	Risk type	Event type	Details	Country/location
Slightly over 66 million years ago	Impact event	Sample case	The Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event occurs when a large asteroid, about 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) in diameter, strikes Earth, causing a mass extinction in which 75% of plant and animal species on Earth became extinct, including all non-avian dinosaurs.^[9]	Mexico (Yucatán Peninsula)
1490	Impact event	Sample case	The Ch'ing-yang event occurs as a meteor shower or air burst in Qingyang, China.^[10] More than 10,000 people are estimated to be killed by the meteoric event.^[11]	China
1577	Impact event	Research	Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe tries to measure the distance of a comet through its parallax. After this, the extraterrestrial nature of comets is recognized and confirmed.^[12]	Denmark
1694	Impact event	Research	English astronomer Edmond Halley presents a theory that Noah's flood in the Bible was caused by a comet impact.^[13]	United Kingdom (Kingdom of England)
1763	Multiple	Concept development	English statistician Thomas Bayes' solution to a problem of inverse probability is presented in the publication of An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances.^[14] The Bayes theorem describes the probability of an event, based on prior knowledge of conditions that might be related to the event, thus providing rules for thinking about probabilities prior to any trials.^[15]	United Kingdom
1777	Heat death of the universe	Research	French astronomer Jean Sylvain Bailly becomes the first to put forward the conjecture that all bodies in the universe cool off, eventually becoming too cold to support life.^[16]^[17]	France
1778	Multiple	Literature	French naturalist, mathematician, cosmologist, and encyclopédiste Georges Buffon publishes Les époques de la nature, which theorizes that the Earth was created by molten matter expelled from the Sun. Buffon also provides first experimental calculations of the window of planetary habitability, arguing that eventually Earth will become irreversibly uninhabitable.^[18]
1798	Overpopulation	Literature	English cleric, scholar and economist Thomas Robert Malthus publishes An Essay on the Principle of Population, which mathematically demonstrates the relationship between food and human population. Malthus argues that whenever food supply increases, population rapidly grows to eliminate the abundance resulting in perpetual human suffering unless we control human population.^[19] Human overpopulation is considered a global catastrophic risk in the domain of earth system governance.^[20]	United Kingdom
1800	Multiple	Research	French naturalist and zoologist Georges Cuvier publishes paleontological paper under the title Mémoires sur les espèces d'éléphants vivants et fossiles. Cuvier demonstrates that elephantine bones unearthed in Siberia and North America belonged to mammoths and mastodons. Prior to this, the scientific community largely rejected the possibility that species could go extinct.^[2]	France
1815	Supervolcano	Sample case	Mount Tambora erupts in the island of Sumbawa, dispersing volcanic ash around the world and lowering global temperatures in an event sometimes known as the Year Without a Summer. Extreme weather and harvest failures follow, causing famine in China and Europe and triggering cholera outbreak in Bengal.^[3]	Indonesia
1826	Pandemic	Literature	English novelist Mary Shelley publishes The Last Man, which depicts Europe in the late 21st century, ravaged by a mysterious plague pandemic that rapidly sweeps across the entire globe, ultimately resulting in the near-extinction of humanity. This is first modern post-apocalyptic pandemic novel^[21], and the first proper depiction of an existential catastrophe where nonhuman ecosystems continue after demise of humanity.^[3]	United Kingdom
1844	Omnicide	Concept development	Russian prince Vladimir Odoevsky writes a short story in which a future humanity, stricken with overpopulation and resource-depletion, welcomes a ‘Last Messiah’ who instructs a jaded mankind to commit omnicide by blowing up the planet.^[22] According to Thomas Moynihan, this is the first speculation on omnicide.^[3]
1859	Nature	Literature	Charles Darwin publishes On the Origin of Species, which would succed in convincing the scientific community that evolution is a fact about the history of all Earth-originating life, metaphysically integrating humanity into the natural order. Before this book, the belief that an ontological gap separates humans from nature was prominent.^[2]	United Kingdom
1863	Weapons of mass destruction	Deterrence theory	French science fiction writer Jules Verne imagines a world in which “the engines of warfare were perfected to such a degree” that they brought peace to the world. The topic of deterrence theory, which is anticipated by Verne, would gain relevance in the atomic age. The general consensus is that, in theory, no one would have an incentive to start a nuclear war as long as no one could win.^[4]	France
1893	Multiple	Literature	Science fiction author H. G. Wells writes two non-fiction essays about the topic of human extinction, On Extinction and The Extinction of Man, though both clearly draw as much on his literary imagination as his scientific method.^[2]	United Kingdom
1898	Impact event	Research	433 Eros is discovered by German astronomer C.G. Witt at the Berlin Observatory in an eccentric orbit between Mars and Earth.^[23] It is the first near-Earth asteroid to be discovered.^[24]	Germany (Berlin Observatory)
1901	Multiple	Literature	H. G. Wells publishes Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress upon Human Life and Thought, followed by The Discovery of the Future. Both texts can be considered foundational for the academic field of Futures Studies. Wells contends that the scientific method can and should be used to predict future events, trends, and outcomes. He believes that by understanding the past and present, we can make more informed decisions about the future.^[2]	United Kingdom
1903	Multiple	Notable comment	English writer H.G. Wells gives a lecture at the Royal Institution, highlighting the risk of global disaster. Wells states: It is impossible to show why certain things should not utterly destroy and end the human race and story; why night should not presently come down and make all our dreams and efforts vain. … something from space, or pestilence, or some great disease of the atmosphere, some trailing cometary poison, some great emanation of vapour from the interior of the earth, or new animals to prey on us, or some drug or wrecking madness in the mind of man. Wells' pessimism would deepen in his later years, as he would live long enough to learn about the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki before dying in 1946.^[25]	United Kingdom
1906	Geomagnetic reversal	Research	Magnetic field reversal is discovered. This is a major discovery as it shows that the Earth's magnetic field is not always the same.^[26]
1907	Multiple	Research	English utilitarian philosopher and economist Henry Sidgwick becomes the first to note that human extinction would be “the greatest of conceivable crimes from a Utilitarian point of view. Total utilitarianism implies that humanity should not only strive for happiness, but create as much well-being as possible, including through the creation of as many humans with positive well-being as possible.^[2]	United Kingdom
1908	Impact event	Sample case	The Tunguska event occurs when an asteroid of about 200 feet in diameter explodes above Siberia with the force of a hydrogen bomb that would have have killed millions of people had it exploded above a major city. A much larger asteroid among the thousands of dangerously large objects in orbits that intersect the earth’s orbit, could strike the earth and cause the total extinction of humanity through a combination of shock waves, fire, tsunamis, and blockage of sunlight, wherever it struck.^[25]	Russia
1922	Technology	Research	German bacteriologist and anthropologist Paul Alsberg hypothesizes that human progress resulted in ‘physiological regression’. This is, instead of bodily adaptation, the evolutionary selection process in humans have shifted to the extra-bodily evolution of our technical tools, which triggers an ‘atrophy of the body’ as the ‘immediate consequence of it being superseded by the artificial tool’.^[3]^{(Loc 5629)}
1924	Multiple	Literature	British statesman Winston Churchill publishes Shall We All Commit Suicide?, which would be considered an example of pure journalism helping to build the field of existential risk.^[2] In his essay, Churchill argues that human survival depends on setting aside selfish materialism in favor of developing our capacities for “Mercy, Pity, Peace and Love”.^[27]	United Kingdom
1925 (June 17)	Weapons of mass destruction (chemical weapon,biological weapon)	International law	The Geneva Protocol is signed with the purpose to ban the use of chemical and biological weapons.^[28] It would enter into force on 8 February 1928.^[29]
1929	Ultimate fate of the universe	Research	Edwin Hubble publishes his conclusion, based on his observations of Cepheid variable stars in distant galaxies, that the universe is expanding. From then on, the beginning of the universe and its possible end would be subjects of serious scientific investigation.^[30]	United States
1937	Impact event	Sample case	Asteroid 69230 Hermes is discovered when it passes the Earth at twice the distance of the Moon.^[31]
1945	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Organization	The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists is founded by Manhattan Project scientists at the University of Chicago^[32]^[33], upon being concerned about the consequences of their work. Two years later, the bulletin would create the iconic “Doomsday Clock”.^[2]	United States
1937	Omnicide	Literature	British writer Olaf Stapledon publishes science fiction novel Star Maker, which synthesizes ideas on longtermism into a comparative study of omnicide.^[3]	United Kingdom
1945 (July 16)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Milestone event	The first nuclear detonation is conducted when a plutonium implosion device is tested at a site located 210 miles south of Los Alamos, New Mexico. Many scientists would suggest dating the beginning of the Anthropocene age to this event, stating that that Homo sapiens gained a position of unprecedented influence over the Earth system.^[34]	United States
1945 (August 6)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Milestone event	Hiroshima becomes the first city targeted by a nuclear weapon, when the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) drops the atomic bomb "Little Boy" on the city.^[35]	Japan
1945 (August 9)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Milestone event	Nagasaki becomes the second and, to date, last city in the world to experience a nuclear attack, when the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) drops the atomic bomb "Fat Man" on the city.^[36]	Japan
1945 (August 18)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature (article)	Bertrand Russell publishes The Bomb and Civilization, which he had begun writing the day Nagasaki was bombed.^[37] Russell writes: The prospect for the human race is sombre beyond all precedent. Mankind are faced with a clear-cut alternative: either we shall all perish, or we shall have to acquire some slight degree of common sense. A great deal of new political thinking will be necessary if utter disaster is to be averted.^[38]	United Kingdom
1947	Impact event	Organization	The Minor Planet Center is established by the International Astronomical Union at Cincinnati Observatory. It is responsible for collecting and disseminating positional measurements and orbital data for asteroids (minor planets) and comets.^[39]	United States
1947	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Probability	The Doomsday Clock is introduced, and set seven minutes to midnight.^[40] It is a symbol that represents the likelihood of a man-made global catastrophe, in the opinion of the members of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.^[41]
1948	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Notable comment	Albert Einstein writes: I advocate world government because I am convinced that there is no other possible way of eliminating the most terrible danger in which man has ever found himself. The objective of avoiding total destruction must have priority over any other objective.^[26]
1948	Overpopulation	Literature	American ecologist William Vogt publishes Road to Survival^[2], which argues that human population control is necessary to avoid an ecological catastrophe. This book constitutes an early warning of the dangers of overpopulation.^[42]
1948	Environmental disaster	Literature	American conservationist Henry Fairfield Osborn Jr. publishes Our Plundered Planet^[2], which warns of the environmental destruction caused by human activity. It is considered one of the earliest works on the subject of environmentalism.^[43]
1949	Supervolcano	Concept development	The term "supervolcano" is first used in a volcanic context.^[44]
1950	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Research	In a letter to the editor of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Leo Szilard warns that it would be possible to rig an H-bomb with materials that would create enough fallout to kill everyone on earth. This would become known as a "cobalt bomb."^[45]	United States
1954 (March 1)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Milestone event	The United States tests its largest thermonuclear weapon test in Bikini Atoll; the detonation being code-named “Castle Bravo”.^[46]	United States
1955	Multiple	Literature (article)	Hungarian-American mathematician John von Neumann publishes an article entitled Can We Survive Technology?^[47]^[48], which alerts on the threats that may result from ever-expanding technological progress in a finite world.^[49] Von Neumann discusses nuclear weapons, nuclear power, climate control, and automated systems, and believes that the difficulties and opportunities facing humanity are of great importance in having a bearing on future events.^[50]	United States (Fortune magazine)
1955	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	A group of prominent scientists, including Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein, write what would come to be known as the Russell–Einstein Manifesto, according to which: “No one knows how widely such lethal radioactive particles might be diffused, but the best authorities are unanimous in saying that a war with H-bombs might possibly put an end to the human race… sudden only for a minority, but for the majority a slow torture of disease and disintegration.”^[2]
1958	Multiple	Literature	German mathematician Emil Julius Gumbel publishes Statistics of Extremes, which would become an important classic in extreme value theory, a branch of statistics dealing with the extreme deviations from the median of probability distributions.^[51]
1960	Impact event	Scientific development	American geologist Eugene Merle Shoemaker definitively proves that some of the Earth’s craters were produced not by geological activity, but by vast meteoric impacts, far beyond any in recorded history.^[26]	United States
1960	Multiple	Concept development	English-American theoretical physicist Freeman Dyson in his paper Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation popularizes the concept of the later called Dyson sphere, a hypothetical megastructure that completely encompasses a star and captures a large percentage of its solar power output. Dyson speculates that such structures would be the logical consequence of the escalating energy needs of a technological civilization and would be a necessity for its long-term survival.^[52]	United States
1960 (October 5)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Sample case	The world goes at the brink of nuclear war when a radar alert from Thule, Greenland is sent to the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD), announcing the detection of dozens of Soviet missiles launched for the United States.^[53] NORAD headquarter in Colorado goes into a panic, but the latter is put to rest when it is realized that Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev is visiting New York at the time. It would be later determined that the radar had mistaken the moon rising over Norway as Soviet missiles.^[54]	Greenland, United States
1960	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Concept development	American nuclear physicist Herman Kahn introduces the concept "doomsday machine" in his book On Thermonuclear War. It is a hypothetical device that would automatically trigger a global nuclear holocaust in response to a nuclear attack.^[55]	United States
1960	Overpopulation	Concept development	Austrian American scientist Heinz von Foerster and his colleagues P. M. Mora and L. W. Amiot publishe their Doomsday equation formula in Science, predicting future population growth. The formula represents a best fit to available historical data on world population, and the authors then predict future population growth on the basis of this formula, which gives 2.7 billion as the 1960 world population and predicts that population growth would become infinite by Friday, November 13, 2026 – von Foerster's 115th birthday anniversary – a prediction that would earn it the name "the Doomsday Equation."^[56]	United States
1961 (April 12)	Multiple	Space colonization	Soviet pilot and cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin becomes the first human to journey into outer space^[57], becoming also the first human face for space exploration, giving hope to humanity to survive outside of earth.^[58]^[59]	Soviet Union
1961	Scorched earth, multiple	Literature (article)	German astrophysicist Sebastian von Hoerner publishes an article entitled The Search for Signals from Other Civilizations, which discusses various factors that might affect the longevity of technological races and what this in turn would mean for the chances of success of SETI programs.^[60] Von Hoerner suggests that sixty percent of all civilisations immolate themselves in planet-scorching war.^[61]^[3]⁽²⁴⁴⁾ In the following years, he would expand his speculations on the longevity of civilizations, and the existential 'crises' they face, concluding that the civilizations that don't destroy themselves will instead face "irreversible stagnation".^[62]	Germany (Astronomical Calculation Institute (Heidelberg University)
1961 (November 24)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Sample case	On an evening, communication links between Strategic Air Command headquarters (SAC HQ) and NORAD go dead, resulting in the lost communication with three Ballistic Missile Early Warning Sites (BMEWS) around the world, all of which were supposed to run on independent telephone and telegraph lines.^[63]	United States
1962	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Concept development	Herman Kahn's Hudson Institute strategist Donald Brennan coins the term "mutual assured destruction", commonly abbreviated "MAD".^[64], a doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by an attacker on a nuclear-armed defender with second-strike capabilities would cause the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender.^[65]
1962	Climate change	Literature	Rachel Carson publishes Silent Spring, which warns of the potential dangers of pesticide use.^[66] Considered a pivotal early work, this book would become immensely popular, in addition to increasing scientific rigour and raising public awareness about the danger from chemical pesticides, such as DDT, chlordane, and heptachlor.^[2]	United States (Houghton Mifflin)
1962 (October 27)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Probability	During the Cuban Missile Crisis, after a Soviet submarine B-59 loses contact with Moscow for days, the captain orders the use of a nuclear torpedo when a US ship begins dropping practice depth charges to make the submarine surface, with the Russian captain mistaking them for real depth charges, and concluding that war has begun. Aboard commander Vasili Arkhipov countermands the order to fire, thus preventing the nuclear strike and potentially an all-out nuclear war.^[67]^[4] During the crisis, United States President John F. Kennedy would estimate the probability of escalation to nuclear conflict as between 33% and 50%.^[68]^[69]	Cuba, United States, Russia (Soviet Union)
1963 (August 5)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	International law	The Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty is signed with the purpose to ban all nuclear weapons tests except for those conducted underground.^[70] It would enter into force on October 10, 1963.^[71] With the signing of this treaty, the Doomsday Clock is moved back to twelve minutes to midnight.^[4]
1964	Multiple	Notable comment	Soviet astrophysicist Iosif Shklovsky writes: Profound crises lie in wait for a developing civilization and one of them may well prove fatal. We are already familiar with several such critical (situations): Self-destruction as a result of a thermonuclear catastrophe or some other discovery which may have unpredictable and uncontrollable consequences. Genetic danger. Overproduction of information. Restricted capacity of the individual's brain which can lead to excessive specialization, with consequent dangers of degeneration. A crisis precipitated by the creation of artificial intelligent beings.^[72]	Russia (Soviet Union)
1964	Impact event	Literature	Dandridge M. Cole and Donald W. Cox publish Islands in Space, which notes the dangers of planetoid impacts, both those occurring naturally and those that might be brought about with hostile intent. The authors argue for cataloging the minor planets and developing the technologies to land on, deflect, or even capture planetoids.^[73]	United States
1966	Artificial intelligence	Research	British mathematician Irving Good publishes paper entitled Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine, which posits that such AI would be “the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control.”^[2] Good speculates that artificial general intelligence might bring about an intelligence explosion.^[74]	United Kingdom
1967 (January 27)	Weapons of mass destruction	International law	The Outer Space Treaty is opened for signature in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union, with the purpose to ban stationing of weapons of mass destruction in space.^[75] It would enter into force on October 10, 1967.^[76]	United States, United Kingdom, Russia (Soviet Union)
1967 (May 23)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Sample case	A major solar flare causes radars at all three Ballistic Missile Early Warning System (BMEWS) sites in the far Northern Hemisphere to become jammed, the latter being a signal of attack.^[77]	United States
1967	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Notable comment	Hungarian-British essayist Arthur Koestler writes: [B]efore the thermonuclear bomb, man had to live with the idea of his death as an individual; from now onward, mankind has to live with the idea of its death as a species. The bomb has given us the power to commit genosuicide; and within a few years we should even have the power to turn our planet into a nova, an exploding star. Every age has had its Cassandras [and] mankind has managed to survive regardless of their sinister prophecies. But this comforting argument is no longer valid, as no past age, however convulsed by war and pestilence, has possessed our newly acquired power over life on the planet as a whole.^[78]	United Kingdom
1967	Impact event	Research	Students in the Aeronautics and Astronautics department at MIT conduct a design study, "Project Icarus", of a mission to prevent a hypothetical impact on Earth by asteroid 1566 Icarus.^[79] The design project would be later published in a book by the MIT Press^[80] and receive considerable publicity, for the first time bringing asteroid impact into the public eye.^[81]
1968 (July 1)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	International law	The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty is signed to prevent nuclear proliferation, promote nuclear disarmament, and promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy.^[82] It would enter into force on March 5, 1970.^[83]	Rusia (Moscow, United Kingdom (London), United States (Washington D.C.)
1968	Overpopulation	Literature	American biologist Paul R. Ehrlich publishes The Population Bomb.^[84] This book would receive wide public attention, warning about the catastrophic impacts of overpopulation, and arguing that human overpopulation would lead to widespread famine by the 1970s and 1980s.^[2]	United States
1969	Gamma-ray burst	Scientific development	Scientists discover a new and distinctive type of stellar explosion^[26] when the first gamma-ray burst is found.^[85] A high-energy astronomical event, its release of vast amounts of energy could conceivably harm biospheres at astronomical distances, with radiation penetrating the atmosphere, a resulting ultraviolet flash, possible Air shower (physics), and formation of nitrous oxides that deplete the ozone layer, producing acid rain, and causing multiyear cooling climate effects that if, intense enough, could plausibly cause a mass extinction.^[86]
1969	Weapons of mass destruction (biological weapon)	Literature (article)	Just prior to Richard Nixon announcement of new U.S. initiatives towards the regulations of biological weapons^[87], Joshua Lederberg of Stanford University publishes Biological warfare and the extinction of man, which argues that the use of biological weapons could lead to the extinction of humanity. Leberberg cites the uncontrollable nature of infectious agents compared to nuclear weapons, which allow the possibility at least to be confident of the laws of scaling, as the destruction of targets can be calculated from simple physical measures like the energy released, a control impossible to apply to biological weapons.^[2]^[88]	United States (Stanford University)
1969 (July 20)	Multiple	Space colonization	United States astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin land the Apollo Lunar Module Eagle, and Armstrong becomes the first person to step onto the Moon. This is another milestone event towards space colonization, which can be considered a hedge against existential risk.^[89]	United States
1971 (February 11)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	International law	The Seabed Arms Control Treaty is signed, with the purpose to ban stationing of weapons of mass destruction on the ocean floor. It would enter into force on May 18, 1972.^[90]
1972 (April 10)	Weapons of mass destruction (biological weapon)	International law	The Biological Weapons Convention is signed, with the purpose to comprehensively ban biological weapons.^[91] It would enter into force on March 26, 1975.^[92]
1972	Multiple	Preservation effort	The San Diego Zoo establishes the first "frozen zoo" program. A “frozen zoo” is a cryonic facility for the long term preservation of animal and plant genetic material such as skin cells, DNA, sperm, eggs, and embryos.^[93]	United States
1972	Economic growth	Literature	The Club of Rome publishes a report called The Limits to Growth^[3], which warns of the dangers of unchecked economic growth. The report suggests that the world was on a path to economic and environmental disaster, and that action needed to be taken to prevent this. Its conclusions are stark: “If the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years.”^[2]
1974 (August 1)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Sample case	As a result of the Watergate scandal, United States President Richard Nixon becomes clinically depressed, emotionally unstable, and drinking heavily. As a mode of precaution U.S. Secretary of Defense James R. Schlesinger instruct the Joint Chiefs of Staff to route “any emergency order coming from the president”—such as a nuclear launch order— through him first.” ^[94]	United States
1975	Multiple	Concept development	American astrophysicist Michael H. Hart publishes an early detailed examination of the Fermi paradox.^[95]^[96]^:27–28^[97]^:6 He argues that if intelligent extraterrestrials exist, and are capable of space travel, then the galaxy could have been colonized in a time much less than that of the age of the Earth. However, there is no observable evidence they have been here, which Hart called "Fact A".^[97]^:6	United States
1976	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Notable comment	Iosif Shklovsky argues that global self-destruction is the result of capitalist ideology, which doesn't take into account a potential ‘communist transformation of society’ which would ‘remove the very possibility of such crisis situations’.^[98]	Russia (Soviet Union)
1979	Climate change	Research	The range of climate sensitivity is first put forward from 1.5°C to 4.5°C, a range adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and that would barely change over the next forty years.^[99]	Worldwide (United Nations)
1979	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	The United States Congress' Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) publishes The Effects of Nuclear War,^[100] a study examining the full range of effects that nuclear war would have on civilians: direct effects from blast and radiation; and indirect effects from economic, social, and politicai disruption. Particular attention is devoted to the ways in which the impact of a nuclear war would extend over time.^[101]	United States
1979	Multiple	Literature	Isaac Asimov publishes A Choice of Catastrophes: The Disasters That Threaten Our World, an early book-length nonfiction treatment of possible existential catastrophes.^[2]	United States
1979	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	American engineer Cresson Kearny publishes Nuclear War Survival Skills: Lifesaving Nuclear Facts and Self-Help Instructions, which aims to provide a general audience with advice on how to survive conditions likely to be encountered in the event of a nuclear catastrophe, as well as encouraging optimism in the face of such a catastrophe by asserting the survivability of a nuclear war.^[102]	United States
1980	Collapse of the vacuum	Scientific development	Theoretical physicists Sidney Coleman and Frank De Luccia calculate for the first time that any bubble of true vacuum would immediately suffer total gravitational collapse.^[103]^[104]	United States
1980	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Research	The earliest appearance of a connection between space exploration and human survival appears in Louis J. Halle, Jr.'s article in Foreign Affairs, in which he states colonization of space will keep humanity safe should global nuclear warfare occur.^[105]	United States
1980	Impact event	Organization	Spacewatch is founded by Tom Gehrels and Robert S. McMillan as a research group of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory of the University of Arizona in Tucson, with the purpose to be the first to use electronic detectors to discover NEAs and to explore the various populations of small objects in the solar system.^[106]^[107]	United States
1980	Impact event	Scientific development	A team of scientists led by Luis Walter Alvarez and his son Walter Alvarez discover that the geological boundary between the Cretaceous and Palaeogene periods is rich in iridium, an element markedly more common in asteroids than on the Earth’s surface, where it's extremely rare. The team concludes with what would be called the Alvarez hypothesis, which posits that the impact of a large asteroid on the Earth could have caused the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event, which killed the dinosaurs.^[26]^[2]	United States
1980	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	Survival expert Bruce Clayton publishes Life After Doomsday^[108], which attempts to provide a comprehensive guide to surviving a nuclear disaster, including detailed instructions on how to build and defend a shelter, store food, treat illnesses and injuries, and cope with the psychological effects of such an event.^[109]	United States}} (Paladin Press)
1980	Multiple	Scientific wager	In what is known as the Simon–Ehrlich wager, American professor Julian Simon and American biologist Paul Ehrlich, bet on the future of natural resource prices as a vehicle for their public debate about mankind's future. Simon challenges Ehrlich, which dismisses and mocks the optimistic views of Simon, to a wager over a 10-year period, to judge who was right about resource availability. Simon would ultimately win, and his victory would be used as evidence that innovation can offset material scarcity induced by human economic activity.^[110] On a deeper level, the Simon–Ehrlich wager can be regarded as a conflict of visions concerning the future of humanity.^[111]	United States
1981	Impact event	Field development	Inspired by the Alvarez hypothesis, American astronomer Carolyn S. Shoemaker convenes a seminal meeting, founding the scientific field of impact hazards.^[26]	United States
1981	Pandemic	Sample case	HIV/AIDS is first recognized with reports of an unusual pneumonia in men who have sex with men caused by Pneumocystis carinii and previously seen almost exclusively in immunocompromised subjects.^[25] For years this disease would remain a death sentence, spreading to all continents and lowering life expectancy in many countries in Africa.^[112]
1982	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	American author Jonathan Schell publishes The Fate of the Earth, which would be regarded as a key document in the nuclear disarmament movement.^[113] By the time of this publication, there are almost 60,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled with a destructive force equal to roughly 20,000 megatons (20 billion tons) of TNT, or over 1 million times the power of the Hiroshima bomb.^[25]^[2]	United States
1983	Multiple	Research	American historian W. Warren Wagar argues that science fiction played a significant role in the development of the academic field of futures studies.^[2]	United States
1983	Multiple	Concept development	British cosmologist Brandon Carter frames the "Doomsday argument", a probabilistic argument that claims to predict the future number of members of the human species given an estimate of the total number of humans born so far.^[114]	United Kingdom
1983 (September 26)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Sample case	A newly inaugurated Soviet early-warning satellite system causes a nuclear false alarm, leading to widespread panic and confusion.^[115]	Russia (Soviet Union)
1984	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	Carl Sagan and Paul Ehrlich publish The Cold and the Dark, a book discussing long-term biological consequences of nuclear war.^[2]
1984	Bioterrorism	Sample case	The Rajneeshee bioterror attack occurs when a group of prominent followers of Rajneesh spread the enteric bacterium, Salmonella typhimurium, onto salad bars in The Dalles, Oregon, causing illness in over 750 people and sending many to hospitals.^[25]	United States
1984	Multiple	Literature	British philosopher Derek Parfit publishes Reasons and Persons, which partly discusses population ethics. It raises questions about whether it can be wrong to create a life, whether environmental destruction violates the rights of future people, and so on.^[116]
1985	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Politics	54-year-old Mikhail Gorbachev is appointed General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. While his full intentions would remain unclear, Gorbachev's moderate liberalization measures would result in the dissolution of the Soviet Union.^[25] Historian Yuval Noah Harari would call Gorbachev an historical hero, for probably saving the world from nuclear war.^[117]	Russia (Soviet Union)
1986	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Statistics	The global size of the nuclear arsenals peaks at 70,000 warheads.^[26]	Countries with nuclear weapons
1986	Nanotechnology	Concept development	Nanotechnology pioneer K. Eric Drexler coins the term gray goo in his book Engines of Creation.^[118] Gray goo is a hypothetical global catastrophic scenario involving molecular nanotechnology in which out-of-control self-replicating machines consume all biomass on Earth while building more of themselves^[119], a scenario that would be called ecophagy (the literal consumption of the ecosystem).^[120]^[25]^[2]
1986	Technology	Organization	The Foresight Institute is founded by K. Eric Drexler "to help prepare society for anticipated advanced technologies", mainly nanotechnology.^[121]^[122]
1986	Multiple	Organization	The Center for Security and International Cooperation is formed at Stanford University.^[123] It is a hub for researchers tackling some of the world's most pressing security and international cooperation problems.^[124]	United States
1986	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	Lydia Dotto publishes Planet Earth in Jeopardy: Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War, A distillation of the report by the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), written for a lay audience. It explores the climatic and atmospheric changes induced, radiation and fallout, and the putative biological consequences of nuclear war.^[125]
1987	Technology	Research	American political scientist Aaron Wildavsky proposes that cultural orientations such as egalitarianism and individualism frame public perceptions of technological risks. Since then, a body of empirical research would grow to affirm the risk-framing effects of personality and culture.^[25]	United States
1987 (September 16)	Multiple		The Montreal Protocol is an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of numerous substances that are responsible for ozone depletion. Entering into force on 1 January 1989, it would result in the ozone hole in Antarctica slowly recovering. This can be considered an example of global coordination resulting in positive outcome.	All United Nations members, as well as the Cook Islands, Niue, the Holy See, the State of Palestine and the European Union
1988	Impact event	Progream launch	The United States, the European Union, and other nations begin scanning the sky for near-earth objects in an effort called Spaceguard.^[126]	United States, European Union, other
1988	Climate change	Organization	American scientist James Hansen testifies to the United States Congress that climate change is already underway. In the same year, the World Meteorological Organization establishes the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which would since produce five reports summarizing the state of the science on climate change.^[4]	United States
1988	Supervolcano	Research	According to Rampino et al., the injection of massive amounts of volcanic dust into the stratosphere by a super-eruption such as Toba might be expected to lead to immediate surface cooling, creating a volcanic winter.^[127] ^[25]
1989 (March 23)	Impact event	Sample case	300 m (980 ft) diameter Apollo asteroid 4581 Asclepius (1989 FC) misses the Earth by 700,000km. If the asteroid had impacted it would have created the largest explosion in recorded history, equivalent to 20,000 megatons of TNT. This event would attract widespread attention because it was discovered only after the closest approach.^[128]
1991	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Sample case	The Nunn–Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program is initiated upon the dissolution of the Soviet Union, when the risk of "loose nukes" prompts a new wave of government, academic, and popular concern about nuclear terrorism. The program provides funding and expertise to partner governments in the former Soviet Union to secure and eliminate weapons of mass destruction at the source.^[129]^[25]
1991	Multiple	Project launch	Biosphere 2 is completed. It is a massive scientific facility meant to simulate Earth's ecosystems.^[130] It is originally meant to demonstrate the viability of closed ecological systems to support and maintain human life in outer space as a substitute for Earth's biosphere.^[131]	United States
1992	Multiple	Document	The World Scientists' Warning to Humanity is writen by Henry Way Kendall, a former chair of the board of directors of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and signed by about 1,700 leading scientists, including a majority of the Nobel Prize laureates in the sciences.^[132]	United States
1992	Greenhouse effect	Research	According to Caldeira and Kasting, the end of complex life may come in 0.9-1.5 billion years owing to the runaway greenhouse effect.^[25] According to the researchers, when the Sun becomes too bright, it will drive a runaway greenhouse effect through the Earth’s atmosphere.^[25]^[133]	United States
1992	Impact event	Recommendation	In a report to NASA, a coordinated Spaceguard Survey is recommended to discover, verify and provide follow-up observations for Earth-crossing asteroids. This survey is expected to discover 90% of these objects larger than one kilometer within 25 years.^[134]	United States (NASA)
1992	Bioterrorism	Sample case	The doomsday cult Aum Shinrikyo sends a medical team to Zaire in what would be believed to have been an attempt to procure Ebola virus^[135]. While an unsuccessful attempt, this event provides an example of a terrorist group apparently intending to make use of a contagious virus.^[25]	Japan, Congo DR
1992 (September 3)	Weapons of mass destruction (chemical weapon)	International law	The Chemical Weapons Convention is signed to comprehensively ban chemical weapons.^[136] It would enter into force on April 29, 1997.^[137]
1993	Bioterrorism	Sample case	The United States Congress' Office of Technology Assessment finds that a single 100 kg load of anthrax spores, if delivered by aircraft over a crowded urban setting, depending on weather conditions, could result in fatalities ranging between 130,000 and 3 million individuals.^[25]	United States
1993	Impact event	Research	American geophysicist H. J. Melosh with I. V. Nemchinov propose deflecting an asteroid or comet by focusing solar energy onto its surface to create thrust from the resulting vaporization of material.^[138]	United States
1994	Impact event	Program launch	The United States Congress issues NASA the directive to find and track 90 percent of all near-Earth Objects greater than one kilometer across, a task that would be completed in 2011, for a total cost of less than $70 million.^[139]^[26]	United States
1995	Impact event	Recommendation	A NASA report recommends search surveys that would discover 60–70% of short-period, near-Earth objects larger than one kilometer within ten years and obtain 90% completeness within five more years.^[140]	United States (NASA)
1995	Impact event	Program launch	Following the 1994 Shoemaker-Levy 9 comet impacts with Jupiter, Edward Teller proposes, to a collective of U.S. and Russian ex-Cold War weapons designers in a planetary defense workshop meeting at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), that they collaborate to design a one-gigaton nuclear explosive device, which would be equivalent to the kinetic energy of a 1km diameter asteroid.^[141]^[142]^[143]	United States
1995 (January 25)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Sample case	The Norwegian rocket incident occurs when a Norwegian-U.S. scientific weather rocket is mistaken by Russian radar operators for a nuclear attack.^[144] Russian President Boris Yeltsin is prompted to activate his nuclear briefcase to contemplate launching in retaliation. ^[145]	Russia
1995	Impact event	Research	The concept of asteroid laser ablation is articulated in a white paper entitled Preparing for Planetary Defense. Similar to the effects of a nuclear device, it is thought possible to focus sufficient laser energy on the surface of an asteroid to cause flash vaporization/ablation to create either in impulse or to ablate away the asteroid mass.^[146]
1995	Bioterrorism	Sample case	The Tokyo subway sarin attack occurs when members of the cult movement Aum Shinrikyo released sarin on three lines of the Tokyo Metro, killing 13 people, and severely injuring 50.^[147] ReligiousTolerance.org says that Aum Shinrikyo is the only religion known to have planned Armageddon for non-believers.^[148]	Japan
1996 (March 26)	Impact event	Organization	The Spaceguard Foundation is established in Rome.^[149] It works to promote and coordinate activities for the discovery and characterization of near-Earth objects.^[150]	Italy
1996	Multiple	Literature	Canadian philosopher John A. Leslie publishes The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction, which examines the various ways that humanity could come to an end, such as through nuclear war, environmental disaster, or disease, and evaluates the ethical implications of each.^[151] This work contributes to the foundation of the field of existential risk studies.^[2] Leslie estimates that if the reproduction rate drops to the German or Japanese level the extinction date will be 2400.^[151]	United Kingdom (Routledge)
1996	Multiple	Preservation effort	The Millennium Seed Bank Partnership begins. It is an international conservation project with the purpose to provide an "insurance policy" against the extinction of plants in the wild by storing seeds for future use in large underground frozen vaults preserving the world's largest wild-plant seedbank or collection of seeds from wild species.^[152]	United Kingdom
1996	Impact event	Research	Planetary scientist Eugene Shoemaker proposes deflecting a potential impactor by releasing a cloud of steam in the path of the object, hopefully gently slowing it.^[153]
1996	Supervolcano	Research	According to Bekki et al., volcanic aerosols have a longer residence time of several years compared to a few months for fine dust, therefore a huge eruption might be expected to have a longer lasting effect on global climate than an impact producing a comparable amount of atmospheric loading.^[25]
1996 (September 10)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	International law	The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty is signed to ban all nuclear weapons tests.^[154] As of 2022, it is not in force.^[155]
1997	Climate change	Research	According to Toon et al., the major effect on civilization would be through collapse of agriculture as a result of the loss of one or more growing seasons. This would be followed by famine, the spread of infectious diseases, breakdown of infrastructure, social and political unrest, and conflict.^[25]
1997	Epizootic	Sample case	An outbreak in Taiwan of the highly contagious foot-and-mouth disease, causes the slaughter of 8 million pigs and brings exports to a halt, with estimated costs of $20 billion. This case exemplifies how threats to agriculture, livestock, and crops, which can cause major economic damage and loss of confidence in food security, should not be overlooked.^[25]	Taiwan
1998	Impact event	Program launch	The United States Congress gives NASA a mandate to detect 90% of near-earth asteroids over 1km diameter (that threaten global devastation).^[156]^[157]	United States (NASA)
1998 (August 13)	Multiple	Organization	The Mars Society is founded by Robert Zubrin. It is a nonprofit organization that works to educate the public, the media and the government on the benefits of exploring Mars and creating a permanent human presence on the planet. Headquartered in Lakewood, Colorado, it is based on Zubrin's Mars Direct plan, which aims to make human mission to Mars as lightweight and feasible as possible.^[158] Members include Buzz Aldrin and Elon Musk.	United States
1998 (December 6)	Artificial intelligence	Research	In one message from Nick Bostrom to artificial intelligence theorist Eliezer Yudkowsky on the Extropians mailing list^[159], inline quotations show Yudkowsky arguing that it would be good to allow a superintelligent AI system to choose own its morality. Bostrom responds that it's possible for an AI system to be highly intelligent without being motivated to act morally, explaining an early version of the orthogonality thesis^[160], which states that an agent can have any combination of intelligence level and final goal.^[161] Yudkowsky would reverse his opinion, devoting the rest of his career so far trying to reduce AI risks, and prevent AI-related catastrophe.	United States
1999	Weapons of mass destruction (biological weapon)	Literature	Ken Alibek and Stephen Handelman publish Biohazard: the Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World-Told from the Inside by the Man who Ran it.^[162]	United States (Random House)
1999	Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider	Research	Arnon Dar publishes research on high energy physics experiments, and the possibility of relativistic heavy-ion colliders destroying the planet.^[163]^[2]	Israel (Technion – Israel Institute of Technology)
2000	Pandemic	Organization	The Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network is established.^[164] It provides international public health resources to control outbreaks and public health emergencies worldwide.^[165]
2000	Multiple	Research	Corey S. Powell and Diane Martindale publish an article describing 20 scenarios of how the world could end suddenly: asteroid impact, gamma ray burst, collapse of the vacuum, rogue black holes, giant solar flares, reversal of earth's magnetic field, flood-basalt volcanism, global warming, ecosystem collapse, biotech disaster, particle accelerator mishap, nanotechnology disaster, environmental toxins, robots take over, mass insanity, alien invasion, and divine intervention.^[166]	United States (Discover Magazine)
2000	Particle Accelerator Mishap	Research	The director of the Brookhaven Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, prompted by the possibility that the experiments that physicists carry out in particle accelerators might pose an existential risk, commissions an official report, after concerns resurface with the construction of powerful accelerators such as CERN’s Large Hadron Collider.^[25]	United States
2000	Artificial intelligence	Research	Bill Joy suggests that if AI systems rapidly become super-intelligent, they may take unforeseen actions or out-compete humanity.^[167]
2000	Pandemic	Sample case	The genome of the extinct influenza virus of 1918 (A virus subtype H1N1) is resurrected piece by piece from preserved human lung tissue.^[25]
2000	Artificial intelligence		American cognitive and computer scientist Marvin Minsky raises the subject of the Riemann Hypothesis Catastrophe, that an AI asked to solve the Riemann Hypothesis would convert the Solar System into computronium, a material hypothesized by Norman Margolus and Tommaso Toffoli of MIT in 1991 to be used as "programmable matter".^[168]
2000	Artificial intelligence	Organization	The Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI) is founded as the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence by Brian Atkins, Sabine Atkins and Eliezer Yudkowsky^[169], with the purpose of accelerating the development of artificial intelligence.^[170]^[171]^[172] After Yudkowsky begins to be concerned that AI systems developed in the future could become superintelligent and pose risks to humanity,^[170], the institute would move in 2005 to Silicon Valley and begin to focus on ways to identify and manage those risks, which are at the time largely ignored by scientists in the field.^[172] Today, MIRI is an independent non-governmental organizations (NGO), with the purpose to reduce the risk of a catastrophe caused by artificial intelligence.^[173]	United States
2001 (January 1)	Multiple	Eschatology	Graham Oppy publishes paper Physical Eschatology, in which he reviews evidence which strongly supports the claim that life will eventually be extinguished from the universe.^[174] Occasionally the term "physical eschatology" is applied to the long-term predictions of astrophysics about the future of Earth and ultimate fate of the universe.^[175]^[176]	Australia
2001 (January)	Biotechnology	Sample case	A group of Australian researchers unintentionally change characteristics of the mousepox virus while trying to develop a virus to sterilize rodents, creating a virus that kills them by crippling their immune system.^[177]^[178] The modified virus becomes highly lethal even in vaccinated and naturally resistant mice.^[179]	Australia
2001	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Organization	The Nuclear Threat Initiative is formed.^[180] It is a nonprofit, nonpartisan global security organization focused on reducing nuclear and biological threats.^[181]
2001	Environmental disaster	Program launch	The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment is launched.^[182] It is a four-year international scientific assessment of the condition of Earth's ecosystems, potential impacts of changes to ecosystems on their ability to meet human needs, and policies, technologies, and tools to improve ecosystem management.^[183]
2001	Environmental disaster	Sample case	2 million trees are destroyed in Florida in an effort to contain a natural outbreak of Xanthomonas campestris, a bacterium that threatening the state's citrus industry and for which there is no cure. This event demonstrates that crops can be particularly vulnerable to an attack.^[25]	United States
2001	Environmental disaster	Research	Analyses of the fossil record by Alroy et al. suggest that recovery to former diversity levels from even severe environmental disasters may be more rapid than had previously been thought.^[25]
2001 (September–October)	Bioterrorism	Sample case	The 2001 anthrax attacks occur when anthrax spores through the mail cause 17 illnesses and 5 deaths in the United States in.^[25]	United States
2002	Multiple	Concept development	Nick Bostrom publishes a seminal paper, which defines existential risk as "One where an adverse outcome would either annihilate Earth-originating intelligent life or permanently and drastically curtail its potential".^[3] "we date the beginning of Existential Risk studies as a unified field of research to the 2002 paper Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards (Bostrom 2002) by Nick Bostrom"^[2]
2002	Weapons of mass destruction	Program launch	The G-8 Global Partnership arranges a target of 20 billion dollars to be committed over a 10-year period for the purpose of preventing terrorists from acquiring weapons and materials of mass destruction.^[25]
2002	Multiple	Organization	SpaceX is founded by Elon Musk, with the goal of reducing space transportation costs to enable the colonization of Mars.^[184]	United States
2002	Artificial intelligence	Notable comment	According to philosopher Nick Bostrom, it is possible that the first super-intelligence to emerge would be able to bring about almost any possible outcome it valued, as well as to foil virtually any attempt to prevent it from achieving its objectives.^[185]
2002 (October 7)	Impact event	Organization	B612 Foundation is founded^[186] with the goal "to develop tools and technologies to understand, map, and navigate our solar system and protect our planet from asteroid impacts."^[187]	United States
2002 (December)	Nanotechnology	Organization	Mike Treder and Chris Phoenix found the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.^[188]
2003	Multiple	Literature	British Astronomer Royal Sir Martin Rees publishes Our Final Hour.^[189] A celebrated cosmologist, Rees offers a ‘scientist’s warning’ that humanity faces unprecedented challenges in the 21st century. Rees concludes that the probability of civilization surviving the next 100 years is perhaps 50%.^[2]	United Kingdom
2003	Impact event	Budget	A NASA study of a follow-on program suggests spending US$250–450 million to detect 90% of all near-Earth asteroids 140 meters and larger by 2028.^[190]	United States (NASA)
2003	Climate change	Sample case	The 2003 European heat wave results in seventy thousand deaths. While heatstroke is not the only risk from catastrophic climate change, it is among the most potent.^[4]	Europe
2004	Multiple	Organization	The Global Risk Network is established,^[191] by the World Economic Forum in an attempt to bring together cross-sectoral responses to a new set of emerging global risks.^[192]
2004	Pandemic	Sample case	SARS escapes from the National Institute of Virology in Beijing^[26] when a graduate student develops symptoms just two weeks after she started working at the virology institute.^[193]	China
2004	Weapons of mass destruction (biological weapon)	Literature	Luther E. Lindler, Frank J. Lebeda and George Korch publish Biological Weapons Defense: Infectious Disease and Counterbioterrorism, which provides an overview of the threat of biological weapons and the measures that could be taken to protect against them.^[194]
2004	Multiple	Literature	American economist Richard Posner publishes Catastrophe: Risk and Response,^[195] which examines four risks whose worst cases could end advanced human civilization or worse: impact events, a catastrophic chain reaction initiated in high-energy particle accelerators, climate change, and bioterrorism.^[196]	United States (Oxford University Press, USA)
2005	Multiple	Organization	The Future of Humanity Institute is founded.^[197] Located at University of Oxford, it is a multidisciplinary research center enabling researchers to use mathematics, science, and philosophy to bear on big-picture questions about humanity and its prospects.^[198]	United Kingdom (University of Oxford)
2005 (March)	Impact event	Policy	The George E. Brown, Jr. Near-Earth Object Survey Act. is introduced by Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA). Named in honor to United States Representative George Brown Jr. for his commitment to planetary defense, the bill has the purpose "to provide for a Near-Earth Object Survey program to detect, track, catalogue, and characterize certain near-Earth asteroids and comets".^[199]	United States
2005	Pandemic	Literature	Jo Hays publishes Epidemics and Pandemics: Their Impacts on Human History, which details the devastating effects that major outbreaks have had on society throughout the ages. Hays argues that epidemics and pandemics are not simply medical problems, but also social and economic ones that can have a profound impact on a community.^[200]
2005	Technology	Literature	Jared Diamond publishes Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, in which the author first defines collapse: "a drastic decrease in human population size and/or political/economic/social complexity, over a considerable area, for an extended time." Diamond argues that history presents several examples of the phenomenon in which technologies that are desirable in themselves can get out of control, leading to catastrophic exhaustion of resources or accumulation of externalities. Examples range from small island cultures to major civilizations.^[25]^[201]	United States (Viking Press)
2005	Pandemic	Research	According to Bonn, more than 150 countries do not have national strategies to deal with a possible influenza pandemic.^[25]
2005	Multiple	Organization	The Future of Humanity Institute is founded.^[202] Based at the University of Oxford, it is a multidisciplinary research center applying mathematics, science, and philosophy to bear on big-picture questions about humanity and its prospects.^[203]	United Kingdom
2005	Impact event	Program launch	The United States Congress again direct NASA to find at least 90 percent of potentially hazardous near-Earth objects sized 140 meters or larger by the end of 2020.^[204]	United States (NASA)
2005 (November)	Impact event	open letter	A number of astronauts publish an open letter through the Association of Space Explorers calling for a united push to develop strategies to protect Earth from the risk of a cosmic collision.^[205]
2006	Weapons of mass destruction (biological weapon)	Literature	Mark Wheelis, Lajos Rózsa and Malcolm Dando publish Deadly cultures: biological weapons since 1945, which investigates the use of biological weapons throughout history.^[206]	United States (Harvard University Press)
2006	Impact event	Program launch	NEO Surveyor is first proposed^[207] as a planned space-based infrared telescope designed to survey the Solar System for potentially hazardous asteroids.^[208] A 50-centimeter-wide telescope, its camera sees things in infrared wavelengths, which reveal heat signatures. This is perfect for asteroids because they are very dark and hard to see against the blackness of space.^[209] It is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.^[210]	United States (NASA)
2006 (June 1)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	The Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, chaired by Dr. Hans Blix, publishes Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological And Chemical Arms In this report, which presents 60 recommendations on what the world community can and should do to avoid nuclear war.^[211]	United States
2006 (June 19)	Multiple	Preservation	The prime ministers of Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and Iceland lay "the first stone" to the Svalbard Global Seed Vault.^[212] Located in the island of Spitsbergen the vault now has the capacity to hold 2.25 billion seeds, is intended to “provide insurance against both incremental and catastrophic loss of crop diversity.”^[213]	Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Iceland
2007	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Research	Members of the original group of nuclear winter scientists collectively perform a new comprehensive quantitative assessment utilizing the latest computer and climate models. They conclude that even a small-scale, regional nuclear war could kill as many people as died in all of World War II and seriously disrupt the global climate for a decade or more, harming nearly everyone on Earth.^[25]
2007	Artificial intelligence	Research	Eliezer Yudkowsky believes risks from artificial intelligence are harder to predict than any other known risks due to bias from anthropomorphism. Since people base their judgments of artificial intelligence on their own experience, he claims they underestimate the potential power of AI.^[214]	United States
2007 (November 8)	Impact event	Program launch	The House Committee on Science and Technology's Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics holds a hearing to examine the status of NASA's Near-Earth Object survey program. The prospect of using the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer is proposed by NASA officials.^[215]	United States (NASA)
2008	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	Michael Dobbs publishes One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War, which describes what Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. called “the most dangerous moment in human history”.^[216]
2008	Nanotechnology	Research	According to Chris Phoenix and Mike Treder, molecular manufacturing could be used to cheaply produce, among many other products, highly advanced, durable weapons. Being equipped with compact computers and motors these could be increasingly autonomous and have a large range of capabilities. Phoenix and Treder classify catastrophic risks posed by nanotechnology into three categories: From augmenting the development of other technologies such as AI and biotechnology. By enabling mass-production of potentially dangerous products that cause risk dynamics (such as arms races) depending on how they are used. From uncontrolled self-perpetuating processes with destructive effects.^[217]
2008	Biotechnology	Research	According to Noun and Chyba, a biotechnology catastrophe may be caused by accidentally releasing a genetically engineered organism from controlled environments, by the planned release of such an organism which then turns out to have unforeseen and catastrophic interactions with essential natural or agro-ecosystems, or by intentional usage of biological agents in biological warfare or bioterrorism attacks. Noun and Chyba propose three categories of measures to reduce risks from biotechnology and natural pandemics: Regulation or prevention of potentially dangerous research, improved recognition of outbreaks, and developing facilities to mitigate disease outbreaks (e.g. better and/or more widely distributed vaccines).^[218]
2008	Artificial intelligence	Probability	A survey by the Future of Humanity Institute estimates a 5% probability of extinction by super-intelligence by 2100.^[219]	United Kingdom (University of Oxford)
2008	Multiple	Concept developoment	Eliezer Yudkowsky introduces the Moore's Law of Mad Science, which states that "every 18 months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point".^[220]^[221]	United States
2008	Biotechnology	Probability	A survey by the Future of Humanity Institute estimates a 2% probability of extinction from engineered pandemics by 2100.^[219]	United Kingdom (University of Oxford)
2008	Multiple	Notable comment	U.S. economist Robin Hanson argues that a refuge permanently housing as few as 100 people would significantly improve the chances of human survival during a range of global catastrophes.^[222]	United States
2008	Totalitarianism	Notable comment	American economist and author Bryan Caplan writes that "perhaps an eternity of totalitarianism would be worse than extinction". He states that it is better to risk extinction than to live under a dictatorship forever. Caplan also believes that the human capacity for suffering is so great that even the worst possible life would be preferable to an infinite amount of pain.^[223]	United States
2008	Multiple	Literature	Nick Bostrom publishes Global Catastrophic Risks, which examines the possibility of disastrous events that could bring about the end of human civilization, or even lead to the extinction of the human race. Bostrom looks at a variety of risks, including those posed by nuclear war, climate change, biotechnology, and artificial intelligence.^[25]
2009	Impact event	Research	Research published in an issue of the journal Nature, describes how scientists were able to identify an asteroid in space before it entered Earth's atmosphere, enabling computers to determine its area of origin in the Solar System as well as predict the arrival time and location on Earth of its shattered surviving parts. The four-meter-diameter asteroid, called 2008 TC₃, was initially sighted by the automated Catalina Sky Survey telescope, on October 6, 2008. Computations correctly predict that it would impact 19 hours after discovery and in the Nubian Desert of northern Sudan.^[224]	United Kingdom (Nature Research)
2009	Artificial intelligence	Research	The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) hosts a conference to discuss the possibility of computers and robots acquiring autonomy, and the potential risks associated with this. They note that some robots have already acquired various forms of semi-autonomy, including the ability to find power sources on their own and to independently choose targets to attack with weapons. They also note that some computer viruses can evade elimination and have achieved "cockroach intelligence". The researchers note that self-awareness is probably unlikely, but there are other potential hazards and pitfalls.^[225]	United States (Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence)
2009	Pandemic	Literature	Alan Sipress publishes The Fatal Strain: On the Trail of Avian Flu and the Coming Pandemic.^[226]	United States (Penguin Publishing Group)
2009	Pandemic	Program launch	The Emerging Pandemic Threats program is launched^[227] with the purpose to strengthen global capacity for detection of viruses with pandemic potential that can move between animals and people.^[228]
2009	Multiple	Concept development	M. L. Weitzman presents his 'dismal theorem', which states that a standard cost-benefit analysis may break down if there is a possibility of catastrophes occurring.^[229] The “dismal” theorem tells that it is an error to use trade-off analysis under existential risk.^[230]
2010	Multiple	Literature	Robert Wuthnow publishes Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats.^[231]	United States (Oxford University Press, USA)
2010	Weapons of mass destruction (chemical weapon, niological weapon)	Literature	Edward M. Spiers publishes A history of chemical and biological weapons, which attempts to provide a detailed history of the use of chemical and biological agents in warfare.^[232]
2011	Multiple	Organization	The Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere (MAHB) is formed^[233] at Stanford University, with the purpose to gather organizations concerned about the existential threats to civilization.^[234] MAHB is a meeting place for citizens concerned with the interconnections among the greatest threats to human well being.^[235]	United States
2011	Impact event	Research	Dr. Bong Wie at Asteroid Deflection Research Center at Iowa State University, after studying strategies that could deal with 50-to-500-metre-diameter objects when the time to Earth impact is less than one year, concludes that to provide the required energy, a nuclear explosion or other event that could deliver the same power, are the only methods that can work against a very large asteroid within these time constraints.^[236]	United States (Iowa State University)
2011	Biotechnology, pandemic	Sample case	Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus University Medical Center engineers a deadly, airborne version of the H5N1 influenza virus.^[237] The virus is believed to kill 60 percent of the people it infects.^[238]	Netherlands (Erasmus University Medical Center)
2011	Pandemic	Literature	Nathan Wolfe publishes The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age, which explores the dangers of pandemics in the modern world.^[239]	United States (Henry Holt and Company)
2011	Multiple	Organization	The Global Catastrophic Risk Institute (GCRI) is founded by Seth Baum and Tony Barrett.^[240] It is a think tank that analyzes the risk of catastrophes severe enough to threaten the survival of human civilization.^[241]	United States (Washington, DC.)
2012 (January)	Impact event	Literature	After a near pass-by of object 2012 BX34, a paper entitled A Global Approach to Near-Earth Object Impact Threat Mitigation is released by an international team of researchers. The paper discusses the "NEOShield" project.^[242]	Russia, Germany, United States, France, Britain, Spain
2012 (February 23)	Impact event	Research	The small asteroid 367943 Duende is discovered and successfully predicted to be on close but non-colliding approach to Earth again just 11 months later.^[243] Due to its tiny size and having been closely monitored, this discovery is considered a landmark prediction.
2012	Multiple	Organization	The Centre for the Study of Existential Risk is founded.^[244] A research center located at the University of Cambridge, it is dedicated to the study and mitigation of existential risks that could lead to human extinction or irrevocable civilisational decline.^[245]	United Kingdom (University of Cambridge)
2012 (June)	Pandemic	Sample case	With the purpose to study human adaptation, researchers publish the creation of highly lethal and virulent artificial strains of H5N1.^[246]
2011 (August)	Giant Solar Flares	Conference	Nasa holds a press conference about Solar Flares and their effects on the Earth. Solar flares are a type of energy release that can cause disruptions on the Earth, including power outages and interference with communications.^[247]	United States (NASA)
2012	Impact event	Research	V.P. Vasylyev proposes to apply the ring-array concentrator as an alternative design of a mirrored collector for deflecting hazardous near-earth objects.^[248] This type of collector has an underside lens-like position of its focal area that avoids shadowing of the collector by the target and minimizes the risk of its coating by ejected debris.
2012	Multiple	Organization	The Global Challenges Foundation is founded by the Swedish financial analyst and author Laszlo Szombatfalvy.^[249] It aims to "incite deeper understanding of the most pressing threats to humanity - and to catalyse new ways of tackling them".^[250]	Sweden
2012	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	M.A. Harwell publishes Nuclear Winter: The Human and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War, which argues that comparatively little scientific research has been done about the envifonmental consequences of a nuclear war of the magnitude of the arsenal at the time could unleash.^[251]
2012 (June 29)	Weapons of mass destruction (biological weapon)	Literature	Milton Leitenberg, Raymond A. Zilinskas and Jens H. Kuhn publish The Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History, which attempts to understand the full scope of the USSR’s offensive biological weapons research.^[252]	United States (Harvard University Press)
2013 (February)	Impact event	Program launch	Microsatellite NEOSSat is launched as a Near Earth Object Surveillance Satellite by the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) with the purpose to hunt for NEOs in space.^[253]
2013 (March)	Multiple	Conference	Nick Bostrom gives at TED conference titled The end of humanity. Among topics exposed, Bostrom describes four classes of existential risk: human extinction, permanent stagnation, flawed realization, and subsequent ruination.^[254]	United Kingdom
2013	Impact event	Organization	The International Asteroid Warning Network (IAWN) is founded, with the purpose to serve as an authoritative source of accurate and up-to-date information on near-earth objects and their impact risks.^[255]
2013	Impact event	Research	A table-top exercise is conducted at the headquarters of the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency in Washington, D.C., with the purpose to acquaint FEMA with the nature of an impact event and how a warning of an impact might evolve if the threatening object is detected a short time prior to possible impact.^[256]	United States
2013	Impact event	Program launch	Asteroid Redirect Mission is proposed by NASA with the purpose to develop a robotic spacecraft to visit a large near-Earth asteroid and collect a multi-ton boulder from its surface for further analysis.^[257] The program would be defunded and cancelled, but key technologies being developed for it would continue.^[258]^[259]^[260]	United States (NASA)
2013 (July)	Multiple	Organization	The Center on Long-Term Risk is founded.^[261] It has the purpose to address worst-case risks from the development and deployment of advanced AI systems.^[262]	United Kingdom
2013	Impact event	Program launch	The related National Laboratories of the United States (Department of Energy national laboratories) and Russia (Rosatom) sign a deal that includes an intent to cooperate on defense from asteroids.^[263]	United States, Rusia
2013	Impact event	Program launch	NASA announces its Asteroid Initiative, which includes the mission to identify, capture and relocate an asteroid through the Asteroid Redirect Mission, and an Asteroid Grand Challenge to find all asteroids threats to the human population and know what to do about them.^[204]	United States (NASA)
2013	Impact event	Research	According to expert testimony in the United States Congress, NASA would require at least five years of preparation before a mission to intercept an asteroid could be launched.^[264]	United States (NASA)
2013	Multiple	Literature	Nick Bostrom publishes his paper Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority, which argues that existential risks are those that threaten the future of humanity as a whole, and that preventing such risks should be a global priority..^[265]	United Kingdom (University of Oxford)
2013	Climate change	Literature	Wil C. G. Burns and Andrew L. Strauss publish Climate Change Geoengineering : Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks, which considers the legal, policy, and philosophical issues presented by geoengineering and explores combating global warming through human-engineered climate interventions.^[266]	United Kingdom (Cambridge University Press)
2014 (March)	Impact event	Program launch	NASA launches the Asteroid Data Hunter contest in partnership with Planetary Resources to create better algorithms to hunt for undiscovered asteroids in existing data.^[204]	United States (NASA)
2014 (March)	Multiple	Organization	The Future of Life Institute is founded by Max Tegmark and Jaan Tallinn.^[267] Based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, it is an independent non-profit that works to reduce extreme risks from transformative technologies, as well as steer the development and use of these technologies to benefit life.^[268]	United States
2014 (April)	Impact event	Program launch	A US Government Accountability Office report notes that the National Nuclear Security Administration retains canned sub assemblies (CSAs—nuclear secondary stages) in an indeterminate state pending a senior-level government evaluation of their use in planetary defense against earthbound asteroids.^[269]	United States
2014	Impact event	Research	At NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts conference, Wie and his colleagues confirm having the ability to mitigate the asteroid-impact threat, with any range of warning. According to their computer models, with a warning time of 30 days, a 300-meter-wide asteroid would be neutralized by using a single Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle, with less than 0.1% of the destroyed object's mass potentially striking Earth, which by comparison would be more than acceptable.^[270]	United States (NASA)
2014	Human activity	Literature	Elizabeth Kolbert publishes The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, which explores the idea that human activity is leading to a mass extinction.^[271]
2014	Multiple	Research	Seth Baum and Itsuki C. Handoh write an article comparing the planetary boundaries and global catastrophic risk paradigms and integrates them into a unified conceptual framework, which they call Boundary Risk for Humanity and Nature (BRIHN).^[272] The researchers propose increasingly sophisticated risk assessment concepts that seek to more fully explore the space within which global catastrophes could occur and classify their salient features.^[2]
2014	Pandemic	Sample case (accident)	GlaxoSmithKline accidentally releases 45 liters of concentrated polio virus into a river in Belgium.^[26]	Belgium
2014	Artificial intelligence	Literature	Nick Bostrom publishes Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, which argues that if artificial intelligence surpasses human brains in general intelligence, then this new superintelligence could replace humans as the dominant lifeform on Earth.^[273]
2014	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Research	A study finds that even a regional nuclear war, involving fewer than a hundred weapons being detonated, could cause a global nuclear famine.^[4]^[274]
2015	Technology	Literature	Yuval Noah Harari publishes Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow^[275], which explores the impact of major technological developments on human society, and attempts to predict humankind's main goals in the next millennium.^[276]
2015	Multiple	Concept development	Owen Cotton-Barratt and Toby Ord propose a definition of existential risk in terms of expected value theory, arguing that any event which causes the loss of a large fraction of expected value is an existential risk. This is different from Bostrom's original definition, as they argue that Bostrom fails to adequately capture catastrophes like a global totalitarian state that oppresses its citizenry for a period of time but then collapses, thus enabling humanity to continue its quest to maximize value.^[2]
2015	Impact event	Program launch	The Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System begins operating in order to give warnings about any asteroids that might be on a collision course with Earth.^[277]
2015 (July 27)	Artificial intelligence	Open leter	The Future of Life Institute publishes an open letter in which more than a thousand eminent signatories (including business magnate Elon Musk, the linguist Noam Chomsky, the astrophysicist Stephen Hawking and the Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak) express the view that artificial intelligence is going to present serious problems for humanity.^[278]
2015 (September 14)	Collapse of the vacuum	Research	American astrophysicist Katie Mack publishes an article on `cosmosmagazine.com` describing how the Universe could be destroyed through vacuum decay.^[103] If it were to occur, it would cause a change in the energy level of the Higgs field. This would cause a "bubble" of broken physics to expand throughout the universe at the speed of light, thus resulting in the complete destruction of the known laws of physics.^[279]	United States
2015 (November 3)	Climate change	Literature	Oliver Morton publishes The planet remade: how geoengineering could change the world, which explores the history, politics, and cutting-edge science of geoengineering, and attempts to untangle the implications of our failure to meet the challenge of climate change and reintroduces the hope that success is possible.^[280]	United States (Princeton University Press)
2016 (March)	Artificial intelligence		Google's Deep Mind AI system AlphaGo wins over Lee Sedol from South Korea in a five-game Go match. This represents a crucial turning point in the history of non-biological intelligence.^[278]
2016	Pandemic	Literature	Ali Khan and William Patrick publish The Next Pandemic: On the Front Lines Against Humankind’s Gravest Dangers.^[281]	United Kingdom (Hachette UK)
2016 (December 13)	Impact event	Research	NASA researcher Joseph Nuth warns that the Earth is unprepared for an impact event.^[282]^[283]^[284] Nuth also comments: The biggest problem, basically, is there’s not a hell of a lot we can do about it at the moment.^[285]	United States (NASA)
2017	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	International law	The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is adopted to comprehensively ban nuclear weapons.^[286] It would enter into force on January 22, 2021.^[287]
2017	Impact event	Literature	David Shonting and Cathy Ezrailson publish Chicxulub: The Impact and Tsunami: The Story of the Largest Known Asteroid to Hit the Earth.
2017 (March 27)	Multiple	Preservation effort	The Arctic World Archive is opened in the island of Spitsbergen, Norway, as a facility for data preservation.^[288] Designed to withstand natural and man-made disasters, it contains data of historical and cultural interest, with over 15 contributing nations.^[289]	Norway
2017 (May)	Artificial intelligence	Probability	A survey of AI experts estimates that the chance of human-level machine learning having an "extremely bad (e.g., human extinction)" long-term effect on humanity is 5%.^[290]
2017 (June)	Cyberattack	Research	Christine Peterson, co-founder and past president of the Foresight Institute, believes a cyberattack on electric grids has the potential to be a catastrophic risk. She notes that little has been done to mitigate such risks, and that mitigation could take several decades of readjustment.^[291]	United States
2017	Pandemic	Literature	American epidemiologist Michael T. Osterholm and writer Mark Olshaker publish Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs.^[292]	United States
2017	Multiple	Literature	Phil Torres publishes Morality, Foresight, and Human Flourishing: An Introduction to Existential Risks.^[293] According to Torres, if more existential risk scenarios are either actively created (“ontological risk multiplication”) or discovered by science (“epistemic risk multiplication”), then the ranks of existencial risks studies could further swell.^[2]
2017	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	United States military analyst Daniel Ellsberg publishes The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner, attempting to reveal his shocking firsthand account of the Nuclear program of the United States in the 1960s.^[294]	United States
2017	Global catastrophic biological risks	Concept development	Monica Schoch-Spana et al. define Global Catastrophic Biological Risks as “events [which] could lead to sudden, extraordinary, widespread disaster beyond the collective capability of national and international governments and the private sector to control.”^[295]^[2]	United States
2017 (October)	Environmental disaster	Research	A report published in The Lancet states that toxic air, water pollution, soil pollution, and workplaces are collectively responsible for nine million deaths worldwide in 2015, particularly from air pollution which was linked to deaths by increasing susceptibility to non-infectious diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, and lung cancer. The report warned that the pollution crisis was exceeding "the envelope on the amount of pollution the Earth can carry" and "threatens the continuing survival of human societies".^[296]
2017 (November)	Climate change	Research	A statement by 15,364 scientists from 184 countries indicates that increasing levels of greenhouse gases from the use of fossil fuels, human population growth, deforestation, and overuse of land for agricultural production, particularly by farming ruminants for meat consumption, are trending in ways that forecast an increase in human misery over coming decades.^[297]
2017 (December)	Multiple	Conference	Swedish researcher Anders Sandberg gives a TED Talk on existential risks titled Humanity on the Edge of Extinction.^[298]	Austria
2017 (October 18)	Weapons of mass destruction (chemical weapon,biological weapon)	Literature	Anthony Tu publishes Chemical and Biological Weapons and Terrorism. Tu is recognized as the world’s leading expert on the Tokyo subway sarin attack.^[299]	United States (CRC Press)
2018 (April)	Impact event	Probability	The B612 Foundation states "It's 100 per cent certain we'll be hit [by a devastating asteroid], but we're not 100 per cent sure when."^[300]
2018	Space exploration	Research	Phil Torres argues that there are strong reasons for believing that venturing into space could have catastrophic consequences, likely causing something like a suffering risk (s-risk). He believes that the potential rewards of space exploration do not outweigh the risks.^[2]
2018	Climate change	Program launch	The Club of Rome calls for greater climate change action and publishes its Climate Emergency Plan, which proposes ten action points to limit global average temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius.^[301]
2018	Multiple	Research	A group of scholars of disaster law and policy at the University of Copenhagen combine the classification of global catastrophic risk with lessons from the field of disaster studies to produce a framework for governing boring apocalypses. This focuses on vulnerabilities and exposures, two crucial factors that have long concerned the field of disaster studies.^[2]^[302]	Denmark (University of Copenhagen)
2018	Multiple	Research	A paper by researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Centre for the Study of Existential Risk notes that “to date, research on global catastrophic risk scenarios has focused mainly on tracing a causal pathway from catastrophic event to global catastrophic loss of life.” The paper argues that this focus is misplaced and that the research community should instead focus on understanding how the world would recover from such an event.^[2]	United Kingdom (University of Cambridge)
2018 (September 19)	Supervolcano	Literature	Donald R. Prothero publishes When humans nearly vanished: the catastrophic explosion of the Toba supervolcano, which describes the Toba catastrophe theory, according which the Youngest Toba eruption might have caused a population bottleneck.^[303]	United States (Smithsonian)
2018	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Literature	Mark Wolverton publishes Burning the Sky: Operation Argus and the Untold Story of the Cold War Nuclear Tests in Outer Space.^[304]	United States (Abrams Books)
2018 (April)	Impact event	Research	Astronomers spot more than 8,000 near-Earth asteroids that are at least 460 feet (140 meters) wide and it is estimated about 17,000 such near-Earth asteroids remain undetected.^[305]
2018 (June)	Impact event	Research	The U.S. National Science and Technology Council warns that the United States is unprepared for an asteroid impact event, and develops and releases the National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan to better prepare.^[306]^[307]^[308]^[309]^[310]	United States
2018	Pandemic	Literature	Sandra Hempel publishes The Atlas of Disease: Mapping Deadly Epidemics and Contagion from the Plague to the Zika Virus.^[311]	United Kingdom (White Lion Publishing)
2018 (October)	Climate change	Literature (paper)	The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change releases a paper on climate change warning about catastrophic events in the future if we do not decarbonize.^[3]
2018 (October)	Impact event	Literature	English physicist Stephen Hawking in his final book Brief Answers to the Big Questions^[312] considers an asteroid collision to be the biggest threat to the planet.^[313]^[314]^[315]	United States
2018 (November)	Multiple	Literature (paper)	Seth D. Baum publishes paper titled Resilience to global catastrophe, which concludes that while hopefully global catastrophe might never occur, there is no guarantee that efforts to prevent global catastrophe will succeed, and that efforts to increase humanity’s resilience to global catastrophe constitute an important class of policy, something that has thus far received rather limited attention.^[316]
2019 (January)	Artificial intelligence	Organization	The Center for Security and Emerging Technology is established at Georgetown's Walsh School of Foreign Service with the purpose to focus on policy research of emerging technologies with an initial emphasis on artificial intelligence.^[317]	United States
2019 (February)	Multiple	Literature (paper)	An international group of 14 scholars publish a paper titled Long-term trajectories of human civilization, which identifies four types of long-term trajectories: "status quo trajectories, in which civilization stays about the same, catastrophe trajectories, in which civilization collapses, technological transformation trajectories, in which radical technology fundamentally changes civilization, and astronomical trajectories, in which civilization expands beyond our home planet". The paper concludes that status quo trajectories are unlikely to persist over the long-term, and that it depends on what people do today whether humanity succumbs to catastrophe or achieves a more positive trajectory.^[318]^[319]
2019 (March)	Impact event	Research	Scientists report that asteroids may be much more difficult to destroy than thought earlier.^[320]^[321]
2019	Environmental disaster	Research	A new climate report claims that, given plummeting biodiversity and receding ice sheets, "human life on earth may be on the way to extinction".^[322]
2019	Climate change	Research	The 2019 report on climate change and the oceans by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change describes the trend in which storms that used to occur once a century will happen once a year by midcentury. 46 If the planet continues to warm, “once a century” events will happen once a month. Because hurricanes get their destructive power from ocean heat, warmer waters increase the impact of extreme storms.^[323] If the planet continues to warm, “once a century” events will happen once a month^[4], due to hurricanes getting their destructive power from ocean heat.^[324]
2019	Multiple	Literature	The Club of Rome publishes the Planetary Emergency Plan, with the purpose to obtain a set of key policy levers to address the cross-cutting challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss and human health and wellbeing.^[325]
2019	Climate change	Field growth	The term "existential threat" becomes increasingly common in consideration of the climate crisis.^[8]
2020 (January 23)	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Probability	The Doomsday Clock moves to 100 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been in its 73-year history.^[326]
2020 (March 3)	Multiple	Literature	Australian philosopher Toby Ord publishes The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. According to the author, understanding global catastrophic risks requires delving into disciplines such as physics, biology, earth science, computer science, history, anthropology, philosophy, economics, international relations, and political science.^[26] Toby Ord estimates the odds that humanity could become extinct over the next century at one in six, with an out-of-control superintelligence, bioterrorism, and totalitarianism among the largest risks.^[4]	United Kingdom
2020 (March 11)	Pandemic	Sample case	The COVID-19 pandemic is declared, soon becoming one of the deadliest pandemics in history, and revealing global unpreparedness for global risks.^[3] The pandemic would trigger severe social and economic disruption around the world, including the largest global recession since the Great Depression.^[327] While this pandemic does not constitute an existential risk in itself, according to Luiz Marques, frequently, an existential risk results from a set of crises that, separately, do not existentially threaten humanity, but combined and acting in synergy they have the potential to do so.^[328]	Worldwide
2020 (May)	Environmental disaster	Research	An analysis published in Scientific Reports finds that if deforestation and resource consumption continue at current rates they could culminate in a "catastrophic collapse in human population" and possibly "an irreversible collapse of our civilization" within the next several decades. The study says humanity should pass from a civilization dominated by the economy to a "cultural society" that "privileges the interest of the ecosystem above the individual interest of its components, but eventually in accordance with the overall communal interest." The authors also note that "while violent events, such as global war or natural catastrophic events, are of immediate concern to everyone, a relatively slow consumption of the planetary resources may be not perceived as strongly as a mortal danger for the human civilization."^[329]^[330]
2020	Multiple	Concept development	Nathan Sears formulates a concept of existential security, which takes humankind as its referent object against anthropogenic existential threats to human civilization and survival. his concept combines existential risk studies with security studies.^[2]
2020	Pandemic	Literature	American physician Michael Greger publishes How to Survive a Pandemic, which attempts to reveal not only what we can do to cope with a pandemic, but also what can society do to reduce the likelihood of even worse catastrophes in the future.^[331]	United States
2020	Multiple	Research	Owen Cotton-Barratt, Max Daniel, and Anders Sandberg publish Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter, which discusses the importance of multiple levels of defense against human extinction, including prevention, response, and resilience.^[2] The authors argue that all of these strategies are important and should be given consideration in planning for the future.^[332]	United Kingdom (University of Oxford)
2020	Multiple	Literature	British historian and researcher Thomas Moynihan publishes X-Risk, which explores how humanity has come to understand the risks posed by its own actions and inactions.^[333]	United Kingdom (University of Oxford)
2020	Natural disaster	Statistics	A total of 389 natural disasters are reported in the year, having killed 15,080 people, affected 98.4 million others, and costed US$171.3 billion. Statistics calculate an average of 400 natural disasters occurring worldwide each year.^[334]	Worldwide
2021	Weapons of mass destruction (nuclear weapon)	Statistics	As of date, humanity has about 13,410 nuclear weapons, thousands of which are on hair-trigger alert.^[335]	Countries with nuclear weapons
2021 (May)	Impact event	Research	NASA astronomers report that 5 to 10 years of preparation may be needed to avoid a virtual impactor based on a simulated exercise conducted by the 2021 Planetary Defense Conference.^[336]^[337]^[338]	United States (NASA)
2021	Environmental disaster	Research	A study described as the "first long-term assessment of global bee decline", which analyzes GBIF-data of over a century, finds that the number of bee species declined steeply worldwide after the 1990s, shrinking by a quarter in 2006–2015 compared to before 1990.^[339]^[340]
2021 (September)	Climate change	Recommendation	More than 200 scholarly medical journals joint publish an emergency call for action, saying that a temperature increase of 1.5 degrees would bring catastrophic harm to global health from which the world will never recover.^[341]
2021 (October 19)	Multiple	Literature	Joshua Schuster and Derek Woods publish Calamity Theory: Three Critiques of Existential Risk, which examines the rise of the the field of existential risk and points its failures to acknowledge the ways some communities and lifeways are more at risk than others and what it implies about human extinction.^[342]	United States (University of Minnesota Press)
2021 (November 9)	Multiple	Literature	Andrew Leigh publishes What's the Worst That Could Happen?: Existential Risk and Extreme Politics, which looks at catastrophic risks and how to mitigate them, arguing provocatively that the rise of populist politics makes catastrophe more likely.^[4]	United States (MIT Press)
2021 (November 24)	Impact event	Program launch	The Double Asteroid Redirection Test NASA space mission is launched. It is aimed at testing a method of planetary defense against near-Earth objects.	United States (NASA)
2021 (December 5)	Climate change	Filmmaking	American apocalyptic political satire black comedy film Don't Look Up is released, being well received by numerous climate scientists and climate communicators.^[343]^[344]^[345] Climate scientist Peter Kalmus would remark, "It's the most accurate film about society's terrifying non-response to climate breakdown I've seen."^[346]	United States
2022 (January)	Impact event	Research	A team of astronomers report the first unambiguous detection and mass measurement of an isolated stellar black hole using the Hubble Space Telescope together with the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) and the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE).^[347]
2022 (August)	Impact event	Program launch	Near-Earth Asteroid Scout is planned for launch.^[348] Developed under NASA’s Advanced Exploration Systems Program, it is a miniaturized spacecraft^[349]. This low-cost concept is aimed to map an asteroid and demonstrate several technological firsts, including being the first CubeSat to reach an asteroid.^[350]	United States (NASA)
2022 (August 16)	Multiple	Literature	Scottish philosopher and ethicist William MacAskill publishes What We Owe the Future, which argues for longtermism, an ethical stance which gives priority to improving the long-term future. MacAskill states that we must ensure that civilization would rebound if it collapsed, counter the end of moral progress, and prepare for a planet where the smartest beings are digital, not human.^[351]	United States

