Difference between revisions of "Timeline of bioethics"

From Timelines
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(80 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This is a '''timeline of {{w|bioethics}}''', listing significant events in the development of the field.
 
This is a '''timeline of {{w|bioethics}}''', listing significant events in the development of the field.
 +
 +
== Sample questions ==
 +
 +
The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:
 +
 +
* Literature (journal)
 +
* Literature (book)
 +
* Organization
 +
* Treaty
 +
* Study
  
 
==Big picture==
 
==Big picture==
Line 27: Line 37:
 
| 1259 – 1265 || Literature || Italian philosopher {{w|Thomas Aquinas}} writes his ''{{w|Summa contra Gentiles}}'', which briefly discusses the permissibility of {{w|abortion}}.<ref name="Bioethicsbritannica.com">{{cite web |title=Bioethics |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/bioethics |website=britannica.com |accessdate=18 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|Italy}}
 
| 1259 – 1265 || Literature || Italian philosopher {{w|Thomas Aquinas}} writes his ''{{w|Summa contra Gentiles}}'', which briefly discusses the permissibility of {{w|abortion}}.<ref name="Bioethicsbritannica.com">{{cite web |title=Bioethics |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/bioethics |website=britannica.com |accessdate=18 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|Italy}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1588 || || "In 1588, Pope Sixtus V adopted a papal bull adopting the position of St. Thomas Aquinas that contraception and abortion were crimes against nature and sins against marriage. " ||
+
| 1588 || || "In 1588, Pope Sixtus V adopted a papal bull adopting the position of St. Thomas Aquinas that contraception and abortion were crimes against nature and sins against marriage. "<ref>{{cite book |last1=Victory |first1=Regardless |title=RDV'S INTERNET ANTHLOGY PLUS |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=9n9pMnYBSwMC&pg=PT71&lpg=PT71&dq=In+1588,+Pope+Sixtus+V+adopted+a+papal+bull+adopting+the+position+of+St.+Thomas+Aquinas+that+contraception+and+abortion+were+crimes+against+nature+and+sins+against+marriage&source=bl&ots=j14d4p_UcI&sig=ACfU3U1ITnaJBzp8ZouYDAeTJl_QNGW2yw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjm5rTWg8jqAhV4DrkGHSFxDGwQ6AEwAHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=In%201588%2C%20Pope%20Sixtus%20V%20adopted%20a%20papal%20bull%20adopting%20the%20position%20of%20St.%20Thomas%20Aquinas%20that%20contraception%20and%20abortion%20were%20crimes%20against%20nature%20and%20sins%20against%20marriage&f=false}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1620 || || "Francis Bacon publishes The Novum Organon, in which he argues that scientific research should benefit humanity."<ref>{{cite web |title=Francis Bacon (1561—1626) |url=https://www.iep.utm.edu/bacon/ |website=iep.utm.edu |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1775 – 1780 || Field development || German philosopher {{w|Immanuel Kant}} in his lectures on ethics argues against the sale of human body parts.<ref name="Bioethicsbritannica.com"/> ||
 
| 1775 – 1780 || Field development || German philosopher {{w|Immanuel Kant}} in his lectures on ethics argues against the sale of human body parts.<ref name="Bioethicsbritannica.com"/> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1796 || || "Edward Jenner inoculates eight-year-old James Phipps with fluid from a cowpox pustule to immunize him against smallpox."<ref>{{cite web |title=Early smallpox vaccine is tested |url=https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/jenner-tests-smallpox-vaccine |website=history.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Riedel |first1=Stefan |title=Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination |doi=10.1080/08998280.2005.11928028 |pmid=16200144 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1200696/ |pmc=1200696}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1847 || || The {{w|American Medical Association}} adopts its first [[w:ethical code|code of ethics]], with this being based in large part upon the work of {{w|Thomas Percival}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uab.edu/reynolds/MajMedFigs/Percival.htm |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2007-10-16 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060704201058/http://www.uab.edu/reynolds/MajMedFigs/Percival.htm |archivedate=2006-07-04 }}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1847 || || The {{w|American Medical Association}} adopts its first [[w:ethical code|code of ethics]], with this being based in large part upon the work of {{w|Thomas Percival}}.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.uab.edu/reynolds/MajMedFigs/Percival.htm |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2007-10-16 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060704201058/http://www.uab.edu/reynolds/MajMedFigs/Percival.htm |archivedate=2006-07-04 }}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1856 || || "Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace publish The Origin of Species, which proposes a theory of evolution of living things by natural selection. The book generates a great deal of controversy because it proposes that human beings were not created by God (as most religions claimed) but descended from apes"<ref>{{cite web |title=Wallace and Darwin |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/4448600?seq=1 |website=jstor.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1874 || || "Robert Bartholomew inserts electrodes into a hole in the skull of Mary Rafferty caused by a tumor. He notes that small amounts electric current caused bodily movements and that larger amounts caused pain. Rafferty, who was mentally ill, fell into a coma and died a few days after the experiment."<ref>{{cite web |title=Historical Background |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8_2#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20in%201874%20Robert,inserted%20electrodes%20into%20the%20hole. |website=link.springer.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1885 || || "Louis Pasteur administers an experimental rabies vaccine to nine-year-old Joseph Meister without testing it on animals first."<ref>{{cite web |title=Louis Pasteur and the Development of the Attenuated Vaccine |url=https://www.vbivaccines.com/wire/louis-pasteur-attenuated-vaccine/#:~:text=Then%2C%20in%201885%2C%20while%20studying,Louis%20Pasteur%20performing%20an%20experiment. |website=vbivaccines.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=July 6, 1885: Rabies Vaccine Saves Boy – and Pasteur |url=https://www.wired.com/2007/07/dayintech-0706/ |website=wired.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Rabies Vaccine Backstory |url=https://www.the-scientist.com/foundations/the-rabies-vaccine-backstory-33441 |website=the-scientist.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|France}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1897 || || "Giuseppe Sanarelli injects the yellow fever bacteria into five patients without their consent. All the patients developed the disease and three died."<ref>{{cite web |title=Historical Background |url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-68756-8_2#:~:text=In%201897%2C%20Giuseppe%20Sanarelli%20(1864,fever%20symptoms%20and%20three%20died. |website=link.springer.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Case 5 Roots of Informed Consent |url=https://highschoolbioethics.georgetown.edu/units/cases/unit3_5.html |website=highschoolbioethics.georgetown.edu |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Resnik |first1=David B. |title=The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=uQdGDwAAQBAJ&dq=1897+%22Giuseppe+Sanarelli+injects+the+yellow+fever+bacteria&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> || {{w|Italy}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1900 || || "Walter Reed experiments to determine the cause of yellow fever. Thirty-three participants, including eighteen Americans and six Cubans, were exposed to mosquitoes infected with yellow fever or injected with blood from yellow fever patients. Six participants died, including two researcher-volunteers. The participants all signed consent forms, some of which were translated into Spanish."<ref>{{cite web |title=Major Walter Reed and the Eradication of Yellow Fever |url=https://armyhistory.org/major-walter-reed-and-the-eradication-of-yellow-fever/#:~:text=In%20a%20series%20of%20experiments,to%20person%20with%20their%20bites. |website=armyhistory.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Politics of Participation: Walter Reed's Yellow-Fever Experiments |url=https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/politics-participation-walter-reeds-yellow-fever-experiments/2009-04 |website=journalofethics.ama-assn.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Walter Reed and Yellow Fever |url=http://exhibits.hsl.virginia.edu/insects/reed/ |website=exhibits.hsl.virginia.edu |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1920 || Policy (reproductive rights) || "Lenin legalized all abortions in the Soviet Union"<ref>{{cite web |title=ABORTION AND BIRTH CONTROL IN SOVIET RUSSIA |url=https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/field-alice/protect/ch04.html |website=marxists.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Savage |first1=Mark |title=The Law of Abortion in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the People's Republic of China: Women's Rights in Two Socialist Countries |doi=10.2307/1228777 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1228777?seq=1}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1926 || Literature || German theologian {{w|Fritz Jahr}}, referring to European and Oriental traditions, publishes an article entitled ''Natural sciences and teaching ethics'' where he gives the subtitle “Old Knowledge in new clothes” describing the function of natural sciences for education and teaching biological research ethics.<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|Germany}}
 
| 1926 || Literature || German theologian {{w|Fritz Jahr}}, referring to European and Oriental traditions, publishes an article entitled ''Natural sciences and teaching ethics'' where he gives the subtitle “Old Knowledge in new clothes” describing the function of natural sciences for education and teaching biological research ethics.<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|Germany}}
Line 37: Line 63:
 
| 1927 || Literature || {{w|Fritz Jahr}} publishes article using the German term “Bio-Ethik” (which translates as “Bio-Ethics”) and argues, both for the establishment of a new academic discipline, and for the practice of a new, more civilized, ethical approach to issues concerning human beings and the environment. Jahr would publish similar articles discussing bioethics in 1928, and 1934.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> || {{w|Germany}}
 
