Difference between revisions of "Timeline of GiveWell"
From Timelines
(→Interactions) |
|||
| Line 307: | Line 307: | ||
! Counterpart entity !! Entity type !! First mention by GiveWell !! First mention of GiveWell by that entity (if applicable) !! Notes | ! Counterpart entity !! Entity type !! First mention by GiveWell !! First mention of GiveWell by that entity (if applicable) !! Notes | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | {{w|Population Services International}} (PSI) || Charity || 2007-01-07<ref name=psi-first-rec/> || || Population Services International (PSI) | + | | {{w|Population Services International}} (PSI) || Charity || 2007-01-07<ref name=psi-first-rec/> || || Population Services International (PSI) is one of GiveWell's top recommendations from early 2007 till the end of 2009, when GiveWell would come up with an updated list based on its research. |
|- | |- | ||
| {{w|Charity Navigator}} (CN) || Charity evaluator || 2007-01-09<ref name=before-tearing-straw-man-apart/> || || GiveWell's first mention of Charity Navigator, and many of its subsequent mentions, are in the context of criticism of too much focus on the "overhead ratio" of charities, a metric that CN focuses on. GiveWell also mentions CN in its business plan as another organization providing a somewhat similar service but one that is different in important ways. GiveWell also responds to personal blog posts by Trent Stamp, the President of Charity Navigator at the time.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://blog.givewell.org/2007/05/02/can-charity-be-cool/|title = Can charity be cool?|date = May 2, 2007|accessdate = September 4, 2022|publisher = GiveWell|last = Karnofsky|first = Holden}}</ref> | | {{w|Charity Navigator}} (CN) || Charity evaluator || 2007-01-09<ref name=before-tearing-straw-man-apart/> || || GiveWell's first mention of Charity Navigator, and many of its subsequent mentions, are in the context of criticism of too much focus on the "overhead ratio" of charities, a metric that CN focuses on. GiveWell also mentions CN in its business plan as another organization providing a somewhat similar service but one that is different in important ways. GiveWell also responds to personal blog posts by Trent Stamp, the President of Charity Navigator at the time.<ref>{{cite web|url = https://blog.givewell.org/2007/05/02/can-charity-be-cool/|title = Can charity be cool?|date = May 2, 2007|accessdate = September 4, 2022|publisher = GiveWell|last = Karnofsky|first = Holden}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 21:19, 4 September 2022
This is a timeline of GiveWell, a United States non-profit charity assessment and effective altruism-focused organization based in San Francisco. Among the many charity evaluators, GiveWell stands out as a rating service that complements classic quantitative measures.[1] The organization has reviewed over 500 charities.[2] According to nonprofit 80,000 hours, GiveWell is the world’s leading charity evaluator.[3]
Contents
Sample questions
The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:
- What are some strategies conducted by GiveWell in order to optimize results?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Strategy".
- You will see a miscellaneous list of events including priority relocations, change of direction, plans, and experiments.
- What are some significant fundings received by GiveWell?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Funding".
- You will see a number of grants awarded by donors.
- What are some significant grantmaking allocations recommended by GiveWell?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Grantmaking".
- You will see a number of discretionary grants allocated by GiveWell and many grants awarded by Good Ventures to charities through GiveWell recommendations.
- What are the several charities being top ranked by GiveWell across the years?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Charity ranking".
- You will see standout names like Against Malaria Foundation, GiveDirectly, and Malaria Consortium.
- What is the composition of the staff and what are the different roles?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Staff".
- Which countries have been visited by members of the GiveWell staff and what was the purpose of the visit?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Site visit".
- You will see a number of countries where evaluated charities conduct work, mostly in Africa.
- What are some illustrative versions of GiveWell's Cost-Effectiveness Analyses that have been published across the years?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "Cost-effectiveness analysis".
- For the number of versions per year, see the Tables section.
- What are events reflecting the impact of GiveWell in the media and among notable people?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "External citation".
- You will see mostly articles citing the charity evaluator.
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "External review".
- You will see publications focusing on GiveWell
- What are some important interviews conducted to people from GiveWell?
- Sort the full timeline by "Event type" and look for the group of rows with value "interview".
- You will see a number of interviews, especially to Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld.
- How much money has been moved through GiveWell recommendations across the years?
- See the tables section for details.
Big picture
| Period | Development summary | More details |
|---|---|---|
| 2006–2008 | Initial years | GiveWell starts conducting its grant application process. Initial struggles in founding are experienced, with very little money moved through the website. Some controversies emerge in the leadership. |
| 2009–2010 | Stabilization | GiveWell achieves growth in money moved. GiveWell staff begin making site visits to the areas served by current and potential top charities. |
| 2011–2012 | Partnership | Good Ventures is formed and starts injecting money. Annual cycles are standardized. |
| 2013–2014 | Relocation | GiveWell moves to the San Francisco Bay Area, where people have become strong supporters of effective altruism. GiveWell Labs grows in this period. |
| 2015 onward | Reorganization | A spectacular growth in money moved through recommendations is experienced in this period. GiveWell Labs separates from GiveWell, renaming as Open Philanthropy Project. |
Highlights by year
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| 2007 | GiveWell launches. In the first year, fifty-nine organizations apply for GiveWell grants, with fifteen being considered to produce adequate information about their activities.[4] Population Services International (PSI) is announced as first recommended charity, and becomes the recipient of GiveWell's first substantial donation.[5] |
| 2008 | GiveWell moves US$35,021 through its website, and receives 130 donations.[6] |
| 2009 | GiveWell decides to rate only charities that meet a minimal standard of transparency.[7] The evaluator moves US$143,013 through its website (A 308% increase from the previous year). The number of donations reaches 665 (a 412% increase from 2008).[6] |
| 2010 | GiveWell manages to track over US$1.5 million in donations to top charities, compared to just over $1 million in 2009. Its website traffic nearly doubles compared to the previous year, and donations through the website nearly triples.[8] The evaluator moves US$399,456 through its website (a 179% increase from 2009), whereas the number of donations reaches 976 (a 47% growth from the previous year).[6] |
| 2011 | A strong growth is experienced during the year. GiveWell tracks over US$5 million to top charities, compared to about US$1.5 million in 2010.[8] Its website reaches US$1,305,089 in movement (a 227% increase from 2010), whereas its number of donations more than triples to 3,099 (a 218% growth from the previous year).[6] In 2011 GiveWell broadens its search on charitable organizations to include flag promising charities, based on additional characteristics. The set of heuristics for flagging charities worth investigating further is partially developed by incorporating research and previous heuristics from the 2009 report.[9] |
| 2012 | GiveWell starts searching for organizations working on immunization, nutrition and other global health programs.[9] The evaluator identifies three top priorities for the year: to make significant progress on GiveWell Labs; find more top charities under the same basic framework as our existing recommendations; and expand its team.[8] |
| 2013 | GiveWell develops a cause selection framework, getting basic context for assessing causes within policy-oriented philanthropy and scientific research funding.[8] |
| 2014 | GiveWell tracks 27.8 million dollars moved to its recommended charities, about 60% more than in 2013. The total number of donors giving to GiveWell's recommended charities or to GiveWell unrestricted would not grow significantly (up 9% to about 9,300). Many new donors who gave less than $1,000 in 2013 would not give again in 2014, but among those who gave $10,000 or more in 2013, a higher proportion would give again in 2014.[8] |
| 2015 | GiveWell tracks approximately 100 million dollars in donations going to its recommended charities as a result of its research.[10] |
| 2015–2016 | GiveWell seeks to expand top charity room for more funding and consider alternatives to its top charities by inviting other groups that work on deworming, net distributions, and micronutrient fortification to apply. This would lead to adding Sightsavers' deworming program, the END Fund's deworming program, Project Healthy Children, and Food Fortification Initiative to GiveWell's lists.[9] |
| 2017 | The Open Philanthropy Project becomes an independent entity. |
| 2018 | GiveWell tracks US$141 million in money moved in donations to its recommended charities or through its Incubation Grants program.[11] In the same year, the GiveWell moves US$65 million to its top charities.[12] |
| 2019 | GiveWell processes US$54.1 million in donations.[13] |
Numerical and visual data
Google Scholar
The following table summarizes per-year mentions on Google Scholar as of December 18, 2021.
| Year | "GiveWell" |
|---|---|
| 2007 | 2 |
| 2008 | 14 |
| 2009 | 18 |
| 2010 | 37 |
| 2011 | 38 |
| 2012 | 60 |
| 2013 | 83 |
| 2014 | 109 |
| 2015 | 121 |
| 2016 | 144 |
| 2017 | 138 |
| 2018 | 112 |
| 2019 | 146 |
| 2020 | 162 |
Wikipedia views
The image below shows Wikipedia views from December 2007 for desktop, and from July 2015 (see red vertical line) for mobile web, mobile app, desktop spider, and mobile web spider; to March 2020.[14]
Google Trends
The comparative chart below shows Google Trends data for GiveWell (Non-profit) and GiveWell (Search term) from January 2007 to February 2021, when the screenshot was taken. Interest is also ranked by country and displayed on world map.[15]
Google Ngram Viewer
The chart below shows Google Ngram Viewer data for GiveWell from 2007 to 2019.[16]
Tables
The table below shows money moved by category, in US$ millions.[11]
| Year | Incubation grants | Good ventures to recommended charities | All other money moved | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 3 | 1.1 | 0 | 4.1 |
| 2012 | 6.4 | 3 | 0 | 9.4 |
| 2013 | 8.7 | 9.3 | 0.1 | 18.1 |
| 2014 | 16.7 | 15.1 | 0.3 | 32.1 |
| 2015 | 43.4 | 70.4 | 0.5 | 114.3 |
| 2016 | 41.5 | 50.4 | 13.3 | 105.2 |
| 2017 | 45.7 | 75.1 | 15.8 | 136.6 |
| 2018 | 61 | 64 | 15.9 | 140.9 |
The table below shows growth of GiveWell staff, June 2010 – August 2016. ‘Num’ is the number of full-time staff, ‘Diff’ is the difference in ‘Num’ relative to the previous month and is given in the form
(−x,y), where x is the number full-time staff that left and y is the number of full-time staff that joined.[17]
| Date | Num | Diff |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-06-09 | 4 | |
| 2011-06-04 | 4 | (−1,+1) |
| 2011-09-25 | 5 | (−0,+1) |
| 2012-01-02 | 4 | (−1,+0) |
| 2012-02-08 | 5 | (−0,+1) |
| 2012-07-19 | 8 | (−0,+3) |
| 2013-01-13 | 6 | (−2,+0) |
| 2013-04-30 | 7 | (−0,+1) |
| 2013-08-15 | 8 | (−1,+2) |
| 2013-09-28 | 10 | (−0,+2) |
| 2013-12-14 | 11 | (−0,+1) |
| 2014-07-13 | 12 | (−0,+1) |
| 2014-11-03 | 18 | (−0,+6) |
| 2015-02-01 | 18 | (−1,+1) |
| 2015-05-01 | 18 | (−1,+1) |
| 2015-06-16 | 23 | (−0,+5) |
| 2015-08-16 | 24 | (−0,+1) |
| 2015-10-01 | 30 | (−0,+6) |
| 2015-10-31 | 32 | (−0,+2) |
| 2015-11-22 | 31 | (−1,+0) |
| 2015-12-15 | 32 | (−1,+2) |
| 2016-03-10 | 31 | (−2,+1) |
| 2016-06-25 | 35 | (−2,+6) |
| 2016-07-23 | 37 | (−1,+3) |
| 2016-08-13 | 36 | (−2,+1) |
Growth of GiveWell and Open Phil since September 2016
| Date | GW ∩ OP | GW ∖ OP | OP ∖ GW |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-10 | 2 | 18 | 20 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2(−0,+0) | 19(−0,+1) | 20(−0,+0) |
| 2016-11-04 | 2(-0,+0) | 18(−1,+0) | 20(−0,+0) |
| 2016-12-05 | 2(−0,+0) | 18(−0,+0) | 20(−0,+0) |
| 2017-01-05 | 2(−0,+0) | 17(−1,+0) | 20(−0,+0) |
| 2017-02-05 | 2(−0,+0) | 15(−2,+0) | 21(−0,+1) |
| 2017-03-08 | 2(−0,+0) | 14(−1,+0) | 21(−1,+1) |
| 2017-04-20 | 2(−0,+0) | 16(−0,+2) | 21(−0,+0) |
| 2017-05-05 | 2(−0,+0) | 16(−0,+0) | 21(−0,+0) |
| 2017-06-05 | 2(−0,+0) | 16(−0,+0) | 20(−1,+0) |
| 2017-07-05 | 1(−1,+0) | 16(−0,+0) | 23(−0,+3) |
| 2017-08-05 | 1(−0,+0) | 16(−0,+0) | 24(−0,+1) |
| 2017-09-06 | 1(−0,+0) | 16(−0,+0) | 22(−2,+0) |
| 2017-10-07 | 1(−0,+0) | 16(−0,+0) | 22(−0,+0) |
| 2017-11-06 | 1(−0,+0) | 18(−0,+2) | 22(−0,+0) |
| 2017-12-05 | 1(−0,+0) | 19(−0,+1) | 22(−0,+0) |
| 2018-01-05 | 1(−0,+0) | 19(−0,+0) | 22(−0,+0) |
| 2018-02-06 | 1(−0,+0) | 18(−1,+0) | 21(−1,+0) |
| 2018-03-06 | 0(−1,+0) | 19(−0,+1) | 21(−0,+0) |
The table below shows the number of versions per year of GiveWell's Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.