Numerical and visual data

Google Scholar

The table below summarizes per-year mentions of "existential risk" on Google Scholar as of July 14, 2022. Note: Nick Bostrom introduced the term "existential risk" in 2003.

Year	Mentions
1990	3
1992	11
1994	6
1996	4
1998	9
2000	13
2002	14
2004	40
2006	22
2008	34
2010	74
2012	115
2014	207
2016	348
2018	614
2020	965

Google trends

The chart below shows Google Trends data for global catastrophic risk (topic) from January 1, 2004 to July 3, 2022, when the screenshot was taken. Interest is also ranked by country and displayed on world map.^[352]

Google Ngram viewer

The chart below shows Google Ngram Viewer data for existential risk from 1900 to 2019.^[353]

Wikipedia views

The chart below shows pageviews of the English Wikipedia page Global catastrophic risk, on desktop, mobile-web, desktop-spider, mobile-web-spider and mobile app, from July 2015 to June 2022.^[354]

Meta information on the timeline

How the timeline was built

The initial version of the timeline was written by Sebastian.

Base literature:

The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity by Toby Ord^[26]
X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction, by Thomas Moynihan.^[3]
Our Final Hour by Martin Rees.^[355]
Global Catastrophic Risks by Nick Bostrom.^[25]

Funding information for this timeline is available.

Feedback and comments

Feedback for the timeline can be provided at the following places:

FIXME

What the timeline is still missing

Category:Earth-grazing fireballs
Ultimate fate of the universe (check categories below)
Big Rip
Heat death of the universe
Big Crunch
Gamma-ray Burst

Rogue Black Holes ([2])