| 1927 || Literature || {{w|Fritz Jahr}} publishes article using the German term “Bio-Ethik” (which translates as “Bio-Ethics”) and argues, both for the establishment of a new academic discipline, and for the practice of a new, more civilized, ethical approach to issues concerning human beings and the environment. Jahr would publish similar articles discussing bioethics in 1928, and 1934.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> || {{w|Germany}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1932 || Literature || {{w|The Linacre Quarterly}} || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1931 || Policy (reproductive rights) || {{w|Mexico}} becomes the first country in the world to legalize abortion in cases of rape.<ref>{{cite web |title=Mexico City to Legalize Abortion Despite Protests |url=http://www.banderasnews.com/0704/nr-despiteprotests.htm |website=banderasnews.com |accessdate=1 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|Mexico}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1932 || || {{w|Tuskegee syphilis experiment}} || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1932 || Literature || {{w|The Linacre Quarterly}}<ref>{{cite web |title=The Linacre Quarterly |url=https://epublications.marquette.edu/lnq/ |website=epublications.marquette.edu |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1943–1944 || || {{w|Nazi human experimentation}}. "The central leader of the experiments was [[Josef Mengele]], who from 1943 to 1944 performed experiments on nearly 1,500 sets of imprisoned twins at Auschwitz. About 200 people survived these studies."<ref>[http://www.longwood.k12.ny.us/lhs/science/mos/twins/mengele.html Josef Mengele and Experimentation on Human Twins at Auschwitz] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150414074936/http://www.longwood.k12.ny.us/lhs/science/mos/twins/mengele.html |date=14 April 2015 }}, ''Children of the Flames; Dr. Josef Mengele and the Untold Story of the Twins of Auschwitz'', Lucette Matalon Lagnado and Sheila Cohn Dekel, and ''Mengele: the Complete Story'' by Gerald Posner and John Ware.</ref> ||
+
| 1932 || || {{w|Tuskegee syphilis experiment}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Newton-Matza |first1=Mitchell |title=Disasters and Tragic Events: An Encyclopedia of Catastrophes in American History [2 volumes] |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=8o6dAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA307&dq=1932+Tuskegee+syphilis+experiment&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwipuKTj7MbqAhXeIbkGHQv_BJ4Q6AEwCHoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=1932%20Tuskegee%20syphilis%20experiment&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Suffering and Bioethics |edition=Ronald Michael Green, Nathan J. Palpant |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=c2cJBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA165&dq=1932+Tuskegee+syphilis+experiment&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjI2ZHr7MbqAhUlIbkGHYEkAaM4ChDoATAAegQIAxAC#v=onepage&q=1932%20Tuskegee%20syphilis%20experiment&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1932–1945 || || "Japanese scientists working at Unit 731 performed morally abominable experiments on thousands of Chinese prisoners or war, including biological and chemical weapons experiments, vaccination experiments, and wound-healing and surgical studies, including vivisections."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Brody |first1=Howard |last2=Leonard |first2=Sarah E. |last3=Nie |first3=Jing-Bao |last4=Weindling |first4=Paul |title=United States Responses to Japanese Wartime Inhuman Experimentation after World War II: National Security and Wartime Exigency |doi=10.1017/S0963180113000753 |pmid=24534743 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4487829/ |pmc=4487829}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1943–1944 || || {{w|Nazi human experimentation}}. "German scientists conducted morally abominable research on concentration camp prisoners, including experiments that exposed subjects to freezing temperatures, low air pressures, ionizing radiation and electricity, and infectious diseases; as well as wound-healing and surgical studies. " "The central leader of the experiments was [[Josef Mengele]], who from 1943 to 1944 performed experiments on nearly 1,500 sets of imprisoned twins at Auschwitz. About 200 people survived these studies."<ref>[http://www.longwood.k12.ny.us/lhs/science/mos/twins/mengele.html Josef Mengele and Experimentation on Human Twins at Auschwitz] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150414074936/http://www.longwood.k12.ny.us/lhs/science/mos/twins/mengele.html |date=14 April 2015 }}, ''Children of the Flames; Dr. Josef Mengele and the Untold Story of the Twins of Auschwitz'', Lucette Matalon Lagnado and Sheila Cohn Dekel, and ''Mengele: the Complete Story'' by Gerald Posner and John Ware.</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1947 || || The {{w|Nuremberg Code}} is adopted as a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. It is set as a result of the {{w|Subsequent Nuremberg trials}} at the end of the {{w|Second World War}}.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> || {{w|Germany}}
 
| 1947 || || The {{w|Nuremberg Code}} is adopted as a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. It is set as a result of the {{w|Subsequent Nuremberg trials}} at the end of the {{w|Second World War}}.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> || {{w|Germany}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1948 || || {{w|Declaration of Geneva}} || {{w|Switzerland}}
+
| 1948 || || {{w|Declaration of Geneva}}.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Fassin |first1=Didier |title=A Companion to Moral Anthropology |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=qxImBgAAQBAJ&pg=PA500&dq=1948+Declaration+of+Geneva&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiny9auwcbqAhVvHLkGHchjC7oQ6AEwAXoECAEQAg#v=onepage&q=1948%20Declaration%20of%20Geneva&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Advancing the Human Right to Health |edition=José M. Zuniga, Stephen P. Marks, Lawrence O. Gostin |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=5cXwAAAAQBAJ&pg=PT425&dq=1948+Declaration+of+Geneva&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiny9auwcbqAhVvHLkGHchjC7oQ6AEwAnoECAUQAg#v=onepage&q=1948%20Declaration%20of%20Geneva&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|Switzerland}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1948 || || "Alfred Kinsey publishes Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Five years later, he publishes Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. These books were very controversial, because they examined topics which were regarded as taboo at the time, such as masturbation, orgasm, intercourse, promiscuity, and sexual fantasies. Kinsey could not obtain public funding for the research, so he funded it privately through the Kinsey Institute."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Charles Kinsey |first1=Alfred |last2=Baxter Pomeroy |first2=Wardell |last3=Eugene Martin |first3=Clyde |title=Sexual Behavior in the Human Male |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Sexual_Behavior_in_the_Human_Male.html?id=pfMKrY3VvigC&redir_esc=y}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Sexual Behavior in the Human Male |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sexual-Behavior-in-the-Human-Male |website=britannica.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1954 || Literature || Joseph F. Fletcher publishes ''Morals and Medicine: The Moral Problems of the Patient’s Right to Know the Truth, Contraception, Artificial Insemination, Sterilization, and Euthanasia''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Morals and Medicine |url=https://press.princeton.edu/titles/549.html |website=press.princeton.edu |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref><ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> ||
 
| 1954 || Literature || Joseph F. Fletcher publishes ''Morals and Medicine: The Moral Problems of the Patient’s Right to Know the Truth, Contraception, Artificial Insemination, Sterilization, and Euthanasia''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Morals and Medicine |url=https://press.princeton.edu/titles/549.html |website=press.princeton.edu |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref><ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1964 || || The {{w|Declaration of Helsinki}} is created in order to provide researchers and physicians with ethical guidelines. It is developed for the medical community by the {{w|World Medical Association}}.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/><ref>{{cite web |title=DECLARATION OF HELSINKI |url=https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/ |website=wma.net |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|Finland}}
 
| 1964 || || The {{w|Declaration of Helsinki}} is created in order to provide researchers and physicians with ethical guidelines. It is developed for the medical community by the {{w|World Medical Association}}.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/><ref>{{cite web |title=DECLARATION OF HELSINKI |url=https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/ |website=wma.net |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|Finland}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1956–1980 || || "Saul Krugman, Joan Giles and other researchers conduct hepatitis experiments on mentally disabled children at The Willowbrook State School. They intentionally infected subjects with the disease and observed its natural progression. The experiments were approved by the New York Department of Health."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Shamoo |first1=Adil E. |last2=Resnik |first2=David B. |title=Responsible Conduct of Research |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=dP7oKntCUUUC&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=1956%E2%80%931980+%22Saul+Krugman,+Joan+Giles+and+other+researchers+conduct+hepatitis+experiments+on+mentally+disabled+children+at+The+Willowbrook+State+School&source=bl&ots=PF80NaLudm&sig=ACfU3U33xOo6F0mFchm1BiGwMuGC9NbdlQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjXtrnJlcjqAhU7K7kGHWAXDmQQ6AEwCHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=1956%E2%80%931980%20%22Saul%20Krugman%2C%20Joan%20Giles%20and%20other%20researchers%20conduct%20hepatitis%20experiments%20on%20mentally%20disabled%20children%20at%20The%20Willowbrook%20State%20School&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Research Ethics: Where are we,  How did we get here, and Where  are we going? |url=https://research.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/HRPO/MIM%20files/ResearchEthicsMIM_4_18_19.pdf |website=research.columbia.edu |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1966 || Organization || The [[W:Schlesinger Institute|Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research]] is founded.<ref>{{cite web |title=Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research |url=http://www.medethics.org.il/website/index.php/en/ |website=medethics.org.il |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Partnership with the Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research and the International Responsa Project |url=https://www.israelrabbis.org/about-barkai-practical-rabbinics/newsletter-articles/90-bulletin/96-partnership-with-the-dr-falk-schlesinger-institute-for-medical-halachic-research-and-the-international-responsa-project |website=israelrabbis.org |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|Israel}}
 