| Year | Num |
|---|---|
| 2012 | 1[18] |
| 2013 | 1[18] |
| 2014 | 1[18] |
| 2015 | 1[18] |
| 2016 | 2[18] |
| 2017 | 5[18] |
| 2018 | 16[19] |
| 2019 | 6[20] |
Interactions
The dates of first mention may be inaccurate insofar as earlier mentions were missed.
| Counterpart entity | Entity type | First mention by GiveWell | First mention of GiveWell by that entity (if applicable) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population Services International (PSI) | Charity | 2007-01-07[21] | Population Services International (PSI) is one of GiveWell's top recommendations from early 2007 till the end of 2009, when GiveWell would come up with an updated list based on its research. | |
| Charity Navigator (CN) | Charity evaluator | 2007-01-09[22] | GiveWell's first mention of Charity Navigator, and many of its subsequent mentions, are in the context of criticism of too much focus on the "overhead ratio" of charities, a metric that CN focuses on. GiveWell also mentions CN in its business plan as another organization providing a somewhat similar service but one that is different in important ways. GiveWell also responds to personal blog posts by Trent Stamp, the President of Charity Navigator at the time.[23] | |
| Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) | Foundation | 2007-01-20[24] | 2019-07-01[25] | GiveWell often mentions the Gates Foundation, generally positively, though at times being critical or puzzled about the Gates Foundation's lack of transparency and unwillingness to make recommendations or accept money from individual donors. GiveWell recommends that Good Ventures co-fund a grant with the Gates Foundation in 2012.[26] |
| Network for Good | Donation processor | 2007-01-20[27] | On the GiveWell blog, Karnofsky brings up criticisms of Network for Good's donation-processing fees and argues that PayPal may be better. Katya of Network for Good responds with clarifications, and Karnofsky updates his views somewhat. In 2017, GiveWell says that the blog post no longer represents their views on Network for Good. | |
| Tactical Philanthropy (main blogger: Sean Stannard-Stockton) | Blog/website | 2007-02-17 | 2007-02-16[28] | Sean Stannard-Stockton writes positively about GiveWell on the Tactical Philanthropy blog; GiveWell links to the post the next day from their roundup. The two blogs link to each other occasionally over the coming years with mutual respect and admiration, even though some of the commentary would be critical. |
| Copenhagen Consensus | Prioritization project / cause research | 2007-11-27[29] | In 2008 and 2009, while in the early stages of exploring different cause areas within global health and development, GiveWell often cites the Copenhagen Consensus as one of the information sources it consults. GiveWell's references to the Copenhagen Consensus become less frequent starting 2010. | |
| Disease Control Priorities Project (DCPP) | Prioritization project / cause research | 2007-11-27[29] | GiveWell frequently cites the work of the Disease Control Priorities Project, specifically the Disease Control Priorities Report (DCP2), in its exploration of various cause areas between 2008 and 2011. In 2011, GiveWell discovers an error in the deworming cost-effectiveness estimates in DCP2.[30] | |
| Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) | Program evaluator | 2008-02-05[31] | GiveWell cites and references the work pf J-PAL, more in its early years (2008 to 2011) though occasionally even after that. | |
| Innovations for Poverty Action (IPA) | Program evaluator | 2008-02-05[31] | GiveWell cites and references the work of J-PAL, more in its early years (2008 to 2011) though occasionally even after that. | |
| Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy | 2008-02-05 [31] | GiveWell cites and references the work of the Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy, mostly in its early years (2008 to 2010). GiveWell even has a guest post from the Assistant Director at the Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy.[32] | ||
| Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) | Prioritization project / cause research | 2008-08-11[33] | GiveWell cites GBD's 2000 report several times in blog posts in August and September 2008, and occasionally in the coming years. | |
| Against Malaria Foundation (AMF) | Charity | 2008-09-26[34] | GiveWell discovers AMF and starts investigating it, adding AMF to its list of recommended charities in July 2009, and cementing its top charity status in December 2009. With the exception of a year-long period where GiveWell marks AMF as not having room for more funding, GiveWell continues to recommend AMF as a top charity. | |
| Center for Global Development (CGD) | Research think tank | 2009-01-07[35] | GiveWell cites the work of researchers at CGD in several blog posts over the years starting 2009, including the work of David Roodman. GiveWell spin-off organization Open Philanthropy later hires David Roodman as an advisor. GiveWell also recommends grants to CGD in the 2010s, and GiveWell spin-off Open Philanthropy makes several further grants to CGD. | |
| Carter Center | Charity | 2009-02-09[36] | Elie Hassenfeld of GiveWell starts investigating the Carter Center after finding some of its program activities promising. The investigation ends in 2009 with disappointment, as the Carter Center does not provide GiveWell with a useful budget breakdown between its programs.[37] | |
| Aid Watch | Blog/website | 2009-02-12[38] | 2012-07-18[39] | In 2009, GiveWell cites and responds to several Aid Watch posts, including Aid Watch's posts arguing for cash transfers and cash as a benchmark. |
| Center for High Impact Philanthropy | 2009-03-04[40] | GiveWell talks about the Center for High Impact Philanthropy (based at the University of Pennsylvania) in March 2009. The Center for High Impact Philanthropy is mentioned in further blog posts and comments on the GiveWell blog between 2009 and 2011. | ||
| Peter Singer | Effective giving advocate | 2009-03 | 2009-03-06[41] | Peter Singer highlights GiveWell as a resource for donors interested in effective giving in his book The Life You Can Save. The GiveWell blog has a review of the book shortly after its publication. The GiveWell blog continues to reference and engage with Singer in the coming years, particularly in the context of obligations to give and cost-per-life-saved estimates. |
| Stop TB Partnership | Charity | 2009-04-03[42] | GiveWell prepares a report on Stop TB Partnership, and then adds it to its top charity list. Stop TB Partnership is dropped from the top charity list around 2012. | |
| Good Intentions are not Enough | Blog/website | 2009-05-21[43] | GiveWell frequently cites and mentions the work of the Good Intentions are not Enough blog, that tends to highlight cases where aid and charities don't work as well as expected. |
Full timeline
| Year | Month and date | Event type | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | November 30 | Prelude (website registration) | givewell.org is registered (by a different organization).[44]
|
| 2003 | July 4 | Prelude (website registration) | givewell.com is registered (by a different organization).[45][46]
|
| 2003 | Prelude | Holden Karnofsky graduates from Harvard with a degree in Social Studies. Karnofsky would spend the next several years in the hedge fund industry.[47] | |
| 2004 | Prelude | Elie Hassenfeld graduates from Columbia University with a degree in Religion. As well as Karnofsky, Hassenfeld would spend the next several years in the hedge fund industry.[47] | |
| 2006 | August | Prelude | Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, working at a hedge fund in Connecticut, set up an informal “charity club” with colleagues, to help them make informed decisions about their giving. Each person would pick a cause and then research the best charities working on that cause, evaluating them based on data and performance metrics. Hassenfeld and Karnofsky find this work so satisfying that it would ultimately lead them to create GiveWell.[48][49] |
| 2006 | November 19 | Online community | givewell.net is registered.[50]
|
| 2006 | November 25 | Content creation | Probably the earliest GiveWell wiki edit is made on this date. The wiki would later be shut down.[51] |
| 2006 | December 23 | Content creation | The first post on the GiveWell blog is from this date.[52] The initial tone of the blog would be playful and exploratory, with Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld sharing the intermediate results of their investigations and using emotionally expressive language. Over time, the blog would mirror the organization's own growth in stature and influence and switch to a more formal, measured tone. |
| 2006 | December 28 | Cause identification (malaria) | In a post on the GiveWell blog, Karnofsky expresses excitement about the seemingly low cost-per-life-saved ($200) of malaria net distribution based on numbers provided by Nothing But Nets for malaria net distribution, as well as a study of the effect of malaria net distribution on malaria-induced mortality. Karnofsky does not yet have enough details to make a concrete recommendation, but seems excited about the possibility, and argues that readers too should be excited at the possibility of saving lives at such a "bargain" price.[53] GiveWell's interest in malaria nets would eventually lead to it recommending Against Malaria Foundation in 2010, an organization that GiveWell would recommend for the next decade, with brief pauses in due to lack of room for more funding. |
| 2007 | January 2 | Holden Karnofsky blogs about his 2006 donation decisions, that are split between New Visions for Public Schools ($5000), Interplast ($2000), Children's Aid Society ($1000) and four other smaller causes ($256 each). Karnofsky argues for donating to fewer of the causes that one thinks are best rather than splitting donatons across a wide variety of causes that one does not think are all equally good; this repeats parts of an argument made previously by Steven Landsburg, though Karnosky still ends up splitting between seven charities. Karnofsky says that his decision was "based on about .01% of the information I wish I had".[54] The only named charity in the list that would make it to the 2007 end-of-year recommendations would be Interplast, and none of these charities would make it to the GiveWell end-of-year recommendations starting 2009. | |
| 2007 | January 7 | Recommendation | In a blog post, Elie Hassenfeld announces GiveWell's first official recommendation: Population Services International (PSI) for their work on oral rehydration therapy (ORT) that helps combat diarrhea, for an estimate of $50 per life saved.[21] PSI would also be a recommendation at the end of 2007, but would drop out of the recommendations in GiveWell's updated list at the end of 2009 and never return as a top charity. |
| 2007 | January, with some followup posts in March | Concept development (overhead ratio fallacy) | In a series of blog posts, Holden Karnofsky critiques the "overhead ratio" (the split of a charity's revenue that it spends on overhead versus direct program expenses) -- a prominent measure used by Charity Navigator to rate charities. Karnofsky says that the measure is useful to identify really wasteful charities, but that it does little to help figure out the effectiveness of a charity's programs and does not help identify the best charities.[55][22][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] |
| 2007 | February | Update | A blog post by Elie Hassenfeld talks about the reactions of nonprofits working in the clean water space to the questions he posed to them about their work. He classifies the reactions into three categories: hostile, dumbfounded, and grateful. Hassenfeld feels that Population Services International is one of the few organizations that was able to provide an adequate response, but he'd like to do a lot better by the end of 2007.[49] |
| 2007 | February 16 | External citation | Writing for Tactical Philanthropy, Sean Stannard-Stockton praises the efforts of the GiveWell blog and project, calling it the "pissed off donor model" and saying: "I don’t agree with everything they write. But it is refreshing to see donors blogging instead of consultants and advisors (like me) telling everyone what donors want." He asks (rhetorically?) why foundations don't share more of their research publicly the way GiveWell has been.[28] |
| 2007 | February 27 | Concept development (cause neutrality, transparency) | Holden Karnofsky responds to Blog Carnival's prompt on what donors wish nonprofits knew about them.[63] His first point: "I see you as competing with other charities." includes an early formulation of the idea of cause neutrality: And if you think your only competitors are the charities “in your space,” think again. I’m not committed to addressing malaria, or diarrhea, or education. I’m just committed to helping the world. Anyone who does that better than you can win my donation away. And they will. Most importantly, they should.Karnofksy's remaining points underline that he, as a donor, actually wants to know how his money will be used, and is looking to have impact and learn the truth rather than looking for "reassurance" or "customer service". |
| 2007 | April 7 | Publication | GiveWell publishes The Case for the Clear Fund, its so called original business plan, written mostly to solicit the support and feedback of its existing contacts.[8] Holden Karnofsky announces that he's quitting his hedge fund job on April 27 to devote himself full time to the Clear Fund / GiveWell, and Elie will also be taking a leave of absence from the hedge fund world to help Holden.[64] |