Timeline update strategy

External links

References

↑ "Existential Risk". Future of Life Institute. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
↑ ^2.00 ^2.01 ^2.02 ^2.03 ^2.04 ^2.05 ^2.06 ^2.07 ^2.08 ^2.09 ^2.10 ^2.11 ^2.12 ^2.13 ^2.14 ^2.15 ^2.16 ^2.17 ^2.18 ^2.19 ^2.20 ^2.21 ^2.22 ^2.23 ^2.24 ^2.25 ^2.26 ^2.27 ^2.28 ^2.29 ^2.30 ^2.31 ^2.32 ^2.33 ^2.34 ^2.35 ^2.36 Beard, Simon; Torres, Phil (2020). "Ripples on the Great Sea of Life: A Brief History of Existential Risk Studies". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3730000.
↑ ^3.00 ^3.01 ^3.02 ^3.03 ^3.04 ^3.05 ^3.06 ^3.07 ^3.08 ^3.09 ^3.10 ^3.11 Moynihan, Thomas (3 November 2020). X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction. MIT Press. ISBN 978-1-913029-84-5.
↑ ^4.0 ^4.1 ^4.2 ^4.3 ^4.4 ^4.5 ^4.6 ^4.7 ^4.8 ^4.9 Leigh, Andrew (9 November 2021). What's the Worst That Could Happen?: Existential Risk and Extreme Politics. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-36661-8.
↑ ^5.0 ^5.1 "Why despite global progress, humanity is probably facing its most dangerous time ever". 80,000 Hours. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ Sandberg, Anders. "The five biggest threats to human existence". The Conversation. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ ^7.0 ^7.1 "The Importance of Unknown Existential Risks - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ ^8.0 ^8.1 "What Does Existential Threat Mean?". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ Alvarez, Walter (25 June 2013). T. rex and the Crater of Doom. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-4740-2.
↑ "Apophis Can Wipe Out A Country: A Look At Every Massive Asteroid That Has Hit Earth - 'God of Chaos' Is Coming!". The Economic Times. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ "1490: When a Meteorite Killed 10,000 People in the Chinese City of Ch'ing-yang | Inquisitive Wonder". inquisitivewonder.com. 16 March 2022. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ "A Synopsis of the Astronomy of Comets | work by Halley | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Whiston's Flood". web.stanford.edu. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
↑ "bayesian - What is the origin of the term 'inverse probability'?". Cross Validated. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ Gupta, Dishashree26 (14 March 2017). "Introduction to Conditional Probability and Bayes theorem for data science professionals". Analytics Vidhya. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ Kragh, Helge S. (29 April 2016). Entropic Creation: Religious Contexts of Thermodynamics and Cosmology. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-14248-5.
↑ Brush, Stephen G.; Brush, Stephen G.; Brush, Distinguished University Professor of the History of Science Emeritus Stephen G. (26 April 1996). A History of Modern Planetary Physics: Nebulous Earth. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44171-1.
↑ Moynihan, T. (2019). "The intellectual discovery of human extinction". University of Oxford.
↑ "Defeating Thanos and his Malthusian Mission of Population Control". carnegiemnh.org. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
↑ "Global catastrophic risk". www.nanowerk.com. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
↑ Hunt, Eileen M. "Mary Shelley's The Last Man: Existentialism and IR meet the post-apocalyptic pandemic novel". Review of International Studies: 1–23. ISSN 0260-2105. doi:10.1017/S0260210522000250.
↑ "readers library". thereaderslibrary.quora.com. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
↑ "Eros | asteroid | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 27 August 2022.
↑ Scholl, Hans; Schmadel, Lutz D. (2002). "Discovery Circumstances of the First Near-Earth Asteroid (433) Eros". Acta Historica Astronomiae. 15: 210–220.
↑ ^25.00 ^25.01 ^25.02 ^25.03 ^25.04 ^25.05 ^25.06 ^25.07 ^25.08 ^25.09 ^25.10 ^25.11 ^25.12 ^25.13 ^25.14 ^25.15 ^25.16 ^25.17 ^25.18 ^25.19 ^25.20 ^25.21 ^25.22 ^25.23 ^25.24 ^25.25 ^25.26 ^25.27 Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (29 September 2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-960650-4.
↑ ^26.00 ^26.01 ^26.02 ^26.03 ^26.04 ^26.05 ^26.06 ^26.07 ^26.08 ^26.09 ^26.10 ^26.11 Ord, Toby (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. ISBN 978-1-5266-0022-6.
↑ "Shall We All Commit Suicide?". International Churchill Society. 17 June 2016. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
↑ "Treaties, States parties, and Commentaries - Geneva Protocol on Asphyxiating or Poisonous Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods, 1925". ihl-databases.icrc.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "1925 Geneva Protocol – UNODA". un.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ Kirshner, Robert P. (6 January 2004). "Hubble's diagram and cosmic expansion". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (1): 8–13. doi:10.1073/pnas.2536799100.
↑ "Radar observations of long-lost asteroid 1937 UB (Hermes)". web.archive.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists". Atomic Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ "The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists begins publishing in 1945". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
↑ J. Zalasiwicz, ‘When Did the Anthropocene Begin? A Mid-Twentieth Century Boundary Level is Stratigraphically Optimal’, Quaternary International 383 (2015), 196–203.
↑ Hakim, Joy (January 5, 1995). A History of US: Book 9: War, Peace, and All that Jazz. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195095142.
↑ "atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki | Date, Facts, Significance, Timeline, Deaths, & Aftermath | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
↑ "The Atomic Bomb [1945]" (PDF). russell.humanities.mcmaster.ca. Retrieved 29 October 2022.
↑ Bertrand Russell, "The Bomb and Civilisation."
↑ "Minor Planet Center". Oxford Reference. doi:10.1093/oi/authority.20110810105415958. Retrieved 29 August 2022.
↑ "Doomsday Clock moved to just two minutes to 'apocalypse'". BBC News. 25 January 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
↑ Sinclaire, Janice (9 March 2016). "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Announces Leadership Changes to Governing Board, Board of Sponsors, and Science and Security Board". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ Magazine, Smithsonian; Mann, Charles C. "The Book That Incited a Worldwide Fear of Overpopulation". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
↑ Osborn, Fairfield (1948). Our Plundered Planet. Grosset & Dunlap.
↑ Klemetti, Erik. "The Rise of a Supervolcano". Wired. Retrieved 3 July 2022.
↑ Szilard, Leo (March 1955). "The First Step to Peace". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 11 (3): 104–104. doi:10.1080/00963402.1955.11453578.
↑ "1 March 1954 - Castle Bravo: CTBTO Preparatory Commission". www.ctbto.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "Can We Survive Technology?" (PDF). geosci.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 3 September 2022.
↑ "Of Historical Note: Can We Survive Technology? - Ideas | Institute for Advanced Study". www.ias.edu. 3 October 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2022.
↑ Veisdal, Jørgen. "Can We Survive Technology? — John von Neumann (1955)". www.privatdozent.co. Retrieved 3 September 2022.
↑ "For Progress There Is No Cure – Quote Investigator". quoteinvestigator.com. Retrieved 3 September 2022.
↑ "Statistics of Extremes". amazon.com. Retrieved 29 October 2022.
↑ Dyson, Freeman J. (3 June 1960). "Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation". Science. 131 (3414): 1667–1668. doi:10.1126/science.131.3414.1667.
↑ Barash, David P. (1 December 2020). "International Affairs". Threats: 121–216. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190055295.003.0004.
↑ "9 Times The World Was At The Brink Of Nuclear War - And Pulled Back". IFLScience. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
↑ "doomsday machine | nuclear device | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 27 August 2022.
↑ von Foerster, Heinz; Mora, Patricia M.; Amiot, Lawrence W. (4 November 1960). "Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026: At this date human population will approach infinity if it grows as it has grown in the last two millenia.". Science. 132 (3436): 1291–1295. doi:10.1126/science.132.3436.1291.
↑ Nations, United. "International Day of Human Space Flight". United Nations. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ Torres, Phil (June 2018). "Space colonization and suffering risks: Reassessing the "maxipok rule"". Futures. 100: 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.008. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
↑ "It's been 60 years since Yuri Gagarin became the first man in outer space". The World from PRX. Retrieved 1 November 2022.
↑ Darling, David. "Hoerner, Sebastian von (1919-2003)". www.daviddarling.info. Retrieved 3 September 2022.
↑ von Hoerner, Sebastian (8 December 1961). "The Search for Signals from Other Civilizations: The waiting time for answers may be greater than the longevity of the technical state of mind.". Science. 134 (3493): 1839–1843. doi:10.1126/science.134.3493.1839.
↑ Crawford, Ian (7 June 2021). Expanding Worldviews: Astrobiology, Big History and Cosmic Perspectives. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-70482-7.
↑ Roulette, Joey (24 November 2021). "NASA Launches New Mission: Crash Into Asteroid, Defend Planet Earth". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
↑ Daniel., Deudney (1983). Whole earth security : a geopolitics of peace. Washington: Worldwatch Institute. p. 80. ISBN 978-0-916468-54-5.
↑ "Mutually Assured Destruction Revisited". web.archive.org. 20 June 2015. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
↑ "Silent Spring, Rachel Carson, 1962". Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 19 July 2022.
↑ "Vasili Arkhipov". IMDb. Retrieved 30 October 2022.
↑ Allison, Graham (2012). "The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50". Foreign Affairs. 91 (4). Retrieved 9 July 2012.
↑ "ВЗГЛЯД / "США и Россия: кризис 1962–го"". vzglyad.ru. 26 June 2022.
↑ Schwelb, Egon (July 1964). "The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and International Law". American Journal of International Law. 58 (3): 642–670. doi:10.2307/2196663.
↑ "Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT)". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. Retrieved 16 July 2022.
↑ Dandridge M. Cole and Donald W. Cox (1964). Islands in Space: The Challenge of the Planetoids. Chilton Books. pp. 7–8.
↑ "History of AI Risk Thought - LessWrong". www.lesswrong.com. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ Hwan, Kim, Doo (23 April 2021). Global Issues Surrounding Outer Space Law and Policy. IGI Global.
↑ "Outer Space Treaty". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ Nast, Condé. "How a massive solar storm in 1967 almost sparked a nuclear war". Wired UK. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
↑ A. Koestler, The Ghost in the Machine (London: Hutchinson, 1967), 322.
↑ "The Space Review: Giant bombs on giant rockets: Project Icarus (page 1)". web.archive.org. 15 April 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Project Icarus - Revised Edition - The MIT Press". web.archive.org. 17 October 2007. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Systems Engineering: Avoiding an Asteroid - TIME". web.archive.org. 21 July 2013. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (1 July 1968)". cvce. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "2. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Done at London, Moscow, and Washington July 1, 1968". United States Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "The Population Bomb". Environment & Society Portal. 24 November 2014. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ Binétruy, Pierre (2006). "Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology". Les Houches. 84: 457–536. doi:10.1016/S0924-8099(06)80029-6.
↑ Piper, Kelsey (3 January 2019). "Here are the ways nature could wipe out humanity". Vox. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
↑ Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs (19 September 2007). "166. Statement Issued by President Nixon, November 25, 1969". 2001-2009.state.gov. Retrieved 2 September 2022.
↑ "Biological Warfare and the Extinction of Man". Joshua Lederberg - Profiles in Science.
↑ Editors, History com. "The 1969 Moon Landing". HISTORY. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ "Seabed Arms Control Treaty". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "Biological Weapons Convention – UNODA". un. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) At A Glance | Arms Control Association". www.armscontrol.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Tales From A Frozen Zoo". Mongabay Environmental News. 2 February 2010. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ Schlosser 2013, p. 360
↑ Hart, Michael H. ".Explanation for absence of extraterrestrials on earth". Quarterly Journal Of The Royal Astronomical Society.
↑ Webb, Stephen (2015). If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... WHERE IS EVERYBODY?: Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life (2 ed.). Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-13235-8. Archived from the original on |archive-url= requires |archive-date= (help). Retrieved June 12, 2020.
↑ ^97.0 ^97.1 Forgan, Duncan H. (2019). Solving Fermi's Paradox. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-73231-1. Retrieved June 12, 2020.
↑ I.S. Shklovsky, Vselennaia, zhizn’, razum (Moscow: Nauka, 1976), 257.
↑ Buis, Alan. "Making Sense of 'Climate Sensitivity'". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Retrieved 31 July 2022.
↑ Assessment, United States Congress Office of Technology (1979). The Effects of Nuclear War. Congress of the U.S., Office of Technology Assessment. ISBN 978-0-916672-36-2.
↑ "The Effects of Nuclear War" (PDF). princeton.edu. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
↑ Kearny, Cresson H. (1980). Nuclear War Survival Skills. NWS Research Bureau.
↑ ^103.0 ^103.1 "Vacuum decay: the ultimate catastrophe". cosmosmagazine.com. 14 September 2015. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
↑ Coleman, Sidney; De Luccia, Frank (15 June 1980). "Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay". Physical Review D. 21 (12): 3305–3315. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3305.
↑ Halle, Louis J. (1980-07-01). "A Hopeful Future for Mankind". Foreign Affairs. 58 (5): 1129–1136. JSTOR 20040585. doi:10.2307/20040585.
↑ "Twentieth Anniversary of the First Automatic Discovery of a Near-Earth Asteroid by Software -- Spacewatch® Project | SPACEWATCH®". spacewatch.lpl.arizona.edu. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
↑ "Wayback Machine". web.archive.org. 11 February 2011. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ Clayton, Bruce (1980). Life After Doomsday. Paladin Press. ISBN 978-0-87364-175-3.
↑ "Life After Doomsday". amazon. Retrieved 23 August 2022.
↑ Emmett, Ross B.; Grabowski, Jesse (1 March 2022). "Better lucky than good: The Simon-Ehrlich bet through the lens of financial economics". Ecological Economics. 193: 107322. ISSN 0921-8009. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107322.
↑ Vardy, Nicholas (4 January 2018). "Why the "Population Bomb" Never Exploded". Investment U. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ Bor, Jacob; Herbst, Abraham J.; Newell, Marie-Louise; Bärnighausen, Till (22 February 2013). "Increases in Adult Life Expectancy in Rural South Africa: Valuing the Scale-Up of HIV Treatment". Science. 339 (6122): 961–965. ISSN 0036-8075. doi:10.1126/science.1230413.
↑ Walker, Martin (25 November 2007). "Smoking Guns and Mushroom Clouds". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 July 2022.
↑ "The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 310 (1512): 347–363. 20 December 1983. doi:10.1098/rsta.1983.0096.
↑ "NOVA Online | Russia's Nuclear Warriors | False Alarms on the Nuclear Front". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Parfit, Derek (12 April 1984). Reasons and Persons. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-151984-0.
↑ "Yuval Noah Harari: 'I wish I had come out when I was 16 or 17, and not 21'". the Guardian. 23 October 2021. Retrieved 29 July 2022.
↑ Drexler, K. Eric (1986). Engines of Creation. Anchor Press/Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-19973-5.
↑ "grey goo | nanotechnology | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
↑ "Some Limits to Global Ecophagy". www.rfreitas.com. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
↑ "Resources on Existential Risk" (PDF). futureoflife.org. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ "Kim Eric Drexler". biography.yourdictionary.com. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ "Stanford University, Center for International Security and Cooperation - MacArthur Foundation". www.macfound.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Stanford University, Center for International Security and Cooperation - MacArthur Foundation". www.macfound.org. Retrieved 7 July 2022.
↑ John, Doxat; Dotto, Lydia; l'environnement, Comité scientifique chargé des problèmes de; Environment, Consejo Internacional de Uniones Científicas Scientific Committee on Problems of the (26 March 1986). Planet Earth in Jeopardy: Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-99836-5.
↑ "NASA - NASA on the Prowl for Near-Earth Objects". www.nasa.gov. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Pubs.GISS: Rampino et al. 1988: Volcanic winters". pubs.giss.nasa.gov.
↑ Leary, Warren E.; Times, Special To the New York (20 April 1989). "Big Asteroid Passes Near Earth Unseen In a Rare Close Call". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Fact Sheet: The Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program" (PDF). globalwps. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
↑ Gorden, Max (14 March 2022). "Biosphere 2, once used to prepare us for other planets, now researches the future of our own". FOX Weather. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
↑ "Biosphere Ii Project | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
↑ "1992 World Scientists' Warning to Humanity | Union of Concerned Scientists". www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ Kasting, James F. (June 1988). "Runaway and moist greenhouse atmospheres and the evolution of Earth and Venus". Icarus. 74 (3): 472–494. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9.
↑ Morrison, David (1992). The Spaceguard Survey: Report of the NASA International Near-Earth-Object Detection Workshop. NASA.
↑ Kaplan, 2000
↑ "Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction - Main Page". legal.un.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "History". OPCW. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ Melosh, H. J.; Nemchinov, I. V. (November 1993). "Solar asteroid diversion". Nature. 366 (6450): 21–22. doi:10.1038/366021a0.
↑ Mainzer et al., 2011; US House of Representatives, 2013
↑ Shoemaker, E.M., 1995, Report of the Near-Earth Objects Survey Working Group, NASA Office of Space Science, Solar System Exploration Office
↑ Planetary defense workshop LLNL 1995
↑ "DailyTech - Russia, U.S. Eye Team-up to Build Massive Nuke to Save Planet from an Asteroid". web.archive.org. 9 October 2014. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
↑ "A new use for nuclear weapons: hunting rogue asteroids". Center for Public Integrity. 16 October 2013. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
↑ "The Norwegian Rocket Incident | Russian Roulette - A Close Call? | FRONTLINE | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "This Week in History: The Rocket Launch That Didn't Start a Nuclear War With Russia | Russia Matters". www.russiamatters.org. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. Retrieved 6 August 2022.
↑ "Ataxia: The Chemical and Biological Terrorism Threat and the US Response • Stimson Center". Stimson Center. 9 October 2000. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Home page of the ReligiousTolerance.org web site". Home page of the ReligiousTolerance.org web site. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
↑ Marov, Mikhail Y.; Marov, Mikhail I︠A︡kovlevich; Marov, Michail Jakovlevič; Rickman, Hans (2001). Collisional Processes in the Solar System. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-7923-6946-2.
↑ Darling, David. "Spaceguard Foundation". www.daviddarling.info. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
↑ ^151.0 ^151.1 Leslie, John (8 January 2002). The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-66854-0.
↑ "Millennium Seed Bank Partnership, Mid Sussex District Podcast". Loquis. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ in a lecture to the Arizona Geological Society in 12–96
↑ "United Nations Treaty Collection". treaties.un.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty not yet in force but it has virtually halted tests: Official". www.aa.com.tr. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ Clark R. Chapman (May 21, 1998). "Statement on The Threat of Impact by Near-Earth Asteroids before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives at its hearings on "Asteroids: Perils and Opportunities"". Southwest Research Institute. Retrieved 2018-03-06.
↑ "New telescope will hunt dangerous asteroids". New Scientist. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "About the Mars Society". The Mars Society. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
↑ "extropy: Re: Singularity: Individual, Borg, Death?". extropians.weidai.com. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
↑ "On Deference and Yudkowsky's AI Risk Estimates - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 15 July 2022.
↑ "Orthogonality Thesis - LessWrong". www.lesswrong.com. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
↑ Alibek, Ken; Handelman, Stephen (1999). Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World, Told from the Inside by the Man who Ran it. Random House. ISBN 978-0-385-33496-9.
↑ Dar, Arnon; De Rújula, A.; Heinz, Ulrich (December 1999). "Will relativistic heavy-ion colliders destroy our planet?". Physics Letters B. 470 (1-4): 142–148. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01307-6.
↑ Mackenzie, John S.; Drury, Patrick; Arthur, Ray R.; Ryan, Michael J.; Grein, Thomas; Slattery, Raphael; Suri, Sameera; Domingo, Christine Tiffany; Bejtullahu, Armand (21 October 2014). "The Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network". Global Public Health. 9 (9): 1023–1039. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.951870.
↑ "Welcome to GOARN | GOARN". extranet.who.int. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
↑ "20 Ways the World Could End". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
↑ Joy, Bill. "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us". Wired. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "extropians: Marvin Minsky and Eliezer Yudkowsky". extropians.weidai.com. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
↑ "Machine Intelligence Research Institute - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 25 October 2022.
↑ ^170.0 ^170.1 "MIRI: Artificial Intelligence: The Danger of Good Intentions". Future of Life Institute. 12 October 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
↑ "Artificial intelligence: machine v man". Financial Times. 31 October 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
↑ ^172.0 ^172.1 Nast, Condé (16 November 2015). "The Doomsday Invention". The New Yorker. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
↑ "Machine Intelligence Research Institute". linkedin. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ Oppy, Graham (2001). "Physical Eschatology:". Philo. 4 (2): 148–168. doi:10.5840/philo20014213.
↑ Ćirković, Milan M. "Resource letter: PEs-1: physical eschatology." American Journal of Physics 71.2 (2003): 122–133.
↑ Baum, Seth D. "Is humanity doomed? Insights from astrobiology." Sustainability 2.2 (2010): 591–603.
↑ Broad, William J. (23 January 2001). "Australians Create a Deadly Mouse Virus". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Killer mousepox virus raises bioterror fears". New Scientist. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Sandberg, Anders. "The five biggest threats to human existence". The Conversation. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Nuclear Threat Initiative | American organization | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "The Nuclear Threat Initiative - Home". The Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
↑ "Millennium Ecosystem Assessment". www.millenniumassessment.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "World Bank Group | Environment | Millennium Ecosystem Assessment". web.worldbank.org. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
↑ "SpaceX". Google Arts & Culture. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
↑ "Ethical Issues In Advanced Artificial Intelligence". nickbostrom.com. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Asteroids & Beyond: The B612 Foundation Newsletter Vol. 24". us5.campaign-archive.com. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
↑ "B612 Foundation". B612. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
↑ "Nanotechnology: C-R-Newsletter Archives - 2007". crnano.org. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Our Final Century | book by Rees | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "News Article: Close Pass by XP14 & NASA NEO Workshop". web.archive.org. 22 January 2008. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "World Economic Forum - Global Risk Network". web.worldbank.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "World Economic Forum: world is more vulnerable to global risks". E3G. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ Brown, David (29 May 2004). "SARS Cases in Asia Show Labs' Risks". Washington Post. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Lucey, Daniel R. (April 2006). "Biological Weapons Defense: Infectious Diseases and Counterbioterrorism". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 12 (4): 713–713. doi:10.3201/eid1204.060090.
↑ Posner, Richard A. (11 November 2004). Catastrophe: Risk and Response. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-517813-5.
↑ Parson, Edward A. (March 2007). "The Big One: A Review of Richard Posner's Catastrophe: Risk and Response". Journal of Economic Literature. pp. 147–213. doi:10.1257/jel.45.1.147. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ "Future of Humanity Institute - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ FHI, Future of Humanity Institute-. "Future of Humanity Institute". The Future of Humanity Institute. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
↑ "Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies". web.archive.org. 6 August 2014. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
↑ Hays, J. N. (2005). Epidemics and Pandemics: Their Impacts on Human History. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109-658-9.
↑ Diamond, Jared (4 January 2011). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed: Revised Edition. Penguin. ISBN 978-1-101-50200-6.
↑ "Future of Humanity". Oxford Martin School. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ "The Future of Humanity Institute". www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ ^204.0 ^204.1 ^204.2 Loff, Sarah (22 April 2014). "NASA's Search for Asteroids to Help Protect Earth and Understand Our History". NASA. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ "Astronauts push for strategies, spacecraft to prevent calamitous asteroid strike". old.post-gazette.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Deadly Cultures — Mark Wheelis, Lajos Rózsa, Malcolm Dando". www.hup.harvard.edu. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "NASA has approved the start of work on the design of the NEO Surveyor space telescope". ВПК.name. Retrieved 11 August 2022.
↑ "NEOS". NEO Surveyor | Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission. 26 June 2020. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "NEO Surveyor, Protecting Earth from Dangerous Asteroids". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "In Depth | NEO Surveyor". NASA Solar System Exploration. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Sweden), Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (Stockholm; Blix, Hans (2006). Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms. WMDC. ISBN 978-91-38-22582-0.
↑ "2006 (June 19) Svalbard Global Seed Vault - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ Editors, History com. "Construction on Global Seed Vault begins". HISTORY. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk – Eliezer S. Yudkowsky". www.yudkowsky.net. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Hearing Charter: Near-Earth Objects: Status of the Survey Program and Review of NASA's 2007 Report to Congress". archive.ph. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
↑ Dobbs, Michael (2009). One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-1-4000-7891-2.
↑ Chris Phoenix; Mike Treder (2008). "Chapter 21: Nanotechnology as global catastrophic risk". In Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-857050-9.
↑ Ali Noun; Christopher F. Chyba (2008). "Chapter 20: Biotechnology and biosecurity". In Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford University Press.
↑ ^219.0 ^219.1 "Global Catastrophic Risks Survey" (PDF). fhi.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Naudé, Wim (2 January 2021). "Artificial intelligence: neither Utopian nor apocalyptic impacts soon". Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 30 (1): 1–23. ISSN 1043-8599. doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1839173.
↑ Yudkowsky 2008, p. 338
↑ Hanson, Robin. "Catastrophe, social collapse, and human extinction". Global catastrophic risks 1 (2008): 357.
↑ Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008. ISBN 9780198570509.
↑ "We Saw It Coming: Asteroid Monitored from Outer Space to Ground Impact". www.newswise.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ Markoff, John (25 July 2009). "Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Sipress, Alan (30 November 2010). The Fatal Strain: On the Trail of Avian Flu and the Coming Pandemic. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-311830-5.
↑ "Emerging Pandemic Threats | Fact Sheet | U.S. Agency for International Development". www.usaid.gov. 12 July 2021. Retrieved 3 July 2022.
↑ Preston, Eunah (17 January 2019). "PREDICT". School of Veterinary Medicine. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Cato, Susumu (October 2020). "From the St. Petersburg paradox to the dismal theorem". Environment and Development Economics. pp. 423–432. doi:10.1017/S1355770X20000121. Retrieved 29 October 2022.
↑ Taleb, Nassim Nicholas; Bar-Yam, Yaneer; Cirillo, Pasquale (April 2022). "On single point forecasts for fat-tailed variables". International Journal of Forecasting. 38 (2): 413–422. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.008.
↑ Wuthnow, Robert (7 April 2010). Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-973087-2.
↑ Spiers, Edward M. (30 April 2010). A History of Chemical and Biological Weapons. Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-1-86189-724-4.
↑ Wilder, Author: (7 August 2017). "N-Gen Newsletter, August 2017 - N-Gen". nextgensd. Retrieved 3 July 2022.
↑ "Millennium Alliance for Humanity and Biosphere | International Environment Forum". iefworld.org. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
↑ "Home | What's Next For Earth - Monthly Online Exhibitions". whatsnextforearth.com. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
↑ "Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Flu Researcher Ron Fouchier Loses Legal Fight Over H5N1 Studies". www.science.org. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
↑ Vogel, Kathleen M. (2013). "Expert Knowledge in Intelligence Assessments: Bird Flu and Bioterrorism". International Security. 38 (3): 39–71. ISSN 0162-2889.
↑ Wolfe, Nathan (11 October 2011). The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-8050-9194-6.
↑ "Global Catastrophic Risk Institute founded in - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
↑ "GCR Institute". Twitter. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Asteroid Threat to Earth Sparks Global 'NEOShield' Project". web.archive.org. 9 March 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ Devyatkin, A. V.; Gorshanov, D. L.; Yershov, V. N.; Melnikov, A. V.; Martyusheva, A. A.; Petrova, S. N.; L'vov, V. N.; Tsekmeister, S. D.; Naumov, K. N. (11 July 2016). "A study of the asteroid (367943) Duende at Pulkovo Observatory". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 459 (4): 3986–3997. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw736.
↑ "Centre for the Study of Existential Risk - History - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "Centre for the Study of Existential Risk - CRASSH". CRASSH - CENTRE FOR RESEARCH IN THE ARTS, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES. 3 August 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Morens, David M.; Subbarao, Kanta; Taubenberger, Jeffery K. (June 2012). "Engineering H5N1 avian influenza viruses to study human adaptation". Nature. 486 (7403): 335–340. doi:10.1038/nature11170.
↑ "NASA HAS A CONFERENCE ON SOLAR FLARES". youtube. Retrieved 29 July 2022.
↑ Vasylyev, V. P. (February 2013). "Deflection of Hazardous Near-Earth Objects by High Concentrated Sunlight and Adequate Design of Optical Collector". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 110 (1-2): 67–79. doi:10.1007/s11038-012-9410-2.
↑ "History". The Global Challenges Foundation. Retrieved 1 July 2022.
↑ "Global Challenges Foundation". linkedin. Retrieved 29 July 2022.
↑ Harwell, M. A. (6 December 2012). Nuclear Winter: The Human and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4612-5288-7.
↑ Leitenberg, Milton; Zilinskas, Raymond A.; Kuhn, Jens H. (29 June 2012). The Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-07023-3.
↑ "NEOSSat (Near-Earth Object Surveillance Satellite)". eoportal. Retrieved 21 July 2022.
↑ "The end of humanity: Nick Bostrom at TEDxOxford". youtube. Retrieved 29 July 2022.
↑ "iawn: IAWN Home". iawn.net. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "2013 Tabletop Exercise". cneos.jpl.nasa.gov. Retrieved 21 July 2022.
↑ "Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission". SpaceNews. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Harwood, William. "Trump budget blueprint focuses on deep space exploration, commercial partnerships – Spaceflight Now". spaceflightnow. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission". SpaceNews. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Center on Long-Term Risk - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 4 July 2022.
↑ "Home". Center on Long-Term Risk. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "United States, Russia Sign Agreement to Further Research and Development Collaboration in Nuclear Energy and Security". Energy.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
↑ U.S.Congress (Spring 2013). "Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session" (PDF). United States Congress (Hearings held 19 March 2013 and 10 April 2013). p. 147. Retrieved 3 May 2014.
↑ Bostrom, Nick (February 2013). "Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority: Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority". Global Policy. 4 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12002.
↑ Burns, Wil C. G.; Strauss, Andrew L. (22 July 2013). Climate Change Geoengineering: Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02393-2.
↑ "Future of Life Institute - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ "Team". Future of Life Institute. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ ""Actions Needed by NNSA to Clarify Dismantlement Performance Goal", Report to the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate, United States Government Accountability Office" (PDF). April 2014. Retrieved 4 August 2014.
↑ "Phrase nasa innovative advanced concepts - examples d'usage pour nasa innovative advanced concepts". fr.ichacha.net. Retrieved 16 August 2022.
↑ Kolbert, Elizabeth (2014). The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. Henry Holt. ISBN 978-1-4088-5122-7.
↑ Baum, Seth; Handoh, Itsuki C. (24 August 2014). "Integrating the Planetary Boundaries and Global Catastrophic Risk Paradigms". Social Science Research Network.
↑ Bostrom, Nick (2014). "Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies". philpapers.org. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 29 October 2022.
↑ Mills, Michael J.; Toon, Owen B.; Lee‐Taylor, Julia; Robock, Alan (April 2014). "Multidecadal global cooling and unprecedented ozone loss following a regional nuclear conflict". Earth's Future. 2 (4): 161–176. ISSN 2328-4277. doi:10.1002/2013EF000205.
↑ "2015 Literature Yuval Noah Harari publishes Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "Book Review: Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow". District of Columbia Public Library. 29 January 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.
↑ "ATLAS, the Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System –". www.spacesafetymagazine.com. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ ^278.0 ^278.1 Belando, Laurent; Besnier, Jean-Michel (2 October 2018). Do Robots Make Love?: Transhumanism in 12 questions. Octopus Books. ISBN 978-1-78840-070-1.
↑ "How 'vacuum decay' could end the universe". Big Think. Retrieved 27 August 2022.
↑ Morton, Oliver (3 November 2015). The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-7445-3.
↑ Khan, Dr Ali S. (24 May 2016). The Next Pandemic: On the Front Lines Against Humankind's Gravest Dangers. PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-61039-592-2.
↑ "NASA scientist warns we're not prepared for surprise asteroid or comet strike". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ "Earth Unprepared For Asteroid Hit, Warns NASA Scientist". www.yahoo.com. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ Yuhas, Alan (13 December 2016). "Earth woefully unprepared for surprise comet or asteroid, Nasa scientist warns". The Guardian.
↑ "Earth woefully unprepared for surprise comet or asteroid, Nasa scientist warns". the Guardian. 13 December 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
↑ "United Nations Treaty Collection". treaties.un.org. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
↑ "Entry Into Force Day". ICAN. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
↑ "The Digital Treasures of the National Library of Hungary are Deposited in the Arctic World Archive in Svalbard – The Conference of European National Librarians (CENL)". www.cenl.org. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ "Arctic World Archive". arcticworldarchive.org. Retrieved 28 October 2022.
↑ Grace, Katja; Salvatier, John; Dafoe, Allan; Zhang, Baobao; Evans, Owain (2017). "When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts". doi:10.48550/arXiv.1705.08807.
↑ "Scholars assess threats to civilization, life on Earth". UCLA. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Osterholm, Michael T.; Olshaker, Mark (14 March 2017). Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs. Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-316-34369-5.
↑ Torres, Phil (2017). Morality, Foresight, and Human Flourishing: An Introduction to Existential Risks. Pitchstone Publishing. ISBN 978-1-63431-142-7.
↑ Ellsberg, Daniel (5 December 2017). The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-60819-674-6.
↑ Schoch-Spana, Monica; Cicero, Anita; Adalja, Amesh; Gronvall, Gigi; Kirk Sell, Tara; Meyer, Diane; Nuzzo, Jennifer B.; Ravi, Sanjana; Shearer, Matthew P.; Toner, Eric; Watson, Crystal; Watson, Matthew; Inglesby, Tom (August 2017). "Global Catastrophic Biological Risks: Toward a Working Definition". Health Security. 15 (4): 323–328. doi:10.1089/hs.2017.0038.
↑ "Global pollution kills 9m a year and threatens 'survival of human societies'". the Guardian. 20 October 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F. (1 December 2017). "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice". BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125.
↑ "Humanity on the Edge of Extinction | Anders Sandberg | TEDxVienna". youtube. Retrieved 29 July 2022.
↑ Tu, Anthony (20 October 2017). Chemical and Biological Weapons and Terrorism. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-315-30549-3.
↑ "Earth Will Be Hit By An Asteroid With 100 Percent Certainty, Says Space-Watching Group B612 - Inquisitr". www.inquisitr.com. Retrieved 6 August 2022.
↑ Kellerhoff, Till. "The Climate Emergency Plan". Club of Rome. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ Liu, Hin-Yan; Lauta, Kristian Cedervall; Maas, Matthijs Michiel (September 2018). "Governing Boring Apocalypses: A new typology of existential vulnerabilities and exposures for existential risk research". Futures. 102: 6–19. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.009.
↑ Prothero, Donald R. (16 October 2018). When Humans Nearly Vanished: The Catastrophic Explosion of the Toba Volcano. Smithsonian. ISBN 978-1-58834-635-3.
↑ Wolverton, Mark (27 November 2018). Burning the Sky: Operation Argus and the Untold Story of the Cold War Nuclear Tests in Outer Space. Abrams. ISBN 978-1-4683-1418-2.
↑ published, Mike Wall (10 April 2018). "About 17,000 Big Near-Earth Asteroids Remain Undetected: How NASA Could Spot Them". Space.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ Staff (21 June 2018). "National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan" (PDF). whitehouse.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2022 – via National Archives.
↑ Mandelbaum, Ryan F. (21 June 2018). "America Isn't Ready to Handle a Catastrophic Asteroid Impact, New Report Warns". Gizmodo. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
↑ Myhrvold, Nathan (22 May 2018). "An empirical examination of WISE/NEOWISE asteroid analysis and results". Icarus. 314: 64–97. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.004.
↑ Chang, Kenneth (14 June 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks - Two years ago, NASA dismissed and mocked an amateur's criticisms of its asteroids database. Now Nathan Myhrvold is back, and his papers have passed peer review.". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
↑ Chang, Kenneth (14 June 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks - Relevant Comments". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
↑ Hempel, Sandra (30 October 2018). The Atlas of Disease: Mapping deadly epidemics and contagion from the plague to the zika virus. White Lion Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78131-880-5.
↑ Hawking, Stephen (16 October 2018). Brief Answers to the Big Questions: the final book from Stephen Hawking. John Murray Press. ISBN 978-1-4736-9600-6.
↑ "Stephen Hawking feared race of 'superhumans' able to manipulate their own DNA". washingtonpost. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Stephen Hawking left us bold predictions on AI, superhumans, and aliens". Quartz. 14 October 2018. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ Chang, Kenneth (14 June 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Resilience to Global Catastrophe" (PDF). beta. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
↑ Anderson, Nick (February 28, 2019). "Georgetown launches think tank on security and emerging technology". Washington Post. Retrieved March 12, 2019.
↑ Baum, Seth D.; Armstrong, Stuart; Ekenstedt, Timoteus; Häggström, Olle; Hanson, Robin; Kuhlemann, Karin; Maas, Matthijs M.; Miller, James D.; Salmela, Markus; Sandberg, Anders; Sotala, Kaj; Torres, Phil; Turchin, Alexey; Yampolskiy, Roman V. (11 March 2019). "Long-term trajectories of human civilization". foresight. 21 (1): 53–83. doi:10.1108/FS-04-2018-0037.
↑ "Long-Term Trajectories of Human Civilization | Global Catastrophic Risk Institute". gcrinstitute. 8 August 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2022.
↑ Johns Hopkins University (4 March 2019). "Asteroids are stronger, harder to destroy than previously thought". Phys.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
↑ El Mir, Charles; Ramesh, KT; Richardson, Derek C. (15 March 2019). "A new hybrid framework for simulating hypervelocity asteroid impacts and gravitational reaccumulation". Icarus. 321: 1013–1025. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.032.
↑ D. Spratt and I. Dunlop, Existential Climate-Related Security Risk (Melbourne: Breakthrough, 2019), 3.
↑ Hans-Otto Pörtner, Debra C. Roberts, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Melinda Tignor, Elvira Poloczanska, Katja Mintenbeck, et al., eds., The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019), 57, 327.
↑ Anders Levermann, quoted in Jonathan Watts, “Twin Megastorms Have Scientists Fearing This May Be the New Normal,” Guardian, September 7, 2017.
↑ Kellerhoff, Till. "The Planetary Emergency Plan". Club of Rome. Retrieved 2 July 2022.
↑ "'If there's ever a time to wake up, it's now': Doomsday Clock moves 20-seconds closer to midnight". ABC News. 23 January 2020. Retrieved 27 June 2022.
↑ "The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great Depression". IMF. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ Marques, Luiz (3 July 2020). "Pandemics, Existential and non-Existential Risks to Humanity". Ambiente & Sociedade. 23. ISSN 1414-753X. doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200126vu2020L3ID.
↑ "Theoretical Physicists Say 90% Chance of Societal Collapse Within Several Decades". www.vice.com. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ Bologna, Mauro; Aquino, Gerardo (December 2020). "Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 7631. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63657-6.
↑ MD, Michael Greger (26 May 2020). How to Survive a Pandemic. Pan Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-5290-5490-3.
↑ Cotton‐Barratt, Owen; Daniel, Max; Sandberg, Anders (May 2020). "Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter". Global Policy. 11 (3): 271–282. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12786.
↑ Moynihan, Thomas (3 November 2020). X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction. MIT Press. ISBN 978-1-913029-84-5.
↑ Denizli, Adil; Alencar, Marcelo; Nguyen, Tuan Anh; Motaung, David (29 May 2022). Nanotechnology-Based Smart Remote Sensing Networks for Disaster Prevention. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-99828-4.
↑ "Status of World Nuclear Forces". Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved 26 June 2022.
↑ Woodward, Morgan McFall-Johnsen, Aylin. "A NASA simulation revealed that 6 months' warning isn't enough to stop an asteroid from hitting Earth. We'd need 5 to 10 years.". Business Insider. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ published, Meghan Bartels (1 May 2021). "How did you spend your week? NASA pretended to crash an asteroid into Earth.". Space.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "Planetary Defense Conference Exercise - 2021". cneos.jpl.nasa.gov. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
↑ "A quarter of all known bee species haven't been seen since the 1990s". New Scientist. Retrieved 12 July 2022.
↑ Zattara, Eduardo E.; Aizen, Marcelo A. (January 2021). "Worldwide occurrence records suggest a global decline in bee species richness". One Earth. 4 (1): 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.005.
↑ Atwoli, Lukoye; Baqui, Abdullah H; Benfield, Thomas; Bosurgi, Raffaella; Godlee, Fiona; Hancocks, Stephen; Horton, Richard; Laybourn-Langton, Laurie; Monteiro, Carlos Augusto; Norman, Ian; Patrick, Kirsten; Praities, Nigel; Olde Rikkert, Marcel G M; Rubin, Eric J; Sahni, Peush; Smith, Richard; Talley, Nicholas J; Turale, Sue; Vázquez, Damián (5 September 2021). "Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health". BMJ: n1734. doi:10.1136/bmj.n1734.
↑ Schuster, Joshua (2021). Calamity theory : three critiques of existential risk. Minneapolis, MN. ISBN 9781452966588.
↑ "Don't Look Up is the climate movie I've been waiting for". The Phoenix. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ "'It parodies our inaction': Don't Look Up, an allegory of the climate crisis, lauded by activists". the Guardian. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ "Don't Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film". the Guardian. 8 January 2022. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ Max, Grinnell, (29 December 2021). "I'm a climate scientist. Don't Look Up captures the madness I see every day | Peter Kalmus". the Guardian. Retrieved 31 October 2022.
↑ Sahu, Kailash C.; Anderson, Jay; Casertano, Stefano; Bond, Howard E.; Udalski, Andrzej; Dominik, Martin; Calamida, Annalisa; Bellini, Andrea; Brown, Thomas M.; Rejkuba, Marina; Bajaj, Varun; Kains, Noe; Ferguson, Henry C.; Fryer, Chris L.; Yock, Philip; Mroz, Przemek; Kozlowski, Szymon; Pietrukowicz, Pawel; Poleski, Radek; Skowron, Jan; Soszynski, Igor; Szymanski, Michael K.; Ulaczyk, Krzysztof; Wyrzykowski, Lukasz; Barry, Richard; Bennett, David P.; Bond, Ian A.; Hirao, Yuki; Silva, Stela Ishitani; Kondo, Iona; Koshimoto, Naoki; Ranc, Clement; Rattenbury, Nicholas J.; Sumi, Takahiro; Suzuki, Daisuke; Tristram, Paul J.; Vandorou, Aikaterini; Beaulieu, Jean-Philippe; Marquette, Jean-Baptiste; Cole, Andrew; Fouque, Pascal; Hill, Kym; Dieters, Stefan; Coutures, Christian; Dominis-Prester, Dijana; Bennett, Clara; Bachelet, Etienne; Menzies, John; Alb-row, Michael; Pollard, Karen; Gould, Andrew; Yee, Jennifer; Allen, William; de Almeida, Leonardo Andrade; Christie, Grant; Drummond, John; Gal-Yam, Avishay; Gorbikov, Evgeny; Jablonski, Francisco; Lee, Chung-Uk; Maoz, Dan; Manulis, Ilan; McCormick, Jennie; Natusch, Tim; Pogge, Richard W.; Shvartzvald, Yossi; Jorgensen, Uffe G.; Alsubai, Khalid A.; Andersen, Michael I.; Bozza, Valerio; Novati, Sebastiano Calchi; Burgdorf, Martin; Hinse, Tobias C.; Hundertmark, Markus; Husser, Tim-Oliver; Kerins, Eamonn; Longa-Pena, Penelope; Mancini, Luigi; Penny, Matthew; Rahvar, Sohrab; Ricci, Davide; Sajadian, Sedighe; Skottfelt, Jesper; Snodgrass, Colin; Southworth, John; Tregloan-Reed, Jeremy; Wambsganss, Joachim; Wertz, Olivier; Tsapras, Yiannis; Street, Rachel A.; Bramich, Daniel M.; Horne, Keith; Steele, Iain A. (2022). "An Isolated Stellar-Mass Black Hole Detected Through Astrometric Microlensing". doi:10.48550/arXiv.2201.13296.
↑ Dickinson, David (2 February 2022). "Tiny NEA Scout Solar Sail Mission to Chase Asteroid". Universe Today. Retrieved 10 August 2022.
↑ Mahoney, Erin (30 October 2015). "NEA Scout". NASA. Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "Near Earth Asteroid Scout (NEAScout)". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Retrieved 17 August 2022.
↑ "What We Owe the Future". Goodreads. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
↑ "Google Trends". Google Trends. Retrieved 4 July 2022.
↑ "Google Books Ngram Viewer". books.google.com. Retrieved 4 July 2022.
↑ "Wikipedia Views: results". wikipediaviews.org. Retrieved 4 July 2022.
↑ Rees, Martin (14 April 2004). Our Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-06863-0.

[1] "Existential Risk". Future of Life Institute. Retrieved 6 July 2022.

[Torres-2] 2.00 ^2.01 ^2.02 ^2.03 ^2.04 ^2.05 ^2.06 ^2.07 ^2.08 ^2.09 ^2.10 ^2.11 ^2.12 ^2.13 ^2.14 ^2.15 ^2.16 ^2.17 ^2.18 ^2.19 ^2.20 ^2.21 ^2.22 ^2.23 ^2.24 ^2.25 ^2.26 ^2.27 ^2.28 ^2.29 ^2.30 ^2.31 ^2.32 ^2.33 ^2.34 ^2.35 ^2.36 Beard, Simon; Torres, Phil (2020). "Ripples on the Great Sea of Life: A Brief History of Existential Risk Studies". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3730000.

[Moynihan-3] 3.00 ^3.01 ^3.02 ^3.03 ^3.04 ^3.05 ^3.06 ^3.07 ^3.08 ^3.09 ^3.10 ^3.11 Moynihan, Thomas (3 November 2020). X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction. MIT Press. ISBN 978-1-913029-84-5.

[Leigh-4] 4.0 ^4.1 ^4.2 ^4.3 ^4.4 ^4.5 ^4.6 ^4.7 ^4.8 ^4.9 Leigh, Andrew (9 November 2021). What's the Worst That Could Happen?: Existential Risk and Extreme Politics. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-36661-8.

[dfssss-5] 5.0 ^5.1 "Why despite global progress, humanity is probably facing its most dangerous time ever". 80,000 Hours. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[6] Sandberg, Anders. "The five biggest threats to human existence". The Conversation. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[forum.effectivealtruism.org-7] 7.0 ^7.1 "The Importance of Unknown Existential Risks - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[Dictionary.com-8] 8.0 ^8.1 "What Does Existential Threat Mean?". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[9] Alvarez, Walter (25 June 2013). T. rex and the Crater of Doom. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-4740-2.

[10] "Apophis Can Wipe Out A Country: A Look At Every Massive Asteroid That Has Hit Earth - 'God of Chaos' Is Coming!". The Economic Times. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[11] "1490: When a Meteorite Killed 10,000 People in the Chinese City of Ch'ing-yang | Inquisitive Wonder". inquisitivewonder.com. 16 March 2022. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[12] "A Synopsis of the Astronomy of Comets | work by Halley | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[13] "Whiston's Flood". web.stanford.edu. Retrieved 7 July 2022.

[14] "bayesian - What is the origin of the term 'inverse probability'?". Cross Validated. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[15] Gupta, Dishashree26 (14 March 2017). "Introduction to Conditional Probability and Bayes theorem for data science professionals". Analytics Vidhya. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[16] Kragh, Helge S. (29 April 2016). Entropic Creation: Religious Contexts of Thermodynamics and Cosmology. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-14248-5.

[17] Brush, Stephen G.; Brush, Stephen G.; Brush, Distinguished University Professor of the History of Science Emeritus Stephen G. (26 April 1996). A History of Modern Planetary Physics: Nebulous Earth. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-44171-1.

[The_intellectual_disc-18] Moynihan, T. (2019). "The intellectual discovery of human extinction". University of Oxford.

[19] "Defeating Thanos and his Malthusian Mission of Population Control". carnegiemnh.org. Retrieved 26 October 2022.

[20] "Global catastrophic risk". www.nanowerk.com. Retrieved 1 November 2022.

[21] Hunt, Eileen M. "Mary Shelley's The Last Man: Existentialism and IR meet the post-apocalyptic pandemic novel". Review of International Studies: 1–23. ISSN 0260-2105. doi:10.1017/S0260210522000250.

[22] "readers library". thereaderslibrary.quora.com. Retrieved 25 October 2022.

[23] "Eros | asteroid | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 27 August 2022.

[Scholl-24] Scholl, Hans; Schmadel, Lutz D. (2002). "Discovery Circumstances of the First Near-Earth Asteroid (433) Eros". Acta Historica Astronomiae. 15: 210–220.

[Bostrom-25] 25.00 ^25.01 ^25.02 ^25.03 ^25.04 ^25.05 ^25.06 ^25.07 ^25.08 ^25.09 ^25.10 ^25.11 ^25.12 ^25.13 ^25.14 ^25.15 ^25.16 ^25.17 ^25.18 ^25.19 ^25.20 ^25.21 ^25.22 ^25.23 ^25.24 ^25.25 ^25.26 ^25.27 Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. (29 September 2011). Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-960650-4.

[Ord-26] 26.00 ^26.01 ^26.02 ^26.03 ^26.04 ^26.05 ^26.06 ^26.07 ^26.08 ^26.09 ^26.10 ^26.11 Ord, Toby (2020). The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. ISBN 978-1-5266-0022-6.

[27] "Shall We All Commit Suicide?". International Churchill Society. 17 June 2016. Retrieved 26 August 2022.

[28] "Treaties, States parties, and Commentaries - Geneva Protocol on Asphyxiating or Poisonous Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods, 1925". ihl-databases.icrc.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[29] "1925 Geneva Protocol – UNODA". un.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[30] Kirshner, Robert P. (6 January 2004). "Hubble's diagram and cosmic expansion". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (1): 8–13. doi:10.1073/pnas.2536799100.

[31] "Radar observations of long-lost asteroid 1937 UB (Hermes)". web.archive.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[32] "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists". Atomic Heritage Foundation. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[33] "The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists begins publishing in 1945". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 7 July 2022.

[34] J. Zalasiwicz, ‘When Did the Anthropocene Begin? A Mid-Twentieth Century Boundary Level is Stratigraphically Optimal’, Quaternary International 383 (2015), 196–203.

[35] Hakim, Joy (January 5, 1995). A History of US: Book 9: War, Peace, and All that Jazz. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0195095142.

[36] "atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki | Date, Facts, Significance, Timeline, Deaths, & Aftermath | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2 November 2022.

[37] "The Atomic Bomb [1945]" (PDF). russell.humanities.mcmaster.ca. Retrieved 29 October 2022.

[38] Bertrand Russell, "The Bomb and Civilisation."

[39] "Minor Planet Center". Oxford Reference. doi:10.1093/oi/authority.20110810105415958. Retrieved 29 August 2022.

[40] "Doomsday Clock moved to just two minutes to 'apocalypse'". BBC News. 25 January 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2022.

[41] Sinclaire, Janice (9 March 2016). "Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Announces Leadership Changes to Governing Board, Board of Sponsors, and Science and Security Board". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[42] Magazine, Smithsonian; Mann, Charles C. "The Book That Incited a Worldwide Fear of Overpopulation". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 26 August 2022.

[43] Osborn, Fairfield (1948). Our Plundered Planet. Grosset & Dunlap.

[44] Klemetti, Erik. "The Rise of a Supervolcano". Wired. Retrieved 3 July 2022.

[45] Szilard, Leo (March 1955). "The First Step to Peace". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 11 (3): 104–104. doi:10.1080/00963402.1955.11453578.

[46] "1 March 1954 - Castle Bravo: CTBTO Preparatory Commission". www.ctbto.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[47] "Can We Survive Technology?" (PDF). geosci.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 3 September 2022.

[48] "Of Historical Note: Can We Survive Technology? - Ideas | Institute for Advanced Study". www.ias.edu. 3 October 2014. Retrieved 3 September 2022.

[49] Veisdal, Jørgen. "Can We Survive Technology? — John von Neumann (1955)". www.privatdozent.co. Retrieved 3 September 2022.

[50] "For Progress There Is No Cure – Quote Investigator". quoteinvestigator.com. Retrieved 3 September 2022.

[51] "Statistics of Extremes". amazon.com. Retrieved 29 October 2022.

[52] Dyson, Freeman J. (3 June 1960). "Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation". Science. 131 (3414): 1667–1668. doi:10.1126/science.131.3414.1667.

[53] Barash, David P. (1 December 2020). "International Affairs". Threats: 121–216. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190055295.003.0004.

[fdssdf-54] "9 Times The World Was At The Brink Of Nuclear War - And Pulled Back". IFLScience. Retrieved 2 September 2022.

[55] "doomsday machine | nuclear device | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 27 August 2022.

[56] von Foerster, Heinz; Mora, Patricia M.; Amiot, Lawrence W. (4 November 1960). "Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026: At this date human population will approach infinity if it grows as it has grown in the last two millenia.". Science. 132 (3436): 1291–1295. doi:10.1126/science.132.3436.1291.

[57] Nations, United. "International Day of Human Space Flight". United Nations. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[58] Torres, Phil (June 2018). "Space colonization and suffering risks: Reassessing the "maxipok rule"". Futures. 100: 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.008. |access-date= requires |url= (help)

[59] "It's been 60 years since Yuri Gagarin became the first man in outer space". The World from PRX. Retrieved 1 November 2022.

[60] Darling, David. "Hoerner, Sebastian von (1919-2003)". www.daviddarling.info. Retrieved 3 September 2022.

[61] von Hoerner, Sebastian (8 December 1961). "The Search for Signals from Other Civilizations: The waiting time for answers may be greater than the longevity of the technical state of mind.". Science. 134 (3493): 1839–1843. doi:10.1126/science.134.3493.1839.

[62] Crawford, Ian (7 June 2021). Expanding Worldviews: Astrobiology, Big History and Cosmic Perspectives. Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-030-70482-7.

[63] Roulette, Joey (24 November 2021). "NASA Launches New Mission: Crash Into Asteroid, Defend Planet Earth". The New York Times. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

[64] Daniel., Deudney (1983). Whole earth security : a geopolitics of peace. Washington: Worldwatch Institute. p. 80. ISBN 978-0-916468-54-5.

[65] "Mutually Assured Destruction Revisited". web.archive.org. 20 June 2015. Retrieved 11 July 2022.

[66] "Silent Spring, Rachel Carson, 1962". Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved 19 July 2022.

[67] "Vasili Arkhipov". IMDb. Retrieved 30 October 2022.

[68] Allison, Graham (2012). "The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50". Foreign Affairs. 91 (4). Retrieved 9 July 2012.

[69] "ВЗГЛЯД / "США и Россия: кризис 1962–го"". vzglyad.ru. 26 June 2022.

[70] Schwelb, Egon (July 1964). "The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and International Law". American Journal of International Law. 58 (3): 642–670. doi:10.2307/2196663.

[71] "Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT)". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[72] "Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. Retrieved 16 July 2022.

[73] Dandridge M. Cole and Donald W. Cox (1964). Islands in Space: The Challenge of the Planetoids. Chilton Books. pp. 7–8.

[74] "History of AI Risk Thought - LessWrong". www.lesswrong.com. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[75] Hwan, Kim, Doo (23 April 2021). Global Issues Surrounding Outer Space Law and Policy. IGI Global.

[76] "Outer Space Treaty". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[77] Nast, Condé. "How a massive solar storm in 1967 almost sparked a nuclear war". Wired UK. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

[78] A. Koestler, The Ghost in the Machine (London: Hutchinson, 1967), 322.

[79] "The Space Review: Giant bombs on giant rockets: Project Icarus (page 1)". web.archive.org. 15 April 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[80] "Project Icarus - Revised Edition - The MIT Press". web.archive.org. 17 October 2007. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[81] "Systems Engineering: Avoiding an Asteroid - TIME". web.archive.org. 21 July 2013. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[82] "Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (1 July 1968)". cvce. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[83] "2. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Done at London, Moscow, and Washington July 1, 1968". United States Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[84] "The Population Bomb". Environment & Society Portal. 24 November 2014. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[85] Binétruy, Pierre (2006). "Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology". Les Houches. 84: 457–536. doi:10.1016/S0924-8099(06)80029-6.

