Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline of genetic engineering in humans"
From Timelines
(→Timeline status: reply) |
(Timeline status) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:[[User:Mati Roy|Mati]], "Not yet complete" is the default creation month that is used when the payment is zero; see [https://github.com/riceissa/timelines-wiki-main-page-table/blob/0150d1ced7aeba49cb009b4e2cf76dba627e570a/proc.py#L16-L21 here] for an explanation. I can use December 2018 as the completion date for this timeline, if you would like (the date will then show up when I re-generate the front page table around March 1). [[User:Issa|Issa]] ([[User talk:Issa|talk]]) 17:32, 18 February 2019 (PST) | :[[User:Mati Roy|Mati]], "Not yet complete" is the default creation month that is used when the payment is zero; see [https://github.com/riceissa/timelines-wiki-main-page-table/blob/0150d1ced7aeba49cb009b4e2cf76dba627e570a/proc.py#L16-L21 here] for an explanation. I can use December 2018 as the completion date for this timeline, if you would like (the date will then show up when I re-generate the front page table around March 1). [[User:Issa|Issa]] ([[User talk:Issa|talk]]) 17:32, 18 February 2019 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::[[User:Issa|Issa]], I see, thanks for the info. I think putting December 2018 would make more sense, but only change it if that makes sense for you as well. Thanks. | ||
Revision as of 13:21, 20 February 2019
Timeline status
Issa, why did you tag this timeline as "Not yet complete" / what do you suggest be added to it to complete it? --Mati Roy (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2019 (PST)
- Mati, "Not yet complete" is the default creation month that is used when the payment is zero; see here for an explanation. I can use December 2018 as the completion date for this timeline, if you would like (the date will then show up when I re-generate the front page table around March 1). Issa (talk) 17:32, 18 February 2019 (PST)
- Issa, I see, thanks for the info. I think putting December 2018 would make more sense, but only change it if that makes sense for you as well. Thanks.