| 2007 | April 28 | Team | This is Holden Karnofsky's first day working full-time for GiveWell.[65] |
| 2007 | June 9 | Concept development (proven, cost-effective, scalable) | A blog post by Holden Karnofsky, talking about GiveWell starting to contact charities to apply for grants from it, says: "broadly, we want organizations with proven, effective, scalable ways of helping people." These adjectives would form a key part of GiveWell's self-description of the sort of charities and interventions it seeks to recommend.[66] |
| 2007 | late June / early July | Official launch | GiveWell is founded by Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld,[67][68] with the purpose of evaluating, ranking, and recommending charities, focussing on evidence of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, transparency, self-monitoring and need for funding.[69][70] The organization has a board including Holden, co-founder Bob Elliott, and several others, and a set of focus areas.[71] |
| 2007 | August 3 | Elie Hassenfeld joins GiveWell full-time.[72] | |
| 2007 | November 11 | Online community | GiveWell launches its website at www.givewell.net where it summarizes its research and findings to date. Until this time, GiveWell had been communicating its research through its blog and mailing list, but neither of these served the purpose of providing a concise description of what GiveWell currently recommends and why.[73]
|
| 2007 | November 20 | Concept development (proven, cost-effective, scalable) | A blog post by Holden Karnofsky argues that in relative terms, there is a lot more money for innovative, high-risk projects and not enough money for scaling up existing projects that work. GiveWell is interested in focusing on the latter, and Karnofsky argues that more philanthropic money in general should go towards scaling up proven interventions.[74] |
| 2007 | December 13 | External citation | The Chronicle of Philanthropy covers GiveWell.[75] |
| 2007 | December 17 | Grantmaking | At a board meeting, the GiveWell staff and board try to figure out the best charities to fund in cause areas that GiveWell had been investigating. They aren't able to cover causes 3 and 4 as GiveWell hasn't done enough research in these yet. For "Employment assistance" the board unanimously chooses with HOPE after some discussion. For Cause 1, "Saving lives in Africa", the debate is between Population Services International (PSI) and Partners in Health (PIH), with heated debate ultimately leading to PSI being selected. For "Global poverty", the board goes with Opportunity International, despite overall reservations regarding the microfinance category. Audio of the board meeting does not survive,[76] but a blog post goes into detail on the events of the meeting.[77] |
| 2007 | December 19 | Concept development (money goes farther in the developing world) | Elie Hassenfeld says that he regrets GiveWell having pledged $25,000 for one charity each in its five cause areas, as, based on the research they've done, they believe that the money donated to charities working to save lives in the developing world delivers much more value per unit money spent than money on the cause areas focused in the New York City area (such as the ones working on helping people find employment). This is an early clear articulation of the idea that donations go much farther when focused on global health and development and targeted at the developing world, an idea that would inform GiveWell's internal prioritization in future years as well as become part of their messaging to donors on their website.[78] |
| 2007 | December 20 | External citation | Stephanie Strom at The New York Times publishes article entitled "2 Young Hedge-Fund Veterans Stir Up the World of Philanthropy", featuring GiveWell and its founders.[79] |
| 2007 | December 20 | External citation | Rachel Emma Silverman and Sally Beatty at The Wall Street Journal publish article highlighting GiveWell among WSJ resources for donors.[80] |
| 2007 | December 20 | Interview | Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld are interviewed by CNBC.[81] |
| 2007 | December 24 | Interview | Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld are interviewed by NPR.[82] |
| 2007 | December 27 | Concept development (transparency, measurement, humility) | A blog post by Holden Karnofsky titled "Transparency, measurement, humility" identifies humility is an important underpinning value of the GiveWell value, and explains GiveWell's focus on transparency and measurement as both being due to its underlying focus on humility. Notable quote:To us, humility is constantly saying “The things that make sense to me could be wrong – that’s why I’m going to do everything I can to test them, against others’ ideas and against reality.” Instead of being silently dissatisfied with charity, we’re loudly dissatisfied, so that anyone who disagrees can respond.In a later personal blog post in 2017 (after he was no longer working at GiveWell), Karnofsky would describe the evolution in his personal views, some of which is based on his experience of relatively high costs and low benefits of transparency.[83] |
| 2007 | December | Controversy | Holden Karnofsky is discovered posting a question about GiveWell to community weblog MetaFilter using another individual's name, and then posting an answer about the organization with his own name but without disclosing his affiliation with GiveWell. Negative publicity would arise, leading Karnofsky to resign from the role of executive director, though he would later be reinstated.[84][85][86][87] This would be one among several "astroturfing" incidents in which Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld would participate over the time period; GiveWell would later post what they claim to be a full list of such incidents on their website[88] as well as a FAQ on GiveWell and astroturfing.[89] |
| 2008 | January 3 | Content creation | The article GiveWell is created at Wikipedia. This is a stub and about half the article discusses the controversies around its co-founders' promotional methods.[90] |
| 2008 | January 3, 6, 11 | Controversy | The Clear Fund Board Meeting of January 3 is focused on discussion of the astroturfing / inappropriate marketing by GiveWell in December 2007, and leads to Karnofsky resigning from the executive director role and his position on the board.[91] As followup, the board publishes two statements that are posted to the GiveWell blog on January 6[87] and January 11[92] respectively. |
| 2008 | March 4 | Grantmaking | At a board meeting, the GiveWell staff and board decide what charities to grant to in the two remaining causes that weren't covered in the December 2007 board meeting. The charities are Nurse-Family Partnership for Cause 3 (early childhood care)and KIPP for Cause 4 (K-12 education).[93][94] |
| 2008 | June 19 | Publication | GiveWell's first-year review is published. The review evaluates GiveWell's performance on four goals: Research (B+), Website (B), Publicity (C, mainly due to the aggressive marketing tactics including Karnofsky's Metafilter promotion), and startup hurdles (B+).[8] |
| 2008 | July 23 | GiveWell announces the GiveWell Pledge, where donors make a formal, advance commitment to donate to charities based on what GiveWell finds after a year of research. The purpose is to demonstrate to GiveWell the level of interest donors have in its research.[95] | |
| 2008 | August 9 | Strategy | At a board meeting, GiveWell board members agree that their top priority for the coming year is money moved, with research as a secondary priority.[8] |
| 2008 | August 27 | Concept development (proven, cost-effective, scalable) | A blog post by Holden Karnofsky articulates the idea that GiveWell is looking for proven, scalable, and cost-effective interventions.[96] These adjectives would become part of GiveWell's description of its work, and as part of its rubric for evaluating its top charities.[97] |
| 2008 | August 29 | Concept development (the case against disaster relief) | A blog post by Holden Karnofsky approvingly summarizes the findings of the Disease Control Priorities report on the relatively lower cost-effectiveness of spending on disaster relief compared to spending on disaster-preparedness and on ongoing chronic issues. Several nuances are discussed.[98] This would become part of GiveWell's standard advice on disaster relief. |
| 2008 | September 14 (with alternative dates from alternative sources) | Online community | GiveWell mailing list on Yahoo! Groups launches.[99] A GiveWell blog post on October 21, 2008, however, dates the starting of the mailing list to July 2008 and its conversion to a public list to around the time of the public post (October 21).[100] |
| 2008 | September 26 | Top charities | GiveWell is referred to the Against Malaria Foundation (AMF) on this date. Holden Karnofsky blogs about how he's impressed by AMF's transparency as evidenced on its website.[34] AMF would go on to become a GiveWell top charity in the coming years and GiveWell would direct tens of millions of dollars in funding toward it. |
| 2008 | November 17 | Strategy | GiveWell publishes its Change of Direction, based on stuff discussed in the August 2008 board meeting as well as further updates since then. The main updates are in the direction of believing that it's more important to focus on research than on money moved for the near term.[8] |
| 2008 | December 10 | Interview | Holden Karnofsky is interviewed by NPR on the importance of researching for donations.[101] |
| 2008 | December | Funding | The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation makes a $100,000 grant to GiveWell.[102] |
| 2008 | ? | Recommendation | After conducting an open grant application process and reviewing 59 applications in global health and development, GiveWell announces the first recommendations: Population Services International (PSI), which markets and distributes life-saving materials (mostly condoms and insecticide treated bednets); Partners in Health (PIH), which creates comprehensive health programs (hospital, health center, and community health workers) in disadvantaged, generally rural, areas in the developing world; and Interplast, which devotes to correcting deformities requiring surgery (such as cleft lip and palate deformities), both through direct treatment and through support of local doctors.[9][103] These recommendations would be supplanted by GiveWell's 2009 end-of-year recommendations and none of these charities would return to GiveWell's top charities list after that.[104] |
| 2009 | January | Team | GiveWell Board of Directors' member Ari Herman joins the organization.[105] |
| 2009 | March | External citation | Australian philosopher Peter Singer publishes The Life You Can Save. Singer writes: When I speak about why we ought to be doing more to help the world's poorest people — something I do often — the most frequent question I get is: how can we know that our donation will really help the poor? Until GiveWell came along, it was difficult to give a convincing answer to that question. Previous charity-rating organizations just looked at how much of a charity's income went to program expenses, rather than administration - and it doesn't take much thought to realize that that figure tells you nothing about how effective the charity's programs are. GiveWell has filled a huge gap, and at the same time has started a major trend towards greater transparency and demonstrated cost-effectiveness in the charitable world.[101]A review of the book by William Easterly uses GiveWell's difficulties getting effectiveness information from charities to push back against Singer's claims of a clear moral obligation similar to that of saving a drowning child.[106] In a review on the GiveWell blog, Holden Karnofsky agrees with Singer and also partly with Easterly's criticism, concluding: It’s just that “doing more” has to mean more than “giving more.” Picking your charity – and doing your part in holding it accountable – is at least as important as giving generously. We’re trying to make this task easier for time-strapped donors: if you put credence in our analysis, it can mean simply basing your giving on our recommendations (informally, or formally via GiveWell Advance Donation).[41] |
| 2009 | April 3 | Top charities | GiveWell completes a preliminary report on the Stop TB Partnership, a charity that it is excited about.[42] Stop TB Partnership would become a GiveWell top charity at the end of 2009 though it would leave the top charity list after a few years. |
| 2009 | July 1 | Recommendation | GiveWell publishes its "2008-2009 international aid recommendations"; the top recommendations are Stop TB Partnership and VillageReach, and other recommended charities include Against Malaria Foundation, Population Services International, Partners in Health, and The Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.[107] |
| 2009 | July | Team | Natalie Crispin joins GiveWell as a Research Analyst.[108] |
| 2009 | ? | Team | GiveWell co-founder and Board Chairman Bob Elliott departs from the organization.[109] |
| 2009 | ? | Review | GiveWell conducts reviews of websites from over 300 charitable organizations, aiming to find ones that either implemented priority programs or published, on their websites, meaningful evaluations of their programs.[9] |