[Piper-86] Piper, Kelsey (3 January 2019). "Here are the ways nature could wipe out humanity". Vox. Retrieved 25 October 2022.

[87] Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information, Bureau of Public Affairs (19 September 2007). "166. Statement Issued by President Nixon, November 25, 1969". 2001-2009.state.gov. Retrieved 2 September 2022.

[88] "Biological Warfare and the Extinction of Man". Joshua Lederberg - Profiles in Science.

[89] Editors, History com. "The 1969 Moon Landing". HISTORY. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[90] "Seabed Arms Control Treaty". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[91] "Biological Weapons Convention – UNODA". un. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[92] "The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) At A Glance | Arms Control Association". www.armscontrol.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[93] "Tales From A Frozen Zoo". Mongabay Environmental News. 2 February 2010. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[94] Schlosser 2013, p. 360

[95] Hart, Michael H. ".Explanation for absence of extraterrestrials on earth". Quarterly Journal Of The Royal Astronomical Society.

[webb-96] Webb, Stephen (2015). If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... WHERE IS EVERYBODY?: Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life (2 ed.). Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-13235-8. Archived from the original on |archive-url= requires |archive-date= (help). Retrieved June 12, 2020.

[forgan-97] 97.0 ^97.1 Forgan, Duncan H. (2019). Solving Fermi's Paradox. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-316-73231-1. Retrieved June 12, 2020.

[98] I.S. Shklovsky, Vselennaia, zhizn’, razum (Moscow: Nauka, 1976), 257.

[99] Buis, Alan. "Making Sense of 'Climate Sensitivity'". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Retrieved 31 July 2022.

[100] Assessment, United States Congress Office of Technology (1979). The Effects of Nuclear War. Congress of the U.S., Office of Technology Assessment. ISBN 978-0-916672-36-2.

[101] "The Effects of Nuclear War" (PDF). princeton.edu. Retrieved 25 October 2022.

[102] Kearny, Cresson H. (1980). Nuclear War Survival Skills. NWS Research Bureau.

[fdggg-103] 103.0 ^103.1 "Vacuum decay: the ultimate catastrophe". cosmosmagazine.com. 14 September 2015. Retrieved 11 July 2022.

[104] Coleman, Sidney; De Luccia, Frank (15 June 1980). "Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay". Physical Review D. 21 (12): 3305–3315. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3305.

[105] Halle, Louis J. (1980-07-01). "A Hopeful Future for Mankind". Foreign Affairs. 58 (5): 1129–1136. JSTOR 20040585. doi:10.2307/20040585.

[106] "Twentieth Anniversary of the First Automatic Discovery of a Near-Earth Asteroid by Software -- Spacewatch® Project | SPACEWATCH®". spacewatch.lpl.arizona.edu. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

[107] "Wayback Machine". web.archive.org. 11 February 2011. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[108] Clayton, Bruce (1980). Life After Doomsday. Paladin Press. ISBN 978-0-87364-175-3.

[109] "Life After Doomsday". amazon. Retrieved 23 August 2022.

[110] Emmett, Ross B.; Grabowski, Jesse (1 March 2022). "Better lucky than good: The Simon-Ehrlich bet through the lens of financial economics". Ecological Economics. 193: 107322. ISSN 0921-8009. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107322.

[111] Vardy, Nicholas (4 January 2018). "Why the "Population Bomb" Never Exploded". Investment U. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[112] Bor, Jacob; Herbst, Abraham J.; Newell, Marie-Louise; Bärnighausen, Till (22 February 2013). "Increases in Adult Life Expectancy in Rural South Africa: Valuing the Scale-Up of HIV Treatment". Science. 339 (6122): 961–965. ISSN 0036-8075. doi:10.1126/science.1230413.

[113] Walker, Martin (25 November 2007). "Smoking Guns and Mushroom Clouds". The New York Times. Retrieved 29 July 2022.

[114] "The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 310 (1512): 347–363. 20 December 1983. doi:10.1098/rsta.1983.0096.

[115] "NOVA Online | Russia's Nuclear Warriors | False Alarms on the Nuclear Front". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[116] Parfit, Derek (12 April 1984). Reasons and Persons. OUP Oxford. ISBN 978-0-19-151984-0.

[117] "Yuval Noah Harari: 'I wish I had come out when I was 16 or 17, and not 21'". the Guardian. 23 October 2021. Retrieved 29 July 2022.

[118] Drexler, K. Eric (1986). Engines of Creation. Anchor Press/Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-19973-5.

[119] "grey goo | nanotechnology | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 11 July 2022.

[120] "Some Limits to Global Ecophagy". www.rfreitas.com. Retrieved 11 July 2022.

[futureoflife.org-121] "Resources on Existential Risk" (PDF). futureoflife.org. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[122] "Kim Eric Drexler". biography.yourdictionary.com. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[123] "Stanford University, Center for International Security and Cooperation - MacArthur Foundation". www.macfound.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[124] "Stanford University, Center for International Security and Cooperation - MacArthur Foundation". www.macfound.org. Retrieved 7 July 2022.

[125] John, Doxat; Dotto, Lydia; l'environnement, Comité scientifique chargé des problèmes de; Environment, Consejo Internacional de Uniones Científicas Scientific Committee on Problems of the (26 March 1986). Planet Earth in Jeopardy: Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-99836-5.

[126] "NASA - NASA on the Prowl for Near-Earth Objects". www.nasa.gov. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[127] "Pubs.GISS: Rampino et al. 1988: Volcanic winters". pubs.giss.nasa.gov.

[128] Leary, Warren E.; Times, Special To the New York (20 April 1989). "Big Asteroid Passes Near Earth Unseen In a Rare Close Call". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[129] "Fact Sheet: The Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program" (PDF). globalwps. Retrieved 30 July 2022.

[130] Gorden, Max (14 March 2022). "Biosphere 2, once used to prepare us for other planets, now researches the future of our own". FOX Weather. Retrieved 27 October 2022.

[131] "Biosphere Ii Project | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 27 October 2022.

[132] "1992 World Scientists' Warning to Humanity | Union of Concerned Scientists". www.ucsusa.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[133] Kasting, James F. (June 1988). "Runaway and moist greenhouse atmospheres and the evolution of Earth and Venus". Icarus. 74 (3): 472–494. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9.

[134] Morrison, David (1992). The Spaceguard Survey: Report of the NASA International Near-Earth-Object Detection Workshop. NASA.

[135] Kaplan, 2000

[136] "Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction - Main Page". legal.un.org. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[137] "History". OPCW. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[138] Melosh, H. J.; Nemchinov, I. V. (November 1993). "Solar asteroid diversion". Nature. 366 (6450): 21–22. doi:10.1038/366021a0.

[139] Mainzer et al., 2011; US House of Representatives, 2013

[140] Shoemaker, E.M., 1995, Report of the Near-Earth Objects Survey Working Group, NASA Office of Space Science, Solar System Exploration Office

[e-reports-ext.llnl.gov-141] Planetary defense workshop LLNL 1995

[142] "DailyTech - Russia, U.S. Eye Team-up to Build Massive Nuke to Save Planet from an Asteroid". web.archive.org. 9 October 2014. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

[143] "A new use for nuclear weapons: hunting rogue asteroids". Center for Public Integrity. 16 October 2013. Retrieved 9 August 2022.

[144] "The Norwegian Rocket Incident | Russian Roulette - A Close Call? | FRONTLINE | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[145] "This Week in History: The Rocket Launch That Didn't Start a Nuclear War With Russia | Russia Matters". www.russiamatters.org. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[146] "Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. Retrieved 6 August 2022.

[147] "Ataxia: The Chemical and Biological Terrorism Threat and the US Response • Stimson Center". Stimson Center. 9 October 2000. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[Home_page_of_the_ReligiousTolerance.org_web_site-148] "Home page of the ReligiousTolerance.org web site". Home page of the ReligiousTolerance.org web site. Retrieved 16 August 2022.

[149] Marov, Mikhail Y.; Marov, Mikhail I︠A︡kovlevich; Marov, Michail Jakovlevič; Rickman, Hans (2001). Collisional Processes in the Solar System. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-7923-6946-2.

[150] Darling, David. "Spaceguard Foundation". www.daviddarling.info. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

[sdefef-151] 151.0 ^151.1 Leslie, John (8 January 2002). The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-66854-0.

[152] "Millennium Seed Bank Partnership, Mid Sussex District Podcast". Loquis. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[153] ture to the Arizona Geological Society in 12–96

[154] "United Nations Treaty Collection". treaties.un.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[155] "Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty not yet in force but it has virtually halted tests: Official". www.aa.com.tr. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[spaceguard-1998-156] Clark R. Chapman (May 21, 1998). "Statement on The Threat of Impact by Near-Earth Asteroids before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives at its hearings on "Asteroids: Perils and Opportunities"". Southwest Research Institute. Retrieved 2018-03-06.

[157] "New telescope will hunt dangerous asteroids". New Scientist. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[158] "About the Mars Society". The Mars Society. Retrieved 27 October 2022.

[159] "extropy: Re: Singularity: Individual, Borg, Death?". extropians.weidai.com. Retrieved 25 October 2022.

[On_Defere-160] "On Deference and Yudkowsky's AI Risk Estimates - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 15 July 2022.

[161] "Orthogonality Thesis - LessWrong". www.lesswrong.com. Retrieved 25 October 2022.

[162] Alibek, Ken; Handelman, Stephen (1999). Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World, Told from the Inside by the Man who Ran it. Random House. ISBN 978-0-385-33496-9.

[163] Dar, Arnon; De Rújula, A.; Heinz, Ulrich (December 1999). "Will relativistic heavy-ion colliders destroy our planet?". Physics Letters B. 470 (1-4): 142–148. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01307-6.

[164] Mackenzie, John S.; Drury, Patrick; Arthur, Ray R.; Ryan, Michael J.; Grein, Thomas; Slattery, Raphael; Suri, Sameera; Domingo, Christine Tiffany; Bejtullahu, Armand (21 October 2014). "The Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network". Global Public Health. 9 (9): 1023–1039. doi:10.1080/17441692.2014.951870.

[165] "Welcome to GOARN | GOARN". extranet.who.int. Retrieved 18 August 2022.

[166] "20 Ways the World Could End". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 11 July 2022.

[167] Joy, Bill. "Why the Future Doesn't Need Us". Wired. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[168] "extropians: Marvin Minsky and Eliezer Yudkowsky". extropians.weidai.com. Retrieved 24 October 2022.

[169] "Machine Intelligence Research Institute - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 25 October 2022.

[fefe-170] 170.0 ^170.1 "MIRI: Artificial Intelligence: The Danger of Good Intentions". Future of Life Institute. 12 October 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2022.

[171] "Artificial intelligence: machine v man". Financial Times. 31 October 2014. Retrieved 26 October 2022.

[dededed-172] 172.0 ^172.1 Nast, Condé (16 November 2015). "The Doomsday Invention". The New Yorker. Retrieved 26 October 2022.

[173] "Machine Intelligence Research Institute". linkedin. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[174] Oppy, Graham (2001). "Physical Eschatology:". Philo. 4 (2): 148–168. doi:10.5840/philo20014213.

[175] Ćirković, Milan M. "Resource letter: PEs-1: physical eschatology." American Journal of Physics 71.2 (2003): 122–133.

[176] Baum, Seth D. "Is humanity doomed? Insights from astrobiology." Sustainability 2.2 (2010): 591–603.

[177] Broad, William J. (23 January 2001). "Australians Create a Deadly Mouse Virus". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[178] "Killer mousepox virus raises bioterror fears". New Scientist. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[179] Sandberg, Anders. "The five biggest threats to human existence". The Conversation. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[180] "Nuclear Threat Initiative | American organization | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[181] "The Nuclear Threat Initiative - Home". The Nuclear Threat Initiative. Retrieved 18 August 2022.

[182] "Millennium Ecosystem Assessment". www.millenniumassessment.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[183] "World Bank Group | Environment | Millennium Ecosystem Assessment". web.worldbank.org. Retrieved 30 July 2022.

[184] "SpaceX". Google Arts & Culture. Retrieved 27 October 2022.

[185] "Ethical Issues In Advanced Artificial Intelligence". nickbostrom.com. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[186] "Asteroids & Beyond: The B612 Foundation Newsletter Vol. 24". us5.campaign-archive.com. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

[187] "B612 Foundation". B612. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

[188] "Nanotechnology: C-R-Newsletter Archives - 2007". crnano.org. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[189] "Our Final Century | book by Rees | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[190] "News Article: Close Pass by XP14 & NASA NEO Workshop". web.archive.org. 22 January 2008. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[191] "World Economic Forum - Global Risk Network". web.worldbank.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[192] "World Economic Forum: world is more vulnerable to global risks". E3G. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[193] Brown, David (29 May 2004). "SARS Cases in Asia Show Labs' Risks". Washington Post. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[194] Lucey, Daniel R. (April 2006). "Biological Weapons Defense: Infectious Diseases and Counterbioterrorism". Emerging Infectious Diseases. 12 (4): 713–713. doi:10.3201/eid1204.060090.

[195] Posner, Richard A. (11 November 2004). Catastrophe: Risk and Response. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-517813-5.

[196] Parson, Edward A. (March 2007). "The Big One: A Review of Richard Posner's Catastrophe: Risk and Response". Journal of Economic Literature. pp. 147–213. doi:10.1257/jel.45.1.147. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[197] "Future of Humanity Institute - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[198] FHI, Future of Humanity Institute-. "Future of Humanity Institute". The Future of Humanity Institute. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

[199] "Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies". web.archive.org. 6 August 2014. Retrieved 6 July 2022.

[200] Hays, J. N. (2005). Epidemics and Pandemics: Their Impacts on Human History. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109-658-9.

[201] Diamond, Jared (4 January 2011). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed: Revised Edition. Penguin. ISBN 978-1-101-50200-6.

[202] "Future of Humanity". Oxford Martin School. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[203] "The Future of Humanity Institute". www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[Loff-204] 204.0 ^204.1 ^204.2 Loff, Sarah (22 April 2014). "NASA's Search for Asteroids to Help Protect Earth and Understand Our History". NASA. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[205] "Astronauts push for strategies, spacecraft to prevent calamitous asteroid strike". old.post-gazette.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[206] "Deadly Cultures — Mark Wheelis, Lajos Rózsa, Malcolm Dando". www.hup.harvard.edu. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[207] "NASA has approved the start of work on the design of the NEO Surveyor space telescope". ВПК.name. Retrieved 11 August 2022.

[208] "NEOS". NEO Surveyor | Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission. 26 June 2020. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[209] "NEO Surveyor, Protecting Earth from Dangerous Asteroids". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[210] "In Depth | NEO Surveyor". NASA Solar System Exploration. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[211] Sweden), Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (Stockholm; Blix, Hans (2006). Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms. WMDC. ISBN 978-91-38-22582-0.

[212] "2006 (June 19) Svalbard Global Seed Vault - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[213] Editors, History com. "Construction on Global Seed Vault begins". HISTORY. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[214] "Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk – Eliezer S. Yudkowsky". www.yudkowsky.net. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[215] "Hearing Charter: Near-Earth Objects: Status of the Survey Program and Review of NASA's 2007 Report to Congress". archive.ph. Retrieved 6 July 2022.

[216] Dobbs, Michael (2009). One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War. Vintage Books. ISBN 978-1-4000-7891-2.

[GCRs_nano-chapter-217] Chris Phoenix; Mike Treder (2008). "Chapter 21: Nanotechnology as global catastrophic risk". In Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-857050-9.

[GCRs_bio-chapter-218] Ali Noun; Christopher F. Chyba (2008). "Chapter 20: Biotechnology and biosecurity". In Bostrom, Nick; Cirkovic, Milan M. Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford University Press.

[dwdw-219] 219.0 ^219.1 "Global Catastrophic Risks Survey" (PDF). fhi.ox.ac.uk. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[220] Naudé, Wim (2 January 2021). "Artificial intelligence: neither Utopian nor apocalyptic impacts soon". Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 30 (1): 1–23. ISSN 1043-8599. doi:10.1080/10438599.2020.1839173.

[221] Yudkowsky 2008, p. 338

[222] Hanson, Robin. "Catastrophe, social collapse, and human extinction". Global catastrophic risks 1 (2008): 357.

[223] Global catastrophic risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2008. ISBN 9780198570509.

[224] "We Saw It Coming: Asteroid Monitored from Outer Space to Ground Impact". www.newswise.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[225] Markoff, John (25 July 2009). "Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man". The New York Times. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[226] Sipress, Alan (30 November 2010). The Fatal Strain: On the Trail of Avian Flu and the Coming Pandemic. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-311830-5.

[227] "Emerging Pandemic Threats | Fact Sheet | U.S. Agency for International Development". www.usaid.gov. 12 July 2021. Retrieved 3 July 2022.

[228] Preston, Eunah (17 January 2019). "PREDICT". School of Veterinary Medicine. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[229] Cato, Susumu (October 2020). "From the St. Petersburg paradox to the dismal theorem". Environment and Development Economics. pp. 423–432. doi:10.1017/S1355770X20000121. Retrieved 29 October 2022.

[230] Taleb, Nassim Nicholas; Bar-Yam, Yaneer; Cirillo, Pasquale (April 2022). "On single point forecasts for fat-tailed variables". International Journal of Forecasting. 38 (2): 413–422. ISSN 0169-2070. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.008.

[231] Wuthnow, Robert (7 April 2010). Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-973087-2.

[232] Spiers, Edward M. (30 April 2010). A History of Chemical and Biological Weapons. Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-1-86189-724-4.

[233] Wilder, Author: (7 August 2017). "N-Gen Newsletter, August 2017 - N-Gen". nextgensd. Retrieved 3 July 2022.

[234] "Millennium Alliance for Humanity and Biosphere | International Environment Forum". iefworld.org. Retrieved 18 August 2022.

[235] "Home | What's Next For Earth - Monthly Online Exhibitions". whatsnextforearth.com. Retrieved 26 October 2022.

[236] "Wayback Machine" (PDF). web.archive.org. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[237] "Flu Researcher Ron Fouchier Loses Legal Fight Over H5N1 Studies". www.science.org. Retrieved 6 July 2022.

[238] Vogel, Kathleen M. (2013). "Expert Knowledge in Intelligence Assessments: Bird Flu and Bioterrorism". International Security. 38 (3): 39–71. ISSN 0162-2889.

[239] Wolfe, Nathan (11 October 2011). The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-8050-9194-6.

[240] "Global Catastrophic Risk Institute founded in - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 6 July 2022.

[241] "GCR Institute". Twitter. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[242] "Asteroid Threat to Earth Sparks Global 'NEOShield' Project". web.archive.org. 9 March 2016. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[243] Devyatkin, A. V.; Gorshanov, D. L.; Yershov, V. N.; Melnikov, A. V.; Martyusheva, A. A.; Petrova, S. N.; L'vov, V. N.; Tsekmeister, S. D.; Naumov, K. N. (11 July 2016). "A study of the asteroid (367943) Duende at Pulkovo Observatory". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 459 (4): 3986–3997. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw736.

[244] "Centre for the Study of Existential Risk - History - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[245] "Centre for the Study of Existential Risk - CRASSH". CRASSH - CENTRE FOR RESEARCH IN THE ARTS, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES. 3 August 2021. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[246] Morens, David M.; Subbarao, Kanta; Taubenberger, Jeffery K. (June 2012). "Engineering H5N1 avian influenza viruses to study human adaptation". Nature. 486 (7403): 335–340. doi:10.1038/nature11170.

[247] "NASA HAS A CONFERENCE ON SOLAR FLARES". youtube. Retrieved 29 July 2022.

[248] Vasylyev, V. P. (February 2013). "Deflection of Hazardous Near-Earth Objects by High Concentrated Sunlight and Adequate Design of Optical Collector". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 110 (1-2): 67–79. doi:10.1007/s11038-012-9410-2.

[249] "History". The Global Challenges Foundation. Retrieved 1 July 2022.

[250] "Global Challenges Foundation". linkedin. Retrieved 29 July 2022.

[251] Harwell, M. A. (6 December 2012). Nuclear Winter: The Human and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4612-5288-7.

[252] Leitenberg, Milton; Zilinskas, Raymond A.; Kuhn, Jens H. (29 June 2012). The Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-07023-3.

[253] "NEOSSat (Near-Earth Object Surveillance Satellite)". eoportal. Retrieved 21 July 2022.

[254] "The end of humanity: Nick Bostrom at TEDxOxford". youtube. Retrieved 29 July 2022.

[255] "iawn: IAWN Home". iawn.net. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[256] "2013 Tabletop Exercise". cneos.jpl.nasa.gov. Retrieved 21 July 2022.

[257] "Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[258] "NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission". SpaceNews. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[259] Harwood, William. "Trump budget blueprint focuses on deep space exploration, commercial partnerships – Spaceflight Now". spaceflightnow. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[260] "NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission". SpaceNews. 14 June 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[261] "Center on Long-Term Risk - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 4 July 2022.

[262] "Home". Center on Long-Term Risk. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[263] "United States, Russia Sign Agreement to Further Research and Development Collaboration in Nuclear Energy and Security". Energy.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

[US-Congress-20130410-264] U.S.Congress (Spring 2013). "Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session" (PDF). United States Congress (Hearings held 19 March 2013 and 10 April 2013). p. 147. Retrieved 3 May 2014.

[265] Bostrom, Nick (February 2013). "Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority: Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority". Global Policy. 4 (1): 15–31. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12002.

[266] Burns, Wil C. G.; Strauss, Andrew L. (22 July 2013). Climate Change Geoengineering: Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02393-2.

[267] "Future of Life Institute - EA Forum". forum.effectivealtruism.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[268] "Team". Future of Life Institute. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[269] ""Actions Needed by NNSA to Clarify Dismantlement Performance Goal", Report to the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate, United States Government Accountability Office" (PDF). April 2014. Retrieved 4 August 2014.

[270] "Phrase nasa innovative advanced concepts - examples d'usage pour nasa innovative advanced concepts". fr.ichacha.net. Retrieved 16 August 2022.

[271] Kolbert, Elizabeth (2014). The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History. Henry Holt. ISBN 978-1-4088-5122-7.

[272] Baum, Seth; Handoh, Itsuki C. (24 August 2014). "Integrating the Planetary Boundaries and Global Catastrophic Risk Paradigms". Social Science Research Network.

[273] Bostrom, Nick (2014). "Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies". philpapers.org. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 29 October 2022.

[274] Mills, Michael J.; Toon, Owen B.; Lee‐Taylor, Julia; Robock, Alan (April 2014). "Multidecadal global cooling and unprecedented ozone loss following a regional nuclear conflict". Earth's Future. 2 (4): 161–176. ISSN 2328-4277. doi:10.1002/2013EF000205.

[275] "2015 Literature Yuval Noah Harari publishes Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. - Google Search". www.google.com. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[276] "Book Review: Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow". District of Columbia Public Library. 29 January 2021. Retrieved 30 July 2022.

[277] "ATLAS, the Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System –". www.spacesafetymagazine.com. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[Belando-278] 278.0 ^278.1 Belando, Laurent; Besnier, Jean-Michel (2 October 2018). Do Robots Make Love?: Transhumanism in 12 questions. Octopus Books. ISBN 978-1-78840-070-1.

[279] "How 'vacuum decay' could end the universe". Big Think. Retrieved 27 August 2022.

[280] Morton, Oliver (3 November 2015). The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-7445-3.

[281] Khan, Dr Ali S. (24 May 2016). The Next Pandemic: On the Front Lines Against Humankind's Gravest Dangers. PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-61039-592-2.

[282] "NASA scientist warns we're not prepared for surprise asteroid or comet strike". www.cbsnews.com. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[283] "Earth Unprepared For Asteroid Hit, Warns NASA Scientist". www.yahoo.com. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[284] Yuhas, Alan (13 December 2016). "Earth woefully unprepared for surprise comet or asteroid, Nasa scientist warns". The Guardian.

[285] "Earth woefully unprepared for surprise comet or asteroid, Nasa scientist warns". the Guardian. 13 December 2016. Retrieved 20 July 2022.

[286] "United Nations Treaty Collection". treaties.un.org. Retrieved 18 August 2022.

[287] "Entry Into Force Day". ICAN. Retrieved 18 August 2022.

[288] "The Digital Treasures of the National Library of Hungary are Deposited in the Arctic World Archive in Svalbard – The Conference of European National Librarians (CENL)". www.cenl.org. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[289] "Arctic World Archive". arcticworldarchive.org. Retrieved 28 October 2022.

[290] Grace, Katja; Salvatier, John; Dafoe, Allan; Zhang, Baobao; Evans, Owain (2017). "When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts". doi:10.48550/arXiv.1705.08807.

[291] "Scholars assess threats to civilization, life on Earth". UCLA. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[292] Osterholm, Michael T.; Olshaker, Mark (14 March 2017). Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs. Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-316-34369-5.

[293] Torres, Phil (2017). Morality, Foresight, and Human Flourishing: An Introduction to Existential Risks. Pitchstone Publishing. ISBN 978-1-63431-142-7.

[294] Ellsberg, Daniel (5 December 2017). The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-60819-674-6.

[295] Schoch-Spana, Monica; Cicero, Anita; Adalja, Amesh; Gronvall, Gigi; Kirk Sell, Tara; Meyer, Diane; Nuzzo, Jennifer B.; Ravi, Sanjana; Shearer, Matthew P.; Toner, Eric; Watson, Crystal; Watson, Matthew; Inglesby, Tom (August 2017). "Global Catastrophic Biological Risks: Toward a Working Definition". Health Security. 15 (4): 323–328. doi:10.1089/hs.2017.0038.

[296] "Global pollution kills 9m a year and threatens 'survival of human societies'". the Guardian. 20 October 2017. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[297] Ripple, William J.; Wolf, Christopher; Newsome, Thomas M.; Galetti, Mauro; Alamgir, Mohammed; Crist, Eileen; Mahmoud, Mahmoud I.; Laurance, William F. (1 December 2017). "World Scientists' Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice". BioScience. 67 (12): 1026–1028. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix125.

[298] "Humanity on the Edge of Extinction | Anders Sandberg | TEDxVienna". youtube. Retrieved 29 July 2022.

[299] Tu, Anthony (20 October 2017). Chemical and Biological Weapons and Terrorism. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-315-30549-3.

[300] "Earth Will Be Hit By An Asteroid With 100 Percent Certainty, Says Space-Watching Group B612 - Inquisitr". www.inquisitr.com. Retrieved 6 August 2022.

[301] Kellerhoff, Till. "The Climate Emergency Plan". Club of Rome. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[302] Liu, Hin-Yan; Lauta, Kristian Cedervall; Maas, Matthijs Michiel (September 2018). "Governing Boring Apocalypses: A new typology of existential vulnerabilities and exposures for existential risk research". Futures. 102: 6–19. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.009.

[303] Prothero, Donald R. (16 October 2018). When Humans Nearly Vanished: The Catastrophic Explosion of the Toba Volcano. Smithsonian. ISBN 978-1-58834-635-3.

[304] Wolverton, Mark (27 November 2018). Burning the Sky: Operation Argus and the Untold Story of the Cold War Nuclear Tests in Outer Space. Abrams. ISBN 978-1-4683-1418-2.

[305] ublished, Mike Wall (10 April 2018). "About 17,000 Big Near-Earth Asteroids Remain Undetected: How NASA Could Spot Them". Space.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[WH-20180621-306] Staff (21 June 2018). "National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan" (PDF). whitehouse.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2022 – via National Archives.

[GIZ-20180621-307] Mandelbaum, Ryan F. (21 June 2018). "America Isn't Ready to Handle a Catastrophic Asteroid Impact, New Report Warns". Gizmodo. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

[ICARUS-220180522-308] Myhrvold, Nathan (22 May 2018). "An empirical examination of WISE/NEOWISE asteroid analysis and results". Icarus. 314: 64–97. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.004.

[NYT-20180614-309] Chang, Kenneth (14 June 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks - Two years ago, NASA dismissed and mocked an amateur's criticisms of its asteroids database. Now Nathan Myhrvold is back, and his papers have passed peer review.". The New York Times. Retrieved 22 June 2018.

[NYT-20180614c-310] Chang, Kenneth (14 June 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks - Relevant Comments". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

[311] Hempel, Sandra (30 October 2018). The Atlas of Disease: Mapping deadly epidemics and contagion from the plague to the zika virus. White Lion Publishing. ISBN 978-1-78131-880-5.

[312] Hawking, Stephen (16 October 2018). Brief Answers to the Big Questions: the final book from Stephen Hawking. John Murray Press. ISBN 978-1-4736-9600-6.

[313] "Stephen Hawking feared race of 'superhumans' able to manipulate their own DNA". washingtonpost. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[314] "Stephen Hawking left us bold predictions on AI, superhumans, and aliens". Quartz. 14 October 2018. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[315] Chang, Kenneth (14 June 2018). "Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[316] "Resilience to Global Catastrophe" (PDF). beta. Retrieved 6 July 2022.

[CSET-317] Anderson, Nick (February 28, 2019). "Georgetown launches think tank on security and emerging technology". Washington Post. Retrieved March 12, 2019.

[318] Baum, Seth D.; Armstrong, Stuart; Ekenstedt, Timoteus; Häggström, Olle; Hanson, Robin; Kuhlemann, Karin; Maas, Matthijs M.; Miller, James D.; Salmela, Markus; Sandberg, Anders; Sotala, Kaj; Torres, Phil; Turchin, Alexey; Yampolskiy, Roman V. (11 March 2019). "Long-term trajectories of human civilization". foresight. 21 (1): 53–83. doi:10.1108/FS-04-2018-0037.

[319] "Long-Term Trajectories of Human Civilization | Global Catastrophic Risk Institute". gcrinstitute. 8 August 2018. Retrieved 6 July 2022.

[PHYS-20190304-320] Johns Hopkins University (4 March 2019). "Asteroids are stronger, harder to destroy than previously thought". Phys.org. Retrieved 5 July 2022.

[ICRS-20190315-321] El Mir, Charles; Ramesh, KT; Richardson, Derek C. (15 March 2019). "A new hybrid framework for simulating hypervelocity asteroid impacts and gravitational reaccumulation". Icarus. 321: 1013–1025. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.032.

[322] D. Spratt and I. Dunlop, Existential Climate-Related Security Risk (Melbourne: Breakthrough, 2019), 3.

[323] Hans-Otto Pörtner, Debra C. Roberts, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Melinda Tignor, Elvira Poloczanska, Katja Mintenbeck, et al., eds., The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019), 57, 327.

[324] Anders Levermann, quoted in Jonathan Watts, “Twin Megastorms Have Scientists Fearing This May Be the New Normal,” Guardian, September 7, 2017.

[325] Kellerhoff, Till. "The Planetary Emergency Plan". Club of Rome. Retrieved 2 July 2022.

[326] "'If there's ever a time to wake up, it's now': Doomsday Clock moves 20-seconds closer to midnight". ABC News. 23 January 2020. Retrieved 27 June 2022.

[327] "The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great Depression". IMF. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[328] Marques, Luiz (3 July 2020). "Pandemics, Existential and non-Existential Risks to Humanity". Ambiente & Sociedade. 23. ISSN 1414-753X. doi:10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200126vu2020L3ID.

[329] "Theoretical Physicists Say 90% Chance of Societal Collapse Within Several Decades". www.vice.com. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[330] Bologna, Mauro; Aquino, Gerardo (December 2020). "Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 7631. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-63657-6.

[331] MD, Michael Greger (26 May 2020). How to Survive a Pandemic. Pan Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-5290-5490-3.

[332] Cotton‐Barratt, Owen; Daniel, Max; Sandberg, Anders (May 2020). "Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter". Global Policy. 11 (3): 271–282. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12786.

[333] Moynihan, Thomas (3 November 2020). X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction. MIT Press. ISBN 978-1-913029-84-5.

[334] Denizli, Adil; Alencar, Marcelo; Nguyen, Tuan Anh; Motaung, David (29 May 2022). Nanotechnology-Based Smart Remote Sensing Networks for Disaster Prevention. Elsevier. ISBN 978-0-323-99828-4.

[335] "Status of World Nuclear Forces". Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved 26 June 2022.

[336] Woodward, Morgan McFall-Johnsen, Aylin. "A NASA simulation revealed that 6 months' warning isn't enough to stop an asteroid from hitting Earth. We'd need 5 to 10 years.". Business Insider. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[337] ublished, Meghan Bartels (1 May 2021). "How did you spend your week? NASA pretended to crash an asteroid into Earth.". Space.com. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[338] "Planetary Defense Conference Exercise - 2021". cneos.jpl.nasa.gov. Retrieved 5 August 2022.

[339] "A quarter of all known bee species haven't been seen since the 1990s". New Scientist. Retrieved 12 July 2022.

[340] Zattara, Eduardo E.; Aizen, Marcelo A. (January 2021). "Worldwide occurrence records suggest a global decline in bee species richness". One Earth. 4 (1): 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.005.

[341] Atwoli, Lukoye; Baqui, Abdullah H; Benfield, Thomas; Bosurgi, Raffaella; Godlee, Fiona; Hancocks, Stephen; Horton, Richard; Laybourn-Langton, Laurie; Monteiro, Carlos Augusto; Norman, Ian; Patrick, Kirsten; Praities, Nigel; Olde Rikkert, Marcel G M; Rubin, Eric J; Sahni, Peush; Smith, Richard; Talley, Nicholas J; Turale, Sue; Vázquez, Damián (5 September 2021). "Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health". BMJ: n1734. doi:10.1136/bmj.n1734.

[342] Schuster, Joshua (2021). Calamity theory : three critiques of existential risk. Minneapolis, MN. ISBN 9781452966588.

[343] "Don't Look Up is the climate movie I've been waiting for". The Phoenix. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[344] "'It parodies our inaction': Don't Look Up, an allegory of the climate crisis, lauded by activists". the Guardian. 30 December 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[345] "Don't Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film". the Guardian. 8 January 2022. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[346] Max, Grinnell, (29 December 2021). "I'm a climate scientist. Don't Look Up captures the madness I see every day | Peter Kalmus". the Guardian. Retrieved 31 October 2022.

[347] Sahu, Kailash C.; Anderson, Jay; Casertano, Stefano; Bond, Howard E.; Udalski, Andrzej; Dominik, Martin; Calamida, Annalisa; Bellini, Andrea; Brown, Thomas M.; Rejkuba, Marina; Bajaj, Varun; Kains, Noe; Ferguson, Henry C.; Fryer, Chris L.; Yock, Philip; Mroz, Przemek; Kozlowski, Szymon; Pietrukowicz, Pawel; Poleski, Radek; Skowron, Jan; Soszynski, Igor; Szymanski, Michael K.; Ulaczyk, Krzysztof; Wyrzykowski, Lukasz; Barry, Richard; Bennett, David P.; Bond, Ian A.; Hirao, Yuki; Silva, Stela Ishitani; Kondo, Iona; Koshimoto, Naoki; Ranc, Clement; Rattenbury, Nicholas J.; Sumi, Takahiro; Suzuki, Daisuke; Tristram, Paul J.; Vandorou, Aikaterini; Beaulieu, Jean-Philippe; Marquette, Jean-Baptiste; Cole, Andrew; Fouque, Pascal; Hill, Kym; Dieters, Stefan; Coutures, Christian; Dominis-Prester, Dijana; Bennett, Clara; Bachelet, Etienne; Menzies, John; Alb-row, Michael; Pollard, Karen; Gould, Andrew; Yee, Jennifer; Allen, William; de Almeida, Leonardo Andrade; Christie, Grant; Drummond, John; Gal-Yam, Avishay; Gorbikov, Evgeny; Jablonski, Francisco; Lee, Chung-Uk; Maoz, Dan; Manulis, Ilan; McCormick, Jennie; Natusch, Tim; Pogge, Richard W.; Shvartzvald, Yossi; Jorgensen, Uffe G.; Alsubai, Khalid A.; Andersen, Michael I.; Bozza, Valerio; Novati, Sebastiano Calchi; Burgdorf, Martin; Hinse, Tobias C.; Hundertmark, Markus; Husser, Tim-Oliver; Kerins, Eamonn; Longa-Pena, Penelope; Mancini, Luigi; Penny, Matthew; Rahvar, Sohrab; Ricci, Davide; Sajadian, Sedighe; Skottfelt, Jesper; Snodgrass, Colin; Southworth, John; Tregloan-Reed, Jeremy; Wambsganss, Joachim; Wertz, Olivier; Tsapras, Yiannis; Street, Rachel A.; Bramich, Daniel M.; Horne, Keith; Steele, Iain A. (2022). "An Isolated Stellar-Mass Black Hole Detected Through Astrometric Microlensing". doi:10.48550/arXiv.2201.13296.

[348] Dickinson, David (2 February 2022). "Tiny NEA Scout Solar Sail Mission to Chase Asteroid". Universe Today. Retrieved 10 August 2022.

[349] Mahoney, Erin (30 October 2015). "NEA Scout". NASA. Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[350] "Near Earth Asteroid Scout (NEAScout)". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Retrieved 17 August 2022.

[351] "What We Owe the Future". Goodreads. Retrieved 26 October 2022.

[352] "Google Trends". Google Trends. Retrieved 4 July 2022.

[353] "Google Books Ngram Viewer". books.google.com. Retrieved 4 July 2022.

[354] "Wikipedia Views: results". wikipediaviews.org. Retrieved 4 July 2022.

[Rees-355] Rees, Martin (14 April 2004). Our Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-06863-0.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

[15]

[16]

[17]

[18]

[19]

[20]

[21]

[22]

[23]

[24]

[25]

[26]

[27]

[28]

[29]

[30]

[31]

[32]

[33]

[34]

[35]

[36]

[37]

[38]

[39]

[40]

[41]

[42]

[43]

[44]

[45]

[46]

[47]

[48]

[49]

[50]

[51]

[52]

[53]

[54]

[55]

[56]

[57]

[58]

[59]

[60]

[61]

[62]

[63]

[64]

[65]

[66]

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

[71]

[72]

[73]

[74]

[75]

[76]

[77]

[78]

[79]

[80]

[81]

[82]

[83]

[84]

[85]

[86]

[87]

[88]

[89]

[90]

[91]

[92]

[93]

[94]

[95]

[96]

[97]

[98]

[99]

[100]

Difference between revisions of "Timeline of existential risk"