| 1966 || Organization || The [[W:Schlesinger Institute|Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research]] is founded.<ref>{{cite web |title=Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research |url=http://www.medethics.org.il/website/index.php/en/ |website=medethics.org.il |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Partnership with the Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research and the International Responsa Project |url=https://www.israelrabbis.org/about-barkai-practical-rabbinics/newsletter-articles/90-bulletin/96-partnership-with-the-dr-falk-schlesinger-institute-for-medical-halachic-research-and-the-international-responsa-project |website=israelrabbis.org |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|Israel}}
Line 55: Line 89:
 
| 1966 || Organization || The first medical ethics committees in Europe emerge in the United Kingdom and Sweden.<ref name="Bioethics in a European Perspective">{{cite book |last1=Have |first1=Ten |last2=Gordijn |first2=Bert |title=Bioethics in a European Perspective |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=6kf8CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=%22bioethics%22+%22in+1980..1990%22&source=bl&ots=EqKIhtbEXd&sig=nouvRbqMAo4_002jQdhY4WH_GSE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwih_fi8yJrdAhXHQZAKHaJGCI8Q6AEwAXoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22bioethics%22%20%22in%201980..1990%22&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}, {{w|Sweden}}
 
| 1966 || Organization || The first medical ethics committees in Europe emerge in the United Kingdom and Sweden.<ref name="Bioethics in a European Perspective">{{cite book |last1=Have |first1=Ten |last2=Gordijn |first2=Bert |title=Bioethics in a European Perspective |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=6kf8CAAAQBAJ&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=%22bioethics%22+%22in+1980..1990%22&source=bl&ots=EqKIhtbEXd&sig=nouvRbqMAo4_002jQdhY4WH_GSE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwih_fi8yJrdAhXHQZAKHaJGCI8Q6AEwAXoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22bioethics%22%20%22in%201980..1990%22&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}, {{w|Sweden}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1966 || Field development || American anesthesiologist {{w|Henry K. Beecher}} publishes an article in ''{{w|The New England Journal of Medicine}}'' exposing 22 unethical studies in biomedicine, including the {{w|Tuskegee syphilis experiment}} and the [[w:Willowbrook State School|Willowbrook hepatitis study]].<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)">{{cite web |title=Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present) |url=https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm |website=niehs.nih.gov |accessdate=18 September 2018}}</ref>  || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1966 || Field development || American anesthesiologist {{w|Henry K. Beecher}} publishes an article in ''{{w|The New England Journal of Medicine}}'' exposing 22 unethical studies in biomedicine, including the {{w|Tuskegee syphilis experiment}} and the [[w:Willowbrook State School|Willowbrook hepatitis study]].<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)">{{cite web |title=Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present) |url=https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm |website=niehs.nih.gov |accessdate=18 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Ethics and clinical research / Henry K. Beecher |url=https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/74765 |website=apps.who.int |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Henry Knowles Beecher and the Development of Informed Consent in Anesthesia Research |url=https://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1946793 |website=anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref>  || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1969 || Organization || {{w|The Hastings Center}} is founded as a bioethics research institute. It is located in {{w|Garrison, New York}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Hastings Center |url=https://www.thehastingscenter.org/who-we-are/ |website=thehastingscenter.org |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=About The Hastings Center |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.965 |website=onlinelibrary.wiley.com |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1969 || Organization || {{w|The Hastings Center}} is founded as a bioethics research institute. It is located in {{w|Garrison, New York}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=The Hastings Center |url=https://www.thehastingscenter.org/who-we-are/ |website=thehastingscenter.org |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=About The Hastings Center |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.965 |website=onlinelibrary.wiley.com |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
Line 71: Line 105:
 
| 1971 || Organization || The [[w:Kennedy Institute of Ethics|Joseph and Rose Kennedy Center for the Study of Human Reproduction and Bioethics]] (now known as Kennedy Center) opens at {{w|Georgetown University}}. With similar goals to those of {{w|The Hastings Center}}, the Kennedy Institute is however placed inside the traditional academy.<ref name="Bioethics - History Of Bioethics"/><ref name="Handbook of Bioethics and Religion"/> Founded by Andre Hellegers, it is the first in the world to establish an institute of bioethics on the basis of interdisciplinary research and approaches.<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}  
 
| 1971 || Organization || The [[w:Kennedy Institute of Ethics|Joseph and Rose Kennedy Center for the Study of Human Reproduction and Bioethics]] (now known as Kennedy Center) opens at {{w|Georgetown University}}. With similar goals to those of {{w|The Hastings Center}}, the Kennedy Institute is however placed inside the traditional academy.<ref name="Bioethics - History Of Bioethics"/><ref name="Handbook of Bioethics and Religion"/> Founded by Andre Hellegers, it is the first in the world to establish an institute of bioethics on the basis of interdisciplinary research and approaches.<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}  
 
|-
 
|-
| 1972 || Organization || {{w|National Catholic Bioethics Center}} || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1972 || Organization || {{w|National Catholic Bioethics Center}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=National Catholic Bioethics Center |url=https://www.ncbcenter.org/ |website=ncbcenter.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=NCBC - National Catholic Bioethics Center |url=http://inters.org/websites/ncbc |website=inters.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Curran |first1=Charles E. |title=Catholic Moral Theology in the United States: A History |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=enB4otKhEFwC&pg=PA230&lpg=PA230&dq=1972+Organization+National+Catholic+Bioethics+Center&source=bl&ots=rH9AHqZDbp&sig=ACfU3U1imkJ5kLse1gAjljZiLf2kmthC2w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiVxcPTmMjqAhXgKLkGHXeCCbsQ6AEwBHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=1972%20Organization%20National%20Catholic%20Bioethics%20Center&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1973 || Concept development || Dan Callahan writes essay ''Bioethics as a Discipline'', whose title is the first entry of the word "bioethics" in the catalogue of the National Library of Congress.<ref name="Handbook of Bioethics and Religion"/> In the article, Callahan argues for the establishment of a new academic discipline.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1973 || Concept development || Dan Callahan writes essay ''Bioethics as a Discipline'', whose title is the first entry of the word "bioethics" in the catalogue of the National Library of Congress.<ref name="Handbook of Bioethics and Religion"/> In the article, Callahan argues for the establishment of a new academic discipline.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 +
| 1973 || || "After conducting hearings on unethical research involving human subjects, including the Tuskegee study, Congress passes the National Research Act in 1973, which President Nixon signs in 1974. The Act authorizes federal agencies (e.g. the NIH and FDA) to develop human research regulations. The regulations require institutions to form Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to review and oversee research with human subjects."<ref>{{cite web |title=The Tuskegee Timeline |url=https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm |website=cdc.gov |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Tuskegee Experiment: The Infamous Syphilis Study |url=https://www.history.com/news/the-infamous-40-year-tuskegee-study |website=history.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}   
 +
|-
 
| 1975 || Literature || The ''{{w|Journal of Medical Ethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=Editor-in-Chief Journal of Medical Ethics |url=https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2017/07/05/editor-in-chief-journal-of-medical-ethics/ |website=blogs.bmj.com |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=VEATCH |first1=ROBERT M. |title=How Philosophy of Medicine Has Changed Medical Ethics |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03605310601009315 |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
| 1975 || Literature || The ''{{w|Journal of Medical Ethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=Editor-in-Chief Journal of Medical Ethics |url=https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2017/07/05/editor-in-chief-journal-of-medical-ethics/ |website=blogs.bmj.com |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=VEATCH |first1=ROBERT M. |title=How Philosophy of Medicine Has Changed Medical Ethics |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03605310601009315 |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1975 || Field development || {{w|Peter Singer}} claims that human beings must consider the equal interests of human beings and animals alike.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> ||
 