| 2009 | ? | Grantmaking | GiveWell conducts a grant application process for organizations running economic empowerment programs in the developing world.[9] The $250,000 grant is offered to organizations providing economic empowerment programs in Sub-Saharan Africa.[110] |
| 2009 | September 1 | Grantmaking | GiveWell grants $42,523.55 to VillageReach and $42,523.55 to the Stop Tuberculosis Partnership. This money comes from donors who had donated to GiveWell to grant to its recommended charities at its own discretion.[111] This would be the first officially announced "discretionary regranting" by GiveWell; discretionary regranting would later morph into the GiveWell Maximum Impact Fund.[112] |
| 2009 | September 8 | External citation | New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof co-authors Half the Sky with his wife Sheryl WuDunn. The book points to GiveWell and Charity Navigator as donor resources.[101][113][114] |
| 2009 | October 3 | Concept development (cash as benchmark) | A blog post on the GiveWell blog discusses the idea of cash transfers as a benchmark, i.e., the idea that donations should pass the test of being more cost-effective than donating cash to beneficiaries. The post says: "In concept, we think it’s a great idea (and we proposed something similar for evaluations of U.S. charities). However, one major issue for individual donors is simply that we know of no charity that focuses on delivering cash directly to low-income people."[115] This is a few years before the launch of future GiveWell top charity GiveDirectly that would be focused precisely on delivering cash directly to low-income people. The concept of cash as a benchmark would inform the thinking of GiveWell and its spinoff Open Philanthropy over the coming years, with the effectiveness of marginal donations to GiveWell top charities being reported in terms of their multiplier over cash.[116][117] |
| 2009 | November 8 | External citation | GiveWell is recommended by a Wall Street Journal article on resources for evaluating charities, along with Charity Navigator and GuideStar. Whereas Charity Navigator is described as covering 5,400 nonprofits and including "executive compensation, efficiency, organizational capacity, donor privacy policies, and administrative, fund-raising and program expenses", and GuideStar is described as having "nonprofit reports and tax forms for almost two million charities", GiveWell is described as having "in-depth information on individual charities and causes" and focusing on "how well programs work and their impact on the people they serve."[118] |
| 2009 | Late months | Strategy | GiveWell begins to use "scenario analysis" asking how a charity's activities would change at different levels of total unrestricted funding. This approach is expected to allow GiveWell to check back later and see the extent to which actual activities were in line with actual funding.[119] |
| 2009 | December 29, 30, 31 | Recommendation | GiveWell recommends VillageReach (immunizations)[120] and Stop TB Partnership} (tuberculosis)[121] as its top charities for 2009. The post announcing the recommendations says:[104]We ask you, as a donor, to turn down some great pitches – “Your interest-free loan will help this person escape poverty forever,” “You can give a cow to a poor family for Christmas,” etc. – and give instead to charities that aren’t terribly good at storytelling. [...] But if you give to one of our top charities, you really can save (or dramatically change) a human life. |
| 2010 | January 20 | Interview | Elie Hassenfeld is interviewed by CNN about using overhead to evaluate charities.[122][101] |
| 2010 | January 25 | Interview | Holden Karnofsky is interviewed by CNN in a segment on effective giving.[101][123] |
| 2010 | February | Site visit | Holden Karnofsky visits two of GiveWell's recommended charities in site, the Small Enterprise Foundation in South Africa and VillageReach in Mozambique.[124] |
| 2010 | February 19 | Publication | GiveWell's 2009 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2010 | May and June | Online community | Over this period, GiveWell acquires the givewell.org domain and migrates its website from www.givewell.net to www.givewell.org, with the former redirecting to the latter. The Wayback Machine snapshots show the following: April 23 shows www.givewell.org under control of its prior owner,[125] May 25 shows www.givewell.org under GiveWell's control but with no content on the home page,[126] and June 14 shows the full home page at www.givewell.org.[127]
|
| 2010 | June 3 | Guest post | The first guest post on GiveWell by a donor is published.[128] |
| 2010 | August–November | Site visit | GiveWell's staff visits Mumbai, India from mid-August to the end of November, and visits a number of organizations in Mumbai and other cities in the country.[129] |
| 2010 | November 20 | External citation | Nicholas Kristof at The New York Times writes: Philanthropy has made huge strides in the last couple of decades, with far more emphasis on cost-effective interventions that are scalable to bring about change. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has helped lead the way, and Web sites like Givewell.org guide small-time donors. CharityNavigator.org ranks organizations partly by administrative expenses, which are less important than a charity’s impact on the needy, but it is trying to develop more useful information about impact.[101][130] |
| 2010 | November 30 | External citation | GiveWell is featured by USA Today as a donor resource.[131][101] |
| 2010 | Charity ranking | GiveWell publishes its top charities. VillageReach (immunizations), Stop TB Partnership (tuberculosis), and Against Malaria Foundation (malaria) are ranked at the top among international charities. Knowledge is Power Program (KIPP), Nurse-Family Partnership, and Invest in Kids are ranked as top United States charities.[132] | |
| 2010 | Year round | Money tracking | GiveWell tracks over US$1.5 million in donations to top charities, compared to just over US$1 million in 2009.[133] |
| 2011 | c. January 28 | Online community | givewell.com starts redirecting to givewell.org.[134]
|
| 2011 | February | Publication | GiveWell's 2010 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2011 | March 16 | External citation | GiveWell is cited by The New York Times in an article about donating in the aftermath of the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan.[135][101] |
| 2011 | April | Team | Good Ventures co–founder Cari Tuna (who is in a relationship with, and would later marry, Facebook co–founder Dustin Moskovitz) joins the board of GiveWell. Tuna is president of Good Ventures, a foundation started by her and Moskovitz to give away Moskovitz's acquired wealth through Facebook, and GiveWell recommendations are being used to inform some of the donation decisions.[136][137] This relationship would lead to GiveWell Labs that would morph into the Open Philanthropy Project, later shortened to Open Philanthropy, an independent entity directing the bulk of Good Ventures' money, and a major funder of both GiveWell top charities and several other cause areas. |
| 2011 | September 8 | Partnership | GiveWell Labs is announced as a new initiative within GiveWell. A collaboration between private foundation Good Ventures and GiveWell, the purpose of it is to “systematically examine a wide variety of causes and opportunities with the intention of identifying the ones which could use additional money ... to produce the best long-run outcomes.”[138] GiveWell Labs woud morph into the Open Philanthropy Project, later shortened to Open Philanthropy, an independent entity directing the bulk of Good Ventures' money, and a major funder of both GiveWell top charities and several other cause areas. |
| 2011 | October | Site visit | GiveWell staff visits five organizations in Malawi and four in India as part of its research process to identify top-rated charities.[139][140] |
| 2011 | November | Charity ranking | GiveWell announces its 2011 top charities:
Other GiveWell's standout organizations include:
|
| 2011 | November 20 | External citation | Gareth Cook at The Boston Globe writes: As we enter into the prime giving season, GiveWell provides a valuable service for the donor who has few preconceptions and just wants to make the world better.[101] |
| 2011 | November 23 | External citation | Alexandra Wolfe at Bloomberg Bussinesweek writes: When bonus season came around, instead of deciding whether to buy a new suit, car, or a Caribbean vacation, hedge fund analysts Holden Karnofsky and Elie Hassenfeld, both then 25, agonized over which charities to donate to. They put so much time and effort into figuring it out that they eventually left their jobs… to start GiveWell, a nonprofit that evaluates charities with hedge-fund–level rigor.[101] |
| 2011 | December 3 | External citation | Nicholas Kristof at The New York Times features GiveWell recommending its top charity and citing GiveWell's research.[142][101] |
| 2012 | February | Publication | GiveWell's 2011 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2012 | June | Partnership | Private foundation Good Ventures (founded by Cari Tuna and her husband, Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz) announces a close partnership with GiveWell.[143][144] The joint collaboration would later lead to the formation of the Open Philanthropy Project, whose mission is to figure out how, exactly to figure out the best possible way to use large sums of money to do as much good as possible.[145] |
| 2012 | September 28 | External citation | Paul Sullivan at The New York Times publishes an article on measuring the impact of giving, featuring GiveWell. The article talks about GiveWell's disillusionment with finding cost-effective charities for US equality of opportunity, and their success at finding cost-effective opportunities in global health, specifically the Against Malaria Foundation (AMF). Karnofsky, who is interviewed for the article, notes how the GiveWell review process may have influenced AMF to do post-distribution monitoring to make sure that the bed nets they distributed were being used.[146] |
| 2012 | November 13 | External citation | William MacAskill from Giving What We Can publishes post enitled "Researching What We Should", which highlights GiveWell as top evaluator in some areas of research.[147] |
| 2012 | November | Site visit | GiveWell staff travels to Kenya as part of its research process to identify top-rated charities, with the primary purpose of visiting GiveDirectly. The staff also visits two projects run by Evidence Action.[148][140] |
| 2012 | November | Charity ranking | GiveWell announces its updated top charities:
|
| 2012 | December 5 | External citation | Tina Rosemberg at The New York Times features GiveWell in an article on giving effectively.[151][101] |
| 2012 | December 19 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes post discussing how they see the relative “bang-for-the-buck” – good accomplished per dollar spent – of three interventions: distribution of insecticide-treated nets to fight malaria, unconditional direct cash transfers, and treating children for parasites (soil-transmitted helminths and schistosomiasis).[152] |
| 2012 | December 24 | External review | William MacAskill from Giving What We Can publishes post enitled "Some General Concerns About Givewell" which summarizes a list of concerns and recommendations on a variety of points, including long run effects, external evaluation, and meaning of GiveWell's labels and rating.[153] |
| 2012 | December 27 | External citation | Ken Stern at The Washington Post writes: On average, Americans spend more time watching television in one day than they do researching charities in an entire year. Finding good charities takes time. It means using the few organizations, such as GiveWell, that do in-depth studies of charities' effectiveness. And it means remembering that the best organizations, charitable or otherwise, are built on more than a good story or a charismatic leader.[101] |
| 2013 | January | Administration | GiveWell completes moving its offices from New York City to San Francisco.[154][67][155] |
| 2013 | February | Online community | The GiveWell mailing list on Yahoo! Groups is discontinued. Around this time, the organization begins posting more frequent research updates to its website and blog.[99] |
| 2013 | February, March | Publication | GiveWell's 2012 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2013 | May 31 | External citation | Dylan Matthews at The Washington Post publishes an article featuring GiveWell as a resource for donors.[101][156] |
| 2013 | June 19 | Interview | KQED-FM radio station features GiveWell research analyst Alexander Berger on a segment about how to decide where to donate to charity.[101][157] |
| 2013 | June | Funding | Good Ventures awards a grant of $20,000 to GiveWell to support its capacity to research the history of philanthropy and funding opportunities in policy advocacy.[158] |
| 2013 | August 11 | External citation | Peter Singer cites GiveWell in a New York Times op-ed for its "serious evaluation of charities helping people in extreme poverty."[159][101] |
| 2013 | October | Site visit | GiveWell staff travels to India as part of its research process to identify top-rated charities, with the primary purpose of visiting the Deworm the World Initiative, led by Evidence Action.[160][140] |