Latest revision as of 21:50, 20 November 2023

Contents

Sample questions

Big picture

Full timeline

Numerical and visual data

Google Scholar

Google trends

Google Ngram viewer

Wikipedia views

Meta information on the timeline

How the timeline was built

Feedback and comments

What the timeline is still missing

Timeline update strategy

See also

External links

References

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

More

Search

Navigation

Tools

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-This is a '''timeline of FIXME'''.
+This is a '''timeline of existential risk'''. According to the {{w|Future of Life Institute}}, "an existential risk is any risk that has the potential to eliminate all of humanity or, at the very least, kill large swaths of the global population, leaving the survivors without sufficient means to rebuild society to current standards of living".<ref>{{cite web |title=Existential Risk |url=https://futureoflife.org/background/existential-risk/ |website=Future of Life Institute |access-date=6 July 2022}}</ref>
 == Sample questions ==
 The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:
+* What risk types are described in this timeline?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Risk type".
+** You will see both multiple risk types covered in one event, and single types, often {{w|impact event}}s and {{w|nuclear weapon}}s. Scientific concepts, such as {{w|entropy}}, are also included in this column.
+* What are some notable or sample conducted studies in the field of existential risk or directly related fields and sub-fields?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Research".
+* What are some organizations engaged in the study and prevention of {{w|global catastrophic risk}}s?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Organization".
+** You will mostly see organizations engaged in preventing existential risks from multiple causes, but also some organizations specialized in one risk type.
+* What are some notable cases of incidents representing the possibility of global catastrophic risks at a major scale?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Sample case".
+* What are some events describing the probability of occurrence of a global catastrophic risks?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Probability".
+** You will see some calculations of risk, mainly on {{w|nuclear warfare}} and {{w|artificial intellicence}}.
+* What are some notable or sample publications on the topic?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Literature".
+** You will see a variety of publications, some treating the entire field of existential risk, and others specializing in one risk type.
+* What are some notable comments from prominent personalities, regarding the topic of existential risk?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Notable comment".
+** You will see comments by prominent people in the field of existential risk, such as {{w|Nick Bostrom}}, but also prominent personalities, like {{w|Albert Einstein}} and {{w|H.G. Wells}}.
+* What are some concepts introduced in relation to the topic of existential risk?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Concept development".
+** You will see the emergence of concepts related to the field, such as "{{w|existential risk}}", "{{w|supervolcano}}", etc.
+* What are some programs aimed to preserve species, data, and information, in case a catastrofic risk threatens their existence?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Preservation effort".
+** You will see some notable projects, such as the {{w|Svalbard Global Seed Vault}}.
+* What are other programs launched by competitive entities with the purpose to combat existential risks?
+** Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Program launch".
+** You will mostly see programs launched to prevent {{w|impact event}}s. Programs adressing other existential risks are also described.
+* Other events are described under the following types: "Budget", "{{w|Conference}}", "{{w|Document}}", "Field development", "Field growth", "{{w|Filmmaking}}", "International law", "{{w|Milestone event}}", "{{w|Open leter}}", "Policy", "{{w|Politics}}", "Project launch", "{{w|Scientific wager}}", "{{w|Space colonization}}", and "Statistics".
 ==Big picture==
@@ Line 9: / Line 39: @@
 {| class="wikitable"
 ! Time period !! Development summary !! More details
+|-
+| 19th century–1945 || Early development || Concerns about human extinction can be traced back to the 19th century<ref name="Torres">{{cite journal |last1=Beard |first1=Simon |last2=Torres |first2=Phil |title=Ripples on the Great Sea of Life: A Brief History of Existential Risk Studies |journal=SSRN Electronic Journal |date=2020 |doi=10.2139/ssrn.3730000}}</ref>, with {{w|geology}} unveiling a radically nonhuman past.<ref name="Moynihan"/> French scientist {{w|Georges Cuvier}} popularizes the concept of {{w|catastrophism}} in the early 1800s. The first near-Earth asteroid is discovered. Toward the first half of the twentieth century, chemical and biological weapons become a case of concern.
+|-
+| 1945 onwards || {{w|Atomic Age}}/{{w|anthropocene}} || The {{w|nuclear holocaust}} becomes a theoretical scenario shortly after the beginning of this age, which starts following the detonation of the first nuclear weapon. In the 1950s, humanity enters a new age, facing not only existential risks from our natural environment, but also the possibility that we might be able to extinguish ourselves. During the 1960s, {{w|mutual assured destruction}} leads to the expansion of nuclear-armed submarines by both {{w|Cold War}} adversaries.<ref name=Leigh/> In the same decade, the {{w|anti-nuclear movement}} launches, and the {{w|environmentalist movement}} soon adopts the cause of fighting {{w|climate change}}.<ref name=dfssss>{{cite web |title=Why despite global progress, humanity is probably facing its most dangerous time ever |url=https://80000hours.org/articles/existential-risks/ |website=80,000 Hours |access-date=30 August 2022}}</ref> {{w|Supervolcano}}es are discovered in the early 1970s.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Sandberg |first1=Anders |title=The five biggest threats to human existence |url=https://theconversation.com/the-five-biggest-threats-to-human-existence-27053 |website=The Conversation |access-date=30 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> {{w|Global warming}} becomes widely recognized as a risk in the 1980s.<ref name="forum.effectivealtruism.org">{{cite web |title=The Importance of Unknown Existential Risks - EA Forum |url=https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/CRofnyTEqL4uSNBSi/the-importance-of-unknown-existential-risks |website=forum.effectivealtruism.org |access-date=30 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> The term "existential threat", beginning to spread around the 1960–80s during the {{w|Cold War}}, takes off in the 1990s and early 2000s.<ref name="Dictionary.com">{{cite web |title=What Does Existential Threat Mean? |url=https://www.dictionary.com/e/pop-culture/existential-threat/ |website=Dictionary.com |access-date=30 August 2022}}</ref>
+|-
+| 21st century || Field of study consolidation || Nick Bostrom introduces the term "existential risk", which emerges as a unified field of study.<ref name="Torres"/> By the early 2000s, scientists identify many other threats to human survival, including threats associated with artificial intelligence, biological weapons, nanotechnology, and high energy physics experiments.<ref name="Torres"/> Unaligned artificial intelligence is recognized by some as the main threat within a century.<ref name="forum.effectivealtruism.org"/> Today, it is understood that the natural risks are dwarfed by the human-caused ones, turning the risk of extinction into an especially urgent issue.<ref name=dfssss/>
 |-
 |}
@@ Line 15: / Line 52: @@
 {| class="sortable wikitable"
-! Year !! Month and date !! Event type !! Details
+! Year !! Risk type !! Event type !! Details !! Country/location
+|-
+| Slightly over 66 million years ago || {{w|Impact event}} || Sample case || The {{w|Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event}} occurs when a large asteroid, about 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) in diameter, strikes Earth, causing a mass extinction in which 75% of plant and animal species on Earth became extinct, including all non-avian dinosaurs.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Alvarez |first1=Walter |title=T. rex and the Crater of Doom |date=25 June 2013 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-4740-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=MT6TQoZR2JMC&dq=Cretaceous%E2%80%93Paleogene+extinction+event |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Mexico}} ({{w|Yucatán Peninsula}})
+|-
+| 1490 || {{w|Impact event}} || Sample case || The [[w:1490 Ch'ing-yang event|Ch'ing-yang event]] occurs as a {{w|meteor shower}} or {{w|air burst}} in {{w|Qingyang}}, {{w|China}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Apophis Can Wipe Out A Country: A Look At Every Massive Asteroid That Has Hit Earth - 'God of Chaos' Is Coming! |url=https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/apophis-can-wipe-out-a-country-a-look-at-every-massive-asteroid-that-has-hit-earth/ching-yang-meteor-shower/slideshow/71110010.cms |website=The Economic Times |access-date=30 August 2022}}</ref> More than 10,000 people are estimated to be killed by the meteoric event.<ref>{{cite web |title=1490: When a Meteorite Killed 10,000 People in the Chinese City of Ch’ing-yang {{!}} Inquisitive Wonder |url=https://inquisitivewonder.com/1490-when-a-meteorite-killed-10000-people-in-the-chinese-city-of-ching-yang/ |website=inquisitivewonder.com |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en-us |date=16 March 2022}}</ref> || {{w|China}}
+|-
+| 1577 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research  || Danish astronomer {{w|Tycho Brahe}} tries to measure the distance of a {{w|comet}} through its {{w|parallax}}. After this, the extraterrestrial nature of comets is recognized and confirmed.<ref>{{cite web |title=A Synopsis of the Astronomy of Comets {{!}} work by Halley {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/A-Synopsis-of-the-Astronomy-of-Comets |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=5 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Denmark}}
+|-
+| 1694 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || English astronomer {{w|Edmond Halley}} presents a theory that [[w:Genesis flood narrative|Noah's flood]] in the {{w|Bible}} was caused by a comet impact.<ref>{{cite web |title=Whiston's Flood |url=https://web.stanford.edu/~meehan/donnelly/whiston.html |website=web.stanford.edu |access-date=7 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|Kingdom of England}})
+|-
+| 1763 || Multiple || Concept development || English statistician {{w|Thomas Bayes}}' solution to a problem of {{w|inverse probability}} is presented in the publication of ''{{w|An Essay towards solving a Problem in the Doctrine of Chances}}''.<ref>{{cite web |title=bayesian - What is the origin of the term 'inverse probability'? |url=https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/493448/what-is-the-origin-of-the-term-inverse-probability |website=Cross Validated |access-date=28 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> The {{w|Bayes theorem}} describes the probability of an event, based on prior knowledge of conditions that might be related to the event, thus providing rules for thinking about probabilities prior to any trials.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gupta |first1=Dishashree26 |title=Introduction to Conditional Probability and Bayes theorem for data science professionals |url=https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2017/03/conditional-probability-bayes-theorem/ |website=Analytics Vidhya |access-date=28 October 2022 |language=en |date=14 March 2017}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1777 || {{w|Heat death of the universe}} || Research || French astronomer {{w|Jean Sylvain Bailly}} becomes the first to put forward the conjecture that all bodies in the universe cool off, eventually becoming too cold to support life.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kragh |first1=Helge S. |title=Entropic Creation: Religious Contexts of Thermodynamics and Cosmology |date=29 April 2016 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-14248-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=75QWDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA20&dq=1777+Jean+Sylvain+Bailly&hl=en#v=onepage&q=1777%20Jean%20Sylvain%20Bailly&f=false |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Brush |first1=Stephen G. |last2=Brush |first2=Stephen G. |last3=Brush |first3=Distinguished University Professor of the History of Science Emeritus Stephen G. |title=A History of Modern Planetary Physics: Nebulous Earth |date=26 April 1996 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0-521-44171-1 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=vTBZyesS08kC&pg=PA77&dq=1777++Jean+Sylvain+Bailly++all+bodies+in+the+universe+cool+off%2C+eventually+becoming+too+cold+to+support+life.&hl=en#v=onepage&q=1777%20%20Jean%20Sylvain%20Bailly%20%20all%20bodies%20in%20the%20universe%20cool%20off%2C%20eventually%20becoming%20too%20cold%20to%20support%20life.&f=false |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|France}}
+|-
+| 1778 || Multiple || Literature || French naturalist, mathematician, cosmologist, and encyclopédiste {{w|Georges Buffon}} publishes ''Les époques de la nature'', which theorizes that the Earth was created by molten matter expelled from the Sun. Buffon also provides first experimental calculations of the window of planetary habitability, arguing that eventually Earth will become irreversibly uninhabitable.<ref name="The intellectual disc">{{cite journal |last1=Moynihan |first1=T. |title=The intellectual discovery of human extinction |date=2019 |url=https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f451dc6e-18f2-47b2-80c5-50fde8d39182 |publisher=University of Oxford |language=English}}</ref>
+|-
+| 1798 || {{w|Overpopulation}} || Literature || English cleric, scholar and economist {{w|Thomas Robert Malthus}} publishes ''{{w|An Essay on the Principle of Population}}'', which mathematically demonstrates the relationship between food and human population. Malthus argues that whenever food supply increases, population rapidly grows to eliminate the abundance resulting in perpetual human suffering unless we control human population.<ref>{{cite web |title=Defeating Thanos and his Malthusian Mission of Population Control |url=https://carnegiemnh.org/defeating-thanos-and-his-malthusian-mission-of-population-control/ |website=carnegiemnh.org |access-date=26 October 2022}}</ref> {{w|Human overpopulation}} is considered a {{w|global catastrophic risk}} in the domain of earth system governance.<ref>{{cite web |title=Global catastrophic risk |url=https://www.nanowerk.com/reference/global-catastrophic-risk.php |website=www.nanowerk.com |access-date=1 November 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1800 || Multiple || Research || French naturalist and zoologist {{w|Georges Cuvier}} publishes paleontological paper under the title ''Mémoires sur les espèces d'éléphants vivants et fossiles''. Cuvier demonstrates that elephantine bones unearthed in Siberia and North America belonged to mammoths and mastodons. Prior to this, the scientific community largely rejected the possibility that species could go extinct.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|France}}
+|-
+| 1815 || {{w|Supervolcano}} || Sample case || [[w:1815 eruption of Mount Tambora|Mount Tambora erupts]] in the island of {{w|Sumbawa}}, dispersing {{w|volcanic ash}} around the world and lowering global temperatures in an event sometimes known as the {{w|Year Without a Summer}}. Extreme weather and harvest failures follow, causing famine in China and Europe and triggering cholera outbreak in {{w|Bengal}}.<ref name="Moynihan"/> || {{w|Indonesia}}
+|-
+| 1826 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || English novelist {{w|Mary Shelley}} publishes ''{{w|The Last Man}}'', which depicts Europe in the late 21st century, ravaged by a mysterious plague pandemic that rapidly sweeps across the entire globe, ultimately resulting in the near-extinction of humanity. This is first modern post-apocalyptic pandemic novel<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hunt |first1=Eileen M. |title=Mary Shelley's The Last Man: Existentialism and IR meet the post-apocalyptic pandemic novel |journal=Review of International Studies |pages=1–23 |doi=10.1017/S0260210522000250 |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/review-of-international-studies/article/mary-shelleys-the-last-man-existentialism-and-ir-meet-the-postapocalyptic-pandemic-novel/44F4B8E41CD7BB2278AA1AF566D6C402 |language=en |issn=0260-2105}}</ref>, and the first proper depiction of an existential catastrophe where nonhuman ecosystems continue after demise of humanity.<ref name="Moynihan"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1844 || {{w|Omnicide}} || Concept development || Russian prince {{w|Vladimir Odoevsky}} writes a short story in which a future humanity, stricken with overpopulation and resource-depletion, welcomes a ‘Last Messiah’ who instructs a jaded mankind to commit omnicide by blowing up the planet.<ref>{{cite web |title=readers library |url=https://thereaderslibrary.quora.com/In-1844-the-Russian-prince-Vladimir-Odoevsky-wrote-a-short-story-in-which-a-future-humanity-stricken-with-overpopulati |website=thereaderslibrary.quora.com |access-date=25 October 2022}}</ref> According to Thomas Moynihan, this is the first speculation on omnicide.<ref name="Moynihan"/> ||
+|-
+| 1859 || {{w|Nature}} || Literature || {{w|Charles Darwin}} publishes ''{{w|On the Origin of Species}}'', which would succed in convincing the scientific community that evolution is a fact about the history of all Earth-originating life, metaphysically integrating humanity into the natural order. Before this book, the belief that an ontological gap separates humans from nature was prominent.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1863 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} || {{w|Deterrence theory}} || French science fiction writer {{w|Jules Verne}} imagines a world in which “the engines of warfare were perfected to such a degree” that they brought peace to the world. The topic of {{w|deterrence theory}}, which is anticipated by Verne, would gain relevance in the {{w|atomic age}}. The general consensus is that, in theory, no one would have an incentive to start a nuclear war as long as no one could win.<ref name=Leigh/> || {{w|France}}
+|-
+| 1893 || Multiple || Literature || Science fiction author {{w|H. G. Wells}} writes two non-fiction essays about the topic of human extinction, ''On Extinction'' and ''The Extinction of Man'', though both clearly draw as much on his literary imagination as his scientific method.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1898 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || {{w|433 Eros}} is discovered by German astronomer [[w:Carl Gustav Witt|C.G. Witt]] at the {{w|Berlin Observatory}} in an {{w|eccentric orbit}} between Mars and Earth.<ref>{{cite web |title=Eros {{!}} asteroid {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eros-asteroid |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=27 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> It is the first near-Earth asteroid to be discovered.<ref name=Scholl>{{Cite journal |last1=Scholl |first1=Hans |last2=Schmadel |first2=Lutz D. |title=Discovery Circumstances of the First Near-Earth Asteroid (433) Eros |journal=Acta Historica Astronomiae |volume=15 |pages=210–220 |date=2002}}</ref> || {{w|Germany}} ({{w|Berlin Observatory}})
+|-
+| 1901 || Multiple || Literature || {{w|H. G. Wells}} publishes ''Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress upon Human Life and Thought'', followed by ''The Discovery of the Future''. Both texts can be considered foundational for the academic field of Futures Studies. Wells contends that the scientific method can and should be used to predict future events, trends, and outcomes. He believes that by understanding the past and present, we can make more informed decisions about the future.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1903 || Multiple || Notable comment || English writer {{w|H.G. Wells}} gives a lecture at the {{w|Royal Institution}}, highlighting the risk of global disaster. Wells states:
+{{quote|It is impossible to show why certain things should not utterly destroy and end the human race and story; why night should not presently come down and make all our dreams and efforts vain. … something from space, or pestilence, or some great disease of the atmosphere, some trailing cometary poison, some great emanation of vapour from the interior of the earth, or new animals to prey on us, or some drug or wrecking madness in the mind of man.}}
+Wells' pessimism would deepen in his later years, as he would live long enough to learn about the {{w|atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki}} before dying in 1946.<ref name="Bostrom"/>
+|| {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1906 || {{w|Geomagnetic reversal}} || Research || Magnetic field reversal is discovered. This is a major discovery as it shows that the Earth's magnetic field is not always the same.<ref name="Ord"/> ||
+|-
+| 1907 || Multiple || Research || English utilitarian philosopher and economist {{w|Henry Sidgwick}} becomes the first to note that {{w|human extinction}} would be “the greatest of conceivable crimes from a Utilitarian point of view. [[w:Average and total utilitarianism|Total utilitarianism]] implies that humanity should not only strive for happiness, but create as much well-being as possible, including through the creation of as many humans with positive well-being as possible.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1908 || {{w|Impact event}} || Sample case || The {{w|Tunguska event}} occurs when an asteroid of about 200 feet in diameter explodes above {{w|Siberia}} with the force of a hydrogen bomb that would have have killed millions of people had it exploded above a major city. A much larger asteroid among the thousands of dangerously large objects in orbits that intersect the earth’s orbit, could strike the earth and cause the total extinction of humanity through a combination of shock waves, fire, tsunamis, and blockage of sunlight, wherever it struck.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|Russia}}
+|-
+| 1922 || {{w|Technology}} || Research || German bacteriologist and anthropologist Paul Alsberg hypothesizes that human progress resulted in ‘physiological regression’. This is, instead of bodily adaptation, the evolutionary selection process in humans have shifted to the extra-bodily evolution of our technical tools, which triggers an ‘atrophy of the body’ as the ‘immediate consequence of it being superseded by the artificial tool’.<ref name="Moynihan"/>{{rp|at=Loc 5629}} ||
+|-
+| 1924 || Multiple || Literature || British statesman {{w|Winston Churchill}} publishes ''Shall We All Commit Suicide?'', which would be considered an example of pure journalism helping to build the field of {{w|existential risk}}.<ref name="Torres"/> In his essay, Churchill argues that human survival depends on setting aside selfish materialism in favor of developing our capacities for “Mercy, Pity, Peace and Love”.<ref>{{cite web |title=Shall We All Commit Suicide? |url=https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour/finest-hour-094/shall-we-all-commit-suicide/ |website=International Churchill Society |access-date=26 August 2022 |date=17 June 2016}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1925 (June 17) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|chemical weapon}},{{w|biological weapon}}) || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Geneva Protocol}} is signed with the purpose to ban the use of chemical and biological weapons.<ref>{{cite web |title=Treaties, States parties, and Commentaries - Geneva Protocol on Asphyxiating or Poisonous Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods, 1925 |url=https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/INTRO/280 |website=ihl-databases.icrc.org |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> It would enter into force on 8 February 1928.<ref>{{cite web |title=1925 Geneva Protocol – UNODA |url=https://www.un.org/disarmament/wmd/bio/1925-geneva-protocol/#:~:text=The%201925%20Geneva%20Protocol%20prohibits,force%20on%208%20February%201928. |website=un.org |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1929 || {{w|Ultimate fate of the universe}} || Research || {{w|Edwin Hubble}} publishes his conclusion, based on his observations of {{w|Cepheid variable}} stars in distant galaxies, that the universe is expanding. From then on, the ''beginning'' of the universe and its possible ''end'' would be subjects of serious scientific investigation.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kirshner |first1=Robert P. |title=Hubble's diagram and cosmic expansion |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=6 January 2004 |volume=101 |issue=1 |pages=8–13 |doi=10.1073/pnas.2536799100}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1937 || {{w|Impact event}} || Sample case || Asteroid {{w|69230 Hermes}} is discovered when it passes the Earth at twice the [[w:Lunar distance (astronomy)|distance of the Moon]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Radar observations of long-lost asteroid 1937 UB (Hermes) |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170524082001/http://www.astro.cornell.edu/~jlm/NEAs/Hermes/ |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1945 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Organization || The ''{{w|Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists}}'' is founded by {{w|Manhattan Project}} scientists at the {{w|University of Chicago}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |url=https://www.atomicheritage.org/history/bulletin-atomic-scientists#:~:text=It%20was%20founded%20in%201945,other%20accolades%2C%20for%20its%20work. |website=Atomic Heritage Foundation |access-date=20 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists begins publishing in 1945 |url=https://thebulletin.org/virtual-tour/the-bulletin-of-the-atomic-scientists-begins-publishing-in-1945/ |website=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |access-date=7 July 2022}}</ref>, upon being concerned about the consequences of their work. Two years later, the bulletin would create the iconic “{{w|Doomsday Clock}}”.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1937 || Omnicide || Literature || British writer {{w|Olaf Stapledon}} publishes science fiction novel {{w|Star Maker}}, which synthesizes ideas on {{w|longtermism}} into a comparative study of {{w|omnicide}}.<ref name="Moynihan"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1945 (July 16) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Milestone event || The first nuclear detonation is conducted when a plutonium implosion device is tested at a site located 210 miles south of {{w|Los Alamos, New Mexico}}. Many scientists would suggest dating the beginning of the {{w|Anthropocene}} age to this event, stating that that ''{{w|Homo sapiens}}'' gained a position of unprecedented influence over the Earth system.<ref> J. Zalasiwicz, ‘When Did the Anthropocene Begin? A Mid-Twentieth Century Boundary Level is Stratigraphically Optimal’, Quaternary International 383 (2015), 196–203.</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1945 (August 6) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Milestone event || {{w|Hiroshima}} becomes the first city targeted by a nuclear weapon, when the {{w|United States Army Air Forces}} (USAAF) [[w:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|drops the atomic bomb]] "{{w|Little Boy}}" on the city.<ref>{{cite book |last=Hakim |first=Joy|title=A History of US: Book 9: War, Peace, and All that Jazz |publisher={{w|Oxford University Press}} |date=January 5, 1995 |location=[[w:New York City|New York]] |isbn=978-0195095142}}</ref> || {{w|Japan}}
+|-
+| 1945 (August 9) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Milestone event || {{w|Nagasaki}} becomes the second and, to date, last city in the world to experience a nuclear attack, when the {{w|United States Army Air Forces}} (USAAF) [[w:Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki|drops the atomic bomb]] "{{w|Fat Man}}" on the city.<ref>{{cite web |title=atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki {{!}} Date, Facts, Significance, Timeline, Deaths, & Aftermath {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/atomic-bombings-of-Hiroshima-and-Nagasaki |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=2 November 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Japan}}
+|-
+| 1945 (August 18) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature (article) || {{w|Bertrand Russell}} publishes ''The Bomb and Civilization'', which he had begun writing the day {{w|Nagasaki}} was bombed.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Atomic Bomb [1945] |url=https://russell.humanities.mcmaster.ca/civbomb10.pdf |website=russell.humanities.mcmaster.ca |access-date=29 October 2022}}</ref> Russell writes:
+{{quote|The prospect for the human race is sombre beyond all precedent. Mankind are faced with a clear-cut alternative: either we shall all perish, or we shall have to acquire some slight degree of common sense. A great deal of new political thinking will be necessary if utter disaster is to be averted.<ref>[http://www.personal.kent.edu/~rmuhamma/Philosophy/RBwritings/bombCivilization.htm Bertrand Russell, "The Bomb and Civilisation."]</ref>}}
+|| {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1947 || {{w|Impact event}} || Organization || The {{w|Minor Planet Center}} is established by the International Astronomical Union at Cincinnati Observatory. It is responsible for collecting and disseminating positional measurements and orbital data for asteroids (minor planets) and comets.<ref>{{cite web |title=Minor Planet Center |url=https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110810105415958 |website=Oxford Reference |access-date=29 August 2022|language=en |doi=10.1093/oi/authority.20110810105415958}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1947 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Probability || The {{w|Doomsday Clock}} is introduced, and set seven minutes to midnight.<ref>{{cite web |title=Doomsday Clock moved to just two minutes to 'apocalypse' |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-42823734 |website=BBC News |access-date=7 July 2022 |date=25 January 2018}}</ref> It is a symbol that represents the likelihood of a man-made [[w:Global catastrophic risk|global catastrophe]], in the opinion of the members of the ''{{w|Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists}}''.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Sinclaire |first1=Janice |title=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists Announces Leadership Changes to Governing Board, Board of Sponsors, and Science and Security Board |url=https://thebulletin.org/2016/03/bulletin-of-the-atomic-scientists-announces-leadership-changes-to-governing-board-board-of-sponsors-and-science-and-security-board/ |website=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |access-date=20 July 2022 |date=9 March 2016}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1948 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Notable comment  || {{w|Albert Einstein}} writes:
+{{quote|I advocate world government because I am convinced that there is no other possible way of eliminating the most terrible danger in which man has ever found himself. The objective of avoiding total destruction must have priority over any other objective.<ref name="Ord"/>}}
+|-
+| 1948 || {{w|Overpopulation}} || Literature || American ecologist {{w|William Vogt}} publishes ''{{w|Road to Survival}}''<ref name="Torres"/>, which argues that human population control is necessary to avoid an ecological catastrophe. This book constitutes an early warning of the dangers of overpopulation.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Magazine |first1=Smithsonian |last2=Mann |first2=Charles C. |title=The Book That Incited a Worldwide Fear of Overpopulation |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/book-incited-worldwide-fear-overpopulation-180967499/ |website=Smithsonian Magazine |access-date=26 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1948 || {{w|Environmental disaster}} || Literature || American conservationist {{w|Henry Fairfield Osborn Jr.}} publishes ''{{w|Our Plundered Planet}}''<ref name="Torres"/>, which warns of the environmental destruction caused by human activity. It is considered one of the earliest works on the subject of environmentalism.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Osborn |first1=Fairfield |title=Our Plundered Planet |date=1948 |publisher=Grosset & Dunlap |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Our_Plundered_Planet.html?id=B7ifK_piIKIC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1949 || {{w|Supervolcano}} || Concept development || The term "{{w|supervolcano}}" is first used in a volcanic context.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Klemetti |first1=Erik |title=The Rise of a Supervolcano |url=https://www.wired.com/2013/10/the-rise-of-supervolcano/ |website=Wired |access-date=3 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1950 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Research || In a letter to the editor of the {{w|Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists}}, {{w|Leo Szilard}} warns that it would be possible to rig an H-bomb with materials that would create enough fallout to kill everyone on earth. This would become known as a "{{w|cobalt bomb}}."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Szilard |first1=Leo |title=The First Step to Peace |journal=Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists |date=March 1955 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=104–104 |doi=10.1080/00963402.1955.11453578}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1954 (March 1) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Milestone event || The United States tests its largest thermonuclear weapon test in {{w|Bikini Atoll}}; the detonation being code-named “{{w|Castle Bravo}}”.<ref>{{cite web |title=1 March 1954 - Castle Bravo: CTBTO Preparatory Commission |url=https://www.ctbto.org/specials/testing-times/1-march-1954-castle-bravo |website=www.ctbto.org |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1955 || Multiple || Literature (article) || Hungarian-American mathematician {{w|John von Neumann}} publishes an article entitled ''Can We Survive Technology?''<ref>{{cite web |title=Can We Survive Technology? |url=http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~kite/doc/von_Neumann_1955.pdf |website=geosci.uchicago.edu |access-date=3 September 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Of Historical Note: Can We Survive Technology? - Ideas {{!}} Institute for Advanced Study |url=https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2014/can-we-survive-technology |website=www.ias.edu |access-date=3 September 2022 |language=en |date=3 October 2014}}</ref>, which alerts on the threats that may result from ever-expanding technological progress in a finite world.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Veisdal |first1=Jørgen |title=Can We Survive Technology? — John von Neumann (1955) |url=https://www.privatdozent.co/p/can-we-survive-technology-john-von |website=www.privatdozent.co |access-date=3 September 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Von Neumann discusses nuclear weapons, nuclear power, climate control, and automated systems, and believes that the difficulties and opportunities facing humanity are of great importance in having a bearing on future events.<ref>{{cite web |title=For Progress There Is No Cure – Quote Investigator |url=https://quoteinvestigator.com/2021/10/13/progress-cure/ |website=quoteinvestigator.com |access-date=3 September 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} (''{{w|Fortune magazine}}'')
+|-
+| 1955 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || A group of prominent scientists, including Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein, write what would come to be known as the {{w|Russell–Einstein Manifesto}}, according to which: “No one knows how widely such lethal radioactive particles might be diffused, but the best authorities are unanimous in saying that a war with H-bombs might possibly put an end to the human race… sudden only for a minority, but for the majority a slow torture of disease and disintegration.”<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 1958 || Multiple || Literature || German mathematician {{w|Emil Julius Gumbel}} publishes ''{{w|Statistics of Extremes}}'', which would become an important classic in ''{{w|extreme value theory}}'', a branch of {{w|statistics}} dealing with the extreme [[w:Deviation (statistics)|deviation]]s from the {{w|median}} of {{w|probability distribution}}s.<ref>{{cite web |title=Statistics of Extremes |url=https://www.amazon.com/Statistics-Extremes-J-Gumbel/dp/1626549877 |website=amazon.com |access-date=29 October 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1960 || {{w|Impact event}} || Scientific development || American geologist {{w|Eugene Merle Shoemaker}} definitively proves that some of the Earth’s craters were produced not by geological activity, but by vast meteoric impacts, far beyond any in recorded history.<ref name="Ord"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1960 || Multiple || Concept development || English-American theoretical physicist {{w|Freeman Dyson}} in his paper ''Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation'' popularizes the concept of the later called {{w|Dyson sphere}}, a hypothetical {{w|megastructure}} that completely encompasses a {{w|star}} and captures a large percentage of its {{w|solar power}} output. Dyson speculates that such structures would be the logical consequence of the escalating energy needs of a technological civilization and would be a necessity for its long-term survival.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dyson |first1=Freeman J. |title=Search for Artificial Stellar Sources of Infrared Radiation |journal=Science |date=3 June 1960 |volume=131 |issue=3414 |pages=1667–1668 |doi=10.1126/science.131.3414.1667 |url=}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1960 (October 5) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Sample case || The world goes at the brink of nuclear war when a radar alert from {{w|Thule, Greenland}} is sent to the {{w|North American Aerospace Defense Command}} ({{w|NORAD}}), announcing the detection of dozens of Soviet missiles launched for the United States.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Barash |first1=David P. |title=International Affairs |journal=Threats |date=1 December 2020 |pages=121–216 |doi=10.1093/oso/9780190055295.003.0004}}</ref> NORAD headquarter in Colorado goes into a panic, but the latter is put to rest when it is realized that Soviet Premier {{w|Nikita Khrushchev}} is visiting {{w|New York}} at the time. It would be later determined that the radar had mistaken the moon rising over Norway as Soviet missiles.<ref name="fdssdf">{{cite web |title=9 Times The World Was At The Brink Of Nuclear War - And Pulled Back |url=https://www.iflscience.com/9-times-the-world-was-at-the-brink-of-nuclear-war-and-pulled-back-47431 |website=IFLScience |access-date=2 September 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Greenland}}, {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1960 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Concept development || American nuclear physicist Herman Kahn introduces the concept "doomsday machine" in his book ''On Thermonuclear War''. It is a hypothetical device that would automatically trigger a global nuclear holocaust in response to a nuclear attack.<ref>{{cite web |title=doomsday machine {{!}} nuclear device {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/doomsday-machine |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=27 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1960 || Overpopulation || Concept development || Austrian American scientist {{w|Heinz von Foerster}} and his colleagues P. M. Mora and L. W. Amiot publishe their Doomsday equation formula in ''[[w:Science (journal)|Science]]'', predicting future population growth. The formula represents a best fit to available historical data on world population, and the authors then predict future population growth on the basis of this formula, which gives 2.7 billion as the 1960 world population and predicts that population growth would become infinite by Friday, November 13, 2026 – von Foerster's 115th birthday anniversary – a prediction that would earn it the name "the Doomsday Equation."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=von Foerster |first1=Heinz |last2=Mora |first2=Patricia M. |last3=Amiot |first3=Lawrence W. |title=Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026: At this date human population will approach infinity if it grows as it has grown in the last two millenia. |journal=Science |date=4 November 1960 |volume=132 |issue=3436 |pages=1291–1295 |doi=10.1126/science.132.3436.1291}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1961 (April 12) || Multiple || {{w|Space colonization}} || Soviet pilot and cosmonaut {{w|Yuri Gagarin}} becomes the first human to journey into outer space<ref>{{cite web |last1=Nations |first1=United |title=International Day of Human Space Flight |url=https://www.un.org/en/observances/human-spaceflight-day |website=United Nations |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref>, becoming also the first human face for {{w|space exploration}}, giving hope to humanity to survive outside of earth.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Torres |first1=Phil |title=Space colonization and suffering risks: Reassessing the “maxipok rule” |journal=Futures |date=June 2018 |volume=100 |pages=74–85 |doi=10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.008 |access-date=31 October 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=It's been 60 years since Yuri Gagarin became the first man in outer space |url=https://theworld.org/stories/2021-04-12/its-been-60-years-yuri-gagarin-became-first-man-outer-space |website=The World from PRX |access-date=1 November 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Soviet Union}}
+|-
+| 1961 || {{w|Scorched earth}}, multiple || Literature (article) || German astrophysicist {{w|Sebastian von Hoerner}} publishes an article entitled ''The Search for Signals from Other Civilizations'', which discusses various factors that might affect the longevity of technological races and what this in turn would mean for the chances of success of [[w:Search for extraterrestrial intelligence|SETI]] programs.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Darling |first1=David |title=Hoerner, Sebastian von (1919-2003) |url=https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/H/Hoerner.html |website=www.daviddarling.info |access-date=3 September 2022}}</ref> Von Hoerner suggests that sixty percent of all civilisations immolate themselves in [[w:Scorched earth|planet-scorching war]].<ref>{{cite journal |last1=von Hoerner |first1=Sebastian |title=The Search for Signals from Other Civilizations: The waiting time for answers may be greater than the longevity of the technical state of mind. |journal=Science |date=8 December 1961 |volume=134 |issue=3493 |pages=1839–1843 |doi=10.1126/science.134.3493.1839}}</ref><ref name="Moynihan"/>{{rp|at=244}} In the following years, he would expand his speculations on the longevity of civilizations, and the existential 'crises' they face, concluding that the civilizations that don't destroy themselves will instead face "irreversible stagnation".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Crawford |first1=Ian |title=Expanding Worldviews: Astrobiology, Big History and Cosmic Perspectives |date=7 June 2021 |publisher=Springer Nature |isbn=978-3-030-70482-7 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=azYyEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA71&dq=Sebastian+von+Hoerner+civilizations&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjFiabLmPn5AhWeppUCHU-hAdAQ6AF6BAgHEAI#v=onepage&q=Sebastian%20von%20Hoerner%20civilizations&f=false |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Germany}} ({{w|Astronomical Calculation Institute (Heidelberg University}})
+|-
+| 1961 (November 24) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Sample case || On an evening, communication links between {{w|Strategic Air Command}} headquarters (SAC HQ) and {{w|NORAD}} go dead, resulting in the lost communication with three Ballistic Missile Early Warning Sites (BMEWS) around the world, all of which were supposed to run on independent telephone and telegraph lines.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Roulette |first1=Joey |title=NASA Launches New Mission: Crash Into Asteroid, Defend Planet Earth |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/24/science/nasa-dart-mission-asteroid.html |website=The New York Times |access-date=10 August 2022 |date=24 November 2021}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1962 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Concept development || {{w|Herman Kahn}}'s {{w|Hudson Institute}} strategist Donald Brennan coins the term "{{w|mutual assured destruction}}", commonly abbreviated "MAD".<ref>{{Cite book|title=Whole earth security : a geopolitics of peace|last=Daniel.|first=Deudney|date=1983|publisher=Worldwatch Institute|isbn=978-0-916468-54-5|location=Washington|pages=80}}</ref>, a {{w|doctrine}} of {{w|military strategy}} and [[w:national security|national security policy]] in which a full-scale use of {{w|nuclear weapon}}s by an attacker on a nuclear-armed defender with [[w:Second strike|second-strike capabilities]] would cause the [[w:nuclear holocaust|complete annihilation]] of both the attacker and the defender.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mutually Assured Destruction Revisited |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150620055606/http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj97/win97/parrin.html |website=web.archive.org |access-date=11 July 2022 |date=20 June 2015}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1962 || {{w|Climate change}} || Literature || {{w|Rachel Carson}} publishes {{w|Silent Spring}}, which warns of the potential dangers of pesticide use.<ref>{{cite web |title=Silent Spring, Rachel Carson, 1962 |url=https://www.si.edu/object/silent-spring-rachel-carson-1962%3Anmah_1453548#:~:text=Object%20Details&text=The%20book%20Silent%20Spring%20by,companies%20attacked%20it%20as%20unscientific. |website=Smithsonian Institution |access-date=19 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Considered a pivotal early work, this book would become immensely popular, in addition to increasing scientific rigour and raising public awareness about the danger from chemical pesticides, such as {{w|DDT}}, {{w|chlordane}}, and {{w|heptachlor}}.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Houghton Mifflin}})
+|-
+| 1962 (October 27) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Probability || During the {{w|Cuban Missile Crisis}}, after a {{w|Soviet submarine B-59}} loses contact with Moscow for days, the captain orders the use of a nuclear torpedo when a US ship begins dropping practice depth charges to make the submarine surface, with the Russian captain mistaking them for real depth charges, and concluding that war has begun. Aboard commander {{w|Vasili Arkhipov}} countermands the order to fire, thus preventing the nuclear strike and potentially an all-out {{w|nuclear war}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Vasili Arkhipov |url=https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6553291/ |website=IMDb |access-date=30 October 2022}}</ref><ref name=Leigh/> During the crisis, United States President {{w|John F. Kennedy}} would estimate the probability of escalation to nuclear conflict as between 33% and 50%.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Allison |first=Graham |year=2012 |title=The Cuban Missile Crisis at 50 |url=http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137679/graham-allison/the-cuban-missile-crisis-at-50 |journal={{w|Foreign Affairs}} |volume=91 |issue=4 |access-date=9 July 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.vzglyad.ru/opinions/2013/11/22/660828.html|title= ВЗГЛЯД / "США и Россия: кризис 1962–го"|publisher=vzglyad.ru|date=26 June 2022}}</ref> || {{w|Cuba}}, {{w|United States}}, {{w|Russia}} ({{w|Soviet Union}})
+|-
+| 1963 (August 5) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty}} is signed with the purpose to ban all nuclear weapons tests except for those conducted underground.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Schwelb |first1=Egon |title=The Nuclear Test Ban Treaty and International Law |journal=American Journal of International Law |date=July 1964 |volume=58 |issue=3 |pages=642–670 |doi=10.2307/2196663}}</ref> It would enter into force on October 10, 1963.<ref>{{cite web |title=Limited Test Ban Treaty (LTBT) |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/avc/trty/199116.htm |website=U.S. Department of State |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> With the signing of this treaty, the {{w|Doomsday Clock}} is moved back to twelve minutes to midnight.<ref name=Leigh/>  ||
+|-
+| 1964 || Multiple || Notable comment  || Soviet astrophysicist {{w|Iosif Shklovsky}} writes:
+{{quote|Profound crises lie in wait for a developing civilization and one of them may well prove fatal. We are already familiar with several such critical (situations):
+* Self-destruction as a result of a thermonuclear catastrophe or some other discovery which may have unpredictable and uncontrollable consequences.
+* Genetic danger.
+* Overproduction of information.
+* Restricted capacity of the individual's brain which can lead to excessive specialization, with consequent dangers of degeneration.
+* A crisis precipitated by the creation of artificial intelligent beings.<ref>{{cite web |title=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111216004721/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/_files/tech_journals/communications_extraterrestrial_intelligence.pdf |website=web.archive.org |access-date=16 July 2022}}</ref>}}
+|| {{w|Russia}} ({{w|Soviet Union}})
+|-
+| 1964 || {{w|Impact event}} || Literature || {{w|Dandridge M. Cole}} and Donald W. Cox publish ''Islands in Space'', which notes the dangers of planetoid impacts, both those occurring naturally and those that might be brought about with hostile intent. The authors argue for cataloging the minor planets and developing the technologies to land on, deflect, or even capture planetoids.<ref>Dandridge M. Cole and Donald W. Cox (1964). Islands in Space: The Challenge of the Planetoids. Chilton Books. pp. 7–8.</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1966 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Research || British mathematician {{W|Irving Good}} publishes paper entitled ''Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine'', which posits that such AI would be “the last invention that man need ever make, provided that the machine is docile enough to tell us how to keep it under control.”<ref name="Torres"/> Good speculates that artificial general intelligence might bring about an intelligence explosion.<ref>{{cite web |title=History of AI Risk Thought - LessWrong |url=https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/history-of-ai-risk-thought |website=www.lesswrong.com |access-date=1 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1967 (January 27) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Outer Space Treaty}} is opened for signature in the {{w|United States}}, the {{w|United Kingdom}}, and the {{w|Soviet Union}}, with the purpose to ban stationing of {{w|weapons of mass destruction}} in space.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hwan |first1=Kim, Doo |title=Global Issues Surrounding Outer Space Law and Policy |date=23 April 2021 |publisher=IGI Global|url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=KUIoEAAAQBAJ&pg=PA15&lpg=PA15&dq=it+was+opened+for+signature+in+the+United+States%2C+the+United+Kingdom%2C+and+the+Soviet+Union+on+27+January+1967%2C&ots=5eH3XL7WFO&sig=ACfU3U022R5ajvb4hsQWq6NQLR3VaxETJA&hl=en#v=onepage&q=it%20was%20opened%20for%20signature%20in%20the%20United%20States%2C%20the%20United%20Kingdom%2C%20and%20the%20Soviet%20Union%20on%2027%20January%201967%2C&f=false |language=en}}</ref> It would enter into force on October 10, 1967.<ref>{{cite web |title=Outer Space Treaty |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/5181.htm |website=U.S. Department of State |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> ||	{{w|United States}}, {{w|United Kingdom}}, {{w|Russia}} ({{w|Soviet Union}})
+|-
+| 1967 (May 23) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Sample case || A major solar flare causes radars at all three {{w|Ballistic Missile Early Warning System}} (BMEWS) sites in the far Northern Hemisphere to become jammed, the latter being a signal of attack.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Nast |first1=Condé |title=How a massive solar storm in 1967 almost sparked a nuclear war |url=https://www.wired.co.uk/article/solar-storm-in-1967-almost-sparked-a-nuclear-war#:~:text=A%20major%20solar%20flare%20on,to%20be%20act%20of%20war. |website=Wired UK |access-date=10 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1967 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Notable comment || Hungarian-British essayist {{w|Arthur Koestler}} writes:
+{{quote|[B]efore the thermonuclear bomb, man had to live with the idea of his death as an individual; from now onward, mankind has to live with the idea of its death as a species. The bomb has given us the power to commit genosuicide; and within a few years we should even have the power to turn our planet into a nova, an exploding star. Every age has had its Cassandras [and] mankind has managed to survive regardless of their sinister prophecies. But this comforting argument is no longer valid, as no past age, however convulsed by war and pestilence, has possessed our newly acquired power over life on the planet as a whole.<ref>A. Koestler, The Ghost in the Machine (London: Hutchinson, 1967), 322.</ref>}}
+|| {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1967 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || Students in the Aeronautics and Astronautics department at MIT conduct a design study, "Project Icarus", of a mission to prevent a hypothetical impact on Earth by asteroid 1566 Icarus.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Space Review: Giant bombs on giant rockets: Project Icarus (page 1) |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160415041026/http://www.thespacereview.com/article/175/1 |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=15 April 2016}}</ref> The design project would be later published in a book by the MIT Press<ref>{{cite web |title=Project Icarus - Revised Edition - The MIT Press |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071017105104/http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=6840 |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=17 October 2007}}</ref> and receive considerable publicity, for the first time bringing asteroid impact into the public eye.<ref>{{cite web |title=Systems Engineering: Avoiding an Asteroid - TIME |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130721110612/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C843952%2C00.html |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=21 July 2013}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1968 (July 1) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty}} is signed to prevent nuclear proliferation, promote nuclear disarmament, and promote peaceful uses of nuclear energy.<ref>{{cite web |title=Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (1 July 1968) |url=https://www.cvce.eu/en/obj/treaty_on_the_non_proliferation_of_nuclear_weapons_1_july_1968-en-0c1e0636-a043-4982-a8b5-0484c27a1747.html |website=cvce |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> It would enter into force on March 5, 1970.<ref>{{cite web |title=2. Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, Done at London, Moscow, and Washington July 1, 1968 |url=https://www.state.gov/treaty-on-the-non-proliferation-of-nuclear-weapons |website=United States Department of State |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|Rusia}} ({{w|Moscow}}, {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|London}}), {{w|United States}} ({{w|Washington D.C.}})
+|-