| 1975 || Field development || {{w|Peter Singer}} claims that human beings must consider the equal interests of human beings and animals alike.<ref name="Bioethicsvv"/> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1975 || Field development || At a gathering at the {{w|Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA}}, scientists discuss the benefits and risks of recombinant DNA research; the NIH forms the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee."<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1975 || Field development || At a gathering at the {{w|Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA}}, scientists discuss the benefits and risks of recombinant DNA research; the NIH forms the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee." "Scientists gather at Asilomar, California to discuss the benefits and risks of recombinant DNA experiments and agree upon a temporary moratorium for this research until they can develop biosafety standards. The NIH forms the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee to provide guidance for researchers and institutions. Research institutions form Institutional Biosafety Committees (IBCs) to review and oversee research involving hazardous biological materials." <ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Historical Events in the rDNA Debate |url=https://www.ndsu.edu/pubweb/~mcclean/plsc431/debate/debate3.htm |website=ndsu.edu |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Asilomar Conference on Laboratory Precautions When Conducting Recombinant DNA Research – Case Summary |url=https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=edethicsinscience |website=scholarworks.umass.edu |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1978 || Scientific development || {{w|Louise Brown}} is born as the world's first test-tube baby.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
 
| 1978 || Scientific development || {{w|Louise Brown}} is born as the world's first test-tube baby.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
Line 85: Line 121:
 
| 1978 || || "With its starting publication in 1978 (1st edition), the Encyclopedia of Bioethics became the first reference book to focus exclusively on the new and promising field of bioethics, helping to define the discipline"<ref>{{cite web |title=The new edition (4th) of the Encyclopedia of Bioethics |url=http://www.saocamilo-sp.br/pdf/bioethikos/155567/Editorialen.pdf |website=saocamilo-sp.br |accessdate=20 December 2019}}</ref><ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> ||
 
| 1978 || || "With its starting publication in 1978 (1st edition), the Encyclopedia of Bioethics became the first reference book to focus exclusively on the new and promising field of bioethics, helping to define the discipline"<ref>{{cite web |title=The new edition (4th) of the Encyclopedia of Bioethics |url=http://www.saocamilo-sp.br/pdf/bioethikos/155567/Editorialen.pdf |website=saocamilo-sp.br |accessdate=20 December 2019}}</ref><ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1979 || Literature || {{w|IRB: Ethics & Human Research}} ||
+
| 1978 || || "Louise Brown, the world’s first baby conceived by in vitro fertilization, is born in the U.K. She is currently alive and healthy."<ref>{{cite web |title=THIS DAY IN HISTORY |url=https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/worlds-first-test-tube-baby-born |website=history.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Louise Brown Biography |url=https://www.biography.com/personality/louise-brown |website=biography.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1979 || || "The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research publishes The Belmont Report: Principles of Ethical Research on Human Subjects. The Report provides the conceptual foundation for a major revision of the U.S. research regulations in 1981."<ref>{{cite book |last1=Resnik |first1=David B. |title=Playing Politics with Science: Balancing Scientific Independence and Government Oversight |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=I-MQEWXLrXUC&pg=PA165&lpg=PA165&dq=1979+%22The+National+Commission+for+the+Protection+of+Human+Subjects+in+Biomedical+and+Behavioral+Research+publishes+The+Belmont+Report:+Principles+of+Ethical+Research+on+Human+Subjects.+The+Report+provides+the+conceptual+foundation+for+a+major+revision+of+the+U.S.+research+regulations+in+1981&source=bl&ots=oAgfAik88e&sig=ACfU3U2OKd_knXpOtiUVuoCbiTRVuKV_dQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiD9I71_8jqAhX_GbkGHfyqCMIQ6AEwC3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=1979%20%22The%20National%20Commission%20for%20the%20Protection%20of%20Human%20Subjects%20in%20Biomedical%20and%20Behavioral%20Research%20publishes%20The%20Belmont%20Report%3A%20Principles%20of%20Ethical%20Research%20on%20Human%20Subjects.%20The%20Report%20provides%20the%20conceptual%20foundation%20for%20a%20major%20revision%20of%20the%20U.S.%20research%20regulations%20in%201981&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Metcalf |first1=Jacob |last2=Crawford |first2=Kate |title=Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide |doi=10.1177/2053951716650211 |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053951716650211}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1979 || Literature || {{w|IRB: Ethics & Human Research}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Announcing Ethics & Human Research |url=https://www.thehastingscenter.org/news/announcing-ethics-human-research/ |website=thehastingscenter.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1979 || Organization || The Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences officially establishes its own private central ethical committee.<ref name="Bioethics in a European Perspective"/> || {{w|Switzerland}}
 
| 1979 || Organization || The Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences officially establishes its own private central ethical committee.<ref name="Bioethics in a European Perspective"/> || {{w|Switzerland}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1979 || Organization || {{w|Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics}} || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1979 || Organization || {{w|Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics}}<ref>{{cite web |title=About the Center for Health Care Ethics |url=https://www.slu.edu/arts-and-sciences/bioethics/about/index.php |website=slu.edu |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics |url=https://catalog.slu.edu/colleges-schools/arts-sciences/health-care-ethics/ |website=catalog.slu.edu |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1979 || || The {{w|Belmont Report}} is released by the {{w| National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research}}. The Report becomes a key document in human research ethics regulations in the United States.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite web |title=The Belmont Report |url=https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html |website=hhs.gov |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1979 || || The {{w|Belmont Report}} is released by the {{w| National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research}}. The Report becomes a key document in human research ethics regulations in the United States.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite web |title=The Belmont Report |url=https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html |website=hhs.gov |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
Line 97: Line 137:
 
| 1981 || Organization || Japan establishes its first ethics committee, at the Medical Institute of Tokyo University.<ref name="Bioethics in a European Perspective"/> || {{w|Japan}}
 
| 1981 || Organization || Japan establishes its first ethics committee, at the Medical Institute of Tokyo University.<ref name="Bioethics in a European Perspective"/> || {{w|Japan}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1981 || Organization || {{w|MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics}} || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1981 || Organization || {{w|MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Dr. Steven Miles Wins MacLean Prize |url=https://macleanethics.uchicago.edu/ |website=macleanethics.uchicago.edu |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Roberts |first1=Laura Weiss |last2=Siegler |first2=Mark |title=Clinical Medical Ethics: Landmark Works of Mark Siegler, MD |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=M3ckDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=1981++MacLean+Center+for+Clinical+Medical+Ethics&source=bl&ots=8DkQOp1Zll&sig=ACfU3U3FGPbvVjfEjGA5sQxGamQvGhDtnA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjYndjPvMbqAhUSIbkGHfIbDw0Q6AEwA3oECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=1981%20%20MacLean%20Center%20for%20Clinical%20Medical%20Ethics&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1985 || Literature || Zhi-zheng Du's ''Outline of Medical Ethics'' is published in China as the first systematic textbook of medical ethics after the cultural revolution of the 1960s and 1970s.<ref name="Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics"/> || {{w|China}}
 
| 1985 || Literature || Zhi-zheng Du's ''Outline of Medical Ethics'' is published in China as the first systematic textbook of medical ethics after the cultural revolution of the 1960s and 1970s.<ref name="Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics"/> || {{w|China}}
Line 107: Line 147:
 
| 1987 || Literature || Ren-zong Qiu's ''Bioethics'' is published as the first bioethics book in China.<ref name="Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics">{{cite book |last1=Cherry |first1=Mark J. |last2=Peppin |first2=John F. |title=Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=CUB5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA248&dq=%22in+1987%22+Journal+Bioethics&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWuKHx_8DdAhVGlZAKHQ2DArwQ6AEILjAB#v=onepage&q=%22in%201987%22%20Journal%20Bioethics&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|China}}
 
| 1987 || Literature || Ren-zong Qiu's ''Bioethics'' is published as the first bioethics book in China.<ref name="Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics">{{cite book |last1=Cherry |first1=Mark J. |last2=Peppin |first2=John F. |title=Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=CUB5AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA248&dq=%22in+1987%22+Journal+Bioethics&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiWuKHx_8DdAhVGlZAKHQ2DArwQ6AEILjAB#v=onepage&q=%22in%201987%22%20Journal%20Bioethics&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|China}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1987 || Literature || [[w:Bioethics (journal)|Bioethics]] ||
+
| 1987 || Literature || [[w:Bioethics (journal)|Bioethics]].<ref>{{cite web |title=Bioethics |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14678519/1987/1/1 |website=onlinelibrary.wiley.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1988 || Literature || ''{{w|Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics}}'' is established.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Barnhill |first1=Anne |last2=Doggett |first2=Tyler |title=The Oxford Handbook of Food Ethics |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=_QpDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=%22Journal+of+Agricultural+and+Environmental+Ethics%22+%221988%22&source=bl&ots=Itg7VnQ2P_&sig=dVayGEAUB-u386zoCY2kAx0p7iE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjE7L7SwZ_dAhUEWpAKHYcUCqkQ6AEwB3oECAQQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Journal%20of%20Agricultural%20and%20Environmental%20Ethics%22%20%221988%22&f=false}}</ref> ||
 