| 2013 | November 4 | External review | Nick Beckstead at 80,000 Hours publishes blog post entitled "Thoughts on my experience working at GiveWell". Beckstead writes: Who would be a good fit to work at GiveWell? Someone who likes research, pays a lot of attention to detail, is obsessed with effective altruism, enjoys (or at least can handle) highly critical feedback, is extremely intelligent and hardworking, is willing to work for very low pay relative to their earning potential, is OK with limited job security, enjoys intellectually challenging work, and likes doing a variety of different things.[161] |
| 2013 | December 12 | Publication | GiveWell publishes its first staff member donations post, starting an annual tradition of such publications.[162] |
| 2013 | December 15 | External citation | Farhad Manjoo at The Wall Street Journal writes: GiveWell [...] has completely changed the way I think about donating money.[101] |
| 2013 | December | Charity ranking | GiveWell announces its top charities for giving season 2014: |
| 2014 | ? | Strategy | GiveWell solicits applications from several organizations running priority programs and evaluates two organizations that have conducted randomized controlled trials of their own programs.[9] |
| 2014 | January | Grantmaking | Non-profit New Incentives receives a US$100,000 grant from San Francisco-based philantropic organization Good Ventures –with input from GiveWell. The grant is the first of a set of grants that aims to increase the number of contenders for GiveWell's top charity status. New Incentives is selected for the grant because it runs a priority program, is committed to transparency, and is at an early stage of development, according to GiveWell.[164] |
| 2014 | February, March | Publication | GiveWell's 2013 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2014 | March | Funding | Good Ventures awards a grant of US$240,000 to GiveWell for general operating support, with the purpose to increase the availability of high-quality information and analysis about charities and giving opportunities.[165] |
| 2014 | April 12 | External citation | In a post on LessWrong, Vipul Naik evaluates GiveWell as a startup idea based on criteria provided by Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, one of the most successful startup accelerators. Naik's post discusses GiveWell's prescience relative to its time, its fit to a niche market, and other precursors to GiveWell.[166] It also cites a Facebook post by Naik asking for information about precursors to GiveWell; commenters on the post include several people who had been affiliated with Giving What We Can since its founding, including William MacAskill and Bernadette Young, who both say that Giving What We Can was thinking about charity cost-effectiveness and part of the reason they chose to focus on encouraging giving (rather than investigating charity cost-effectiveness) was the entry of GiveWell.[167] |
| 2014 | April 25 | External citation | Ron Lieber at The New York Times features GiveWell in an article on the challenges of giving effectively.[101][168] |
| 2014 | August | Reorganization | GiveWell Labs, an internal project of GiveWell, morphs into the Open Philanthropy Project, a joint venture of GiveWell and Good Ventures, and gets a separate website.[169][8] |
| 2014 | September 7 | External citation | Tim Harford on BBC Radio 4 program More or less features GiveWell's research as an alternative to a social media fundraising campaign.[101][170] |
| 2014 | September | Grantmaking | Good Ventures makes a US$34,382 grant to IDinsight, as part of GiveWell's project to support the development of top charities.[171] |
| 2014 | September | Study | GiveWell completes a medium-depth writeup on geoengineering research – large-scale interventions in the climate to attempt to reduce climate change or its impacts – focusing on research around efforts to artificially cool the planet. The evaluator finds no funders – governmental or philanthropic – spending large amounts in this area at the moment, and the field appears relatively small with relatively little in funding.[172] |
| 2014 | October | Site visit | GiveWell staff travels to Burkina Faso and Uganda as part of its research process to identify top-rated charities, with the primary purpose of visiting Development Media International and Living Goods.[173][140] |
| 2014 | November | Charity ranking | GiveWell announces its top charities for giving season 2014:
Other GiveWell's standout charities include Development Media International (DMI), Iodine Global Network (IGN), The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) - Universal Salt Iodization (USI) program, and Living Goods.[174] |
| 2014 | December | Research | GiveWell completes an investigation of one new intervention (salt iodization), and makes substantial progress on several others (maternal and neonatal tetanus immunization campaigns, mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis, and vitamin A supplementation).[175][176] |
| 2014 | Year round | Money tracking | GiveWell tracks US$27.8 million in “money moved” to its recommended charities.[177] |
| 2015 | March | Grantmaking | Good Ventures, with input from GiveWell, awards US$100,000 grant to New Incentives, for general operating support.[178] |
| 2015 | March, April | Publication | GiveWell's 2014 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2015 | May 23 | External citation | Neil Webb at The Economist publishes article on impact-driven philanthropy entitled "Doing good by doing well", featuring GiveWell.[179] |
| 2015 | April | Partnership | Open Philanthropy Project announces a partnership with Kaitlyn Trigger and Mike Krieger (co-founder of Instagram). |
| 2015 | June 15 | External citation | Derek Thompson at The Atlantic writes: Philosophically, the most difficult task facing GiveWell is putting the vast spectrum of human suffering into numbers. It is, in a way, a math problem, but one laden with value judgments, about which reasonable people can disagree.[180] |
| 2015 | July | Site visit | GiveWell staff travels to Ethiopia to visit the work on universal salt iodization being carried out by the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition.[181][140] |
| 2015 | September | Grantmaking | With GiveWell reccommendation, Good Ventures grants US$200,000 to the Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to support two randomized controlled trials in India and Pakistan that would test whether providing non-cash incentives increases child immunization rates.[182] |
| 2015 | October 23 | External citation | Alexandra Zaslow at Today publishes article about Julia Wise and Jeff Kaufman, a couple notable for donating half of income every year to charity. Wise and Kaufman cite GiveWell as their source for picking out charities.[183] |
| 2015 | November 18 | Online community | GiveWell Community launches as a Facebook group.[184] |
| 2015 | November | Charity ranking | GiveWell announces its top charities for giving season 2015:
Development Media International (DMI), The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition’s Universal Salt Iodization program (GAIN – USI), Iodine Global Network (IGN), and Living Goods are recognized as standout charities.[185][186][68] |
| 2015 | November | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes its 2015 Cost-Effectiveness Analyses. Final analyses are conducted on long-lasting insecticide-treated nets, deworming, cash transfers, and iodine fortification; and Development Media International.[18] |
| 2016 | March | Grantmaking | Following GiveWell’s general effort to support the creation of future top charities, Good Ventures grants US$812,351 to Evidence Action to support the development of additional programs. These funds are expected to develop and implement a program in Bangladesh.[187] In the same month, Good Ventures grants US$300,000 to New Incentives to support its conditional cash transfers program.[188] |
| 2016 | April, May | Publication | GiveWell's 2015 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2016 | May | Grantmaking | As part of GiveWell’s effort, Good Ventures grants US$6,400,000 to non-profit Results for Development to support its Market Dynamics practice area’s pneumonia treatment program in Tanzania. The fund is expected to increase use of amoxicillin, the WHO-recommended first-line treatment for childhood pneumonia.[189] In the same month Good Ventures grants US$350,000 to Innovations for Poverty Action to support a randomized controlled trial.[190] |
| 2016 | June–October | Grantmaking | Following GiveWell’s guidelines, Good Ventures grants $1,985,000 in unrestricted funding over three years to IDinsight, a development-consulting organization that serves mission-driven organizations to facilitate evidence-based decision-making. The fund is expected to allow IDinsight to scale its model of supporting and evaluating development interventions, ideally (in the long term) providing us with research that GiveWell would be able to use in its work to recommend top charities. In October, Good Ventures grants an additional US$314,752 to IDinsight.[191] |
| 2016 | August | Grantmaking | Good Ventures makes a grant of US$25 million to GiveDirectly on GiveWell’s recommendation, with GiveDirectly’s goals for the grant consisting in expanding its ability to raise funds from donors not influenced by GiveWell’s recommendation and collaborating with large aid institutions or governments to address their questions about cash transfers.[192] |
| 2016 | August | Site visit | GiveWell staff travels to the Greater Accra Region, Ghana, with the primary purpose of visiting the Against Malaria Foundation and Sightsavers.[193][140] |
| 2016 | September 14 | Online community | GiveWell launches new website.[194] |
| 2016 | November | Grantmaking | Good Ventures grants $368587 to New Incentives as part of GiveWell's work to support the creation of new top charities.[195] In the same month Good Ventures grants $200,000 to Charity Science: Health to support the first year of its work setting up a charity to send SMS immunization reminders in India.[196] |
| 2016 | November | Charity ranking | Givewell announces its top charities for giving season 2016:
Other charities worthy of special recognition by GiveWell include Development Media International (DMI), Food Fortification Initiative (FFI), The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition’s Universal Salt Iodization program (GAIN – USI), Iodine Global Network (IGN), Living Goods, and Project Healthy Children.[197] |
| 2016 | November 28 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes the Final Analysis of its 2016 Cost-Effectiveness Analyses document, which is conducted on long-lasting insecticide-treated nets, deworming, cash transfers, and seasonal malaria chemoprevention.[18] |
| 2016 | Year round | Money tracking | According to a delayed report posted in September 2017, GiveWell manages to track a total of US$91.6 million during 2016 given to its top charities as a direct result of research.[198] In the same year, Good Ventures made GiveWell Incubation Grants totaling US$13.3 million.[199] |
| 2017 | January | Grantmaking | As part of GiveWell's Incubation Grants to support the development of potential future top charities and improve the quality of our recommendations, Good Ventures grants $900,000 to the Georgetown University Initiative on Innovation, Development, and Evaluation for its Road Safety Campaign.[200] |
| 2017 | January, February | Site visit | GiveWell staff travels to Rwanda, the Democratic Republic of Congo; and Kenya with the purpose of visiting top charity the END Fund and 2017 top charity contender Zusha!, a project of the Georgetown University Initiative on Innovation, Development and Evaluation.[201][140] |
| 2017 | February | Site visit | As part of a broader partnership with GiveWell, IDinsight staff travels to Nigeria to visit New Incentives.[202][140] |
| 2017 | February–March | Strategy | GiveWell runs a small experiment with a few ads on FiveThirtyEight’s Politics podcast and Vox’s The Weeds. Having spent approximately $20,000 on ads for the initial experiment, Givewell asks donors who give via GiveWell's website to tell the evaluator where they learned about GiveWell when they donate. One of the findings is that donors generally find out about GiveWell during the course of the year, but donate in December. The experiment is later expanded, spending approximately $100,000 on podcast ads.[203] |
| 2017 | March, April | Publication | GiveWell's 2016 Review and Plan is published.[8] |
| 2017 | April | Grantmaking | Regents of the University of California, Berkeley receives a GiveWell Incubation Grant of US$1,104,259 to support the Kenya Life Panel Survey Round 4 (KLPS-4), a follow-up study to assess the long-term impact of deworming on consumption.[204] In the same month, under the incubation grant program, Good Ventures makes a grant of US$2,642,300 to Evidence Action –which expects to strengthen its financial systems, human resources, and information technology, and another grant of US$820,000 to New Incentives, which plans to use these funds to support its work on conditional cash transfers to incentivize child immunization.[205][206] |
| 2017 | April 3 | Grantmaking | GiveWell announces plan to allocate US$4.4 million to the Against Malaria Foundation and US$0.5 million of the funding it received for granting to the Deworm the World Initiative. Such allocations have their source in US$4.9 million GiveWell received in funding for making grants at its discretion.[207] |