+| 1968 || {{w|Overpopulation}} || Literature || American biologist {{w|Paul R. Ehrlich}} publishes ''The Population Bomb''.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Population Bomb |url=https://www.environmentandsociety.org/mml/population-bomb |website=Environment & Society Portal |access-date=1 July 2022 |language=en |date=24 November 2014}}</ref> This book would receive wide public attention, warning about the catastrophic impacts of overpopulation, and arguing that human overpopulation would lead to widespread famine by the 1970s and 1980s.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1969 || {{w|Gamma-ray burst}} || Scientific development || Scientists discover a new and distinctive type of stellar explosion<ref name="Ord"/> when the first {{w|gamma-ray burst}} is found.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Binétruy |first1=Pierre |title=Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology |journal=Les Houches |date=2006 |volume=84 |pages=457–536 |doi=10.1016/S0924-8099(06)80029-6}}</ref> A high-energy astronomical event, its release of vast amounts of energy could conceivably harm biospheres at astronomical distances, with radiation penetrating the {{w|atmosphere}}, a resulting ultraviolet flash, possible [[w:cosmic ray showers|Air shower (physics)]], and formation of {{w|nitrous oxide}}s that deplete the {{w|ozone layer}}, producing {{w|acid rain}}, and causing multiyear cooling climate effects that if, intense enough, could plausibly cause a mass extinction.<ref name="Piper">{{cite web |last1=Piper |first1=Kelsey |title=Here are the ways nature could wipe out humanity |url=https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/1/3/18165541/extinction-risks-humanity-asteroids-supervolcanos-gamma-rays |website=Vox |access-date=25 October 2022 |language=en |date=3 January 2019}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1969 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|biological weapon}}) || Literature (article) || Just prior to {{w|Richard Nixon}} announcement of new U.S. initiatives towards the regulations of biological weapons<ref>{{cite web |last1=Department Of State. The Office of Electronic Information |first1=Bureau of Public Affairs |title=166. Statement Issued by President Nixon, November 25, 1969 |url=https://2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/frus/nixon/e2/83597.htm |website=2001-2009.state.gov |access-date=2 September 2022 |language=en |date=19 September 2007}}</ref>, {{w|Joshua Lederberg}} of {{w|Stanford University}} publishes ''Biological warfare and the extinction of man'', which argues that the use of biological weapons could lead to the extinction of humanity. Leberberg cites the uncontrollable nature of infectious agents compared to nuclear weapons, which allow the possibility at least to be confident of the laws of scaling, as the destruction of targets can be calculated from simple physical measures like the energy released, a control impossible to apply to biological weapons.<ref name="Torres"/><ref>{{cite journal |title=Biological Warfare and the Extinction of Man |journal=Joshua Lederberg - Profiles in Science |url=https://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/spotlight/bb/catalog/nlm:nlmuid-101584906X1237-doc |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Stanford University}})
+|-
+| 1969 (July 20) || Multiple || {{w|Space colonization}} || United States astronauts {{w|Neil Armstrong}} and {{w|Buzz Aldrin}} land the {{w|Apollo Lunar Module}} [[w:Lunar Module Eagle|''Eagle'']], and Armstrong becomes the first person to step onto the {{w|Moon}}. This is another milestone event towards {{w|space colonization}}, which can be considered a hedge against existential risk.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Editors |first1=History com |title=The 1969 Moon Landing |url=https://www.history.com/topics/space-exploration/moon-landing-1969#:~:text=On%20July%2020%2C%201969%2C%20American,to%20walk%20on%20the%20moon. |website=HISTORY |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref>
+|| {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1971 (February 11) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Seabed Arms Control Treaty}} is signed, with the purpose to ban stationing of {{w|weapons of mass destruction}} on the ocean floor. It would enter into force on May 18, 1972.<ref>{{cite web |title=Seabed Arms Control Treaty |url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/5187.htm#:~:text=The%20Seabed%20Arms%20Control%20Treaty,had%20deposited%20instruments%20of%20ratification. |website=U.S. Department of State |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1972 (April 10) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|biological weapon}}) || International law || The {{w|Biological Weapons Convention}} is signed, with the purpose to comprehensively ban biological weapons.<ref>{{cite web |title=Biological Weapons Convention – UNODA |url=https://www.un.org/disarmament/biological-weapons/ |website=un |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> It would enter into force on March 26, 1975.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) At A Glance {{!}} Arms Control Association |url=https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/bwc |website=www.armscontrol.org |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1972 || Multiple || Preservation effort || The {{w|San Diego Zoo}} establishes the first "{{w|frozen zoo}}" program. A “frozen zoo” is a cryonic facility for the long term preservation of animal and plant genetic material such as skin cells, DNA, sperm, eggs, and embryos.<ref>{{cite web |title=Tales From A Frozen Zoo |url=https://news.mongabay.com/2010/02/tales-from-a-frozen-zoo/#:~:text=A%20%E2%80%9Cfrozen%20zoo%E2%80%9D%20is%20a,sperm%2C%20eggs%2C%20and%20embryos. |website=Mongabay Environmental News |access-date=28 October 2022 |date=2 February 2010}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1972 || {{w|Economic growth}} || Literature || The {{w|Club of Rome}} publishes a report called ''The Limits to Growth''<ref name="Moynihan"/>, which warns of the dangers of unchecked economic growth. The report suggests that the world was on a path to economic and environmental disaster, and that action needed to be taken to prevent this. Its conclusions are stark: “If the present growth trends in world population, industrialization, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years.”<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 1974 (August 1) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Sample case || As a result of the {{w|Watergate scandal}}, United States President {{w|Richard Nixon}} becomes clinically depressed, emotionally unstable, and drinking heavily. As a mode of precaution U.S. Secretary of Defense {{w|James R. Schlesinger}} instruct the Joint Chiefs of Staff to route “any emergency order coming from the president”—such as a nuclear launch order— through him first.” <ref>Schlosser 2013, p. 360</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1975 || Multiple || Concept development || American astrophysicist {{w|Michael H. Hart}} publishes an early detailed examination of the {{w|Fermi paradox}}.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hart |first1=Michael H. |title=.Explanation for absence of extraterrestrials on earth |journal=Quarterly Journal Of The Royal Astronomical Society |url=https://opensky.ucar.edu/islandora/object/articles:1082}}</ref><ref name=webb>{{cite book |last1=Webb |first1=Stephen |title=If the Universe Is Teeming with Aliens ... WHERE IS EVERYBODY?: Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life |date=2015 |publisher=Springer International Publishing |isbn=978-3-319-13235-8 |edition=2 |url=https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319132358 |language=en |access-date=June 12, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200612035828/https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319132358}}</ref>{{rp|27–28}}<ref name=forgan>{{cite book |last1=Forgan |first1=Duncan H. |title=Solving Fermi's Paradox |date=2019 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-316-73231-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5U-PDwAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=June 12, 2020}}</ref>{{rp|6}} He argues that if intelligent extraterrestrials exist, and are capable of space travel, then the galaxy could have been colonized in a time much less than that of the age of the Earth. However, there is no observable evidence they have been here, which Hart called "Fact A".<ref name=forgan>{{cite book |last1=Forgan |first1=Duncan H. |title=Solving Fermi's Paradox |date=2019 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-316-73231-1 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5U-PDwAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=June 12, 2020}}</ref>{{rp|6}} || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1976 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Notable comment || {{w|Iosif Shklovsky}} argues that global self-destruction is the result of capitalist ideology, which doesn't take into account a potential ‘communist transformation of society’ which would ‘remove the very possibility of such crisis situations’.<ref> I.S. Shklovsky, Vselennaia, zhizn’, razum (Moscow: Nauka, 1976), 257.</ref> || {{w|Russia}} ({{w|Soviet Union}})
+|-
+| 1979 || {{w|Climate change}} || Research || The range of climate sensitivity is first put forward from 1.5°C to 4.5°C, a range adopted by the {{w|Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change}}, and that would barely change over the next forty years.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Buis |first1=Alan |title=Making Sense of ‘Climate Sensitivity' |url=https://climate.nasa.gov/ask-nasa-climate/3017/making-sense-of-climate-sensitivity/ |website=Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet |access-date=31 July 2022}}</ref> || Worldwide ({{w|United Nations}})
+|-
+| 1979 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || The {{w|United States Congress}}' {{w|Office of Technology Assessment}} (OTA) publishes ''The Effects of Nuclear War'',<ref>{{cite book |last1=Assessment |first1=United States Congress Office of Technology |title=The Effects of Nuclear War |date=1979 |publisher=Congress of the U.S., Office of Technology Assessment |isbn=978-0-916672-36-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Effects_of_Nuclear_War.html?id=ppQZAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> a study examining the full range of effects that nuclear war would have on civilians: direct effects from blast and radiation; and indirect effects from economic, social, and politicai disruption. Particular attention is devoted to the ways in which the impact of a nuclear war would extend over time.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Effects of Nuclear War |url=https://www.princeton.edu/~ota/disk3/1979/7906/790601.PDF |website=princeton.edu |access-date=25 October 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1979 || Multiple || Literature || Isaac Asimov publishes ''A Choice of Catastrophes: The Disasters That Threaten Our World'', an early book-length nonfiction treatment of possible existential catastrophes.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1979 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || American engineer {{w|Cresson Kearny}} publishes ''[[w:Nuclear War Survival Skills|Nuclear War Survival Skills: Lifesaving Nuclear Facts and Self-Help Instructions]]'', which aims to provide a general audience with advice on how to [[w:Survivalist|survive]] conditions likely to be encountered in the event of a [[w:Effects of nuclear explosions|nuclear catastrophe]], as well as encouraging optimism in the face of such a catastrophe by asserting the [[w:Nuclear warfare#Survival|survivability]] of a [[w:Nuclear warfare|nuclear war]].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kearny |first1=Cresson H. |title=Nuclear War Survival Skills |date=1980 |publisher=NWS Research Bureau |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Nuclear_War_Survival_Skills.html?id=VPFTAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1980 || [[w:False vacuum decay|Collapse of the vacuum]] || Scientific development || Theoretical physicists {{w|Sidney Coleman}} and Frank De Luccia calculate for the first time that any bubble of true vacuum would immediately suffer total {{w|gravitational collapse}}.<ref name=fdggg/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Coleman |first1=Sidney |last2=De Luccia |first2=Frank |title=Gravitational effects on and of vacuum decay |journal=Physical Review D |date=15 June 1980 |volume=21 |issue=12 |pages=3305–3315 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.21.3305}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1980 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Research || The earliest appearance of a connection between space exploration and human survival appears in {{w|Louis J. Halle, Jr.}}'s article in ''{{w|Foreign Affairs}}'', in which he states colonization of space will keep humanity safe should global {{w|nuclear warfare}} occur.<ref>{{Cite journal|title = A Hopeful Future for Mankind|jstor = 20040585|journal = Foreign Affairs|date = 1980-07-01|pages = 1129–1136|volume = 58|issue = 5|doi = 10.2307/20040585|first = Louis J.|last = Halle}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1980 || {{w|Impact event}} || Organization || {{w|Spacewatch}} is founded by {{w|Tom Gehrels}} and [[w:Robert S. McMillan (astronomer)|Robert S. McMillan]] as a research group of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory of the {{w|University of Arizona}} in Tucson, with the purpose to be the first to use electronic detectors to discover NEAs and to explore the various populations of small objects in the solar system.<ref>{{cite web |title=Twentieth Anniversary of the First Automatic Discovery of a Near-Earth Asteroid by Software -- Spacewatch® Project {{!}} SPACEWATCH® |url=https://spacewatch.lpl.arizona.edu/1990-SS#:~:text=Spacewatch%C2%AE%20is%20the%20research,the%20solar%20system%2C%20including%20comets |website=spacewatch.lpl.arizona.edu |access-date=10 August 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110211071733/http://spacewatch.lpl.arizona.edu/index.html |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=11 February 2011}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1980 || {{w|Impact event}} || Scientific development || A team of scientists led by {{w|Luis Walter Alvarez}} and his son {{w|Walter Alvarez}} discover that the geological boundary between the {{w|Cretaceous}} and {{w|Palaeogene}} periods is rich in {{w|iridium}}, an element markedly more common in asteroids than on the Earth’s surface, where it's extremely rare. The team concludes with what would be called the {{w|Alvarez hypothesis}}, which posits that the impact of a large asteroid on the Earth could have caused the {{w|Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event}}, which killed the dinosaurs.<ref name="Ord"/><ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}}
 |-
-| 2012 || || Organization || The {{w|Centre for the Study of Existential Risk}} is founded. || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+| 1980 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || Survival expert Bruce Clayton publishes ''Life After Doomsday''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Clayton |first1=Bruce |title=Life After Doomsday |date=1980 |publisher=Paladin Press |isbn=978-0-87364-175-3 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Life_After_Doomsday.html?id=EpgsAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref>, which attempts to provide a comprehensive guide to surviving a nuclear disaster, including detailed instructions on how to build and defend a shelter, store food, treat illnesses and injuries, and cope with the psychological effects of such an event.<ref>{{cite web |first1= |title=Life After Doomsday |url=https://www.amazon.com/Life-After-Doomsday-Bruce-Clayton/dp/0873641752 |website=amazon |access-date=23 August 2022}}</ref> || {w|United States}} ({{w|Paladin Press}})
+|-
+| 1980 || Multiple || {{w|Scientific wager}} || In what is known as the {{w|Simon–Ehrlich wager}}, American professor {{w|Julian Simon}} and  American biologist {{w|Paul Ehrlich}}, bet on the future of natural resource prices as a vehicle for their public debate about mankind's future. Simon challenges Ehrlich, which dismisses and mocks the optimistic views of Simon, to a wager over a 10-year period, to judge who was right about resource availability. Simon would ultimately win, and his victory would be used as evidence that innovation can offset material scarcity induced by human economic activity.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Emmett |first1=Ross B. |last2=Grabowski |first2=Jesse |title=Better lucky than good: The Simon-Ehrlich bet through the lens of financial economics |journal=Ecological Economics |date=1 March 2022 |volume=193 |pages=107322 |doi=10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107322 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800921003815 |language=en |issn=0921-8009}}</ref> On a deeper level, the Simon–Ehrlich wager can be regarded as a conflict of visions concerning the future of humanity.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Vardy |first1=Nicholas |title=Why the “Population Bomb” Never Exploded |url=https://investmentu.com/why-population-bomb-never-exploded/ |website=Investment U |access-date=28 October 2022 |date=4 January 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1981 || {{w|Impact event}} || Field development || Inspired by the {{w|Alvarez hypothesis}}, American astronomer {{w|Carolyn S. Shoemaker}} convenes a seminal meeting, founding the scientific field of impact hazards.<ref name="Ord"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1981 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Sample case || {{w|HIV/AIDS}} is first recognized with reports of an unusual {{w|pneumonia}} in {{w|men who have sex with men}} caused by ''{{w|Pneumocystis carinii}}'' and previously seen almost exclusively in immunocompromised subjects.<ref name="Bostrom"/> For years this disease would remain a death sentence, spreading to all continents and lowering life expectancy in many countries in {{w|Africa}}.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bor |first1=Jacob |last2=Herbst |first2=Abraham J. |last3=Newell |first3=Marie-Louise |last4=Bärnighausen |first4=Till |title=Increases in Adult Life Expectancy in Rural South Africa: Valuing the Scale-Up of HIV Treatment |journal=Science |date=22 February 2013 |volume=339 |issue=6122 |pages=961–965 |doi=10.1126/science.1230413 |url=https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1230413 |language=en |issn=0036-8075}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1982 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || American author {{w|Jonathan Schell}} publishes ''{{w|The Fate of the Earth}}'', which would be regarded as a key document in the {{w|nuclear disarmament}} movement.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Walker |first1=Martin |title=Smoking Guns and Mushroom Clouds |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/25/books/review/Walker-t.html |website=The New York Times |access-date=29 July 2022 |date=25 November 2007}}</ref> By the time of this publication, there are almost 60,000 nuclear weapons stockpiled with a destructive force equal to roughly 20,000 megatons (20 billion tons) of TNT, or over 1 million times the power of the Hiroshima bomb.<ref name="Bostrom"/><ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1983 || Multiple || Research || American historian {{w|W. Warren Wagar}} argues that {{w|science fiction}} played a significant role in the development of the academic field of {{w|futures studies}}.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1983 || Multiple || Concept development || British cosmologist {{w|Brandon Carter}} frames the "{{w|Doomsday argument}}", a [[w:probability theory|probabilistic argument]] that claims to {{w|predict}} the future number of members of the {{w|human species}} given an estimate of the total number of humans born so far.<ref>{{cite journal |title=The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution |journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences |date=20 December 1983 |volume=310 |issue=1512 |pages=347–363 |doi=10.1098/rsta.1983.0096}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1983 (September 26) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Sample case || A newly inaugurated Soviet early-warning satellite system causes a nuclear false alarm, leading to widespread panic and confusion.<ref>{{cite web |title=NOVA Online {{!}} Russia's Nuclear Warriors {{!}} False Alarms on the Nuclear Front |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/missileers/falsealarms.html#:~:text=On%20September%2026%2C%201983%2C%20the,method%20of%20spotting%20missile%20launches. |website=www.pbs.org |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|Russia}} ({{w|Soviet Union}})
+|-
+| 1984 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || Carl Sagan and Paul Ehrlich publish ''The Cold and the Dark'', a book discussing long-term biological consequences of nuclear war.<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 1984 || {{w|Bioterrorism}} || Sample case || The [[w:1984 Rajneeshee bioterror attack|Rajneeshee bioterror attack]] occurs when a group of prominent followers of Rajneesh spread the enteric bacterium, ''{{w|Salmonella typhimurium}}'', onto salad bars in {{w|The Dalles, Oregon}}, causing illness in over 750 people and sending many to hospitals.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1984 || Multiple || Literature || British philosopher {{w|Derek Parfit}} publishes ''{{w|Reasons and Persons}}'', which partly discusses {{w|population ethics}}. It raises questions about whether it can be wrong to create a life, whether environmental destruction violates the rights of future people, and so on.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Parfit |first1=Derek |title=Reasons and Persons |date=12 April 1984 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-151984-0 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Reasons_and_Persons.html?id=ulhHdvbDRUkC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1985 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || {{w|Politics}} || 54-year-old {{w|Mikhail Gorbachev}} is appointed {{w|General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union}}. While his full intentions would remain unclear, Gorbachev's moderate liberalization measures would result in the {{w|dissolution of the Soviet Union}}.<ref name="Bostrom"/> Historian {{w|Yuval Noah Harari}} would call Gorbachev an historical hero, for probably saving the world from {{w|nuclear war}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Yuval Noah Harari: ‘I wish I had come out when I was 16 or 17, and not 21’ |url=https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2021/oct/23/yuval-noah-harari-i-wish-i-had-come-out-when-i-was-16-or-17-and-not-21 |website=the Guardian |access-date=29 July 2022 |language=en |date=23 October 2021}}</ref> || {{w|Russia}} ({{w|Soviet Union}})
+|-
+| 1986 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Statistics || The global size of the nuclear arsenals peaks at 70,000 warheads.<ref name="Ord"/> || [[w:List of states with nuclear weapons|Countries with nuclear weapons]]
+|-
+| 1986 || {{w|Nanotechnology}} || Concept development || Nanotechnology pioneer {{w|K. Eric Drexler}} coins the term ''gray goo'' in his book ''{{w|Engines of Creation}}''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Drexler |first1=K. Eric |title=Engines of Creation |date=1986 |publisher=Anchor Press/Doubleday |isbn=978-0-385-19973-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Engines_of_Creation.html?id=1DcoAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> Gray goo is a hypothetical [[w:global catastrophic risk|global catastrophic scenario]] involving {{w|molecular nanotechnology}} in which out-of-control {{w|self-replicating machine}}s consume all biomass on {{w|Earth}} while building more of themselves<ref>{{cite web |title=grey goo {{!}} nanotechnology {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/grey-goo |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=11 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref>, a scenario that would be called ''{{w|ecophagy}}'' (the literal consumption of the ecosystem).<ref>{{cite web |title=Some Limits to Global Ecophagy |url=http://www.rfreitas.com/Nano/Ecophagy.htm |website=www.rfreitas.com |access-date=11 July 2022}}</ref><ref name="Bostrom"/><ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 1986 || {{w|Technology}} || Organization || The Foresight Institute is founded by {{w|K. Eric Drexler}} "to help prepare society for anticipated advanced technologies", mainly {{w|nanotechnology}}.<ref name="futureoflife.org">{{cite web |title=Resources on Existential Risk |url=https://futureoflife.org/data/documents/Existential%20Risk%20Resources%20(2015-08-24).pdf?x76795 |website=futureoflife.org |access-date=30 August 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Kim Eric Drexler |url=https://biography.yourdictionary.com/kim-eric-drexler |website=biography.yourdictionary.com |access-date=30 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1986 || Multiple || Organization || The Center for Security and International Cooperation is formed at {{w|Stanford University}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Stanford University, Center for International Security and Cooperation - MacArthur Foundation |url=https://www.macfound.org/grantee/stanford-university-center-for-international-security-and-cooperation-182/ |website=www.macfound.org |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> It is a hub for researchers tackling some of the world's most pressing security and international cooperation problems.<ref>{{cite web |title=Stanford University, Center for International Security and Cooperation - MacArthur Foundation |url=https://www.macfound.org/grantee/stanford-university-center-for-international-security-and-cooperation-182/ |website=www.macfound.org |access-date=7 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1986 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || Lydia Dotto publishes ''Planet Earth in Jeopardy: Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War'', A distillation of the report by the Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), written for a lay audience. It explores the climatic and atmospheric changes induced, radiation and fallout, and the putative biological consequences of nuclear war.<ref>{{cite book |last1=John |first1=Doxat |last2=Dotto |first2=Lydia |last3=l'environnement |first3=Comité scientifique chargé des problèmes de |last4=Environment |first4=Consejo Internacional de Uniones Científicas Scientific Committee on Problems of the |title=Planet Earth in Jeopardy: Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War |date=26 March 1986 |publisher=Wiley |isbn=978-0-471-99836-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=LtjaAAAAMAAJ |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1987 || {{w|Technology}} || Research || American political scientist {{w|Aaron Wildavsky}} proposes that cultural orientations such as egalitarianism and individualism frame public perceptions of technological risks. Since then, a body of empirical research would grow to affirm the risk-framing effects of personality and culture.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1987 (September 16) || Multiple || || The {{w|Montreal Protocol}} is an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer by phasing out the production of numerous substances that are responsible for ozone depletion. Entering into force on 1 January 1989, it would result in the ozone hole in Antarctica slowly recovering. This can be considered an example of global coordination resulting in positive outcome. || All {{w|United Nations}} members, as well as the {{w|Cook Islands}}, {{w|Niue}}, the {{w|Holy See}}, the {{w|State of Palestine}} and the {{w|European Union}}
+|-
+| 1988 || {{w|Impact event}} || Progream launch || The United States, the European Union, and other nations begin scanning the sky for {{w|near-earth object}}s in an effort called {{w|Spaceguard}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=NASA - NASA on the Prowl for Near-Earth Objects |url=https://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/watchtheskies/near_earth052104.html |website=www.nasa.gov |access-date=5 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}, {{w|European Union}}, other
+|-
+| 1988 || {{w|Climate change}} || Organization || American scientist {{w|James Hansen}} testifies to the {{w|United States Congress}} that {{w|climate change}} is already underway. In the same year, the {{w|World Meteorological Organization}} establishes the {{w|Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change}} (IPCC), which would since produce five reports summarizing the state of the science on climate change.<ref name=Leigh/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1988 || {{w|Supervolcano}} || Research || According to Rampino et al., the injection of massive amounts of volcanic dust into the {{w|stratosphere}} by a super-eruption such as [[w:Toba catastrophe theory|Toba]] might be expected to lead to immediate surface cooling, creating a {{w|volcanic winter}}.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Pubs.GISS: Rampino et al. 1988: Volcanic winters |journal=pubs.giss.nasa.gov |url=https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/abs/ra00400a.html}}</ref> <ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 1989 (March 23) || {{w|Impact event}} || Sample case || 300 m (980 ft) diameter Apollo asteroid {{w|4581 Asclepius}} (1989 FC) misses the Earth by 700,000km. If the asteroid had impacted it would have created the largest explosion in recorded history, equivalent to 20,000 [[w:TNT equivalent|megatons of TNT]]. This event would attract widespread attention because it was discovered only after the closest approach.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Leary |first1=Warren E. |last2=Times |first2=Special To the New York |title=Big Asteroid Passes Near Earth Unseen In a Rare Close Call |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1989/04/20/us/big-asteroid-passes-near-earth-unseen-in-a-rare-close-call.html |website=The New York Times |access-date=5 July 2022 |date=20 April 1989}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1991 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Sample case || The {{w|Nunn–Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction}} Program is initiated upon the {{w|dissolution of the Soviet Union}}, when the risk of "loose nukes" prompts a new wave of government, academic, and popular concern about nuclear terrorism. The program provides funding and expertise to partner governments in the former Soviet Union to secure and eliminate {{w|weapons of mass destruction}} at the source.<ref>{{cite web |title=Fact Sheet: The Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction Program |url=https://www.globalwps.org/data/ALB/files/The%20Nunn-Lugar%20Cooperative%20Threat%20Reduction%20Program.pdf |website=globalwps |access-date=30 July 2022}}</ref><ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 1991 || Multiple || Project launch || {{w|Biosphere 2}} is completed. It is a massive scientific facility meant to simulate Earth's ecosystems.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Gorden |first1=Max |title=Biosphere 2, once used to prepare us for other planets, now researches the future of our own |url=https://www.foxweather.com/earth-space/biosphere2-arizona-climate-change-research |website=FOX Weather |access-date=27 October 2022 |date=14 March 2022}}</ref> It is originally meant to demonstrate the viability of closed ecological systems to support and maintain human life in outer space as a substitute for Earth's biosphere.<ref>{{cite web |title=Biosphere Ii Project {{!}} Encyclopedia.com |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/science-and-technology/biology-and-genetics/environmental-studies/biosphere-ii-project |website=www.encyclopedia.com |access-date=27 October 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1992 || Multiple || {{w|Document}} || The {{w|World Scientists' Warning to Humanity}} is writen by {{w|Henry Way Kendall}}, a former chair of the board of directors of the {{w|Union of Concerned Scientists}}, and signed by about 1,700 leading scientists, including a majority of the {{w|Nobel Prize}} laureates in the sciences.<ref>{{cite web |title=1992 World Scientists' Warning to Humanity {{!}} Union of Concerned Scientists |url=https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/1992-world-scientists-warning-humanity |website=www.ucsusa.org |access-date=1 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1992 || {{w|Greenhouse effect}} || Research || According to Caldeira and Kasting, the end of complex life may come in 0.9-1.5 billion years owing to the runaway greenhouse effect.<ref name="Bostrom"/> According to the researchers, when the {{w|Sun}} becomes too bright, it will drive a runaway greenhouse effect through the Earth’s atmosphere.<ref name="Bostrom"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Kasting |first1=James F. |title=Runaway and moist greenhouse atmospheres and the evolution of Earth and Venus |journal=Icarus |date=June 1988 |volume=74 |issue=3 |pages=472–494 |doi=10.1016/0019-1035(88)90116-9}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1992 || {{w|Impact event}} || Recommendation || In a report to {{w|NASA}}, a coordinated {{w|Spaceguard}} Survey is recommended to discover, verify and provide follow-up observations for Earth-crossing asteroids. This survey is expected to discover 90% of these objects larger than one kilometer within 25 years.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Morrison |first1=David |title=The Spaceguard Survey: Report of the NASA International Near-Earth-Object Detection Workshop |date=1992 |publisher=NASA |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Spaceguard_Survey.html?id=1hH8uQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 1992 || {{w|Bioterrorism}} || Sample case || The {{w|doomsday cult}} {{w|Aum Shinrikyo}} sends a medical team to {{w|Zaire}} in what would be believed to have been an attempt to procure {{w|Ebola virus}}<ref>Kaplan, 2000</ref>. While an unsuccessful attempt, this event provides an example of a terrorist group apparently intending to make use of a contagious virus.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|Japan}}, {{w|Congo DR}}
+|-
+| 1992 (September 3) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|chemical weapon}}) || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Chemical Weapons Convention}} is signed to comprehensively ban chemical weapons.<ref>{{cite web |title=Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction - Main Page |url=https://legal.un.org/avl/ha/cpdpsucw/cpdpsucw.html |website=legal.un.org |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> It would enter into force on April 29, 1997.<ref>{{cite web |title=History |url=https://www.opcw.org/about/history |website=OPCW |access-date=1 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1993 || {{w|Bioterrorism}} || Sample case || The {{w|United States Congress}}' {{w|Office of Technology Assessment}} finds that a single 100 kg load of anthrax spores, if delivered by aircraft over a crowded urban setting, depending on weather conditions, could result in fatalities ranging between 130,000 and 3 million individuals.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1993 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || American geophysicist [[w:H. Jay Melosh|H. J. Melosh]] with I. V. Nemchinov propose deflecting an asteroid or comet by focusing {{w|solar energy}} onto its surface to create thrust from the resulting vaporization of material.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Melosh |first1=H. J. |last2=Nemchinov |first2=I. V. |title=Solar asteroid diversion |journal=Nature |date=November 1993 |volume=366 |issue=6450 |pages=21–22 |doi=10.1038/366021a0}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1994 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || The {{w| United States Congress}} issues {{w|NASA}} the directive to find and track 90 percent of all near-Earth Objects greater than one kilometer across, a task that would be completed in 2011, for a total cost of less than $70 million.<ref>Mainzer et al., 2011; US House of Representatives, 2013</ref><ref name="Ord"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1995 || {{w|Impact event}} || Recommendation || A NASA report recommends search surveys that would discover 60–70% of short-period, {{w|near-Earth object}}s larger than one kilometer within ten years and obtain 90% completeness within five more years.<ref>Shoemaker, E.M., 1995, ''Report of the Near-Earth Objects Survey Working Group'', NASA Office of Space Science, Solar System Exploration Office</ref> ||  {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 1995 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || Following the 1994 {{w|Shoemaker-Levy 9}} comet impacts with Jupiter, {{w|Edward Teller}} proposes, to a collective of U.S. and Russian ex-{{w|Cold War}} weapons designers in a planetary defense workshop meeting at {{w|Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory}} (LLNL), that they collaborate to design a [[w:Nuclear weapon design#Arbitrarily large multi-staged devices|one-gigaton nuclear explosive device]], which would be equivalent to the kinetic energy of a 1km diameter asteroid.<ref name="e-reports-ext.llnl.gov">[https://web.archive.org/web/20150909023233/https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/232015.pdf Planetary defense workshop LLNL 1995]</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=DailyTech - Russia, U.S. Eye Team-up to Build Massive Nuke to Save Planet from an Asteroid |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141009190305/http://www.dailytech.com/Russia+US+Eye+Teamup+to+Build+Massive+Nuke+to+Save+Planet+from+an+Asteroid/article33569.htm#sthash.rQvVzS6m.dpuf |website=web.archive.org |access-date=12 July 2022 |date=9 October 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=A new use for nuclear weapons: hunting rogue asteroids |url=https://publicintegrity.org/national-security/a-new-use-for-nuclear-weapons-hunting-rogue-asteroids/ |website=Center for Public Integrity |access-date=9 August 2022 |date=16 October 2013}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1995 (January 25) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Sample case || The {{w|Norwegian rocket incident}} occurs when a Norwegian-U.S. scientific weather rocket is mistaken by Russian radar operators for a nuclear attack.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Norwegian Rocket Incident {{!}} Russian Roulette - A Close Call? {{!}} FRONTLINE {{!}} PBS |url=https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/russia/closecall/ |website=www.pbs.org |access-date=2 July 2022}}</ref> Russian President {{w|Boris Yeltsin}} is prompted to activate his {{w|nuclear briefcase}} to contemplate launching in retaliation. <ref>{{cite web |title=This Week in History: The Rocket Launch That Didn’t Start a Nuclear War With Russia {{!}} Russia Matters |url=https://www.russiamatters.org/blog/week-history-rocket-launch-didnt-start-nuclear-war-russia |website=www.russiamatters.org |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|Russia}}
+|-
+| 1995 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || The concept of asteroid laser ablation is articulated in a white paper entitled ''Preparing for Planetary Defense''. Similar to the effects of a nuclear device, it is thought possible to focus sufficient laser energy on the surface of an asteroid to cause flash vaporization/ablation to create either in impulse or to ablate away the asteroid mass.<ref>{{cite web |title=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160625011024/http://www.nss.org:8080/resources/library/planetarydefense/1994-DetectionAndInterceptionOfAsteroidsOnCollisionCourseWithEarth.pdf |website=web.archive.org |access-date=6 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1995 || {{w|Bioterrorism}} || Sample case || The {{w|Tokyo subway sarin attack}} occurs when members of the cult movement {{w|Aum Shinrikyo}} released {{w|sarin}} on three lines of the {{w|Tokyo Metro}}, killing 13 people, and severely injuring 50.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ataxia: The Chemical and Biological Terrorism Threat and the US Response • Stimson Center |url=https://www.stimson.org/2000/ataxia-chemical-and-biological-terrorism-threat-and-us-response/ |website=Stimson Center |access-date=17 August 2022 |date=9 October 2000}}</ref> ReligiousTolerance.org says that {{w|Aum Shinrikyo}} is the only religion known to have planned Armageddon for non-believers.<ref name="Home page of the ReligiousTolerance.org web site">{{cite web | title=Home page of the ReligiousTolerance.org web site | website=Home page of the ReligiousTolerance.org web site | url=https://www.religioustolerance.org/ | access-date=16 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|Japan}}
+|-
+| 1996 (March 26) || {{w|Impact event}} || Organization || {{w|The Spaceguard Foundation}} is established in {{w|Rome}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Marov |first1=Mikhail Y. |last2=Marov |first2=Mikhail I︠A︡kovlevich |last3=Marov |first3=Michail Jakovlevič |last4=Rickman |first4=Hans |title=Collisional Processes in the Solar System |date=2001 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-0-7923-6946-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=ICEFIUZmoSwC&pg=PA339&lpg=PA339&dq=1996+%28March+26%29+The+Spaceguard+Foundation&ots=tq5Yy3GYKm&sig=ACfU3U3JLgjdabsXWwLYNtEJY_G7CLo6Yw&hl=en#v=onepage&q=1996%20(March%2026)%20The%20Spaceguard%20Foundation&f=false |language=en}}</ref> It works to promote and coordinate activities for the discovery and characterization of near-Earth objects.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Darling |first1=David |title=Spaceguard Foundation |url=https://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/S/Spaceguard_Foundation.html |website=www.daviddarling.info |access-date=10 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|Italy}}
+|-
+| 1996 || Multiple || Literature || Canadian philosopher {{w|John A. Leslie}} publishes ''The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction'', which examines the various ways that humanity could come to an end, such as through nuclear war, environmental disaster, or disease, and evaluates the ethical implications of each.<ref name=sdefef>{{cite book |last1=Leslie |first1=John |title=The End of the World: The Science and Ethics of Human Extinction |date=8 January 2002 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-134-66854-0 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=DWWFAgAAQBAJ&dq=The+End+of+the+World%3A+The+Science+and+Ethics+of+Human+Extinction. |language=en}}</ref> This work contributes to the foundation of the field of existential risk studies.<ref name="Torres"/> Leslie estimates that if the reproduction rate drops to the [[w:Demographics of Germany|German]] or [[w:Demographics of Japan|Japanese level]] the extinction date will be 2400.<ref name=sdefef/> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|Routledge}})
+|-
+| 1996 || Multiple || Preservation effort || The {{w|Millennium Seed Bank Partnership}} begins. It is an international conservation project with the purpose to provide an "insurance policy" against the extinction of plants in the wild by storing seeds for future use in large underground frozen vaults preserving the world's largest wild-plant seedbank or collection of seeds from wild species.<ref>{{cite web |title=Millennium Seed Bank Partnership, Mid Sussex District Podcast |url=https://www.loquis.com/en/loquis/1036085/Millennium+Seed+Bank+Partnership |website=Loquis |access-date=28 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 1996 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || {{w|Planetary scientist}} {{w|Eugene Shoemaker}} proposes deflecting a potential impactor by releasing a cloud of steam in the path of the object, hopefully gently slowing it.<ref>in a lecture to the Arizona Geological Society in 12–96</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1996 || {{w|Supervolcano}} || Research || According to Bekki et al., volcanic aerosols have a longer residence time of several years compared to a few months for fine dust, therefore a huge eruption might be expected to have a longer lasting effect on global climate than an impact producing a comparable amount of atmospheric loading.<ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 1996 (September 10) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty}} is signed to ban all nuclear weapons tests.<ref>{{cite web |title=United Nations Treaty Collection |url=https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVI-4&chapter=26&clang=_en |website=treaties.un.org |access-date=2 July 2022 |language=EN}}</ref> As of 2022, it is not in force.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty not yet in force but it has virtually halted tests: Official |url=https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/nuclear-test-ban-treaty-not-yet-in-force-but-it-has-virtually-halted-tests-official/2428835 |website=www.aa.com.tr |access-date=2 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 1997 || {{w|Climate change}} || Research || According to Toon et al., the major effect on civilization would be through collapse of agriculture as a result of the loss of one or more growing seasons. This would be followed by famine, the spread of infectious diseases, breakdown of infrastructure, social and political unrest, and conflict.<ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 1997 || {{w|Epizootic}} || Sample case || An outbreak in Taiwan of the highly contagious foot-and-mouth disease, causes the slaughter of 8 million pigs and brings exports to a halt, with estimated costs of $20 billion. This case exemplifies how threats to agriculture, livestock, and crops, which can cause major economic damage and loss of confidence in food security, should not be overlooked.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|Taiwan}}
+|-
+| 1998 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || The {{w|United States Congress}} gives NASA a mandate to detect 90% of near-earth asteroids over 1km diameter (that threaten global devastation).<ref name="spaceguard-1998">{{cite web |author=Clark R. Chapman |title=Statement on The Threat of Impact by Near-Earth Asteroids before the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics of the Committee on Science of the U.S. House of Representatives at its hearings on "Asteroids: Perils and Opportunities" |publisher=Southwest Research Institute |date=May 21, 1998 |url=http://www.boulder.swri.edu/clark/hr.html |access-date=2018-03-06}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=New telescope will hunt dangerous asteroids |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9403 |website=New Scientist |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 1998 (August 13) || Multiple || Organization || The {{w|Mars Society}} is founded by {{w|Robert Zubrin}}. It is a {{w|nonprofit organization}} that works to educate the public, the media and the government on the benefits of [[w:Human mission to Mars|exploring Mars]] and creating a [[w:Mars colonization|permanent human presence]] on the planet. Headquartered in {{w|Lakewood, Colorado}}, it is based on Zubrin's {{w|Mars Direct}} plan, which aims to make {{w|human mission to Mars}} as lightweight and feasible as possible.<ref>{{cite web |title=About the Mars Society |url=https://www.marssociety.org/about/#:~:text=Established%20by%20Dr.,our%20goals%20and%20our%20creed.&text=3. |website=The Mars Society |access-date=27 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Members include {{w|Buzz Aldrin}} and {{w|Elon Musk}}. || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1998 (December 6) || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Research || In one message from Nick Bostrom to {{w|artificial intelligence}} theorist {{w|Eliezer Yudkowsky}} on the Extropians mailing list<ref>{{cite web |title=extropy: Re: Singularity: Individual, Borg, Death? |url=http://extropians.weidai.com/extropians.4Q98/2151.html |website=extropians.weidai.com |access-date=25 October 2022}}</ref>, inline quotations show Yudkowsky arguing that it would be good to allow a superintelligent AI system to choose own its morality. Bostrom responds that it's possible for an AI system to be highly intelligent without being motivated to act morally, explaining an early version of the orthogonality thesis<ref name="On Defere">{{cite web |title=On Deference and Yudkowsky's AI Risk Estimates - EA Forum |url=https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/NBgpPaz5vYe3tH4ga/?commentId=N2Nm9k934DPXpuMHx |website=forum.effectivealtruism.org |access-date=15 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref>, which states that an agent can have any combination of intelligence level and final goal.<ref>{{cite web |title=Orthogonality Thesis - LessWrong |url=https://www.lesswrong.com/tag/orthogonality-thesis |website=www.lesswrong.com |access-date=25 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Yudkowsky would reverse his opinion, devoting the rest of his career so far trying to reduce AI risks, and prevent AI-related catastrophe. || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 1999 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|biological weapon}}) || Literature || Ken Alibek and Stephen Handelman publish ''[[w:Biohazard (book)|Biohazard: the Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World-Told from the Inside by the Man who Ran it]]''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Alibek |first1=Ken |last2=Handelman |first2=Stephen |title=Biohazard: The Chilling True Story of the Largest Covert Biological Weapons Program in the World, Told from the Inside by the Man who Ran it |date=1999 |publisher=Random House |isbn=978-0-385-33496-9 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Biohazard.html?id=mFTOPWAGMSQC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Random House}})
+|-
+| 1999 || {{w|Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider}} || Research || Arnon Dar publishes research on high energy physics experiments, and the possibility of relativistic heavy-ion colliders destroying the planet.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Dar |first1=Arnon |last2=De Rújula |first2=A. |last3=Heinz |first3=Ulrich |title=Will relativistic heavy-ion colliders destroy our planet? |journal=Physics Letters B |date=December 1999 |volume=470 |issue=1-4 |pages=142–148 |doi=10.1016/S0370-2693(99)01307-6}}</ref><ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|Israel}} ({{w|Technion – Israel Institute of Technology}})
+|-
+| 2000 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Organization || The {{w|Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network}} is established.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mackenzie |first1=John S. |last2=Drury |first2=Patrick |last3=Arthur |first3=Ray R. |last4=Ryan |first4=Michael J. |last5=Grein |first5=Thomas |last6=Slattery |first6=Raphael |last7=Suri |first7=Sameera |last8=Domingo |first8=Christine Tiffany |last9=Bejtullahu |first9=Armand |title=The Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network |journal=Global Public Health |date=21 October 2014 |volume=9 |issue=9 |pages=1023–1039 |doi=10.1080/17441692.2014.951870}}</ref> It provides international public health resources to control outbreaks and public health emergencies worldwide.<ref>{{cite web |title=Welcome to GOARN {{!}} GOARN |url=https://extranet.who.int/goarn/ |website=extranet.who.int |access-date=18 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2000 || Multiple || Research || Corey S. Powell and Diane Martindale publish an article describing 20 scenarios of how the world could end suddenly: asteroid impact, gamma ray burst, collapse of the vacuum, rogue black holes, giant solar flares, reversal of earth's magnetic field, flood-basalt volcanism, global warming, ecosystem collapse, biotech disaster, particle accelerator mishap, nanotechnology disaster, environmental toxins, robots take over, mass insanity, alien invasion, and divine intervention.<ref>{{cite web |title=20 Ways the World Could End |url=https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/20-ways-the-world-could-end |website=Discover Magazine |access-date=11 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} (''[[w:Discover (magazine)|Discover Magazine]]'')
+|-
+| 2000 || Particle Accelerator Mishap || Research || The director of the {{w|Brookhaven Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider}}, prompted by the possibility that the experiments that physicists carry out in particle accelerators might pose an existential risk, commissions an official report, after concerns resurface with the construction of powerful accelerators such as CERN’s {{w|Large Hadron Collider}}.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2000 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Research || Bill Joy suggests that if AI systems rapidly become [[w:superintelligence|super-intelligent]], they may take unforeseen actions or out-compete humanity.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Joy |first1=Bill |title=Why the Future Doesn't Need Us |url=https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/ |website=Wired |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2000 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Sample case || The genome of the extinct influenza virus of 1918 ([[w:Influenza A virus subtype H1N1|A virus subtype H1N1]]) is resurrected piece by piece from preserved human lung tissue.<ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 2000 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || || American cognitive and computer scientist {{w|Marvin Minsky}} raises the subject of the Riemann Hypothesis Catastrophe, that an AI asked to solve the {{w|Riemann Hypothesis}} would convert the Solar System into {{w|computronium}}, a material hypothesized by Norman Margolus and Tommaso Toffoli of MIT in 1991 to be used as "{{w|programmable matter}}".<ref>{{cite web |title=extropians: Marvin Minsky and Eliezer Yudkowsky |url=https://extropians.weidai.com/extropians.1Q01/4767.html |website=extropians.weidai.com |access-date=24 October 2022}}</ref>
+|-
+| 2000 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Organization || The {{w|Machine Intelligence Research Institute}} (MIRI) is founded as the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence by Brian Atkins, Sabine Atkins and {{w|Eliezer Yudkowsky}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Machine Intelligence Research Institute - EA Forum |url=https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/machine-intelligence-research-institute#:~:text=MIRI%20was%20founded%20in%202000,Sabine%20Atkins%20and%20Eliezer%20Yudkowsky. |website=forum.effectivealtruism.org |access-date=25 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref>, with the purpose of accelerating the development of {{w|artificial intelligence}}.<ref name=fefe>{{cite web |title=MIRI: Artificial Intelligence: The Danger of Good Intentions |url=https://futureoflife.org/ai/ai-the-danger-of-good-intentions/ |website=Future of Life Institute |access-date=26 October 2022 |date=12 October 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Artificial intelligence: machine v man |url=https://www.ft.com/content/abc942cc-5fb3-11e4-8c27-00144feabdc0 |website=Financial Times |access-date=26 October 2022 |date=31 October 2014}}</ref><ref name=dededed>{{cite web |last1=Nast |first1=Condé |title=The Doomsday Invention |url=https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/11/23/doomsday-invention-artificial-intelligence-nick-bostrom |website=The New Yorker |access-date=26 October 2022 |date=16 November 2015}}</ref> After Yudkowsky begins to be concerned that AI systems developed in the future could become superintelligent and pose risks to humanity,<ref name=fefe/>, the institute would move in 2005 to Silicon Valley and begin to focus on ways to identify and manage those risks, which are at the time largely ignored by scientists in the field.<ref name=dededed/> Today, MIRI is an independent non-governmental organizations (NGO), with the purpose to reduce the risk of a catastrophe caused by artificial intelligence.<ref>{{cite web |title=Machine Intelligence Research Institute |url=https://www.linkedin.com/company/machine-intelligence-research-institute/?originalSubdomain=ar |website=linkedin |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2001 (January 1) || Multiple || {{w|Eschatology}} || Graham Oppy publishes paper ''Physical Eschatology'', in which he reviews evidence which strongly supports the claim that life will eventually be extinguished from the universe.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Oppy |first1=Graham |title=Physical Eschatology: |journal=Philo |date=2001 |volume=4 |issue=2 |pages=148–168 |doi=10.5840/philo20014213}}</ref> Occasionally the term "physical eschatology" is applied to the long-term predictions of astrophysics about the {{w|future of Earth}} and {{w|ultimate fate of the universe}}.<ref>Ćirković, Milan M. "Resource letter: PEs-1: physical eschatology." American Journal of Physics 71.2 (2003): 122–133.</ref><ref>Baum, Seth D. "Is humanity doomed? Insights from astrobiology." Sustainability 2.2 (2010): 591–603.</ref> || {{w|Australia}}
+|-