| 1988 || Literature || ''{{w|Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics}}'' is established.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Barnhill |first1=Anne |last2=Doggett |first2=Tyler |title=The Oxford Handbook of Food Ethics |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=_QpDDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA265&lpg=PA265&dq=%22Journal+of+Agricultural+and+Environmental+Ethics%22+%221988%22&source=bl&ots=Itg7VnQ2P_&sig=dVayGEAUB-u386zoCY2kAx0p7iE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjE7L7SwZ_dAhUEWpAKHYcUCqkQ6AEwB3oECAQQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22Journal%20of%20Agricultural%20and%20Environmental%20Ethics%22%20%221988%22&f=false}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1988 || Scientific development || {{w|Harvard University}} and {{w|Dow Chemical Company}} patent a genetically engineered mouse used to study cancer.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1988 || Scientific development || {{w|Harvard University}} and {{w|Dow Chemical Company}} patent a genetically engineered mouse used to study cancer.<ref>{{cite web |title=Bioethics and Patent Law: The Case of the Oncomouse |url=https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/en/2006/03/article_0006.html |website=wipo.int |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Harvard Gets Mouse Patent, A World First |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1988/04/13/us/harvard-gets-mouse-patent-a-world-first.html |website=nytimes.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Mouse That Changed Science |url=https://www.sciencehistory.org/distillations/podcast/the-mouse-that-changed-science |website=sciencehistory.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1988 || Literature || Zhao-xiong He's ''History of Chinese Medical Morality'' is published, providing material on medical ethics from ancient to current China.<ref name="Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics"/> || {{w|China}}
 
| 1988 || Literature || Zhao-xiong He's ''History of Chinese Medical Morality'' is published, providing material on medical ethics from ancient to current China.<ref name="Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics"/> || {{w|China}}
Line 119: Line 159:
 
| 1989 || Literature || The United States {{w|National Academy of Sciences}} publishes ''On Being A Scientist'', a free, short book on research ethics for scientists in training.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1989 || Literature || The United States {{w|National Academy of Sciences}} publishes ''On Being A Scientist'', a free, short book on research ethics for scientists in training.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1990 || || {{w|Legal Trends in Bioethics}} ||
+
| 1989 || || "The NAS publishes On Being A Scientist (revised in 1994 and 2009), which is a free, short book on research ethics for scientists in training." ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1990 || || {{w|Legal Trends in Bioethics}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=Legal trends in bioethics. |url=https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Legal-trends-in-bioethics.-Fry-Revere/fccb045033e49e6bf380b0c8bb94a368cb7efff9 |website=semanticscholar.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1990 || || "The U.S. launches the Human Genome Project, a $20 billion effort to map and sequence the human genome."<ref>{{cite web |title=1990: Launch of the Human Genome Project |url=https://www.genome.gov/25520329/online-education-kit-1990-launch-of-the-human-genome-project |website=genome.gov |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=The Human Genome Project (1990-2003) |url=https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/human-genome-project-1990-2003 |website=embryo.asu.edu |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1990 || || "W. French Anderson begins the first human gene therapy clinical trial on patients with ADA deficiency, a genetic disease that affects the immune system."<ref>{{cite web |title=Making History with the 1990 Gene Therapy Trial |url=https://www.genengnews.com/magazine/269/making-history-with-the-1990-gene-therapy-trial/ |website=genengnews.com |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Reprogenetics: Law, Policy, and Ethical Issues |edition=Lori P. Knowles, Gregory E. Kaebnick |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=ZhTGhDlOgsYC&pg=PA1973&lpg=PA1973&dq=1990+%22W.+French+Anderson+begins+the+first+human+gene+therapy+clinical+trial+on+patients+with+ADA+deficiency,+a+genetic+disease+that+affects+the+immune+system&source=bl&ots=dPCjDTfiaF&sig=ACfU3U2Dx_PdGt6fqJW9BLW6vbufuLvx-w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwinuqeHlsnqAhWoIbkGHTsTDqoQ6AEwC3oECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=1990%20%22W.%20French%20Anderson%20begins%20the%20first%20human%20gene%20therapy%20clinical%20trial%20on%20patients%20with%20ADA%20deficiency%2C%20a%20genetic%20disease%20that%20affects%20the%20immune%20system&f=false}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1991 || Organization || London-based {{w|Nuffield Council on Bioethics}} is established by the {{w|Nuffield Foundation}} to adress numerous bioethical issues in need of analysis.<ref>{{cite book |title=National bioethics committees in action |publisher=UNESCO |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=8JtYCgAAQBAJ&pg=PP8&dq=%22in+1991%22+%22Nuffield+Council+on+Bioethics%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjk2fS-5cLdAhXBE5AKHaqlCOQQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=%22in%201991%22%20%22Nuffield%20Council%20on%20Bioethics%22&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Weir |first1=Robert F. |last2=Olick |first2=Robert S. |last3=Murray |first3=Jeffrey C. |title=The Stored Tissue Issue: Biomedical Research, Ethics, and Law in the Era of Genomic Medicine |publisher= |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=_1ASDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA105&dq=%22in+1991%22+%22Nuffield+Council+on+Bioethics%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjk2fS-5cLdAhXBE5AKHaqlCOQQ6AEIMzAC#v=onepage&q=%22in%201991%22%20%22Nuffield%20Council%20on%20Bioethics%22&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Global Bioethics: The Impact of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee |publisher=Alireza Bagheri, Jonathan D. Moreno, Stefano Semplici |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=Kv_NCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA129&dq=%22in+1991%22+%22Nuffield+Council+on+Bioethics%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjk2fS-5cLdAhXBE5AKHaqlCOQQ6AEIOzAD#v=onepage&q=%22in%201991%22%20%22Nuffield%20Council%20on%20Bioethics%22&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
 
| 1991 || Organization || London-based {{w|Nuffield Council on Bioethics}} is established by the {{w|Nuffield Foundation}} to adress numerous bioethical issues in need of analysis.<ref>{{cite book |title=National bioethics committees in action |publisher=UNESCO |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=8JtYCgAAQBAJ&pg=PP8&dq=%22in+1991%22+%22Nuffield+Council+on+Bioethics%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjk2fS-5cLdAhXBE5AKHaqlCOQQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=%22in%201991%22%20%22Nuffield%20Council%20on%20Bioethics%22&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Weir |first1=Robert F. |last2=Olick |first2=Robert S. |last3=Murray |first3=Jeffrey C. |title=The Stored Tissue Issue: Biomedical Research, Ethics, and Law in the Era of Genomic Medicine |publisher= |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=_1ASDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA105&dq=%22in+1991%22+%22Nuffield+Council+on+Bioethics%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjk2fS-5cLdAhXBE5AKHaqlCOQQ6AEIMzAC#v=onepage&q=%22in%201991%22%20%22Nuffield%20Council%20on%20Bioethics%22&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Global Bioethics: The Impact of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee |publisher=Alireza Bagheri, Jonathan D. Moreno, Stefano Semplici |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=Kv_NCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA129&dq=%22in+1991%22+%22Nuffield+Council+on+Bioethics%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjk2fS-5cLdAhXBE5AKHaqlCOQQ6AEIOzAD#v=onepage&q=%22in%201991%22%20%22Nuffield%20Council%20on%20Bioethics%22&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1991 || Literature || The ''{{w|Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal}}'' is launched. || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1991 || Literature || The ''{{w|Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal |url=https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/13203 |website=muse.jhu.edu |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Evans |first1=John H. |title=Playing God?: Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=smFfe3p-rm8C&dq=1991+++The+Kennedy+Institute+of+Ethics+Journal+is+launched&source=gbs_navlinks_s}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1992 || || "NAS publishes Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. The book estimates the incidence of misconduct, discusses some of the causes of misconduct, proposes a definition of misconduct, and recommends some strategies for preventing misconduct." ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1992 || Literature || Quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal ''{{w|Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/9208482}}</ref> ||
 
| 1992 || Literature || Quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal ''{{w|Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/9208482}}</ref> ||
Line 129: Line 177:
 
| 1992 || Literature || The United States {{w|National Academy of Sciences}} publishes ''Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process''. The book estimates the incidence of misconduct, discusses some of the causes of misconduct, proposes a definition of misconduct, and recommends some strategies for preventing misconduct.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1992 || Literature || The United States {{w|National Academy of Sciences}} publishes ''Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process''. The book estimates the incidence of misconduct, discusses some of the causes of misconduct, proposes a definition of misconduct, and recommends some strategies for preventing misconduct.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-  
 