| 2017 | May | Grantmaking | IDinsight receives an Incubation Grant of US$2,321,617 to support its GiveWell-embedded team for the next twelve months. This grant is in addition to June 2016 and October 2016 GiveWell Incubation Grants to IDinsight, a company that supports and conducts rigorous evaluations of development interventions, often involving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with an explicit focus on partnering with funders and policy makers to use data to inform key strategy decisions. IDinsight's "decision-focused evaluation" is considered aligned with GiveWell's goals.[208] |
| 2017 | May 20 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes the first version of its 2017 Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.[18] The universal basic income (UBI) program is dropped from the GiveDirectly CEA.[209] |
| 2017 | June 1 | Reorganization | The Open Philanthropy Project becomes an independent organization.[210] |
| 2017 | June | Grantmaking | The Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA) at the University of California, Berkeley receives a GiveWell Incubation Grant of US$18,000 to investigate the feasibility of conducting a high-quality follow-up study on Stoltzfus et al. 1997, a deworming evaluation conducted in Tanzania in the mid-1990s.[211] |
| 2017 | June | Team | Holden Karnofsky departs from GiveWell and assumes rol of CEO of the Open Philanthropy Project.[212] |
| 2017 | June–July | Site visit | As part of a broader partnership with GiveWell, IDinsight visits to United Purpose (formerly Concern Universal), an implementing partner of Against Malaria Foundation, in Malawi.[213] In July, IDinsight would observe a 12-month post-distribution check-up of AMF, in Ghana.[214][140] |
| 2017 | July | Grantmaking | Charity Science Health receives a GiveWell Incubation Grant of US$357,543 to support its SMS immunization reminder program in India.[215] In the same month, the Center for Effective Global Action (CEGA) at the University of California, Berkeley receives a GiveWell Incubation Grant of US$492,188, with CEGA planning to use these funds to create a list of previously completed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that could potentially be candidates for follow-up studies analyzing longer-term effects of programs.[216] |
| 2017 | August 16 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes the second version of its 2017 Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.[18] It includes a series of structural changes to the cost-effectiveness models for Malaria Consortium and the Against Malaria Foundation (AMF).[217] |
| 2017 | August | Grantmaking | The Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention receives a GiveWell Incubation Grant of $1,336,409 to start work aimed at reducing deaths from deliberate ingestion of pesticides. The funds are planned to start collecting data on pesticide suicides in Nepal and India with the aim of assisting governments in enacting bans on the most lethal pesticides currently used in suicide attempts.[218] |
| 2017 | August | Grantmaking | GiveWell announces plan to grant roughly $2.25 million in discretionary funding to the Deworm the World Initiative.[219] |
| 2017 | October 27 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes the third version of its 2017 Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.[18] This workbook revises the structure of GiveWell's worm intensity data to facilitate engagement.[220] |
| 2017 | November | Charity ranking | Givewell announces its top charities for giving season 2017:
Standout charities:
|
| 2017 | November | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates US$0.7 million in discretionary grant to Evidence Action's Deworm the World Initiative. The donations were made between July and September 2017.[221] |
| 2017 | November 8 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes the fourth version of its 2017 Cost-Effectiveness Analyses,[18] which makes several miscellaneous updates to the cost-effectiveness model.[222] |
| 2017 | November 27 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes the fifth version of its 2017 Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.[18] Among the changes, it presents updated cost figures for most of GiveWell's recommended charities and the implementation of a new process for adjusting cost-effectiveness estimates based on the expected behavior of other funders.[223] |
| 2017 | November 27 | External citation | Nurith Aizenman at NPR publishes article entitled "On #GivingTuesday, How To Get The Most Bang For Your Charity Buck", featuring GiveWell.[101][224] |
| 2017 | November 28 | External citation | Carl Richards at The New York Times publishes guide entitled "How to Make a Personal Plan for Giving" which describes GiveWell as a resource for “The Spreadsheet Method of Giving” (calculating altruistic return on investment).[101][225] |
| 2017 | November 28 | Advocacy | Elie Hassenfeld shares his advice for giving effectively in a video from NowThis Politics.[101] |
| 2017 | December 4 | External citation | Financial blogger Mr. Money Mustache includes GiveWell in his article on tips for giving to charities.[101][226] |
| 2017 | Fourth quarter | Funding | GiveWell receives US$5.6 million in funding for making grants at its discretion.[227] |
| 2017 | Year round | Funding | GiveWell receives over US$290,000 in Bitcoin donations.[228] |
| 2018 | January 24 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes the first version of its 2018 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.[19] |
| 2018 | March | Grantmaking | Evidence Action Beta receives a GiveWell Incubation Grant of US$320,000 to support the Indian government's work on iron and folic acid supplementation.[229] |
| 2018 | March | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates US$5.6 million in discretionary grant to Schistosomiasis Control Initiative. The donations were made between October and December 2017.[221][230] |
| 2018 | May | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates US$3.0 million in discretionary grant, distributing 70% to Against Malaria Foundation and 30% to Schistosomiasis Control Initiative. The donations were received between January and March 2018.[221] |
| 2018 | June 2 | External citation | GiveWell is featured by The Economist in an article about effective altruism.[101] |
| 2018 | June | Grantmaking | Fortify Health receives a GiveWell Incubation Grant of US$295,217 to start a new program aimed at mass fortification of wheat flour with iron in India.[231] |
| 2018 | July 16 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes new version of its 2018 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, updating the cost per insecticide-treated bed nets (ITN) parameter.[19] |
| 2018 | August 10 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes new version of its 2018 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis, updating the cost per child covered in Helen Keller International's vitamin A supplementation program.[19] |
| 2018 | August | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates US$4.1 million in discretionary grant, distributing 70% to Against Malaria Foundation and 30% to Schistosomiasis Control Initiative. The donations were received between April and June 2018.[221] |
| 2018 | November | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates US$1.1 million in discretionary grant to Malaria Consortium's seasonal malaria chemoprevention program. The donations were received between July and September 2018.[232][221] |
| 2018 | November 25 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes updated version of its 2018 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Updates include accounting for potential long-term benefits of vitamin A supplementation.[19] |
| 2018 | December | Administration | GiveWell updates its donations processing and announces it is accepting donations in Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash,Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Litecoin, and 0x.[228] |
| 2018 | December 1 | External citation | Dylan Matthews at Vox writes: It's of course possible to research charity options yourself, but it's probably better to outsource that labor to a careful, methodologically rigorous charity recommender like GiveWell.[233] |
| 2018 | Fourth quarter | Funding | Donors give a combined US$7.6 million in funding to GiveWell for making grants at its discretion.[234] |
| 2018 | Year round | Money tracking | GiveWell tracks US$141 million in money moved to its recommended charities and via its Incubation Grants program. The amount is stated to be influenced by GiveWell recommendations.[235] |
| 2018 | Year round | Grantmaking | GiveWell moves US$65 million to its top charities.[12] |
| 2019 | January 3 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | The first version of GiveWell's 2019 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis is published.[20] |
| 2019 | February 4 | Team | Rob Reich announces his intention to resign from GiveWell's Board of Directors. In his resignation letter, Reich lists his reasons for departure, one of them being his concerns that the "board’s important governance role is not taken seriously enough by GiveWell leadership".[236][237] |
| 2019 | February 13 | Grantmaking | GiveWell announces a grantmaking process to look for organizations operating in Southeast Asia and Bangladesh.[238] |
| 2019 | March 5 | Team | Brigid Slipka announces her intention to resign from GiveWell's Board of Directors. In her resignation letter, Slipka gives a pair of recommendations, to create a nominating committee, chaired by a non-board member, and to increase the board to include experts and representatives of beneficiaries.[239] |
| 2019 | March | Strategy | GiveWell announces plan to expand the scope of its research and to roughly double the size of its full-time research staff (from approximately 10 to 20) over the next three years.[234] |
| 2019 | March | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates US$7.6 million in discretionary grant to Malaria Consortium's seasonal malaria chemoprevention program. The donations were received between October and December 2018.[221][240] |
| 2019 | April 1 | Team | Rob Reich, Brigid Slipka, and Tom Rutledge resignations become effective. The most common concern reflected in the resignation letters is the argument that the new board would not be well positioned to play a serious role in the organization governance after GiveWell's decision to reduce the size of the board from eight members to five. Hassenfeld replies that the direction GiveWell has chosen is the right one, expressing his belief that it will mean a "more focused, intensely engaged board, and ultimately a more robust, more impactful GiveWell."[241] After the resignations, GiveWell's Board of Directors retains five members: Timothy Ogden (Interim Chair), Cari Tuna, Holden Karnofsky, Julia Wise, and Elie Hassenfeld.[236] |
| 2019 | May 10 | Administration | Catherine Hollander announces GiveWell plan to move offices from San Francisco to Oakland.[242] |
| 2019 | June | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates U$4.7 million in discretionary grant to the Against Malaria Foundation. The donations were received between January and March 2019.[221][243] |
| 2019 | August | Grantmaking | GiveWell allocates US$2.3 million in discretionary grant to the Against Malaria Foundation. The donations were received between April and June 2019.[221][244] |
| 2019 | September | Site visit | GiveWell staff visits Burkina Faso to meet with staff of Malaria Consortium’s seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) program, and observe its work.[245] |
| 2019 | November 9 | External citation | Allan Saldanha at The Guardian publishes article featuring GiveWell as a leading independent charity evaluator.[246] |
| 2019 | November | Strategy | GiveWell offers matching funds to new donors who hear about its work on podcast advertisements. Offering donation matching is expected enable GiveWell to better track the impact of the ads it funds.[247] |
| 2019 | November | Grantmaking | GiveWell recommends grants of US$57.3 million to its top charities and standout charities, composed of a recommendation to Open Philanthropy to grant US$54.6 million to GiveWell's top charities and standout charities, and US$2.6 million in grants to top charities at GiveWell's discretion.[18] |
| 2019 | November 25 | Cost-effectiveness analysis | GiveWell publishes updated workbook containing its cost-effectiveness analysis. This version estimates the cost-effectiveness of funding gaps GiveWell expects its top charities to fill after taking grants it expects Open Philanthropy to make the year into account.[18] |
| 2019 | November 26 | Charity ranking | GiveWell publishes its 2019 top charities:
|
| 2020 | March 26 | Publication | Catherine Hollander publishes blog post entitled "The impact of COVID-19 on GiveWell’s plans", in order to inform on how the COVID-19 pandemic impacts the organization.[249] |
| 2020 | May 28 | Publication | GiveWell publishes their Plan for 2020, highlighting their focus on three projects:
|
Meta information on the timeline
How the timeline was built
The initial version of the timeline was written by User:Sebastian.