+| 2001 (January) || {{w|Biotechnology}} || Sample case || A group of Australian researchers unintentionally change characteristics of the {{w|mousepox}} virus while trying to develop a virus to sterilize rodents, creating a virus that kills them by crippling their immune system.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Broad |first1=William J. |title=Australians Create a Deadly Mouse Virus |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/23/world/australians-create-a-deadly-mouse-virus.html |website=The New York Times |access-date=17 August 2022 |date=23 January 2001}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Killer mousepox virus raises bioterror fears |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn311-killer-mousepox-virus-raises-bioterror-fears/ |website=New Scientist |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> The modified virus becomes highly lethal even in vaccinated and naturally resistant mice.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Sandberg |first1=Anders |title=The five biggest threats to human existence |url=http://theconversation.com/the-five-biggest-threats-to-human-existence-27053 |website=The Conversation |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Australia}}
+|-
+| 2001 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Organization || The {{w|Nuclear Threat Initiative}} is formed.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nuclear Threat Initiative {{!}} American organization {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Nuclear-Threat-Initiative |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=5 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> It is a nonprofit, nonpartisan global security organization focused on reducing nuclear and biological threats.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Nuclear Threat Initiative - Home |url=https://www.nti.org/ |website=The Nuclear Threat Initiative |access-date=18 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2001 || Environmental disaster || Program launch || The {{w|Millennium Ecosystem Assessment}} is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=Millennium Ecosystem Assessment |url=https://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Framework.html |website=www.millenniumassessment.org |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> It is a four-year international scientific assessment of the condition of Earth's ecosystems, potential impacts of changes to ecosystems on their ability to meet human needs, and policies, technologies, and tools to improve ecosystem management.<ref>{{cite web |title=World Bank Group {{!}} Environment {{!}} Millennium Ecosystem Assessment |url=http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website00675/WEB/OTHER/PARTN-34.HTM |website=web.worldbank.org |access-date=30 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2001 || Environmental disaster || Sample case || 2 million trees are destroyed in Florida in an effort to contain a natural outbreak of ''{{w|Xanthomonas campestris}}'', a bacterium that threatening the state's citrus industry and for which there is no cure. This event demonstrates that crops can be particularly vulnerable to an attack.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2001 || Environmental disaster || Research || Analyses of the fossil record by Alroy et al. suggest that recovery to former diversity levels from even severe environmental disasters may be more rapid than had previously been thought.<ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 2001 (September–October)|| {{w|Bioterrorism}} || Sample case || The {{w|2001 anthrax attacks}} occur when {{w|anthrax}} spores through the mail cause 17 illnesses and 5 deaths in the United States in.<ref name="Bostrom"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2002 || Multiple || Concept development || {{w|Nick Bostrom}} publishes a seminal paper, which defines {{w|existential risk}} as "One where an adverse outcome would either annihilate Earth-originating intelligent life or permanently and drastically curtail its potential".<ref name="Moynihan"/> "we date the beginning of Existential Risk studies as a unified field of research to the 2002 paper Existential Risks: Analyzing Human Extinction Scenarios and Related Hazards (Bostrom 2002) by Nick Bostrom"<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 2002 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} || Program launch || The G-8 Global Partnership arranges a target of 20 billion dollars to be committed over a 10-year period for the purpose of preventing terrorists from acquiring weapons and materials of mass destruction.<ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 2002 || Multiple || Organization || {{w|SpaceX}} is founded by {{w|Elon Musk}}, with the goal of reducing space transportation costs to enable the colonization of {{w|Mars}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=SpaceX |url=https://artsandculture.google.com/entity/spacex/m03fkyw?hl=en |website=Google Arts & Culture |access-date=27 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2002 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Notable comment || According to philosopher {{w|Nick Bostrom}}, it is possible that the first super-intelligence to emerge would be able to bring about almost any possible outcome it valued, as well as to foil virtually any attempt to prevent it from achieving its objectives.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ethical Issues In Advanced Artificial Intelligence |url=http://www.nickbostrom.com/ethics/ai.html |website=nickbostrom.com |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2002 (October 7) || {{w|Impact event}} || Organization || {{w|B612 Foundation}} is founded<ref>{{cite web |title=Asteroids & Beyond: The B612 Foundation Newsletter Vol. 24 |url=https://us5.campaign-archive.com/?u=c7281b61ab362fadf221e16fc&id=dd1cd5a830 |website=us5.campaign-archive.com |access-date=10 August 2022}}</ref> with the goal "to develop tools and technologies to understand, map, and navigate our solar system and protect our planet from asteroid impacts."<ref>{{cite web |title=B612 Foundation |url=https://b612foundation.org/ |website=B612 |access-date=10 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2002 (December) || {{w|Nanotechnology}} || Organization || Mike Treder and Chris Phoenix found the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology.<ref>{{cite web |title=Nanotechnology: C-R-Newsletter Archives - 2007 |url=http://crnano.org/archive07.htm |website=crnano.org |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2003 || Multiple || Literature || British {{w|Astronomer Royal}} Sir {{w|Martin Rees}} publishes ''{{w|Our Final Hour}}''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Our Final Century {{!}} book by Rees {{!}} Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Our-Final-Century |website=www.britannica.com |access-date=2 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> A celebrated cosmologist, Rees offers a ‘scientist’s warning’ that humanity faces unprecedented challenges in the 21st century. Rees concludes that the probability of civilization surviving the next 100 years is perhaps 50%.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 2003 || {{w|Impact event}} || Budget || A NASA study of a follow-on program suggests spending US$250–450 million to detect 90% of all near-Earth asteroids 140 meters and larger by 2028.<ref>{{cite web |title=News Article: Close Pass by XP14 & NASA NEO Workshop |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080122123731/http://impact.arc.nasa.gov/news_detail.cfm?ID=168 |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=22 January 2008}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2003 || {{w|Climate change}} || Sample case || The {{w|2003 European heat wave}} results in seventy thousand deaths. While {{w|heatstroke}} is not the only risk from [[w:Climate apocalypse|catastrophic climate change]], it is among the most potent.<ref name=Leigh/> || {{w|Europe}}
+|-
+| 2004 || Multiple || Organization || The Global Risk Network is established,<ref>{{cite web |title=World Economic Forum - Global Risk Network |url=http://web.worldbank.org/archive/website00818/WEB/OTHER/GLOBAL_R.HTM |website=web.worldbank.org |access-date=2 July 2022}}</ref> by the {{w|World Economic Forum}} in an attempt to bring together cross-sectoral responses to a new set of emerging global risks.<ref>{{cite web |title=World Economic Forum: world is more vulnerable to global risks |url=https://www.e3g.org/publications/world-economic-forum-world-is-more-vulnerable-to-global-risks/ |website=E3G |access-date=20 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2004 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Sample case || {{w|SARS}} escapes from the National Institute of Virology in Beijing<ref name="Ord"/> when a graduate student develops symptoms just two weeks after she started working at the virology institute.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Brown |first1=David |title=SARS Cases in Asia Show Labs' Risks |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2004/05/29/sars-cases-in-asia-show-labs-risks/4c28a35a-e673-4953-a6a8-1e61c366c1c8/ |website=Washington Post |access-date=17 August 2022 |date=29 May 2004}}</ref> || {{w|China}}
+|-
+| 2004 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|biological weapon}}) || Literature || Luther E. Lindler, Frank J. Lebeda and George Korch publish ''Biological Weapons Defense: Infectious Disease and Counterbioterrorism'', which provides an overview of the threat of biological weapons and the measures that could be taken to protect against them.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Lucey |first1=Daniel R. |title=Biological Weapons Defense: Infectious Diseases and Counterbioterrorism |journal=Emerging Infectious Diseases |date=April 2006 |volume=12 |issue=4 |pages=713–713 |doi=10.3201/eid1204.060090 |url=}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2004 || Multiple || Literature || American economist {{w|Richard Posner}} publishes ''{{w|Catastrophe: Risk and Response}}'',<ref>{{cite book |last1=Posner |first1=Richard A. |title=Catastrophe: Risk and Response |date=11 November 2004 |publisher=Oxford University Press, USA |isbn=978-0-19-517813-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=udflRRm9C5kC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Catastrophe:+Risk+and+Response&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Catastrophe%3A%20Risk%20and%20Response&f=false |language=en}}</ref> which examines four risks whose worst cases could end advanced human civilization or worse: {{w|impact event}}s, a catastrophic chain reaction initiated in high-energy particle accelerators, {{w|climate change}}, and {{w|bioterrorism}}.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Parson |first1=Edward A. |title=The Big One: A Review of Richard Posner's Catastrophe: Risk and Response |url=https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.45.1.147 |website=Journal of Economic Literature |access-date=20 July 2022 |pages=147–213 |language=en |doi=10.1257/jel.45.1.147 |date=March 2007}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Oxford University Press, USA}})
+|-
+| 2005 || Multiple || Organization || The {{w|Future of Humanity Institute}} is founded.<ref>{{cite web |title=Future of Humanity Institute - EA Forum |url=https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/future-of-humanity-institute |website=forum.effectivealtruism.org |access-date=2 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Located at {{w|University of Oxford}}, it is a multidisciplinary research center enabling researchers to use mathematics, science, and philosophy to bear on big-picture questions about humanity and its prospects.<ref>{{cite web |last1=FHI |first1=Future of Humanity Institute- |title=Future of Humanity Institute |url=https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/ |website=The Future of Humanity Institute |access-date=30 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Oxford}})
+|-
+| 2005 (March) || {{w|Impact event}} || Policy || The George E. Brown, Jr. Near-Earth Object Survey Act. is introduced by Rep. {{w|Dana Rohrabacher}} (R-CA). Named in honor to United States Representative {{w|George Brown Jr.}} for his commitment to planetary defense, the bill has the purpose "to provide for a Near-Earth Object Survey program to detect, track, catalogue, and characterize certain near-Earth asteroids and comets".<ref>{{cite web |title=Defending Planet Earth: Near-Earth Object Surveys and Hazard Mitigation Strategies |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140806153938/http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12842 |website=web.archive.org |access-date=6 July 2022 |date=6 August 2014}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2005 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || Jo Hays publishes ''Epidemics and Pandemics: Their Impacts on Human History'', which details the devastating effects that major outbreaks have had on society throughout the ages. Hays argues that epidemics and pandemics are not simply medical problems, but also social and economic ones that can have a profound impact on a community.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hays |first1=J. N. |title=Epidemics and Pandemics: Their Impacts on Human History |date=2005 |publisher=ABC-CLIO |isbn=978-1-85109-658-9 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Epidemics_and_Pandemics.html?id=GyE8Qt-kS1kC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2005 || {{w|Technology}} || Literature || {{w|Jared Diamond}} publishes ''{{w|Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed}}'', in which the author first defines ''collapse'': "a drastic decrease in human population size and/or political/economic/social complexity, over a considerable area, for an extended time." Diamond argues that history presents several examples of the phenomenon in which technologies that are desirable in themselves can get out of control, leading to catastrophic exhaustion of resources or accumulation of externalities. Examples range from small island cultures to major civilizations.<ref name="Bostrom"/><ref>{{cite book |last1=Diamond |first1=Jared |title=Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed: Revised Edition |date=4 January 2011 |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-1-101-50200-6 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=9BYoAQAAIAAJ&dq=Collapse%3A+How+Societies+Choose+to+Fail+or+Succeed|language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Viking Press}})
+|-
+| 2005 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Research || According to Bonn, more than 150 countries do not have national strategies to deal with a possible {{w|influenza pandemic}}.<ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 2005 || Multiple || Organization || The {{w|Future of Humanity Institute}} is founded.<ref>{{cite web |title=Future of Humanity |url=https://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/future-humanity/ |website=Oxford Martin School |access-date=28 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Based at the {{w|University of Oxford}}, it is a multidisciplinary research center applying mathematics, science, and philosophy to bear on big-picture questions about humanity and its prospects.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Future of Humanity Institute |url=https://www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk/future-humanity-institute#:~:text=The%20Future%20of%20Humanity%20Institute%20is%20a%20multidisciplinary%20research%20centre,about%20humanity%20and%20its%20prospects. |website=www.philosophy.ox.ac.uk |access-date=28 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 2005 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || The United States Congress again direct NASA to find at least 90 percent of potentially hazardous {{w|near-Earth object}}s sized 140 meters or larger by the end of 2020.<ref name="Loff">{{cite web |last1=Loff |first1=Sarah |title=NASA's Search for Asteroids to Help Protect Earth and Understand Our History |url=https://www.nasa.gov/content/nasas-search-for-asteroids-to-help-protect-earth-and-understand-our-history/ |website=NASA |access-date=20 July 2022 |date=22 April 2014}}</ref> ||  {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2005 (November) || {{w|Impact event}} || {{w|open letter}} || A number of astronauts publish an open letter through the Association of Space Explorers calling for a united push to develop strategies to protect Earth from the risk of a cosmic collision.<ref>{{cite web |title=Astronauts push for strategies, spacecraft to prevent calamitous asteroid strike |url=http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05332/613441.stm |website=old.post-gazette.com |access-date=5 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2006 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|biological weapon}}) || Literature || Mark Wheelis, Lajos Rózsa and Malcolm Dando publish ''Deadly cultures: biological weapons since 1945'', which investigates the use of biological weapons throughout history.<ref>{{cite web |title=Deadly Cultures — Mark Wheelis, Lajos Rózsa, Malcolm Dando |url=https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674016996 |website=www.hup.harvard.edu |access-date=5 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Harvard University Press}})
+|-
+| 2006 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || {{w|NEO Surveyor}} is first proposed<ref>{{cite web |title=NASA has approved the start of work on the design of the NEO Surveyor space telescope |url=https://vpk.name/en/516411_nasa-has-approved-the-start-of-work-on-the-design-of-the-neo-surveyor-space-telescope.html |website=ВПК.name |access-date=11 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> as a planned space-based {{w|infrared telescope}} designed to survey the {{w|Solar System}} for [[w:potentially hazardous object|potentially hazardous asteroids]].<ref>{{cite web |title=NEOS |url=https://neocam.ipac.caltech.edu/ |website=NEO Surveyor {{!}} Near-Earth Object Surveyor Mission |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=en |date=26 June 2020}}</ref> A 50-centimeter-wide telescope, its camera sees things in infrared wavelengths, which reveal heat signatures. This is perfect for asteroids because they are very dark and hard to see against the blackness of space.<ref>{{cite web |title=NEO Surveyor, Protecting Earth from Dangerous Asteroids |url=https://www.planetary.org/space-missions/neosm |website=The Planetary Society |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> It is operated by the {{w|Jet Propulsion Laboratory}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=In Depth {{!}} NEO Surveyor |url=https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/neo-surveyor/in-depth/ |website=NASA Solar System Exploration |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2006 (June 1) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || The Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, chaired by Dr. Hans Blix, publishes ''Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological And Chemical Arms''  In this report, which presents 60 recommendations on what the world community can and should do to avoid nuclear war.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sweden) |first1=Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (Stockholm |last2=Blix |first2=Hans |title=Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms |date=2006 |publisher=WMDC |isbn=978-91-38-22582-0 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Weapons_of_Terror.html?id=PQqR58E9cgcC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2006 (June 19) || Multiple || Preservation || The prime ministers of {{w|Norway}}, {{w|Sweden}}, {{w|Finland}}, {{w|Denmark}}, and {{w|Iceland}} lay "the first stone" to the {{w|Svalbard Global Seed Vault}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=2006 (June 19) Svalbard Global Seed Vault - Google Search |url=https://www.google.com/search?q=2006+%28June+19%29+Svalbard+Global+Seed+Vault |website=www.google.com |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref> Located in the island of {{w|Spitsbergen}} the vault now has the capacity to hold 2.25 billion seeds, is intended to “provide insurance against both incremental and catastrophic loss of crop diversity.”<ref>{{cite web |last1=Editors |first1=History com |title=Construction on Global Seed Vault begins |url=https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/construction-on-global-seed-vault-begins-norway |website=HISTORY |access-date=5 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Norway}}, {{w|Sweden}}, {{w|Finland}}, {{w|Denmark}},  {{w|Iceland}}
+|-
+| 2007 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Research || Members of the original group of nuclear winter scientists collectively perform a new comprehensive quantitative assessment utilizing the latest computer and climate models. They conclude that even a small-scale, regional nuclear war could kill as many people as died in all of {{w|World War II}} and seriously disrupt the global climate for a decade or more, harming nearly everyone on Earth.<ref name="Bostrom"/> ||
+|-
+| 2007 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Research || {{w|Eliezer Yudkowsky}} believes risks from artificial intelligence are harder to predict than any other known risks due to bias from {{w|anthropomorphism}}. Since people base their judgments of artificial intelligence on their own experience, he claims they underestimate the potential power of AI.<ref>{{cite web |title=Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk – Eliezer S. Yudkowsky |url=https://www.yudkowsky.net/singularity/ai-risk |website=www.yudkowsky.net |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2007 (November 8) || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || The {{w|House Committee on Science and Technology}}'s [[w:United States House Science Subcommittee on Space|Subcommittee on Space]] and Aeronautics holds a hearing to examine the status of {{w|NASA}}'s Near-Earth Object survey program. The prospect of using the {{w|Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer}} is proposed by NASA officials.<ref>{{cite web |title=Hearing Charter: Near-Earth Objects: Status of the Survey Program and Review of NASA's 2007 Report to Congress |url=https://archive.today/20121205230352/http://www.spaceref.ca/news/viewsr.html?pid=25960 |website=archive.ph |access-date=6 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2008 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || Michael Dobbs publishes ''One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War'', which describes what {{w|Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.}} called “the most dangerous moment in human history”.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Dobbs |first1=Michael |title=One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War |date=2009 |publisher=Vintage Books |isbn=978-1-4000-7891-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/One_Minute_to_Midnight.html?id=INGx8xGDG44C&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2008 || {{w|Nanotechnology}} || Research || According to [[w:Chris Phoenix (nanotechnologist)|Chris Phoenix]] and Mike Treder, molecular manufacturing could be used to cheaply produce, among many other products, highly advanced, durable weapons. Being equipped with compact computers and motors these could be increasingly autonomous and have a large range of capabilities. Phoenix and Treder classify catastrophic risks posed by nanotechnology into three categories:
+# From augmenting the development of other technologies such as AI and biotechnology.
+# By enabling mass-production of potentially dangerous products that cause risk dynamics (such as arms races) depending on how they are used.
+# From uncontrolled self-perpetuating processes with destructive effects.<ref name="GCRs nano-chapter">{{Cite book |last1=Chris Phoenix |title=Global catastrophic risks |last2=Mike Treder |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-857050-9 |editor-last=Bostrom |editor-first=Nick |location=Oxford |chapter=Chapter 21: Nanotechnology as global catastrophic risk |editor-last2=Cirkovic |editor-first2=Milan M.}}</ref>
+||
+|-
+| 2008 || {{w|Biotechnology}} || Research || According to Noun and Chyba, a biotechnology catastrophe may be caused by accidentally releasing a genetically engineered organism from controlled environments, by the planned release of such an organism which then turns out to have unforeseen and catastrophic interactions with essential natural or agro-ecosystems, or by intentional usage of {{w|biological agent}}s in {{w|biological warfare}} or {{w|bioterrorism}} attacks. Noun and Chyba propose three categories of measures to reduce risks from biotechnology and natural pandemics: Regulation or prevention of potentially dangerous research, improved recognition of outbreaks, and developing facilities to mitigate disease outbreaks (e.g. better and/or more widely distributed vaccines).<ref name="GCRs bio-chapter">{{Cite book |last1=Ali Noun |title=Global Catastrophic Risks |last2=Christopher F. Chyba |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |editor-last=Bostrom |editor-first=Nick |chapter=Chapter 20: Biotechnology and biosecurity |editor-last2=Cirkovic |editor-first2=Milan M.}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2008 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Probability || A survey by the {{w|Future of Humanity Institute}} estimates a 5% probability of extinction by super-intelligence by 2100.<ref name=dwdw>{{cite web |title=Global Catastrophic Risks Survey |url=https://www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2008-1.pdf |website=fhi.ox.ac.uk |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Oxford}})
+|-
+| 2008 || Multiple || Concept developoment || {{w|Eliezer Yudkowsky}} introduces the Moore's Law of Mad Science, which states that "every 18 months, the minimum IQ necessary to destroy the world drops by one point".<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Naudé |first1=Wim |title=Artificial intelligence: neither Utopian nor apocalyptic impacts soon |journal=Economics of Innovation and New Technology |date=2 January 2021 |volume=30 |issue=1 |pages=1–23 |doi=10.1080/10438599.2020.1839173 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10438599.2020.1839173 |issn=1043-8599}}</ref><ref>Yudkowsky 2008, p. 338</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2008 || {{w|Biotechnology}} || Probability || A survey by the {{w|Future of Humanity Institute}} estimates a 2% probability of extinction from engineered pandemics by 2100.<ref name=dwdw/> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Oxford}})
+|-
+| 2008 || Multiple || Notable comment || U.S. economist {{w|Robin Hanson}} argues that a refuge permanently housing as few as 100 people would significantly improve the chances of human survival during a range of global catastrophes.<ref>Hanson, Robin. "[https://mason.gmu.edu/~rhanson/collapse.pdf Catastrophe, social collapse, and human extinction]". Global catastrophic risks 1 (2008): 357.</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2008 || {{w|Totalitarianism}} || Notable comment || American economist and author {{w|Bryan Caplan}} writes that "perhaps an eternity of {{w|totalitarianism}} would be worse than extinction". He states that it is better to risk extinction than to live under a dictatorship forever. Caplan also believes that the human capacity for suffering is so great that even the worst possible life would be preferable to an infinite amount of pain.<ref>{{cite book |title=Global catastrophic risks |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780198570509}}</ref>|| {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2008 || Multiple || Literature || {{w|Nick Bostrom}} publishes ''[[w:Global Catastrophic Risks (book)|Global Catastrophic Risks]]'', which examines the possibility of disastrous events that could bring about the end of human civilization, or even lead to the extinction of the human race. Bostrom looks at a variety of risks, including those posed by {{w|nuclear war}}, {{w|climate change}}, {{w|biotechnology}}, and {{w|artificial intelligence}}.<ref name="Bostrom">{{cite book |last1=Bostrom |first1=Nick |last2=Cirkovic |first2=Milan M. |title=Global Catastrophic Risks |date=29 September 2011 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0-19-960650-4 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=sTkfAQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Global+Catastrophic+Risks+2008&hl=en&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Global%20Catastrophic%20Risks%202008&f=false |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2009 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || Research published in an issue of the journal ''[[w:Nature (journal)|Nature]]'', describes how scientists were able to identify an asteroid in space before it entered Earth's atmosphere, enabling computers to determine its area of origin in the Solar System as well as predict the arrival time and location on Earth of its shattered surviving parts. The four-meter-diameter asteroid, called [[w:2008 TC3|2008 TC<sub>3</sub>]], was initially sighted by the automated {{w|Catalina Sky Survey}} telescope, on October 6, 2008. Computations correctly predict that it would impact 19 hours after discovery and in the {{w|Nubian Desert}} of northern Sudan.<ref>{{cite web |title=We Saw It Coming: Asteroid Monitored from Outer Space to Ground Impact |url=https://www.newswise.com/articles/we-saw-it-coming-asteroid-monitored-from-outer-space-to-ground-impact |website=www.newswise.com |access-date=5 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} (Nature Research)
+|-
+| 2009 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Research || The {{w|Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence}} (AAAI) hosts a conference to discuss the possibility of computers and robots acquiring autonomy, and the potential risks associated with this. They note that some robots have already acquired various forms of semi-autonomy, including the ability to find power sources on their own and to independently choose targets to attack with weapons. They also note that some computer viruses can evade elimination and have achieved "cockroach intelligence". The researchers note that self-awareness is probably unlikely, but there are other potential hazards and pitfalls.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Markoff |first1=John |title=Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/26/science/26robot.html |website=The New York Times |access-date=17 August 2022 |date=25 July 2009}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence}})
+|-
+| 2009 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || Alan Sipress publishes ''The Fatal Strain: On the Trail of Avian Flu and the Coming Pandemic''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Sipress |first1=Alan |title=The Fatal Strain: On the Trail of Avian Flu and the Coming Pandemic |date=30 November 2010 |publisher=Penguin |isbn=978-0-14-311830-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Fatal_Strain.html?id=iJVPEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Penguin Publishing Group}})
+|-
+| 2009 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Program launch || The Emerging Pandemic Threats program is launched<ref>{{cite web |title=Emerging Pandemic Threats {{!}} Fact Sheet {{!}} U.S. Agency for International Development |url=https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/fact-sheets/emerging-pandemic-threats-program#:~:text=Emerging%20Pandemic%20Threats%3A%20As%20a,that%20could%20spark%20future%20pandemics. |website=www.usaid.gov |access-date=3 July 2022 |language=en |date=12 July 2021}}</ref> with the purpose to strengthen global capacity for detection of viruses with pandemic potential that can move between animals and people.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Preston |first1=Eunah |title=PREDICT |url=https://ohi.vetmed.ucdavis.edu/programs-projects/predict-project |website=School of Veterinary Medicine |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=en |date=17 January 2019}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2009 || Multiple || Concept development || M. L. Weitzman presents his 'dismal theorem', which states that a standard cost-benefit analysis may break down if there is a possibility of catastrophes occurring.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Cato |first1=Susumu |title=From the St. Petersburg paradox to the dismal theorem |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/environment-and-development-economics/article/abs/from-the-st-petersburg-paradox-to-the-dismal-theorem/6D2F14DAA612EC498DB07669E81A8919 |website=Environment and Development Economics |access-date=29 October 2022 |pages=423–432 |language=en |doi=10.1017/S1355770X20000121 |date=October 2020}}</ref> The “dismal” theorem tells that it is an error to use trade-off analysis under existential risk.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Taleb |first1=Nassim Nicholas |last2=Bar-Yam |first2=Yaneer |last3=Cirillo |first3=Pasquale |title=On single point forecasts for fat-tailed variables |journal=International Journal of Forecasting |date=April 2022 |volume=38 |issue=2 |pages=413–422 |doi=10.1016/j.ijforecast.2020.08.008 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7572356/ |language=en |issn=0169-2070}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2010 || Multiple || Literature || Robert Wuthnow publishes ''Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wuthnow |first1=Robert |title=Be Very Afraid: The Cultural Response to Terror, Pandemics, Environmental Devastation, Nuclear Annihilation, and Other Threats |date=7 April 2010 |publisher=Oxford University Press, USA |isbn=978-0-19-973087-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Be_Very_Afraid.html?id=voM8DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Oxford University Press, USA}})
+|-
+| 2010 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|chemical weapon}}, {{w|niological weapon}}) || Literature || Edward M. Spiers publishes ''A history of chemical and biological weapons'', which attempts to provide a detailed history of the use of chemical and biological agents in warfare.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Spiers |first1=Edward M. |title=A History of Chemical and Biological Weapons |date=30 April 2010 |publisher=Reaktion Books |isbn=978-1-86189-724-4 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/A_History_of_Chemical_and_Biological_Wea.html?id=Oa53LTOUdUAC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2011 || Multiple || Organization || The {{w|Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere}} (MAHB) is formed<ref>{{cite web |last1=Wilder |first1=Author: |title=N-Gen Newsletter, August 2017 - N-Gen |url=https://nextgensd.com/n-gen-newsletter-august-2017/ |website=nextgensd |access-date=3 July 2022 |date=7 August 2017}}</ref> at {{w|Stanford University}}, with the purpose to gather organizations concerned about the existential threats to civilization.<ref>{{cite web |title=Millennium Alliance for Humanity and Biosphere {{!}} International Environment Forum |url=https://iefworld.org/index.php/comment/49 |website=iefworld.org |access-date=18 August 2022}}</ref> MAHB is a meeting place for citizens concerned with the interconnections among the greatest threats to human well being.<ref>{{cite web |title=Home {{!}} What's Next For Earth - Monthly Online Exhibitions |url=https://www.whatsnextforearth.com/ |website=whatsnextforearth.com |access-date=26 October 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2011 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || Dr. Bong Wie at Asteroid Deflection Research Center at Iowa State University, after studying strategies that could deal with 50-to-500-metre-diameter objects when the time to Earth impact is less than one year, concludes that to provide the required energy, a nuclear explosion or other event that could deliver the same power, are the only methods that can work against a very large asteroid within these time constraints.<ref>{{cite web |title=Wayback Machine |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304091722/http://www.spacesailing.net/paper/200703_Washington_DachwaldKahleWie.pdf |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Iowa State University}})
+|-
+| 2011 || {{w|Biotechnology}}, {{w|pandemic}} || Sample case || Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier of the {{w|Erasmus University Medical Center}} engineers a deadly, airborne version of the {{w|H5N1}} influenza virus.<ref>{{cite web |title=Flu Researcher Ron Fouchier Loses Legal Fight Over H5N1 Studies |url=https://www.science.org/content/article/flu-researcher-ron-fouchier-loses-legal-fight-over-h5n1-studies |website=www.science.org |access-date=6 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> The virus is believed to kill 60 percent of the people it infects.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vogel |first1=Kathleen M. |title=Expert Knowledge in Intelligence Assessments: Bird Flu and Bioterrorism |journal=International Security |date=2013 |volume=38 |issue=3 |pages=39–71 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/24480556 |issn=0162-2889}}</ref> || {{w|Netherlands}} ({{w|Erasmus University Medical Center}})
+|-
+| 2011 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || Nathan Wolfe publishes ''The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age'', which explores the dangers of pandemics in the modern world.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wolfe |first1=Nathan |title=The Viral Storm: The Dawn of a New Pandemic Age |date=11 October 2011 |publisher=Macmillan |isbn=978-0-8050-9194-6 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Viral_Storm.html?id=DgS9Jv_Ofe0C&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Henry Holt and Company}})
+|-
+| 2011 || Multiple || Organization || The Global Catastrophic Risk Institute (GCRI) is founded by Seth Baum and Tony Barrett.<ref>{{cite web |title=Global Catastrophic Risk Institute founded in - Google Search |url=https://www.google.com/search?q=Global+Catastrophic+Risk+Institute+founded+in |website=www.google.com |access-date=6 July 2022}}</ref> It is a think tank that analyzes the risk of catastrophes severe enough to threaten the survival of human civilization.<ref>{{cite web |title=GCR Institute
+ |url=https://twitter.com/gcrinstitute?lang=en |website=Twitter |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Washington, DC.}})
+|-
+| 2012 (January) || {{w|Impact event}} || Literature || After a near pass-by of object {{w|2012 BX34}}, a paper entitled ''A Global Approach to Near-Earth Object Impact Threat Mitigation'' is released by an international team of researchers. The paper discusses the "NEOShield" project.<ref>{{cite web |title=Asteroid Threat to Earth Sparks Global 'NEOShield' Project |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160309203347/http://www.space.com/14370-asteroid-shield-earth-threat-protection-meeting.html |website=web.archive.org |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=9 March 2016}}</ref> || {{w|Russia}}, {{w|Germany}}, {{w|United States}}, {{w|France}}, {{w|Britain}}, {{w|Spain}}
+|-
+| 2012 (February 23) || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || The small asteroid {{w|367943 Duende}} is discovered and successfully predicted to be on close but non-colliding approach to Earth again just 11 months later.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Devyatkin |first1=A. V. |last2=Gorshanov |first2=D. L. |last3=Yershov |first3=V. N. |last4=Melnikov |first4=A. V. |last5=Martyusheva |first5=A. A. |last6=Petrova |first6=S. N. |last7=L'vov |first7=V. N. |last8=Tsekmeister |first8=S. D. |last9=Naumov |first9=K. N. |title=A study of the asteroid (367943) Duende at Pulkovo Observatory |journal=Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |date=11 July 2016 |volume=459 |issue=4 |pages=3986–3997 |doi=10.1093/mnras/stw736 |url=}}</ref> Due to its tiny size and having been closely monitored, this discovery is considered a landmark prediction. ||
+|-
+| 2012 || Multiple || Organization || The {{w|Centre for the Study of Existential Risk}} is founded.<ref>{{cite web |title=Centre for the Study of Existential Risk - History - EA Forum |url=https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/centre-for-the-study-of-existential-risk/history |website=forum.effectivealtruism.org |access-date=2 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> A research center located at the University of Cambridge, it is dedicated to the study and mitigation of existential risks that could lead to human extinction or irrevocable civilisational decline.<ref>{{cite web |title=Centre for the Study of Existential Risk - CRASSH |url=https://www.crassh.cam.ac.uk/research/projects-centres/centre-for-the-study-of-existential-risk/ |website=CRASSH - CENTRE FOR RESEARCH IN THE ARTS, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=EN |date=3 August 2021}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Cambridge}})
+|-
+| 2012 (June) || {{w|Pandemic}} || Sample case || With the purpose to study human adaptation, researchers publish the creation of highly lethal and virulent artificial strains of H5N1.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Morens |first1=David M. |last2=Subbarao |first2=Kanta |last3=Taubenberger |first3=Jeffery K. |title=Engineering H5N1 avian influenza viruses to study human adaptation |journal=Nature |date=June 2012 |volume=486 |issue=7403 |pages=335–340 |doi=10.1038/nature11170}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2011 (August) || Giant Solar Flares || {{w|Conference}} || Nasa holds a press conference about Solar Flares and their effects on the Earth. Solar flares are a type of energy release that can cause disruptions on the Earth, including power outages and interference with communications.<ref>{{cite web |title=NASA HAS A CONFERENCE ON SOLAR FLARES |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXcJvgJTMTs |website=youtube |access-date=29 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2012 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || V.P. Vasylyev proposes to apply the ring-array concentrator as an alternative design of a mirrored collector for deflecting hazardous near-earth objects.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Vasylyev |first1=V. P. |title=Deflection of Hazardous Near-Earth Objects by High Concentrated Sunlight and Adequate Design of Optical Collector |journal=Earth, Moon, and Planets |date=February 2013 |volume=110 |issue=1-2 |pages=67–79 |doi=10.1007/s11038-012-9410-2}}</ref> This type of collector has an underside lens-like position of its focal area that avoids shadowing of the collector by the target and minimizes the risk of its coating by ejected debris. ||
+|-
+| 2012 || Multiple || Organization || The {{w|Global Challenges Foundation}} is founded by the Swedish financial analyst and author Laszlo Szombatfalvy.<ref>{{cite web |title=History |url=https://globalchallenges.org/about/history/ |website=The Global Challenges Foundation |access-date=1 July 2022}}</ref> It aims to "incite deeper understanding of the most pressing threats to humanity - and to catalyse new ways of tackling them".<ref>{{cite web |title=Global Challenges Foundation |url=https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-global-challenges-foundation/ |website=linkedin |access-date=29 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|Sweden}}
+|-
+| 2012 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || M.A. Harwell publishes ''Nuclear Winter: The Human and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War'', which argues that comparatively little scientific research has been done about the envifonmental consequences of a nuclear war of the magnitude of the arsenal at the time could unleash.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Harwell |first1=M. A. |title=Nuclear Winter: The Human and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear War |date=6 December 2012 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-1-4612-5288-7 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Nuclear_Winter.html?id=AZsKCAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2012 (June 29) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|biological weapon}}) || Literature || Milton Leitenberg, Raymond A. Zilinskas and Jens H. Kuhn publish ''The Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History'', which attempts to understand the full scope of the USSR’s offensive biological weapons research.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Leitenberg |first1=Milton |last2=Zilinskas |first2=Raymond A. |last3=Kuhn |first3=Jens H. |title=The Soviet Biological Weapons Program: A History |date=29 June 2012 |publisher=Harvard University Press |isbn=978-0-674-07023-3 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Soviet_Biological_Weapons_Program.html?id=6iSg3YKhzikC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Harvard University Press}})
+|-
+| 2013 (February) || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || {{w|Microsatellite}} [[w:Near Earth Object Surveillance Satellite|NEOSSat]] is launched as a Near Earth Object Surveillance Satellite by the {{w|Canadian Space Agency}} (CSA) with the purpose to hunt for NEOs in space.<ref>{{cite web |title=NEOSSat (Near-Earth Object Surveillance Satellite) |url=https://www.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/content/-/article/neossat |website=eoportal |access-date=21 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2013 (March) || Multiple || {{w|Conference}} || Nick Bostrom gives at TED conference titled The end of humanity. Among topics exposed, Bostrom describes four classes of existential risk: human extinction, permanent stagnation, flawed realization, and subsequent ruination.<ref>{{cite web |title=The end of humanity: Nick Bostrom at TEDxOxford |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0Nf3TcMiHo |website=youtube |access-date=29 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 2013 || {{w|Impact event}} || Organization || The {{w|International Asteroid Warning Network}} (IAWN) is founded, with the purpose to serve as an authoritative source of accurate and up-to-date information on {{w|near-earth object}}s and their impact risks.<ref>{{cite web |title=iawn: IAWN Home |url=https://iawn.net/#:~:text=IAWN%20was%20established%20(2013)%20as,%2C%20tracking%2C%20and%20characterizing%20NEOs. |website=iawn.net |access-date=2 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2013 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || A table-top exercise is conducted at the headquarters of the U.S. {{w|Federal Emergency Management Agency}} in {{w|Washington, D.C.}}, with the purpose to acquaint FEMA with the nature of an impact event and how a warning of an impact might evolve if the threatening object is detected a short time prior to possible impact.<ref>{{cite web |title=2013 Tabletop Exercise |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/ttx13/ |website=cneos.jpl.nasa.gov |access-date=21 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2013 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || {{w|Asteroid Redirect Mission}} is proposed by {{w|NASA}} with the purpose to develop a robotic spacecraft to visit a large near-Earth asteroid and collect a multi-ton boulder from its surface for further analysis.<ref>{{cite web |title=Asteroid Redirect Robotic Mission |url=https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/asteroid-redirect-robotic-mission-arrm |website=NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> The program would be defunded and cancelled, but key technologies being developed for it would continue.<ref>{{cite web |title=NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission |url=https://spacenews.com/nasa-closing-out-asteroid-redirect-mission/ |website=SpaceNews |access-date=17 August 2022 |date=14 June 2017}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Harwood |first1=William |title=Trump budget blueprint focuses on deep space exploration, commercial partnerships – Spaceflight Now |url=https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/03/16/trump-budget-blueprint-focuses-on-deep-space-exploration-commercial-partnerships/ |website=spaceflightnow |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission |url=https://spacenews.com/nasa-closing-out-asteroid-redirect-mission/ |website=SpaceNews |access-date=17 August 2022 |date=14 June 2017}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2013 (July) || Multiple || Organization || The Center on Long-Term Risk is founded.<ref>{{cite web |title=Center on Long-Term Risk - EA Forum |url=https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/center-on-long-term-risk#:~:text=CLR%20was%20founded%20in%20July,of%20the%20Effective%20Altruism%20Foundation. |website=forum.effectivealtruism.org |access-date=4 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> It has the purpose to address worst-case risks from the development and deployment of advanced AI systems.<ref>{{cite web |title=Home |url=https://longtermrisk.org/#:~:text=Our%20goal%20is%20to%20address,and%20philosophical%20aspects%20of%20cooperation. |website=Center on Long-Term Risk |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 2013 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || The related National Laboratories of the United States ([[w:United States Department of Energy national laboratories|Department of Energy national laboratories]]) and Russia ({{w|Rosatom}}) sign a deal that includes an intent to cooperate on defense from asteroids.<ref>{{cite web |title=United States, Russia Sign Agreement to Further Research and Development Collaboration in Nuclear Energy and Security |url=https://www.energy.gov/articles/united-states-russia-sign-agreement-further-research-and-development-collaboration-nuclear |website=Energy.gov |access-date=12 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}, {{w|Rusia}}
+|-
+| 2013 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || NASA announces its Asteroid Initiative, which includes the mission to identify, capture and relocate an asteroid through the Asteroid Redirect Mission, and an Asteroid Grand Challenge to find all asteroids threats to the human population and know what to do about them.<ref name="Loff"/> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2013 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || According to expert testimony in the {{w|United States Congress}}, {{w|NASA}} would require at least five years of preparation before [[w:Asteroid impact avoidance|a mission to intercept an asteroid]] could be launched.<ref name="US-Congress-20130410">{{cite web |author=U.S.Congress |title=Threats From Space: a Review of U.S. Government Efforts to Track and mitigate Asteroids and Meteors (Part I and Part II) – Hearing Before the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology House of Representatives One Hundred Thirteenth Congress First Session |url=http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113hhrg80552/pdf/CHRG-113hhrg80552.pdf |date=Spring 2013 |type=Hearings held 19 March 2013 and 10 April 2013 |page=147 |work={{w|United States Congress}} |access-date=3 May 2014 }}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2013 || Multiple || Literature || {{w|Nick Bostrom}} publishes his paper ''Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority'', which argues that existential risks are those that threaten the future of humanity as a whole, and that preventing such risks should be a global priority..<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bostrom |first1=Nick |title=Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority: Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority |journal=Global Policy |date=February 2013 |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=15–31 |doi=10.1111/1758-5899.12002}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Oxford}})
+|-
+| 2013 || {{w|Climate change}} || Literature || Wil C. G. Burns and Andrew L. Strauss publish ''Climate Change Geoengineering : Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks'', which considers the legal, policy, and philosophical issues presented by geoengineering and explores combating global warming through human-engineered climate interventions.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Burns |first1=Wil C. G. |last2=Strauss |first2=Andrew L. |title=Climate Change Geoengineering: Philosophical Perspectives, Legal Issues, and Governance Frameworks |date=22 July 2013 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-02393-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Climate_Change_Geoengineering.html?id=9361tVT4-6IC&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|Cambridge University Press}})
+|-
+| 2014 (March) || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || NASA launches the Asteroid Data Hunter contest in partnership with {{w|Planetary Resources}} to create better algorithms to hunt for undiscovered asteroids in existing data.<ref name="Loff"/> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2014 (March) || Multiple || Organization || The {{w|Future of Life Institute}} is founded by {{w|Max Tegmark}} and {{w|Jaan Tallinn}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Future of Life Institute - EA Forum |url=https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/topics/future-of-life-institute |website=forum.effectivealtruism.org |access-date=5 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> Based in {{w|Cambridge, Massachusetts}}, it is an independent non-profit that works to reduce extreme risks from transformative technologies, as well as steer the development and use of these technologies to benefit life.<ref>{{cite web |title=Team |url=https://futureoflife.org/team/ |website=Future of Life Institute |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref>  || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2014 (April) || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || A US {{w|Government Accountability Office}} report notes that the {{w|National Nuclear Security Administration}} retains canned sub assemblies (CSAs—nuclear secondary stages) in an indeterminate state pending a senior-level government evaluation of their use in planetary defense against earthbound asteroids.<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/662840.pdf#page=46|title = "Actions Needed by NNSA to Clarify Dismantlement Performance Goal", Report to the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate, United States Government Accountability Office|date = April 2014|access-date = 4 August 2014}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2014 || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || At {{w|NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts}} conference, Wie and his colleagues confirm having the ability to mitigate the asteroid-impact threat, with any range of warning. According to their computer models, with a warning time of 30 days, a 300-meter-wide asteroid would be neutralized by using a single {{w|Hypervelocity Asteroid Intercept Vehicle}}, with less than 0.1% of the destroyed object's mass potentially striking Earth, which by comparison would be more than acceptable.<ref>{{cite web |title=Phrase nasa innovative advanced concepts - examples d'usage pour nasa innovative advanced concepts |url=https://fr.ichacha.net/phrase/nasa%20innovative%20advanced%20concepts.html |website=fr.ichacha.net |access-date=16 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2014 || Human activity || Literature || {{w|Elizabeth Kolbert}} publishes ''{{w|The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History}}'', which explores the idea that human activity is leading to a mass extinction.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Kolbert |first1=Elizabeth |title=The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History |date=2014 |publisher=Henry Holt |isbn=978-1-4088-5122-7 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Sixth_Extinction.html?id=4kR4ngEACAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2014 || Multiple || Research || Seth Baum and Itsuki C. Handoh write an article comparing the planetary boundaries and global catastrophic risk paradigms and integrates them into a unified conceptual framework, which they call Boundary Risk for Humanity and Nature (BRIHN).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Baum |first1=Seth |last2=Handoh |first2=Itsuki C. |title=Integrating the Planetary Boundaries and Global Catastrophic Risk Paradigms |date=24 August 2014 |url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2807394 |publisher=Social Science Research Network |language=en}}</ref> The researchers propose increasingly sophisticated risk assessment concepts that seek to more fully explore the space within which global catastrophes could occur and classify their salient features.<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 2014 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Sample case (accident) || {{w|GlaxoSmithKline}} accidentally releases 45 liters of concentrated polio virus into a river in Belgium.<ref name="Ord"/> || {{w|Belgium}}
+|-