|-  
| 1992 || Literature || Peer-reviewed academic journal ''{{w|Environmental Values}}'' is established. || {{w|United Kingdom}}
+
| 1992 || Literature || Peer-reviewed academic journal ''{{w|Environmental Values}}'' is established.<ref>{{cite web |last1= |first1= |title=Environmental |url=http://www.environmentandsociety.org/mml/collection/15702#:~:text=The%20journal%20was%20established%20in,published%20by%20White%20Horse%20Press. |website=environmentandsociety.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |title=Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics |edition=Paul G. Harris |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=YSRmAQAAQBAJ&pg=PT41&lpg=PT41&dq=1992++journal+Environmental+Values+is+established&source=bl&ots=SGy6_DMtMI&sig=ACfU3U3IfZ9GqwWPOXp6StwNIp-NY6UWyw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwidk4GZmMnqAhXdGbkGHXaXD8UQ6AEwBXoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=1992%20%20journal%20Environmental%20Values%20is%20established&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1993 || Scientific development || Researchers successfully clone human {{w|embryo}}s.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
 
| 1993 || Scientific development || Researchers successfully clone human {{w|embryo}}s.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
Line 141: Line 189:
 
| 1994 || Literature || American philosophers {{w|Tom Beauchamp}} and {{w|James Childress}} publish ''The principles of biomedical ethics'', in which they state their basic principles of bioethics as "the principle of respect for patient autonomy, which has grounded, in particular, the concept of informed consent; dates back to the Hippocratic principle of “do no harm,” which requires minimization of damage to the patient during the medical intervention; the principle of “do good” (beneficence), emphasizing the physician’s responsibility to take positive steps to improve the condition of the patient; and the principle of justice, emphasizing the need for fairness and equal treatment of patients, and equitable distribution of resources (which are always limited) in the provision of medical care".<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1994 || Literature || American philosophers {{w|Tom Beauchamp}} and {{w|James Childress}} publish ''The principles of biomedical ethics'', in which they state their basic principles of bioethics as "the principle of respect for patient autonomy, which has grounded, in particular, the concept of informed consent; dates back to the Hippocratic principle of “do no harm,” which requires minimization of damage to the patient during the medical intervention; the principle of “do good” (beneficence), emphasizing the physician’s responsibility to take positive steps to improve the condition of the patient; and the principle of justice, emphasizing the need for fairness and equal treatment of patients, and equitable distribution of resources (which are always limited) in the provision of medical care".<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 1995 || || About 200 religious leaders join in {{w|Washington, DC.}}, with leading biotechnology critic Jeremy Rifkin in a press conference named the "Joint Appeal against Human and Animal Patenting", protesting the patenting of plants, animals, and human body parts.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hanson |first1=MJ |title=Religious voices in biotechnology: the case of gene patenting. |pmid=12962106 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12962106}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1994 || || "Harvard psychologist Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray publish {{w|The Bell Curve}}, a controversial book that reignites the centuries old debate about biology, race and intelligence"<ref>{{cite web |title=Intelligence, Genes, and Success |url=https://www.springerprofessional.de/intelligence-genes-and-success/13726156 |website=springerprofessional.de |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1995 || Organization || The {{w|Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics}} is established. || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1994 || || "Roger Poisson admits to fabricating and falsifying patient data in NIH-funded breast cancer clinical trials in order allow his patients to qualify for enrollment and have access to experimental treatments."<ref>{{cite web |title=Doctor Says He Falsified Cancer Data to Help Patients |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1994/04/01/us/doctor-says-he-falsified-cancer-data-to-help-patients.html |website=nytimes.com |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=2019 Tri-I Responsible Conduct of Research Course RCR Case Studies |url=https://www.mskcc.org/sites/default/files/node/26556/documents/case-study-instructions-and-guidelines-fall-2019.pdf |website=mskcc.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1995 || || About 200 religious leaders join in {{w|Washington, DC.}}, with leading biotechnology critic Jeremy Rifkin in a press conference named the "Joint Appeal against Human and Animal Patenting", protesting the patenting of plants, animals, and human body parts.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hanson |first1=MJ |title=Religious voices in biotechnology: the case of gene patenting. |pmid=12962106 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12962106}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Hanson |first1=M J |title=Religious Voices in Biotechnology: The Case of Gene Patenting |url=https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12962106/}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1995 || Organization || The {{w|Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics}} is established.<ref>{{cite web |title=Berman Institute |url=https://bioethics.jhu.edu/about/history/ |website=bioethics.jhu.edu |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Bioethics |url=https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/gim/research/content/bioethics.html |website=hopkinsmedicine.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1995 || Organization || {{w|University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics}}<ref>{{cite web |title=About Us: The Joint Centre for Bioethics |url=http://jcb.utoronto.ca/about/about.shtml |website=jcb.utoronto.ca/ |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> || {{w|Canada}}
 
| 1995 || Organization || {{w|University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics}}<ref>{{cite web |title=About Us: The Joint Centre for Bioethics |url=http://jcb.utoronto.ca/about/about.shtml |website=jcb.utoronto.ca/ |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> || {{w|Canada}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1995 || Concept development || American philosopher {{w|Daniel Callahan}} defines bioethics as a science “which is the product of biomedical achievements related to the environment and social sciences”.<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1995 || Concept development || American philosopher {{w|Daniel Callahan}} defines bioethics as a science “which is the product of biomedical achievements related to the environment and social sciences”.<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 1996 || || "Scientists and defense analysts become concerned about the use of chemical or biological weapons by a terrorist group after Aum Shinrikyo, a Japanese doomsday cult, releases sarin gas in a Tokyo subway, killing 12 people and sending 5,500 to hospitals. The group also attempted (unsuccessfully) to spray anthrax spores over Tokyo. In 1998, terrorism experts warn about the use of biological or chemical weapons by Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein." ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1996 || Scientific development || [[w:Dolly (sheep)|Dolly]] is born as the first mammal ever to be cloned from another individual’s body cell. Her birth is announced in 1997, followed by several European nations banning human cloning. The United States Congress considers a bill to ban all human cloning but changes its mind after scientists argue that the bill would undermine biomedical research.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Dolly the sheep dies young |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3393-dolly-the-sheep-dies-young/ |website=newscientist.com |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Dolly the sheep: 15 years after her death, cloning still has the power to shock |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/dolly-the-sheep-cloning-15-years-death-future-humans-monkeys-what-next-a8208896.html |website=independent.co.uk |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
 
| 1996 || Scientific development || [[w:Dolly (sheep)|Dolly]] is born as the first mammal ever to be cloned from another individual’s body cell. Her birth is announced in 1997, followed by several European nations banning human cloning. The United States Congress considers a bill to ban all human cloning but changes its mind after scientists argue that the bill would undermine biomedical research.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Dolly the sheep dies young |url=https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3393-dolly-the-sheep-dies-young/ |website=newscientist.com |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Dolly the sheep: 15 years after her death, cloning still has the power to shock |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/dolly-the-sheep-cloning-15-years-death-future-humans-monkeys-what-next-a8208896.html |website=independent.co.uk |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United Kingdom}}
Line 153: Line 207:
 
| 1996 || Organization || The {{w|National Bioethics Advisory Commission}} is established. ||
 
| 1996 || Organization || The {{w|National Bioethics Advisory Commission}} is established. ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1996 || Literature || American philosopher {{w|H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr.}} publishes ''The Foundation of Bioethics'', in which he states “Moral diversity is real. It is real in fact and in principle. Bioethics and healthcare policy have yet to take this diversity seriously. Those who teach bioethics, those who engage in bioethics committees, even those who produced textbooks tend to discount the diversity of understanding regarding the morality of particular health care choices (e.g., regarding abortion, commercial surrogacy, euthanasia/ germline genetic engineering, inequalities in access to health care, infanticide, organ sales) or the nature of morality (e.g., theological, deontological, virtue-based)".<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1996 || Literature (book) || American philosopher {{w|David Abram}} publishes ''The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World''. Abram coins the phrase "the more-than-human world" as a way of referring to earthly nature.
 +
|-
 +
| 1996 || Literature (book) || American philosopher {{w|H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr.}} publishes ''The Foundation of Bioethics'', in which he states “Moral diversity is real. It is real in fact and in principle. Bioethics and healthcare policy have yet to take this diversity seriously. Those who teach bioethics, those who engage in bioethics committees, even those who produced textbooks tend to discount the diversity of understanding regarding the morality of particular health care choices (e.g., regarding abortion, commercial surrogacy, euthanasia/ germline genetic engineering, inequalities in access to health care, infanticide, organ sales) or the nature of morality (e.g., theological, deontological, virtue-based)".<ref name="Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1997 || || "On May 16, 1997, President Bill Clinton formally apologized on behalf of the United States to victims of the experiment" || {{w|United States}}
 
| 1997 || || "On May 16, 1997, President Bill Clinton formally apologized on behalf of the United States to victims of the experiment" || {{w|United States}}
Line 159: Line 215:
 