Funding information for this timeline is available.
What the timeline is still missing
Timeline update strategy
See also
External links
References
- ↑ New Themes in Institutional Analysis: Topics and Issues from European Research (Georg Krücken, Carmelo Mazza, Renate E. Meyer, Peter Walgenbach ed.). p. 325. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ Bregman, Rutger. Utopia for Realists: How We Can Build the Ideal World. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ↑ "The effective altruism guide to donating this giving season". 80000hours.org. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ↑ Ilo, Stan Chu. The Church and Development in Africa, Second Edition: Aid and Development from the Perspective of Catholic Social Ethics. p. 143. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ Winchester, James J. Ethics in an Age of Savage Inequalities. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 "Update on GiveWell's money moved and web traffic in 2011". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ With Charity for All: Why Charities Are Failing and a Better Way to Give. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ 8.00 8.01 8.02 8.03 8.04 8.05 8.06 8.07 8.08 8.09 8.10 8.11 8.12 8.13 8.14 8.15 8.16 8.17 "Our Progress to Date". givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 "Process for Identifying Top Charities". givewell.org. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ Singer, Peter. Ethics in the Real World: 82 Brief Essays on Things That Matter. p. 166. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 "GiveWell Metrics Report – 2018 Annual Review" (PDF). givewell.org. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 "Review GiveWell Analyses". meetup.com. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ "How did we do in 2019? A preliminary look at our growth.". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ "GiveWell Wikipedia views". wikipediaviews.org. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
- ↑ "GiveWell". Google Trends. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
- ↑ "GiveWell". books.google.com. Retrieved 23 February 2021.
- ↑ "GIVEWELL STAFF GROWTH". issarice.com. Retrieved 29 December 2017.
- ↑ 18.00 18.01 18.02 18.03 18.04 18.05 18.06 18.07 18.08 18.09 18.10 18.11 18.12 18.13 18.14 "GiveWell's Cost-Effectiveness Analysesgivewell.org". givewell.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 19.3 19.4 "2018 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Changelog". givewell.org. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- ↑ 20.0 20.1 "2019 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Changelog". givewell.org. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
- ↑ 21.0 21.1 Hassenfeld, Elie (January 7, 2007). "Recommending Population Services International". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ 22.0 22.1 Karnofsky, Holden (January 9, 2007). "Before I tear the Straw Man apart …". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (May 2, 2007). "Can charity be cool?". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 20, 2007). "I'm basically fine with investing in evil". Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Baker, Shawn. "The danger of complacency: Lost progress in vitamin A distribution". Gates Foundation.
- ↑ "Containment of Artemisinin Resistance in Eastern Myanmar (PSI Myanmar project)". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (February 10, 2007). "Network for what now?". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ 28.0 28.1 Stannard-Stockton, Sean (February 16, 2007). "GiveWell vs. The Ford Foundation". Tactical Philanthropy. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ 29.0 29.1 Hassenfeld, Elie (November 27, 2007). "Cheap ways to save lives". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Berger, Alexander (September 29, 2011). "Errors in DCP2 cost-effectiveness estimate for deworming". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ 31.0 31.1 31.2 Karnofsky, Holden (February 5, 2008). "Rigorous research on aid". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Anderson, David (December 18, 2008). "Guest post: Proven programs are the exception, not the rule". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (August 11, 2008). "Disability-Adjusted Life Years II: Variations". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ 34.0 34.1 Karnofsky, Holdne (September 26, 2008). "Transparency done right". GiveWell. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 7, 2009). "Beware just-published studies". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Hassenfeld, Elie (February 9, 2009). "The Carter Center". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (November 11, 2009). "The Carter Center". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (February 12, 2009). "Malaria "success story" questioned". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ "GiveWell and Easterly Talk Meta-Research". Aid Watch. July 18, 2012. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Hassenfeld, Elie (March 4, 2009). "The Center for High Impact Philanthropy". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ 41.0 41.1 Karnofsky, Holden (March 6, 2009). "Review of The Life You Can Save, by Peter Singer". Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ 42.0 42.1 "New, promising charity: The Stop TB Partnership". GiveWell. April 3, 2009. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (May 21, 2009). "Pitfalls of the overhead ratio?". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ "givewell.org". who.is. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
- ↑ "givewell.com". who.is. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
- ↑ "Give Well". givewell.com.au. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
- ↑ 47.0 47.1 "GiveWell, or Give 'em Hell?". metatalk.metafilter.com. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ Pitney, Nico. "That Time A Hedge Funder Quit His Job And Then Raised $60 Million For Charity". huffingtonpost.com. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ 49.0 49.1 Hassenfeld, Elie (February 20, 2007). "Where I'm coming from". Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "givewell.net". who.is. Retrieved 25 February 2020.
- ↑ "Givewell wiki". archive.org. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (December 23, 2006). "Nice to meet you". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (December 28, 2006). "Don't let Elie rip you off!". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 2, 2007). "The 2006 Holden Awards". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 9, 2007). "I found a number that tells you everything you need to know". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 13, 2007). "OK, Straw Man, the gloves are off". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 16, 2007). "Which of these boasts is not like the others?". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 30, 2007). "Straw man? Or 75% of the population?". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (March 17, 2007). "Low pay driving out the best?? How did this happen?". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (March 20, 2007). "Tears of straw". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (March 24, 2007). "Even Google has been suckered". Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (March 25, 2007). "The Straw Ratio: Closing thoughts (for now)". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (February 27, 2007). "Every time I tried to tell you, the words just came out wrong …". GiveWell. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (April 7, 2007). "Announcing the Clear Fund". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofksy, Holden (April 28, 2007). "What's in it for me". Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (June 9, 2007). "Where should we donate?". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ 67.0 67.1 Pitney, Nico (March 26, 2015). "That Time A Hedge Funder Quit His Job And Then Raised $60 Million For Charity". Huffington Post. Retrieved 24 October 2017.
- ↑ 68.0 68.1 Simler, Kevin; Hanson, Robin. The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ Epstein, Marc J.; Yuthas, Kristi. Measuring and Improving Social Impacts: A Guide for Nonprofits, Companies and Impact Investors. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ Callahan, David. The Givers: Wealth, Power, and Philanthropy in a New Gilded Age. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (July 5, 2007). "Go time". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Hassenfeld, Elie (August 3, 2007). "Why I'm here". GiveWell. Retrieved September 3, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (November 11, 2007). "Where should you give?". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (November 20, 2007). "Here's to fear of failure". GiveWell. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ↑ Perry, Suzanne (December 13, 2007). "A Quest for the Best". Chronicle of Philanthropy. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "Clear Fund Board Meeting - 12/17/2007". GiveWell. December 17, 2007. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (December 25, 2007). "Tough calls". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Hassenfeld, Elie (December 19, 2007). "When apples are better than oranges". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Strom, Stephanie. "2 Young Hedge-Fund Veterans Stir Up the World of Philanthropy". nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ Silverman, Rachel Emma; Beatty, Sally. "Doing Due Diligence On Your Donations". wsj.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Shaking Up Philanthropy". cnbc.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Young Duo to 'Clear' the Way for Charitable Giving". npr.org. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (February 23, 2017). "Some Thoughts on Public Discourse". Effective Altruism Forum. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ "GiveWell, or Give 'em Hell?". metatalk.metafilter.com. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- ↑ Strom, Stephanie. "Founder of a Nonprofit Is Punished by Its Board for Engaging in an Internet Ruse". nytimes.com. Retrieved 24 October 2017.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (December 31, 2007). "I had a lapse in judgment, did a horrible thing, and I apologize". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ 87.0 87.1 Elliot, Bob (January 6, 2008). "Statement from the GiveWell Board of Directors". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "Full account of GiveWell staff's inappropriate online promotion in December 2007". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "FAQ on GiveWell and Astroturfing". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "GiveWell". Wikipedia. January 3, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ "Clear Fund Board Meeting - 01/03/2008". January 3, 2008. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Elliot, Bob (January 11, 2008). "Updated: Statement from the GiveWell Board of Directors". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "Clear Fund Board Meeting - 03/04/2008". GiveWell. March 4, 2008. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (March 7, 2008). "Quick update". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (July 23, 2008). "The GiveWell Pledge". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (August 27, 2008). "Selecting program-based health interventions". Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ↑ "Frequently Asked Questions About Our Charity Research and Recommendations". GiveWell. Retrieved August 29, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (August 29, 2008). "The case against disaster relief". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ 99.0 99.1 "Group Description". groups.yahoo.com. Archived from the original on 9 February 2020.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (October 21, 2008). "Research mailing list". GiveWell. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ↑ 101.00 101.01 101.02 101.03 101.04 101.05 101.06 101.07 101.08 101.09 101.10 101.11 101.12 101.13 101.14 101.15 101.16 101.17 101.18 101.19 101.20 101.21 101.22 101.23 "What Others Are Saying". givewell.org. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (January 15, 2009). "Quick notes on our progress". GiveWell. Retrieved August 30, 2022.