+| 2014 || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Literature || {{w|Nick Bostrom}} publishes ''{{w|Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies}}'', which argues that if artificial intelligence surpasses human brains in general intelligence, then this new {{w|superintelligence}} could replace humans as the dominant lifeform on Earth.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Bostrom |first1=Nick |title=Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies |url=https://philpapers.org/rec/BOSS |website=philpapers.org |publisher=Oxford University Press |access-date=29 October 2022 |date=2014}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2014 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Research || A study finds that even a regional nuclear war, involving fewer than a hundred weapons being detonated, could cause a global nuclear famine.<ref name=Leigh/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mills |first1=Michael J. |last2=Toon |first2=Owen B. |last3=Lee‐Taylor |first3=Julia |last4=Robock |first4=Alan |title=Multidecadal global cooling and unprecedented ozone loss following a regional nuclear conflict |journal=Earth's Future |date=April 2014 |volume=2 |issue=4 |pages=161–176 |doi=10.1002/2013EF000205 |url=https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/2013EF000205 |language=en |issn=2328-4277}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2015 || {{w|Technology}} || Literature || {{w|Yuval Noah Harari}} publishes ''{{w|Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow}}''<ref>{{cite web |title=2015 Literature Yuval Noah Harari publishes Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. - Google Search |url=https://www.google.com/search?q=2015+Literature+Yuval+Noah+Harari+publishes+Homo+Deus%3A+A+Brief+History+of+Tomorrow. |website=www.google.com |access-date=2 July 2022}}</ref>, which explores the impact of major technological developments on human society, and attempts to predict humankind's main goals in the next millennium.<ref>{{cite web |title=Book Review: Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow |url=https://www.dclibrary.org/node/67744 |website=District of Columbia Public Library |access-date=30 July 2022 |language=en |date=29 January 2021}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2015 || Multiple || Concept development || Owen Cotton-Barratt and Toby Ord propose a definition of existential risk in terms of expected value theory, arguing that any event which causes the loss of a large fraction of expected value is an existential risk. This is different from Bostrom's original definition, as they argue that Bostrom fails to adequately capture catastrophes like a global totalitarian state that oppresses its citizenry for a period of time but then collapses, thus enabling humanity to continue its quest to maximize value.<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 2015 || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || The {{w|Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System}} begins operating in order to give warnings about any asteroids that might be on a collision course with Earth.<ref>{{cite web |title=ATLAS, the Asteroid Terrestrial-Impact Last Alert System – |url=https://www.spacesafetymagazine.com/space-hazards/asteroid-hitting-earth/atlas-asteroid-terrestrial-impact-alert-system/ |website=www.spacesafetymagazine.com |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2015 (July 27) || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || {{w|Open leter}} || The Future of Life Institute publishes an open letter in which more than a thousand eminent signatories (including business magnate {{w|Elon Musk}}, the linguist {{w|Noam Chomsky}}, the astrophysicist {{w|Stephen Hawking}} and the Apple cofounder {{w|Steve Wozniak}}) express the view that artificial intelligence is going to present serious problems for humanity.<ref name="Belando">{{cite book |last1=Belando |first1=Laurent |last2=Besnier |first2=Jean-Michel |title=Do Robots Make Love?: Transhumanism in 12 questions |date=2 October 2018 |publisher=Octopus Books |isbn=978-1-78840-070-1 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=n0lGtAEACAAJ&dq=Laurent+Alexandre+%26+Jean-Michel+Besnier+-+Do+Robots+Make+Love&hl=en&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2015 (September 14) || [[w:False vacuum decay|Collapse of the vacuum]] || Research || American astrophysicist [[w:Katie Mack (astrophysicist)|Katie Mack]] publishes an article on <code>cosmosmagazine.com</code> describing how the {{w|Universe}} could be destroyed through [[w:False vacuum decay|vacuum decay]].<ref name=fdggg>{{cite web |title=Vacuum decay: the ultimate catastrophe |url=https://cosmosmagazine.com/science/physics/vacuum-decay-the-ultimate-catastrophe/ |website=cosmosmagazine.com |access-date=11 July 2022 |language=en-AU |date=14 September 2015}}</ref> If it were to occur, it would cause a change in the energy level of the {{w|Higgs field}}. This would cause a "bubble" of broken physics to expand throughout the universe at the speed of light, thus resulting in the complete destruction of the known laws of physics.<ref>{{cite web |title=How 'vacuum decay' could end the universe |url=https://bigthink.com/hard-science/vacuum-decay-end-of-the-universe/ |website=Big Think |access-date=27 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2015 (November 3) || {{w|Climate change}} || Literature || Oliver Morton publishes ''The planet remade: how geoengineering could change the world'', which explores the history, politics, and cutting-edge science of {{w|geoengineering}}, and attempts to untangle the implications of our failure to meet the challenge of climate change and reintroduces the hope that success is possible.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Morton |first1=Oliver |title=The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World |date=3 November 2015 |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-1-4008-7445-3 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Planet_Remade.html?id=428uCgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Princeton University Press}})
+|-
+| 2016 (March) || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || || {{w|Google}}'s {{w|Deep Mind}} AI system {{w|AlphaGo}} wins over {{w|Lee Sedol}} from South Korea in a [[w:AlphaGo versus Lee Sedol|five-game Go match]]. This represents a crucial turning point in the history of non-biological intelligence.<ref name="Belando"/>
+|-
+| 2016 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || Ali Khan and William Patrick publish ''The Next Pandemic: On the Front Lines Against Humankind’s Gravest Dangers''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Khan |first1=Dr Ali S. |title=The Next Pandemic: On the Front Lines Against Humankind's Gravest Dangers |date=24 May 2016 |publisher=PublicAffairs |isbn=978-1-61039-592-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=ZCY4DgAAQBAJ&dq=2016+Ali+Khan+and+William+Patrick+publish+The+Next+Pandemic%3A+On+the+Front+Lines+Against+Humankind%E2%80%99s+Gravest+Dangers |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} (Hachette UK)
+|-
+| 2016 (December 13) || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || {{w|NASA}} researcher Joseph Nuth warns that the Earth is unprepared for an {{w|impact event}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=NASA scientist warns we're not prepared for surprise asteroid or comet strike |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/nasa-scientist-warns-earth-not-prepared-asteroid-or-comet-impact/ |website=www.cbsnews.com |access-date=20 July 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Earth Unprepared For Asteroid Hit, Warns NASA Scientist |url=https://news.yahoo.com/earth-unprepared-asteroid-hit-warns-141721190.html |website=www.yahoo.com |access-date=20 July 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/dec/13/space-asteroid-comet-nasa-rocket |title=Earth woefully unprepared for surprise comet or asteroid, Nasa scientist warns |work={{w|The Guardian}} |first=Alan |last=Yuhas |date=13 December 2016}}</ref> Nuth also comments:
+{{quote|The biggest problem, basically, is there’s not a hell of a lot we can do about it at the moment.<ref>{{cite web |title=Earth woefully unprepared for surprise comet or asteroid, Nasa scientist warns |url=https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/dec/13/space-asteroid-comet-nasa-rocket |website=the Guardian |access-date=20 July 2022 |language=en |date=13 December 2016}}</ref>}}
+|| {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2017 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || {{w|International law}} || The {{w|Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons}} is adopted to comprehensively ban nuclear weapons.<ref>{{cite web |title=United Nations Treaty Collection |url=https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVI-9&chapter=26#:~:text=TREATIES%2DXXVI%2D9%20of%2026,2020%20(Entry%20into%20Force).&text=The%20Treaty%20was%20adopted%20on,June%20to%207%20July%202017. |website=treaties.un.org |access-date=18 August 2022 |language=EN}}</ref> It would enter into force on January 22, 2021.<ref>{{cite web |title=Entry Into Force Day |url=https://www.icanw.org/entryintoforce#:~:text=On%2022%20January%202021%2C%20the,chemical%20weapons%20and%20biological%20weapons. |website=ICAN |access-date=18 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2017 || {{w|Impact event}} || Literature || David Shonting and Cathy Ezrailson publish ''Chicxulub: The Impact and Tsunami: The Story of the Largest Known Asteroid to Hit the Earth''. ||
+|-
+| 2017 (March 27)  || Multiple || Preservation effort || The {{w|Arctic World Archive}} is opened in the island of {{w|Spitsbergen}}, {{w|Norway}}, as a facility for {{w|data preservation}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Digital Treasures of the National Library of Hungary are Deposited in the Arctic World Archive in Svalbard – The Conference of European National Librarians (CENL) |url=https://www.cenl.org/the-digital-treasures-of-the-national-library-of-hungary-are-deposited-in-the-arctic-world-archive-in-svalbard/ |website=www.cenl.org |access-date=28 October 2022}}</ref> Designed to withstand natural and man-made disasters, it contains data of historical and cultural interest, with over 15 contributing nations.<ref>{{cite web |title=Arctic World Archive |url=https://arcticworldarchive.org/ |website=arcticworldarchive.org |access-date=28 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Norway}}
+|-
+| 2017 (May) || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Probability || A survey of AI experts estimates that the chance of human-level machine learning having an "extremely bad (e.g., human extinction)" long-term effect on humanity is 5%.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Grace |first1=Katja |last2=Salvatier |first2=John |last3=Dafoe |first3=Allan |last4=Zhang |first4=Baobao |last5=Evans |first5=Owain |title=When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts |date=2017 |doi=10.48550/arXiv.1705.08807}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2017 (June) || {{w|Cyberattack}} || Research || {{w|Christine Peterson}}, co-founder and past president of the {{w|Foresight Institute}}, believes a cyberattack on electric grids has the potential to be a catastrophic risk. She notes that little has been done to mitigate such risks, and that mitigation could take several decades of readjustment.<ref>{{cite web |title=Scholars assess threats to civilization, life on Earth |url=https://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/scholars-assess-existential-and-catastrophic-risks-to-humanity |website=UCLA |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2017 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || American epidemiologist {{w|Michael T. Osterholm}} and writer {{w|Mark Olshaker}} publish ''{{w|Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs}}''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Osterholm |first1=Michael T. |last2=Olshaker |first2=Mark |title=Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Killer Germs |date=14 March 2017 |publisher=Little, Brown |isbn=978-0-316-34369-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=lW-QDAEACAAJ&dq=Deadliest+Enemy%3A+Our+War+Against+Killer+Germs |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2017 || Multiple || Literature || Phil Torres publishes ''Morality, Foresight, and Human Flourishing: An Introduction to Existential Risks''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Torres |first1=Phil |title=Morality, Foresight, and Human Flourishing: An Introduction to Existential Risks |date=2017 |publisher=Pitchstone Publishing |isbn=978-1-63431-142-7 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Morality_Foresight_and_Human_Flourishing.html?id=DDPZAQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> According to Torres, if more existential risk scenarios are either actively created (“ontological risk multiplication”) or discovered by science (“epistemic risk multiplication”), then the ranks of existencial risks studies could further swell.<ref name="Torres"/>||
+|-
+| 2017 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || United States military analyst {{w|Daniel Ellsberg}} publishes ''The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner'', attempting to reveal his shocking firsthand account of the [[w:Nuclear weapons of the United States|Nuclear program of the United States]] in the 1960s.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Ellsberg |first1=Daniel |title=The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner |date=5 December 2017 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing USA |isbn=978-1-60819-674-6 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=I3gvDwAAQBAJ |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2017 || Global catastrophic biological risks || Concept development || Monica Schoch-Spana et al. define Global Catastrophic Biological Risks as “events [which] could lead to sudden, extraordinary, widespread disaster beyond the collective capability of national and international governments and the private sector to control.”<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Schoch-Spana |first1=Monica |last2=Cicero |first2=Anita |last3=Adalja |first3=Amesh |last4=Gronvall |first4=Gigi |last5=Kirk Sell |first5=Tara |last6=Meyer |first6=Diane |last7=Nuzzo |first7=Jennifer B. |last8=Ravi |first8=Sanjana |last9=Shearer |first9=Matthew P. |last10=Toner |first10=Eric |last11=Watson |first11=Crystal |last12=Watson |first12=Matthew |last13=Inglesby |first13=Tom |title=Global Catastrophic Biological Risks: Toward a Working Definition |journal=Health Security |date=August 2017 |volume=15 |issue=4 |pages=323–328 |doi=10.1089/hs.2017.0038 |url=}}</ref><ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2017 (October) || Environmental disaster || Research || A report published in ''{{w|The Lancet}}'' states that toxic air, {{w|water pollution}}, {{w|soil pollution}}, and workplaces are collectively responsible for nine million deaths worldwide in 2015, particularly from air pollution which was linked to deaths by increasing susceptibility to non-infectious diseases, such as {{w|heart disease}}, stroke, and lung cancer. The report warned that the pollution crisis was exceeding "the envelope on the amount of pollution the Earth can carry" and "threatens the continuing survival of human societies".<ref>{{cite web |title=Global pollution kills 9m a year and threatens 'survival of human societies' |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/oct/19/global-pollution-kills-millions-threatens-survival-human-societies |website=the Guardian |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=en |date=20 October 2017}}</ref>
+|-
+| 2017 (November) || {{w|Climate change}} || Research || A statement by 15,364 scientists from 184 countries indicates that increasing levels of greenhouse gases from the use of fossil fuels, human population growth, deforestation, and overuse of land for agricultural production, particularly by farming {{w|ruminant}}s for meat consumption, are trending in ways that forecast an increase in human misery over coming decades.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Ripple |first1=William J. |last2=Wolf |first2=Christopher |last3=Newsome |first3=Thomas M. |last4=Galetti |first4=Mauro |last5=Alamgir |first5=Mohammed |last6=Crist |first6=Eileen |last7=Mahmoud |first7=Mahmoud I. |last8=Laurance |first8=William F. |title=World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice |journal=BioScience |date=1 December 2017 |volume=67 |issue=12 |pages=1026–1028 |doi=10.1093/biosci/bix125}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2017 (December) || Multiple || {{w|Conference}} || Swedish researcher {{w|Anders Sandberg}} gives a TED Talk on existential risks titled ''Humanity on the Edge of Extinction''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Humanity on the Edge of Extinction {{!}} Anders Sandberg {{!}} TEDxVienna |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-WXOaAnipM |website=youtube |access-date=29 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|Austria}}
+|-
+| 2017 (October 18) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|chemical weapon}},{{w|biological weapon}}) || Literature || Anthony Tu publishes ''Chemical and Biological Weapons and Terrorism''. Tu is recognized as the world’s leading expert on the {{w|Tokyo subway sarin attack}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Tu |first1=Anthony |title=Chemical and Biological Weapons and Terrorism |date=20 October 2017 |publisher=CRC Press |isbn=978-1-315-30549-3 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Chemical_and_Biological_Weapons_and_Terr.html?id=8ro6DwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|CRC Press}})
+|-
+| 2018 (April) || {{w|Impact event}} || Probability || The {{w|B612 Foundation}} states "It's 100 per cent certain we'll be hit [by a devastating asteroid], but we're not 100 per cent sure when."<ref>{{cite web |title=Earth Will Be Hit By An Asteroid With 100 Percent Certainty, Says Space-Watching Group B612 - Inquisitr |url=https://www.inquisitr.com/4881237/earth-will-be-hit-by-an-asteroid-with-100-percent-certainty-says-space-watching-group-b612/ |website=www.inquisitr.com |access-date=6 August 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2018 || {{w|Space exploration}} || Research || Phil Torres argues that there are strong reasons for believing that venturing into space could have catastrophic consequences, likely causing something like a suffering risk (s-risk). He believes that the potential rewards of space exploration do not outweigh the risks.<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 2018 || {{w|Climate change}} || Program launch || The {{w|Club of Rome}} calls for greater climate change action and publishes its ''Climate Emergency Plan'', which proposes ten action points to limit global average temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kellerhoff |first1=Till |title=The Climate Emergency Plan |url=https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-climate-emergency-plan/ |website=Club of Rome |access-date=2 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2018 || Multiple || Research || A group of scholars of disaster law and policy at the University of Copenhagen combine the classification of global catastrophic risk with lessons from the field of disaster studies to produce a framework for governing boring apocalypses. This focuses on vulnerabilities and exposures, two crucial factors that have long concerned the field of disaster studies.<ref name="Torres"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Liu |first1=Hin-Yan |last2=Lauta |first2=Kristian Cedervall |last3=Maas |first3=Matthijs Michiel |title=Governing Boring Apocalypses: A new typology of existential vulnerabilities and exposures for existential risk research |journal=Futures |date=September 2018 |volume=102 |pages=6–19 |doi=10.1016/j.futures.2018.04.009}}</ref> || {{w|Denmark}} ({{w|University of Copenhagen}})
+|-
+| 2018 || Multiple || Research || A paper by researchers at the University of Cambridge’s Centre for the Study of Existential Risk notes that “to date, research on global catastrophic risk scenarios has focused mainly on tracing a causal pathway from catastrophic event to global catastrophic loss of life.” The paper argues that this focus is misplaced and that the research community should instead focus on understanding how the world would recover from such an event.<ref name="Torres"/> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Cambridge}})
+|-
+| 2018 (September 19) || {{w|Supervolcano}} || Literature || Donald R. Prothero publishes ''When humans nearly vanished: the catastrophic explosion of the Toba supervolcano'', which describes the {{w|Toba catastrophe theory}}, according which the Youngest Toba eruption might have caused a {{w|population bottleneck}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Prothero |first1=Donald R. |title=When Humans Nearly Vanished: The Catastrophic Explosion of the Toba Volcano |date=16 October 2018 |publisher=Smithsonian |isbn=978-1-58834-635-3 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/When_Humans_Nearly_Vanished.html?id=1tlOEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Smithsonian}})
+|-
+| 2018 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Literature || Mark Wolverton publishes ''Burning the Sky: Operation Argus and the Untold Story of the Cold War Nuclear Tests in Outer Space''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Wolverton |first1=Mark |title=Burning the Sky: Operation Argus and the Untold Story of the Cold War Nuclear Tests in Outer Space |date=27 November 2018 |publisher=Abrams |isbn=978-1-4683-1418-2 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Burning_the_Sky.html?id=5TqEDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|Abrams Books}})
+|-
+| 2018 (April) || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || Astronomers spot more than 8,000 near-Earth asteroids that are at least 460 feet (140 meters) wide and it is estimated about 17,000 such near-Earth asteroids remain undetected.<ref>{{cite web |last1=published |first1=Mike Wall |title=About 17,000 Big Near-Earth Asteroids Remain Undetected: How NASA Could Spot Them |url=https://www.space.com/40239-near-earth-asteroid-detection-space-telescope.html |website=Space.com |access-date=5 August 2022 |language=en |date=10 April 2018}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2018 (June) || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || The U.S. {{w|National Science and Technology Council}} warns that the {{w|United States}} is unprepared for an asteroid impact event, and develops and releases the National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan to better prepare.<ref name="WH-20180621">{{cite web |author=Staff |title=National Near-Earth Object Preparedness Strategy Action Plan |url=https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/National-Near-Earth-Object-Preparedness-Strategy-and-Action-Plan-23-pages-1MB.pdf |date=21 June 2018 |via=[[w:NARA|National Archives]] |publisher={{w|whitehouse.gov}}|access-date=12 July 2022}}</ref><ref name="GIZ-20180621">{{cite news |last=Mandelbaum |first=Ryan F. |title=America Isn't Ready to Handle a Catastrophic Asteroid Impact, New Report Warns |url=https://gizmodo.com/america-isnt-ready-to-handle-a-catastrophic-asteroid-im-1827014709 |date=21 June 2018 |work={{w|Gizmodo}} |access-date=12 July 2022}}</ref><ref name="ICARUS-220180522">{{cite journal |last=Myhrvold |first=Nathan |title=An empirical examination of WISE/NEOWISE asteroid analysis and results |date=22 May 2018 |journal=[[w:Icarus (journal)|Icarus]] |volume=314 |pages=64–97 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2018.05.004 |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="NYT-20180614">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks - Two years ago, NASA dismissed and mocked an amateur's criticisms of its asteroids database. Now Nathan Myhrvold is back, and his papers have passed peer review. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html |date=14 June 2018 |work={{w|The New York Times}} |access-date=22 June 2018}}</ref><ref name="NYT-20180614c">{{cite news |last=Chang |first=Kenneth |title=Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks - Relevant Comments |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html#permid=27500228:27506217 |date=14 June 2018 |work={{w|The New York Times}} |access-date=12 July 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2018 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || Sandra Hempel publishes ''The Atlas of Disease: Mapping Deadly Epidemics and Contagion from the Plague to the Zika Virus''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hempel |first1=Sandra |title=The Atlas of Disease: Mapping deadly epidemics and contagion from the plague to the zika virus |date=30 October 2018 |publisher=White Lion Publishing |isbn=978-1-78131-880-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Atlas_of_Disease.html?id=6oJwDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} (White Lion Publishing)
+|-
+| 2018 (October) || {{w|Climate change}} || Literature (paper) || The {{w|Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change}} releases a paper on climate change warning about catastrophic events in the future if we do not decarbonize.<ref name="Moynihan">{{cite book |last1=Moynihan |first1=Thomas |title=X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction |date=3 November 2020 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-1-913029-84-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/X_Risk.html?id=7oUBEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2018 (October) || {{w|Impact event}} || Literature || English physicist {{w|Stephen Hawking}} in his final book ''{{w|Brief Answers to the Big Questions}}''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Hawking |first1=Stephen |title=Brief Answers to the Big Questions: the final book from Stephen Hawking |date=16 October 2018 |publisher=John Murray Press |isbn=978-1-4736-9600-6 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Brief_Answers_to_the_Big_Questions.html?id=iKdaDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> considers an asteroid collision to be the biggest threat to the planet.<ref>{{cite web |title=Stephen Hawking feared race of ‘superhumans’ able to manipulate their own DNA |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2018/10/15/stephen-hawking-feared-race-of-superhumans-able-to-manipulate-their-own-dna/ |website=washingtonpost |access-date=5 August 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Stephen Hawking left us bold predictions on AI, superhumans, and aliens |url=https://qz.com/1423685/stephen-hawking-says-superhumans-will-take-over-ai-is-a-threat-and-humans-will-conquer-space/ |website=Quartz |access-date=5 August 2022 |language=en |date=14 October 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Chang |first1=Kenneth |title=Asteroids and Adversaries: Challenging What NASA Knows About Space Rocks |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/science/asteroids-nasa-nathan-myhrvold.html |website=The New York Times |access-date=5 August 2022 |date=14 June 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2018 (November) || Multiple || Literature (paper) || Seth D. Baum publishes paper titled ''Resilience to global catastrophe'', which concludes that while hopefully global catastrophe might never occur, there is no guarantee that efforts to prevent global catastrophe will succeed, and that efforts to increase humanity’s resilience to global catastrophe constitute an important class of policy, something that has thus far received rather limited attention.<ref>{{cite web |title=Resilience to Global Catastrophe |url=https://beta.irgc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Baum-for-IRGC-Resilience-Guide-Vol-2-2018.pdf |website=beta |access-date=6 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2019 (January) || {{w|Artificial intelligence}} || Organization || The {{w|Center for Security and Emerging Technology}} is established at Georgetown's Walsh School of Foreign Service with the purpose to focus on policy research of emerging technologies with an initial emphasis on artificial intelligence.<ref name="CSET">{{Cite news |last=Anderson  |first=Nick |date=February 28, 2019 |title=Georgetown launches think tank on security and emerging technology |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/georgetown-launches-think-tank-on-security-and-emerging-technology/2019/02/27/d6dabc62-391f-11e9-a2cd-307b06d0257b_story.html |access-date=March 12, 2019}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2019 (February) || Multiple || Literature (paper) || An international group of 14 scholars publish a paper titled ''Long-term trajectories of human civilization'', which identifies four types of long-term trajectories: "status quo trajectories, in which civilization stays about the same, catastrophe trajectories, in which civilization collapses, technological transformation trajectories, in which radical technology fundamentally changes civilization, and astronomical trajectories, in which civilization expands beyond our home planet". The paper concludes that status quo trajectories are unlikely to persist over the long-term, and that it depends on what people do today whether humanity succumbs to catastrophe or achieves a more positive trajectory.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Baum |first1=Seth D. |last2=Armstrong |first2=Stuart |last3=Ekenstedt |first3=Timoteus |last4=Häggström |first4=Olle |last5=Hanson |first5=Robin |last6=Kuhlemann |first6=Karin |last7=Maas |first7=Matthijs M. |last8=Miller |first8=James D. |last9=Salmela |first9=Markus |last10=Sandberg |first10=Anders |last11=Sotala |first11=Kaj |last12=Torres |first12=Phil |last13=Turchin |first13=Alexey |last14=Yampolskiy |first14=Roman V. |title=Long-term trajectories of human civilization |journal=foresight |date=11 March 2019 |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=53–83 |doi=10.1108/FS-04-2018-0037}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Long-Term Trajectories of Human Civilization {{!}} Global Catastrophic Risk Institute |url=https://gcrinstitute.org/long-term-trajectories-of-human-civilization/ |website=gcrinstitute |access-date=6 July 2022 |date=8 August 2018}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2019 (March) || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || Scientists report that {{w|asteroid}}s may be [[w:Asteroid impact prediction|much more difficult to destroy]] than thought earlier.<ref name="PHYS-20190304">{{cite news |author=Johns Hopkins University
+ |title=Asteroids are stronger, harder to destroy than previously thought |url=https://phys.org/news/2019-03-asteroids-stronger-harder-previously-thought.html
+ |date=4 March 2019 |work={{w|Phys.org}} |access-date=5 July 2022}}</ref><ref name="ICRS-20190315">{{cite journal |last1=El Mir |first1=Charles |last2=Ramesh |first2=KT |last3=Richardson |first3=Derek C. |title=A new hybrid framework for simulating hypervelocity asteroid impacts and gravitational reaccumulation |date=15 March 2019 |journal=[[w:Icarus (journal)|Icarus]] |volume=321 |pages=1013–1025 |doi=10.1016/j.icarus.2018.12.032}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2019 || {{w|Environmental disaster}} || Research || A new climate report claims that, given plummeting biodiversity and receding ice sheets, "human life on earth may be on the way to extinction".<ref>D. Spratt and I. Dunlop, Existential Climate-Related Security Risk (Melbourne: Breakthrough, 2019), 3.</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2019 || {{w|Climate change}} || Research || The 2019 report on climate change and the oceans by the {{w|Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change}} describes the trend in which storms that used to occur once a century will happen once a year by midcentury. 46 If the planet continues to warm, “once a century” events will happen once a month. Because hurricanes get their destructive power from ocean heat, warmer waters increase the impact of extreme storms.<ref>Hans-Otto Pörtner, Debra C. Roberts, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Melinda Tignor, Elvira Poloczanska, Katja Mintenbeck, et al., eds., The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2019), 57, 327.</ref> If the planet continues to warm, “once a century” events will happen once a month<ref name=Leigh/>, due to hurricanes getting their destructive power from ocean heat.<ref>Anders Levermann, quoted in Jonathan Watts, “Twin Megastorms Have Scientists Fearing This May Be the New Normal,” Guardian, September 7, 2017.</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2019 || Multiple || Literature || The {{w|Club of Rome}} publishes the Planetary Emergency Plan, with the purpose to obtain a set of key policy levers to address the cross-cutting challenges of climate change, biodiversity loss and human health and wellbeing.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kellerhoff |first1=Till |title=The Planetary Emergency Plan |url=https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-planetary-emergency-plan/ |website=Club of Rome |access-date=2 July 2022}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2019 || {{w|Climate change}} || Field growth || The term "existential threat" becomes increasingly common in consideration of the climate crisis.<ref name="Dictionary.com"/> ||
+|-
+| 2020 (January 23) || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Probability || The {{w|Doomsday Clock}} moves to 100 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been in its 73-year history.<ref>{{cite web |title='If there's ever a time to wake up, it's now': Doomsday Clock moves 20-seconds closer to midnight |url=https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-01-24/doomsday-clock-moves-closest-to-midnight-in-73-year-history/11896294 |website=ABC News |access-date=27 June 2022 |language=en-AU |date=23 January 2020}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2020 (March 3) || Multiple || Literature || Australian philosopher {{w|Toby Ord}} publishes ''{{w|The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity}}''. According to the author, understanding global catastrophic risks requires delving into disciplines such as {{w|physics}}, {{w|biology}}, {{w|earth science}}, {{w|computer science}}, {{w|history}}, {{w|anthropology}}, {{w|philosophy}}, {{w|economics}}, {{w|international relations}}, and {{w|political science}}.<ref name="Ord">{{cite book |last1=Ord |first1=Toby |title=The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity |date=2020 |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing Plc |isbn=978-1-5266-0022-6 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/The_Precipice.html?id=8dTEyQEACAAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> Toby Ord estimates the odds that humanity could become extinct over the next century at one in six, with an out-of-control superintelligence, bioterrorism, and totalitarianism among the largest risks.<ref name=Leigh/> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+|-
+| 2020 (March 11) || {{w|Pandemic}} || Sample case || The {{w|COVID-19 pandemic}} is declared, soon becoming one of the deadliest pandemics in history, and revealing global unpreparedness for global risks.<ref name="Moynihan"/> The pandemic would trigger severe [[w:Social impact of the COVID-19 pandemic|social]] and [[w:Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic|economic disruption]] around the world, including [[w:COVID-19 recession|the largest global recession]] since the {{w|Great Depression}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Great Lockdown: Worst Economic Downturn Since the Great Depression |url=https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2020/04/14/blog-weo-the-great-lockdown-worst-economic-downturn-since-the-great-depression |website=IMF |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> While this pandemic does not constitute an existential risk in itself, according to Luiz Marques, frequently, an existential risk results from a set of crises that, separately, do not existentially threaten humanity, but combined and acting in synergy they have the potential to do so.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Marques |first1=Luiz |title=Pandemics, Existential and non-Existential Risks to Humanity |journal=Ambiente & Sociedade |date=3 July 2020 |volume=23 |doi=10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200126vu2020L3ID |url=https://www.scielo.br/j/asoc/a/M6BMn4gtwyTZHnkWTDJDt8C/?lang=en |language=en |issn=1414-753X}}</ref> || Worldwide
+|-
+| 2020 (May) || Environmental disaster || Research || An analysis published in ''{{w|Scientific Reports}}'' finds that if {{w|deforestation}} and resource [[w:Overconsumption|consumption]] continue at current rates they could culminate in a "catastrophic collapse in human population" and possibly "an irreversible collapse of our civilization" within the next several decades. The study says humanity should pass from a civilization dominated by the economy to a "cultural society" that "privileges the interest of the ecosystem above the individual interest of its components, but eventually in accordance with the overall communal interest." The authors also note that "while violent events, such as global war or natural catastrophic events, are of immediate concern to everyone, a relatively slow consumption of the planetary resources may be not perceived as strongly as a mortal danger for the human civilization."<ref>{{cite web |title=Theoretical Physicists Say 90% Chance of Societal Collapse Within Several Decades |url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/akzn5a/theoretical-physicists-say-90-chance-of-societal-collapse-within-several-decades |website=www.vice.com |access-date=17 August 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bologna |first1=Mauro |last2=Aquino |first2=Gerardo |title=Deforestation and world population sustainability: a quantitative analysis |journal=Scientific Reports |date=December 2020 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=7631 |doi=10.1038/s41598-020-63657-6}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2020 || Multiple || Concept development || Nathan Sears formulates a concept of existential security, which takes humankind as its referent object against anthropogenic existential threats to human civilization and survival. his concept combines existential risk studies with security studies.<ref name="Torres"/> ||
+|-
+| 2020 || {{w|Pandemic}} || Literature || American physician {{w|Michael Greger}} publishes ''How to Survive a Pandemic'', which attempts to reveal not only what we can do to cope with a pandemic, but also what can society do to reduce the likelihood of even worse catastrophes in the future.<ref>{{cite book |last1=MD |first1=Michael Greger |title=How to Survive a Pandemic |date=26 May 2020 |publisher=Pan Macmillan |isbn=978-1-5290-5490-3 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=jTXfDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=How+to+Survive+a+Pandemic&hl=en#v=onepage&q=How%20to%20Survive%20a%20Pandemic&f=false |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2020 || Multiple || Research || Owen Cotton-Barratt, Max Daniel, and Anders Sandberg publish ''Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter'', which discusses the importance of multiple levels of defense against human extinction, including prevention, response, and resilience.<ref name="Torres"/> The authors argue that all of these strategies are important and should be given consideration in planning for the future.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cotton‐Barratt |first1=Owen |last2=Daniel |first2=Max |last3=Sandberg |first3=Anders |title=Defence in Depth Against Human Extinction: Prevention, Response, Resilience, and Why They All Matter |journal=Global Policy |date=May 2020 |volume=11 |issue=3 |pages=271–282 |doi=10.1111/1758-5899.12786}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Oxford}})
+|-
+| 2020 || Multiple || Literature || British historian and researcher Thomas Moynihan publishes ''X-Risk'', which explores how humanity has come to understand the risks posed by its own actions and inactions.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Moynihan |first1=Thomas |title=X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction |date=3 November 2020 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-1-913029-84-5 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/X_Risk.html?id=7oUBEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}} ({{w|University of Oxford}})
+|-
+| 2020 || {{w|Natural disaster}} || Statistics || A total of 389 natural disasters are reported in the year, having killed 15,080 people, affected 98.4 million others, and costed US$171.3 billion. Statistics calculate an average of 400 natural disasters occurring worldwide each year.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Denizli |first1=Adil |last2=Alencar |first2=Marcelo |last3=Nguyen |first3=Tuan Anh |last4=Motaung |first4=David |title=Nanotechnology-Based Smart Remote Sensing Networks for Disaster Prevention |date=29 May 2022 |publisher=Elsevier |isbn=978-0-323-99828-4 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=QSxfEAAAQBAJ&pg=PR17&lpg=PR17&dq=Nanotechnology+Disaster&ots=UIwNRZ7nA5&sig=ACfU3U3eOISqCmCY1ovBCVHQR2jZqI6Y4w&hl=en#v=onepage&q=Nanotechnology%20Disaster&f=false |language=en}}</ref> || Worldwide
+|-
+| 2021 || {{w|Weapons of mass destruction}} ({{w|nuclear weapon}}) || Statistics || As of date, humanity has about 13,410 nuclear weapons, thousands of which are on [[w:De-alerting|hair-trigger alert]].<ref>{{cite web|title=Status of World Nuclear Forces|url= https://fas.org/issues/nuclear-weapons/status-world-nuclear-forces/ |website=Federation of American Scientists|access-date=26 June 2022}}</ref> || [[w:List of states with nuclear weapons|Countries with nuclear weapons]]
+|-
+| 2021 (May) || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || NASA astronomers report that 5 to 10 years of preparation may be needed to avoid a [[w:Sentry (monitoring system)|virtual impactor]] based on a simulated exercise conducted by the 2021 Planetary Defense Conference.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Woodward |first1=Morgan McFall-Johnsen, Aylin |title=A NASA simulation revealed that 6 months' warning isn't enough to stop an asteroid from hitting Earth. We'd need 5 to 10 years. |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-asteroid-simulation-reveals-need-years-of-warning-2021-5 |website=Business Insider |access-date=5 August 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=published |first1=Meghan Bartels |title=How did you spend your week? NASA pretended to crash an asteroid into Earth. |url=https://www.space.com/planetary-defense-asteroid-impact-scenario-exercise-2021 |website=Space.com |access-date=5 August 2022 |language=en |date=1 May 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Planetary Defense Conference Exercise - 2021 |url=https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc21/ |website=cneos.jpl.nasa.gov |access-date=5 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2021 || {{w|Environmental disaster}} || Research || A study described as the "first long-term assessment of global bee decline", which analyzes [[w:Global Biodiversity Information Facility|GBIF]]-data of over a century, finds that [[w:biodiversity|the number of bee species]] declined steeply worldwide after the 1990s, shrinking by a quarter in 2006–2015 compared to before 1990.<ref>{{cite web |title=A quarter of all known bee species haven't been seen since the 1990s |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/2265680-a-quarter-of-all-known-bee-species-havent-been-seen-since-the-1990s/ |website=New Scientist |access-date=12 July 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Zattara |first1=Eduardo E. |last2=Aizen |first2=Marcelo A. |title=Worldwide occurrence records suggest a global decline in bee species richness |journal=One Earth |date=January 2021 |volume=4 |issue=1 |pages=114–123 |doi=10.1016/j.oneear.2020.12.005}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2021 (September) || {{w|Climate change}} || Recommendation || More than 200 scholarly medical journals joint publish an emergency call for action, saying that a temperature increase of 1.5 degrees would bring catastrophic harm to global health from which the world will never recover.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Atwoli |first1=Lukoye |last2=Baqui |first2=Abdullah H |last3=Benfield |first3=Thomas |last4=Bosurgi |first4=Raffaella |last5=Godlee |first5=Fiona |last6=Hancocks |first6=Stephen |last7=Horton |first7=Richard |last8=Laybourn-Langton |first8=Laurie |last9=Monteiro |first9=Carlos Augusto |last10=Norman |first10=Ian |last11=Patrick |first11=Kirsten |last12=Praities |first12=Nigel |last13=Olde Rikkert |first13=Marcel G M |last14=Rubin |first14=Eric J |last15=Sahni |first15=Peush |last16=Smith |first16=Richard |last17=Talley |first17=Nicholas J |last18=Turale |first18=Sue |last19=Vázquez |first19=Damián |title=Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases, restore biodiversity, and protect health |journal=BMJ |date=5 September 2021 |pages=n1734 |doi=10.1136/bmj.n1734}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2021 (October 19) || Multiple || Literature || Joshua Schuster and Derek Woods publish ''Calamity Theory: Three Critiques of Existential Risk'', which examines the rise of the the field of existential risk and points its failures to acknowledge the ways some communities and lifeways are more at risk than others and what it implies about human extinction.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Schuster |first1=Joshua |title=Calamity theory : three critiques of existential risk |date=2021 |location=Minneapolis, MN |isbn=9781452966588 |url=}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|University of Minnesota Press}})
+|-
+| 2021 (November 9) || Multiple || Literature || Andrew Leigh publishes ''What's the Worst That Could Happen?: Existential Risk and Extreme Politics'', which looks at catastrophic risks and how to mitigate them, arguing provocatively that the rise of populist politics makes catastrophe more likely.<ref name=Leigh>{{cite book |last1=Leigh |first1=Andrew |title=What's the Worst That Could Happen?: Existential Risk and Extreme Politics |date=9 November 2021 |publisher=MIT Press |isbn=978-0-262-36661-8 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/What_s_the_Worst_That_Could_Happen.html?id=siMZEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|MIT Press}})
+|-
+| 2021 (November 24) || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || The {{w|Double Asteroid Redirection Test}} {{w|NASA}} space mission is launched. It is aimed at testing a method of planetary defense against {{w|near-Earth object}}s. || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2021 (December 5) || {{w|Climate change}} || {{w|Filmmaking}} || American [[w:Apocalyptic and post-apocalyptic fiction|apocalyptic]] {{w|political satire}} {{w|black comedy film}} ''{{w|Don't Look Up}}'' is released, being well received by numerous [[w:Climatology|climate scientists]] and [[w:Climate communication|climate communicators]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Don't Look Up is the climate movie I've been waiting for |url=https://thephoenix.earth/dont-look-up/ |website=The Phoenix |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en |date=30 December 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=‘It parodies our inaction’: Don’t Look Up, an allegory of the climate crisis, lauded by activists |url=https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/dec/30/it-parodies-our-inaction-dont-look-up-an-allegory-of-the-climate-crisis-lauded-by-activists |website=the Guardian |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en |date=30 December 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Don’t Look Up: four climate experts on the polarising disaster film |url=https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/jan/08/dont-look-up-four-climate-experts-on-the-polarising-disaster-film |website=the Guardian |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en |date=8 January 2022}}</ref> Climate scientist [[w:Peter Kalmus (climate scientist)|Peter Kalmus]] would remark, "It's the most accurate film about society's terrifying non-response to climate breakdown I've seen."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Max |first1=Grinnell, |title=I’m a climate scientist. Don’t Look Up captures the madness I see every day {{!}} Peter Kalmus |url=https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/dec/29/climate-scientist-dont-look-up-madness |website=the Guardian |access-date=31 October 2022 |language=en |date=29 December 2021}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+| 2022 (January) || {{w|Impact event}} || Research || A team of astronomers report the first unambiguous detection and mass measurement of an isolated {{w|stellar black hole}} using the {{w|Hubble Space Telescope}} together with the {{w|Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics}} (MOA) and the {{w|Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment}} (OGLE).<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Sahu |first1=Kailash C. |last2=Anderson |first2=Jay |last3=Casertano |first3=Stefano |last4=Bond |first4=Howard E. |last5=Udalski |first5=Andrzej |last6=Dominik |first6=Martin |last7=Calamida |first7=Annalisa |last8=Bellini |first8=Andrea |last9=Brown |first9=Thomas M. |last10=Rejkuba |first10=Marina |last11=Bajaj |first11=Varun |last12=Kains |first12=Noe |last13=Ferguson |first13=Henry C. |last14=Fryer |first14=Chris L. |last15=Yock |first15=Philip |last16=Mroz |first16=Przemek |last17=Kozlowski |first17=Szymon |last18=Pietrukowicz |first18=Pawel |last19=Poleski |first19=Radek |last20=Skowron |first20=Jan |last21=Soszynski |first21=Igor |last22=Szymanski |first22=Michael K. |last23=Ulaczyk |first23=Krzysztof |last24=Wyrzykowski |first24=Lukasz |last25=Barry |first25=Richard |last26=Bennett |first26=David P. |last27=Bond |first27=Ian A. |last28=Hirao |first28=Yuki |last29=Silva |first29=Stela Ishitani |last30=Kondo |first30=Iona |last31=Koshimoto |first31=Naoki |last32=Ranc |first32=Clement |last33=Rattenbury |first33=Nicholas J. |last34=Sumi |first34=Takahiro |last35=Suzuki |first35=Daisuke |last36=Tristram |first36=Paul J. |last37=Vandorou |first37=Aikaterini |last38=Beaulieu |first38=Jean-Philippe |last39=Marquette |first39=Jean-Baptiste |last40=Cole |first40=Andrew |last41=Fouque |first41=Pascal |last42=Hill |first42=Kym |last43=Dieters |first43=Stefan |last44=Coutures |first44=Christian |last45=Dominis-Prester |first45=Dijana |last46=Bennett |first46=Clara |last47=Bachelet |first47=Etienne |last48=Menzies |first48=John |last49=Alb-row |first49=Michael |last50=Pollard |first50=Karen |last51=Gould |first51=Andrew |last52=Yee |first52=Jennifer |last53=Allen |first53=William |last54=de Almeida |first54=Leonardo Andrade |last55=Christie |first55=Grant |last56=Drummond |first56=John |last57=Gal-Yam |first57=Avishay |last58=Gorbikov |first58=Evgeny |last59=Jablonski |first59=Francisco |last60=Lee |first60=Chung-Uk |last61=Maoz |first61=Dan |last62=Manulis |first62=Ilan |last63=McCormick |first63=Jennie |last64=Natusch |first64=Tim |last65=Pogge |first65=Richard W. |last66=Shvartzvald |first66=Yossi |last67=Jorgensen |first67=Uffe G. |last68=Alsubai |first68=Khalid A. |last69=Andersen |first69=Michael I. |last70=Bozza |first70=Valerio |last71=Novati |first71=Sebastiano Calchi |last72=Burgdorf |first72=Martin |last73=Hinse |first73=Tobias C. |last74=Hundertmark |first74=Markus |last75=Husser |first75=Tim-Oliver |last76=Kerins |first76=Eamonn |last77=Longa-Pena |first77=Penelope |last78=Mancini |first78=Luigi |last79=Penny |first79=Matthew |last80=Rahvar |first80=Sohrab |last81=Ricci |first81=Davide |last82=Sajadian |first82=Sedighe |last83=Skottfelt |first83=Jesper |last84=Snodgrass |first84=Colin |last85=Southworth |first85=John |last86=Tregloan-Reed |first86=Jeremy |last87=Wambsganss |first87=Joachim |last88=Wertz |first88=Olivier |last89=Tsapras |first89=Yiannis |last90=Street |first90=Rachel A. |last91=Bramich |first91=Daniel M. |last92=Horne |first92=Keith |last93=Steele |first93=Iain A. |title=An Isolated Stellar-Mass Black Hole Detected Through Astrometric Microlensing |date=2022 |doi=10.48550/arXiv.2201.13296 |url=}}</ref> ||
+|-
+| 2022 (August) || {{w|Impact event}} || Program launch || {{w|Near-Earth Asteroid Scout}} is planned for launch.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Dickinson |first1=David |title=Tiny NEA Scout Solar Sail Mission to Chase Asteroid |url=https://www.universetoday.com/154205/tiny-nea-scout-solar-sail-mission-to-chase-asteroid/ |website=Universe Today |access-date=10 August 2022 |date=2 February 2022}}</ref> Developed under NASA’s {{w|Advanced Exploration Systems Program}}, it is a miniaturized spacecraft<ref>{{cite web |last1=Mahoney |first1=Erin |title=NEA Scout |url=https://www.nasa.gov/content/nea-scout |website=NASA |access-date=17 August 2022 |date=30 October 2015}}</ref>. This low-cost concept is aimed to map an asteroid and demonstrate several technological firsts, including being the first {{w|CubeSat}} to reach an asteroid.<ref>{{cite web |title=Near Earth Asteroid Scout (NEAScout) |url=https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/near-earth-asteroid-scout-neascout |website=NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) |access-date=17 August 2022}}</ref> || {{w|United States}} ({{w|NASA}})
+|-
+| 2022 (August 16) || Multiple || {{w|Literature}} || Scottish philosopher and ethicist {{w|William MacAskill}} publishes ''{{w|What We Owe the Future}}'', which argues for longtermism, an ethical stance which gives priority to improving the long-term future. MacAskill states that we must ensure that civilization would rebound if it collapsed, counter the end of moral progress, and prepare for a planet where the smartest beings are digital, not human.<ref>{{cite web |title=What We Owe the Future |url=https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/59802037-what-we-owe-the-future |website=Goodreads |access-date=26 October 2022 |language=en}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+|-
+|}
+== Numerical and visual data ==
+=== Google Scholar ===
+The table below summarizes per-year mentions of "existential risk" on Google Scholar as of July 14, 2022. Note: {{w|Nick Bostrom}} introduced the term "existential risk" in 2003.
+{| class="sortable wikitable"
+! Year
+! Mentions
+|-
+| 1990 || 3
+|-
+| 1992 || 11
+|-
+| 1994 || 6
+|-
+| 1996 || 4
+|-
+| 1998 || 9
+|-
+| 2000 || 13
+|-
+| 2002 || 14
+|-
+| 2004 || 40
+|-
+| 2006 || 22
+|-
+| 2008 || 34
+|-
+| 2010 || 74
+|-
+| 2012 || 115
+|-
+| 2014 || 207
+|-
+| 2016 || 348
+|-
+| 2018 || 614
+|-
+| 2020 || 965
 |-
 |}
+[[File:Existential risk google scholar.PNG|thumb|center|800px]]
+=== Google trends ===
+The chart below shows Google Trends data for global catastrophic risk (topic) from January 1, 2004 to July 3, 2022, when the screenshot was taken. Interest is also ranked by country and displayed on world map.<ref>{{cite web |title=Google Trends |url=https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=%2Fg%2F11bwf0dfjd |website=Google Trends |access-date=4 July 2022}}</ref>
+[[File:Global catastrophic risk gt.png|thumb|center|800px]]
+=== Google Ngram viewer ===
+The chart below shows Google Ngram Viewer data for existential risk from 1900 to 2019.<ref>{{cite web |title=Google Books Ngram Viewer |url=https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=existential+risk&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=26&smoothing=3 |website=books.google.com |access-date=4 July 2022 |language=en}}</ref>
+[[File:Existencial risk ngram.PNG|thumb|center|800px]]
+=== Wikipedia views ===
+The chart below shows pageviews of the English Wikipedia page {{w|Global catastrophic risk}}, on desktop, mobile-web, desktop-spider, mobile-web-spider and mobile app, from July 2015 to June 2022.<ref>{{cite web |title=Wikipedia Views: results |url=https://wikipediaviews.org/displayviewsformultiplemonths.php?page=Global+catastrophic+risk&allmonths=allmonths-api&language=en&drilldown=all |website=wikipediaviews.org |access-date=4 July 2022}}</ref>
+[[File:Global catastrophic risk wv.png|thumb|center|600px]]
 ==Meta information on the timeline==
@@ Line 25: / Line 723: @@
 ===How the timeline was built===
-The initial version of the timeline was written by [[User:FIXME|FIXME]].
+The initial version of the timeline was written by [[User:Sebastian|Sebastian]].
+Base literature:
+* ''{{w|The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity}}'' by {{w|Toby Ord}}<ref name="Ord"/>
+* ''X-Risk: How Humanity Discovered Its Own Extinction'', by Thomas Moynihan.<ref name="Moynihan"/>
+* ''{{w|Our Final Hour}}'' by {{w|Martin Rees}}.<ref name="Rees">{{cite book |last1=Rees |first1=Martin |title=Our Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning |date=14 April 2004 |publisher=Basic Books |isbn=978-0-465-06863-0 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=1KzUswEACAAJ&dq=Our+Final+Hour%7D%7D%27%27+by+%7B%7Bw%7CMartin+Rees&hl=en&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref>
+* ''[[w:Global Catastrophic Risks (book)|Global Catastrophic Risks]]'' by {{w|Nick Bostrom}}.<ref name="Bostrom"/>
 {{funding info}} is available.
@@ Line 36: / Line 741: @@
 ===What the timeline is still missing===
+* [https://www.iflscience.com/9-times-the-world-was-at-the-brink-of-nuclear-war-and-pulled-back-47431]
+* {{w|List of near-Earth object observation projects}}
+* {{w|Category:Earth-grazing fireballs}}
+* {{w|Ultimate fate of the universe}} (check categories below)
+* {{w|Big Rip}}
+* {{w|Heat death of the universe}}
+* {{w|Big Crunch}}
+* Gamma-ray Burst
+* Rogue Black Holes ([https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zo4gRhG90S4])
+* [https://futureoflife.org/background/existential-risk/] (check RECOMMENDED REFERENCES)
+* [https://futureoflife.org/background/benefits-risks-biotechnology/]
+* [https://www.cser.ac.uk/research/extreme-risks-and-global-environment/]
+* [https://futureoflife.org/data/documents/FLI-XRisk-Organizations.pdf?x76795]
+* {{w|Global catastrophic risk}}
+* {{w|List of global issues}}
+* {{w|Global catastrophe scenarios}}
 ===Timeline update strategy===
 ==See also==
+* [[Timeline of pollution]]
+* [[Timeline of AI safety]]
+* [[Timeline of nuclear security]]
 ==External links==