| 1997 || || {{w|Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights}} ||
 
| 1997 || || {{w|Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights}} ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1998 || Literature || Journal {{w|Medicine Health Care and Philosophy}} is launched by the European Society For Philosophy Of Medicine And Healthcare.<ref name="The European Society For Philosophy Of Medicine And Healthcare"/> ||
+
| 1998 || || "Scientists perfect methods for growing human embryonic stem cells. Some countries ban the research; others promote it." ||
 +
|-
 +
| 1998 || Literature (journal) || {{w|Medicine Health Care and Philosophy}} is launched by the European Society For Philosophy Of Medicine And Healthcare.<ref name="The European Society For Philosophy Of Medicine And Healthcare"/> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1998 || Scientific development || Methods for growing human embryonic stem cells are perfected. Some countries ban the research; others promote it.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
 
| 1998 || Scientific development || Methods for growing human embryonic stem cells are perfected. Some countries ban the research; others promote it.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
Line 165: Line 223:
 
| 1998 || Scientific development || American biotechnologist {{w|Craig Venter}} forms [[w:Celera Corporation|Celera Genomics]] and begins a private effort to sequence the human genome, using dozens of automated sequencing machines.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
 
| 1998 || Scientific development || American biotechnologist {{w|Craig Venter}} forms [[w:Celera Corporation|Celera Genomics]] and begins a private effort to sequence the human genome, using dozens of automated sequencing machines.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 1999 || Literature || ''{{w|AMA Journal of Ethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=AMA Journal of Ethics |url=https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/about |website=journalofethics.ama-assn.org |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1999 || Literature (journal) || ''{{w|AMA Journal of Ethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=AMA Journal of Ethics |url=https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/about |website=journalofethics.ama-assn.org |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 1999 || Literature || The ''{{w|American Journal of Bioethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=American Journal of Bioethics |url=http://www.bioethics.net/about/ |website=bioethics.net |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref>  || {{w|United Sattes}}
 
| 1999 || Literature || The ''{{w|American Journal of Bioethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=American Journal of Bioethics |url=http://www.bioethics.net/about/ |website=bioethics.net |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref>  || {{w|United Sattes}}
Line 175: Line 233:
 
| 1999 || Literature || Chinese bioethicist {{w|Lee Shui-chuen}} publishes ''Confucian Bioethics'' (in Chinese). || {{w|China}}
 
| 1999 || Literature || Chinese bioethicist {{w|Lee Shui-chuen}} publishes ''Confucian Bioethics'' (in Chinese). || {{w|China}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 2000 || Organization || The {{w|Office for Human Research Protections}} is established. || {{w|United States}}
+
| 1999 || || "The U.S. NIH and OHRP require all people conducting or overseeing human subjects research to have training in research ethics." ||
 +
|-
 +
| 2000 || Organization || The {{w|Office for Human Research Protections}} is established.<ref>{{cite web |title=OHRP History |url=https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/about-ohrp/history/index.html |website=hhs.gov |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2001 || Literature || Peer-reviewed journal ''{{w|The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Curran |first1=Charles E. |title=Catholic Moral Theology in the United States: A History |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=enB4otKhEFwC&pg=PA222&lpg=PA222&dq=%22in+2001%22+The+National+Catholic+Bioethics+Quarterly&source=bl&ots=rH3DEl-Bdr&sig=LifxWKWrmT8Js0w50qyzQHz3GsM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiLlcyFksPdAhULg5AKHfOcBZEQ6AEwB3oECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22in%202001%22%20The%20National%20Catholic%20Bioethics%20Quarterly&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 2001 || Literature || Peer-reviewed journal ''{{w|The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Curran |first1=Charles E. |title=Catholic Moral Theology in the United States: A History |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=enB4otKhEFwC&pg=PA222&lpg=PA222&dq=%22in+2001%22+The+National+Catholic+Bioethics+Quarterly&source=bl&ots=rH3DEl-Bdr&sig=LifxWKWrmT8Js0w50qyzQHz3GsM&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiLlcyFksPdAhULg5AKHfOcBZEQ6AEwB3oECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=%22in%202001%22%20The%20National%20Catholic%20Bioethics%20Quarterly&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
Line 184: Line 244:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2001 || || The United States Government announces that the {{w|National Institutes of Health}} will fund research on approximately 64 embryonic stem cell lines created from leftover human {{w|embryo}}s.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 2001 || || The United States Government announces that the {{w|National Institutes of Health}} will fund research on approximately 64 embryonic stem cell lines created from leftover human {{w|embryo}}s.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 2001 || || "Congress debates legislation on human cloning." ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2001 || Organization || The {{w|International Society for Stem Cell Research}} is established to promote the exchange and dissemination of information and ideas relating to stem cells.<ref>{{cite web |title=About the ISSCR |url=http://www.closerlookatstemcells.org/about-isscr |website=closerlookatstemcells.org |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Marzotto |first1=Toni |last2=Alt |first2=Patricia M. |title=Stem Cell Research: Hope or Hype? |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=Vg-lDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1895&dq=%22in+2001%22+International+Society+for+Stem+Cell+Research&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjw9vTll8PdAhXCHJAKHW9oD6IQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=%22in%202001%22%20International%20Society%20for%20Stem%20Cell%20Research&f=false}}</ref> ||
 
| 2001 || Organization || The {{w|International Society for Stem Cell Research}} is established to promote the exchange and dissemination of information and ideas relating to stem cells.<ref>{{cite web |title=About the ISSCR |url=http://www.closerlookatstemcells.org/about-isscr |website=closerlookatstemcells.org |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Marzotto |first1=Toni |last2=Alt |first2=Patricia M. |title=Stem Cell Research: Hope or Hype? |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=Vg-lDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA1895&dq=%22in+2001%22+International+Society+for+Stem+Cell+Research&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjw9vTll8PdAhXCHJAKHW9oD6IQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q=%22in%202001%22%20International%20Society%20for%20Stem%20Cell%20Research&f=false}}</ref> ||
Line 189: Line 251:
 
| 2001 || Organization || {{w|The President's Council on Bioethics}} is created by United States President {{w|George W. Bush}} to advice the President on bioethical issues that may emerge as a consequence of advances in biomedical science and technology.<ref>{{cite web |title=President's Council on Bioethics |url=https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/past_commissions/ |website=bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 2001 || Organization || {{w|The President's Council on Bioethics}} is created by United States President {{w|George W. Bush}} to advice the President on bioethical issues that may emerge as a consequence of advances in biomedical science and technology.<ref>{{cite web |title=President's Council on Bioethics |url=https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/past_commissions/ |website=bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 2001 || Organization || The {{w|Center for Genetics and Society}} is established. || {{w|United States}}
+
| 2001 || Organization || The {{w|Center for Genetics and Society}} is established.<ref>{{cite web |title=HISTORY OF THE CENTER FOR GENETICS AND SOCIETY |url=https://www.geneticsandsociety.org/history-center-genetics-and-society |website=geneticsandsociety.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 2001 || || "The Bush Administration announces that the NIH will only fund human embryonic stem cell research on approximately 64 cell lines created from leftover human embryos."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Murugan |first1=Varnee |title=Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Decade of Debate from Bush to Obama |pmid=19774120 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2744932/ |pmc=2744932}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=CRS Report for Congress |url=https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL31015.pdf |website=fas.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2002 || || {{w|The President's Council on Bioethics}} recommends that the United States ban reproductive cloning and enact a moratorium on research cloning.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 2002 || || {{w|The President's Council on Bioethics}} recommends that the United States ban reproductive cloning and enact a moratorium on research cloning.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 2002 || Organization || {{w|Toi Te Taiao: The Bioethics Council}} || {{w|New Zealand}}
+
| 2002 || || "Scientists publish several papers in prominent journals with direct implications for bioterrorism. A paper published in the Journal of Virology described a method for genetically engineering a form of mousepox virus that is much deadlier than the naturally occurring strain. A paper published in Science showed how to make the poliovirus by obtaining supplies from a mail-order company. A paper published in PNAS develop a mathematical model for showing how many people would be killed by infecting the U.S. milk supply with botulinum toxin." ||
 +
|-
 +
| 2002 || || "The President's Council on Bioethics recommends that the U.S. ban reproductive cloning and enact a moratorium on research cloning." ||
 +
|-
 +
| 2002 || Organization || The {{w|Toi Te Taiao: The Bioethics Council}} is established.<ref>{{cite book |title=Religion and Biopolitics |edition=Mirjam Weiberg-Salzmann, Ulrich Willems |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=jhObDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA140&lpg=PA140&dq=2002++Toi+Te+Taiao:+The+Bioethics+Council&source=bl&ots=Vsa2iuTmS-&sig=ACfU3U3UwPcO27xoelpO9PoxeDnUNmA38A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwji95zh5cbqAhXpLLkGHYTSB1gQ6AEwB3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=2002%20%20Toi%20Te%20Taiao%3A%20The%20Bioethics%20Council&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Manning |first1=Joanna |title=The Cartwright Papers: Essays on the Cervical Cancer Inquiry, 1987-88 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=lHfafxmBkVUC&pg=PA220&lpg=PA220&dq=2002++Toi+Te+Taiao:+The+Bioethics+Council&source=bl&ots=e3mOFcOBtw&sig=ACfU3U3oY5uuceOZyiWtHiG4vHSklUS9Nw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwji95zh5cbqAhXpLLkGHYTSB1gQ6AEwCHoECAkQAQ#v=onepage&q=2002%20%20Toi%20Te%20Taiao%3A%20The%20Bioethics%20Council&f=false}}</ref> || {{w|New Zealand}}
 +
|-
 +
| 2003 || || " In 2003, the American Society for Microbiology (ASM), the National Academy of Sciences, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies held a meeting to discuss the censorship biological research that poses security risks. Journals agree to self-censor some research."<ref name="Schwester, Richard W.">{{cite book |title=Teaching Research Methods in Public Administration |edition=Schwester, Richard W. |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=MfWfBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA223&lpg=PA223&dq=In+2003,+the+American+Society+for+Microbiology+(ASM),+the+National+Academy+of+Sciences,+and+the+Center+for+Strategic+and+International+Studies+held+a+meeting+to+discuss+the+censorship+biological+research+that+poses+security+risks.+Journals+agree+to+self-censor+some+research&source=bl&ots=7bYyab3-UM&sig=ACfU3U2h3BsD2NvuhgnhFJhzBzv6sFevjA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiJooKbp8nqAhX1HrkGHc1tC-EQ6AEwAHoECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=In%202003%2C%20the%20American%20Society%20for%20Microbiology%20(ASM)%2C%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%2C%20and%20the%20Center%20for%20Strategic%20and%20International%20Studies%20held%20a%20meeting%20to%20discuss%20the%20censorship%20biological%20research%20that%20poses%20security%20risks.%20Journals%20agree%20to%20self-censor%20some%20research&f=false}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |title=Censoring science |pmid=12796312 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC156663/ |pmc=156663}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2003 || || The United States invades {{w|Iraq}} with the stated purpose of eliminating its chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs. So far, evidence of weapons programs but no actual weapons would be found.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|Iraq}}
 