- ↑ "Overview: Saving Lives (Focus on Africa)". www.givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ 104.0 104.1 Karnofsky, Holden (December 31, 2009). "You can save a life". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "Ari Herman". linkedin.com. Retrieved 19 February 2020.
- ↑ Easterly, William (March 5, 2009). "Affluence and Ethics: Helping the poor: What can be done must be done. So what truly can be done?". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (July 1, 2009). "2008-2009 international aid recommendations". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ "Natalie Crispin". linkedin.com. Retrieved 18 February 2020.
- ↑ "Bob Elliott". linkedin.com. Retrieved 18 February 2020.
- ↑ "2009 Economic Empowerment Grant". givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "GiveWell grants awarded". GiveWell. September 1, 2009. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ "Maximum Impact Fund". GiveWell. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Kristof, Nicholas; WuDunn, Sheryl. "Half the Sky: Turning Oppression into Opportunity for Women Worldwide". BookBrowse.
- ↑ "Half The Sky: Review & Notes". April 12, 2012. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (October 3, 2009). "Cash as a benchmark?". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Berger, Alexander (July 9, 2019). "GiveWell's Top Charities Are (Increasingly) Hard to Beat". Open Philanthropy. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "Recommendation to Open Philanthropy for Grants in November 2020". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Banjo, Shelly. "Check Out Charities". wsj.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Room for More Funding". givewell.org. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (December 30, 2009). "VillageReach". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (December 29, 2009). "Stop Tuberculosis Partnership". GiveWell. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "Interview". givewell.org. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "American Morning". cnn.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Site Visits: February 2010". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "Wayback Machine snapshot of www.givewell.org". April 23, 2010. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ {{cite web|url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100525182513/http://www.givewell.org/%7Ctitle = Wayback Machine snapshot of www.givewell.org|date = May 25, 2010|accessdate = August 28, 2022}
- ↑ "Wayback Machine snapshot of www.givewell.org". June 14, 2010. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "My donation for 2009 (guest post from Dario Amodei)". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- ↑ "India Site Visits: August-November 2010". www.givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ Kristof, Nicholas (November 20, 2010). "When Donations Go Astray". New York Times. Retrieved August 28, 2022.
- ↑ "How to research a charity before donating your money". usatoday.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Top-Rated Charities - 2010 Archived Version". givewell.org. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ "Stats on GiveWell's money moved and web traffic". givewell.org. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ "givewell.com". web.archive.org. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
- ↑ Strom, Stephanie. "A Charitable Rush, With Little Direction". nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ Preston, Caroline. Another Facebook Co-Founder Gets Philanthropic. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ "Guest post from Cari Tuna". givewell.org. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- ↑ Tuna, Cari. "Update on Open Philanthropy Project". disqus.com. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- ↑ "Site Visits: October 2011". givewell.org. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ↑ 140.0 140.1 140.2 140.3 140.4 140.5 140.6 140.7 140.8 "Charity Site Visits". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "Top Charities - November 2011 Archived Version". givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ↑ "Gifts That Say You Care". nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "GiveWell and Good Ventures". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ↑ "Cari Tuna and Dustin Moskovitz: Young Silicon Valley billionaires pioneer new approach to philanthropy". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ↑ "You have $8 billion. You want to do as much good as possible. What do you do?". vox.com. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ↑ Sullivan, Paul. "Philanthropists Weigh the Returns of Doing Good". nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ MacAskill, William. "RESEARCHING WHAT WE SHOULD". givingwhatwecan.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ "Site Visits: November 2012". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ 149.0 149.1 MacAskill, William. Doing Good Better: Effective Altruism and a Radical New Way to Make a Difference. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "Our top charities for the 2012 giving season". givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ↑ "Putting Charities to the Test". opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Cost-effectiveness of nets vs. deworming vs. cash transfers". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ "SOME GENERAL CONCERNS ABOUT GIVEWELL". givingwhatwecan.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ "San Francisco Bay Area as a rationalist and effective altruist hub". wiki.lesswrong.com. Retrieved 24 April 2020.
- ↑ "Relationship Disclosures". givewell.org. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- ↑ "Join Wall Street. Save the world.". washingtonpost.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Exposing America's Worst Charities". kqed.org. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Research into the History of Philanthropy and Policy Advocacy". goodventures.org. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- ↑ "Good Charity, Bad Charity". nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Site Visits: October 2013". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ Beckstead, Nick. "Thoughts on my experience working at GiveWell". 80000hours.org. Retrieved 29 March 2020.
- ↑ "Staff members' personal donations". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 5 May 2020.
- ↑ "GiveWell's top charities for giving season 2013". givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ↑ "New Incentives — General Support (2014)". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "GiveWell — General Support". goodventures.org. Retrieved 30 November 2017.
- ↑ Naik, Vipul (April 12, 2014). "Evaluating GiveWell as a startup idea based on Paul Graham's philosophy". LessWrong. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Naik, Vipul (April 10, 2014). "What are some precedents to GiveWell?". Facebook. Retrieved September 4, 2022.
- ↑ Lieber, Ron. "Donating, and Making Sure the Money Is Put to Work". nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ Karnofsky, Holden (August 20, 2014). "Open Philanthropy Project (formerly GiveWell Labs)". GiveWell. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ "To ice or not to ice?". bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "IDinsight — Scaling Up a High-Potential Development Intervention". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "Geoengineering research". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- ↑ "Site Visits: October 2014". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "Top Charities - November 2014 Archived Version". givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ↑ "The GiveWell Blog". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "Salt Iodization". givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "GiveWell Metrics Report – 2014 Annual Review". drive.google.com. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ "New Incentives — General Support". goodventures.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "Doing good by doing well". economist.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "The Greatest Good". theatlantic.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Site visit: July 2015". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "J-PAL and IRD — Incentives for Immunization Studies". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "Couple donates half of income every year to treat world health". today.com. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ "GiveWell Community". facebook.com. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
- ↑ "Our updated top charities for giving season 2015". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ↑ Simler, Kevin; Hanson, Robin. The Elephant in the Brain: Hidden Motives in Everyday Life. p. 207.
- ↑ "Evidence Action — No Lean Season". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "New Incentives — General Support (2016)". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "Results for Development — Childhood Pneumonia Treatment Scale-Up". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "Innovations for Poverty Action — Mindset Engagement in Cash Transfers". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ "IDinsight — General Support (2016)". givewell.org. Retrieved 12 December 2017.
- ↑ 192.0 192.1 "The GiveWell Blog". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 30 November 2017.
- ↑ "Site visit: August 2016". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "vipulnaik working-drafts". github.com. Retrieved 22 December 2017.
- ↑ "New Incentives — Exit Grant and Immunizations Pilot". givewell.org. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ↑ "Charity Science: Health — General Support". givewell.org. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
- ↑ "Our updated top charities for giving season 2016". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2017.
- ↑ "GiveWell's money moved and web traffic in 2016". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
- ↑ "GiveWell Metrics Report – 2016 Annual Review" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
- ↑ "Georgetown University Initiative on Innovation, Development, and Evaluation — Zusha! Road Safety Campaign". givewell.org. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
- ↑ "Site visit: January and February 2017". givewell.org. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- ↑ "Site visit: February 2017". givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "Update on our work on outreach". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 1 March 2018.
- ↑ "UC Berkeley — KLPS-4 Survey". www.givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "Evidence Action — Strengthen Operations". givewell.org. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
- ↑ "New Incentives — General Support". givewell.org. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
- ↑ Crispin, Natalie. "Allocation of discretionary funds and new recommendation for donors". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "IDinsight — Embedded GiveWell Team (2017)". givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "2017 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) — Version 1" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ "Who We Are". openphilanthropy.org. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- ↑ "Center for Effective Global Action at UC Berkeley — Deworming Study Planning Gift". givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "Holden Karnofsky". linkedin.com. Retrieved 18 February 2020.
- ↑ "Trip Report: PDCU Site Visit, Malawi" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "Trip Report: PDCU Site Visit, Ghana" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 21 December 2017.
- ↑ "Charity Science Health — SMS Reminders for Immunization". givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "Center for Effective Global Action at UC Berkeley — Scoping RCTs for Long-Term Follow-Ups". www.givewell.org. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
- ↑ "2017 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) — Version 2" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ "Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention – General Support". givewell.org. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
- ↑ "The GiveWell Blog Month, August 2017". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 24 December 2017.
- ↑ "2017 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) — Version 3" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ 221.0 221.1 221.2 221.3 221.4 221.5 221.6 221.7 "Discretionary Grantmaking". givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ "2017 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) — Version 4" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ "2017 GiveWell cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) — Version 5" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
- ↑ "On #GivingTuesday, How To Get The Most Bang For Your Charity Buck". npr.org. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "How to Make a Personal Plan for Giving". nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "How to Give Money (and Get Happiness) More Easily". web.archive.org. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "Allocation of discretionary funds from Q4 2017". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ 228.0 228.1 "We've added more options for cryptocurrency donors". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- ↑ "Evidence Action Beta — Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation". givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- ↑ "Allocation of discretionary funds from Q4 2017". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ "Fortify Health — General Support". givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- ↑ "Our updated top charities for giving season 2018". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ "These are the charities where your money will do the most good". web.archive.org. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ 234.0 234.1 "The GiveWell Blog Month: March 2019". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ "GiveWell's money moved and web traffic in 2018". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- ↑ 236.0 236.1 "Changes in Board Membership (April 2019)". givewell.org. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
- ↑ "Resignation letter by Rob Reich" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 29 May 2020.
- ↑ "The GiveWell Blog". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- ↑ "Brigid Slipka resignation letter" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
- ↑ "Allocation of discretionary funds from Q4 2018". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ Hassenfeld, Elie. "Elie Hassenfeld letter" (PDF). files.givewell.org. Retrieved 29 May 2020.
- ↑ "The GiveWell Blog". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
- ↑ "Allocation of discretionary funds from Q1 2019". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ "Allocation of discretionary funds from Q2 2019". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ "Our recent visit to Burkina Faso". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- ↑ "'I give away half to three-quarters of my income every year'". theguardian.com. Retrieved 30 March 2020.
- ↑ "We're offering matching funds to new donors via podcasts. Here's why.". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 4 December 2019.
- ↑ "Announcing our 2019 top charities". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 3 December 2019.
- ↑ Hollander, Catherine. "The impact of COVID-19 on GiveWell's plans". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 31 March 2020.
- ↑ "GiveWell's plans for 2020". blog.givewell.org. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