| 2003 || || The United States invades {{w|Iraq}} with the stated purpose of eliminating its chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs. So far, evidence of weapons programs but no actual weapons would be found.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|Iraq}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 2003 || || The {{w|International Bioethics Committee}} issues a second global instrument, the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, which may be regarded as an extension of the {{w|Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights}}. ||
+
| 2003 || || The {{w|International Bioethics Committee}} issues a second global instrument, the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, which may be regarded as an extension of the {{w|Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=International Declaration on Human Genetic Data |url=https://en.unesco.org/themes/ethics-science-and-technology/human-genetic-data |website=en.unesco.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=INTERNATIONAL DECLARATION ON HUMAN GENETIC DATA |url=https://www.who.int/genomics/elsi/regulatory_data/region/international/031/en/ |website=who.int |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 2003 || Organization || {{w|The Regenerative Medicine Institute}} || {{w|Ireland}}
+
| 2003 || Organization || {{w|The Regenerative Medicine Institute}}<ref>{{cite web |title=Regenerative Medicine Institute |url=http://www.nuigalway.ie/remedi/about-us |website=nuigalway.ie |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine, and Tissue Engineering |url=https://www.fightaging.org/archives/2003/11/stem-cells-regenerative-medicine-and-tissue-engineering/ |website=fightaging.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|Ireland}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2004 || Literature || The ''{{w|Journal of Bioethical Inquiry}}'' is released by the {{w|University of Otago}} Bioethics Centre.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Journal of bioethical inquiry |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/101250741}}</ref> || {{w|New Zealand}}
 
| 2004 || Literature || The ''{{w|Journal of Bioethical Inquiry}}'' is released by the {{w|University of Otago}} Bioethics Centre.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Journal of bioethical inquiry |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog/101250741}}</ref> || {{w|New Zealand}}
Line 205: Line 275:
 
| 2004 || Literature || Medical ethicist James Hughes publishes ''{{w|Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future}}'', which argues that technologies pushing the boundaries of humanness can radically improve our quality of life if they are controlled democratically.<ref>{{cite web |title=Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future |url=https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/111902.Citizen_Cyborg |website=goodreads.com |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
| 2004 || Literature || Medical ethicist James Hughes publishes ''{{w|Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future}}'', which argues that technologies pushing the boundaries of humanness can radically improve our quality of life if they are controlled democratically.<ref>{{cite web |title=Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future |url=https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/111902.Citizen_Cyborg |website=goodreads.com |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 2004 || Organization || {{w|Institute on Biotechnology and the Human Future}} ||
+
| 2004 || Literature (book) || {{w|Nicholas Agar}} publishes ''Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement''<ref>{{cite web |title=Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9780470775004 |website=onlinelibrary.wiley.com |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement |url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02448849 |website=link.springer.com |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 +
|-
 +
| 2005 || || Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights <ref>{{cite journal |last1=Langlois |first1=Adèle |title=The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Perspectives from Kenya and South Africa |doi=10.1007/s10728-007-0055-7 |pmid=18240025 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2226192/#:~:text=In%20October%202005%2C1%20the,on%20Bioethics%20and%20Human%20Rights.&text=The%20onus%20is%20on%20UNESCO's,national%20laws%2C%20regulations%20or%20policies. |pmc=2226192}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights |url=https://en.unesco.org/themes/ethics-science-and-technology/bioethics-and-human-rights |website=en.unesco.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 2004 || Literature (book) || {{w|Nicholas Agar}} publishes ''Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement''
+
| 2005 || || "In response to recommendations from a National Research Council report titled “Biotechnology in the Age of Terrorism,” the Department of Health and Human Services establishes the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) to provide advice and guidance to federal agencies, scientists, and journals concerning oversight and public of research in biotechnology or biomedicine which can be readily applied to cause significant harm to public health, agriculture, the economy, or national security (i.e. “dual use” research)."<ref>{{cite web |title=National Science Advisory Board on Biosecurity |url=https://osp.od.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/COMBINED_Codes_PDFs.pdf |website=osp.od.nih.gov |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> ||
|-  
 
| 2005 || || Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights ||
 
 
|-
 
|-
| 2005 || Literature || American professor {{w|George Annas}} publishes ''American bioethics: crossing human rights and health law boundaries''. || {{w|United States}}
+
| 2005 || Literature || American professor {{w|George Annas}} publishes ''American bioethics: crossing human rights and health law boundaries''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Worst case bioethics: Death, disaster, and public health |url=https://www.jci.org/articles/view/43845 |website=jci.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2006 || Literature || Quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal ''{{w|BioSocieties}}'' is released.<ref>{{cite web |title=BioSocieties |url=http://andymiah.net/blog/2006/07/01/biosocieties |website=andymiah.net |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
| 2006 || Literature || Quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal ''{{w|BioSocieties}}'' is released.<ref>{{cite web |title=BioSocieties |url=http://andymiah.net/blog/2006/07/01/biosocieties |website=andymiah.net |accessdate=3 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 2006 || Literature || Quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal ''{{w|Clinical Ethics}}'' is launched. || {{w|United States}}
+
| 2006 || Literature || Quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal ''{{w|Clinical Ethics}}'' is launched.<ref>{{cite web |title=Clinical Ethics |url=https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/ceta/1/3 |website=journals.sagepub.com |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
|-
 
| 2007 || [[w:List of medical ethics cases|Medical ethics case]] || A man in pain requests a legal right to die. || {{w|Italy}}
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2008 || Literature || The ''{{w|International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics}}'' is launched to encourage more work in feminist bioethics.<ref>{{cite web |title=Feminist Bioethics |url=https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/sum2009/entries/feminist-bioethics/ |website=stanford.library.sydney.edu.au |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics |url=https://www.researchgate.net/journal/1937-4577_International_Journal_of_Feminist_Approaches_to_Bioethics |website=researchgate.net |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
| 2008 || Literature || The ''{{w|International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics}}'' is launched to encourage more work in feminist bioethics.<ref>{{cite web |title=Feminist Bioethics |url=https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/sum2009/entries/feminist-bioethics/ |website=stanford.library.sydney.edu.au |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics |url=https://www.researchgate.net/journal/1937-4577_International_Journal_of_Feminist_Approaches_to_Bioethics |website=researchgate.net |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2008 || || The {{w|Catholic Church}} publishes a document entitled ''{{w|Dignitas Personae}}'', about a range of bioethical issues related to the areas of assisted reproduction and human genetics. The paper analizes and comments the bioethical thinking of the Catholic Church.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pastor |first1=LM |title=[Ethical analysis and commentary of Dignitas Personae document: from continuity toward the innovation]. |pmid=21692553 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21692553}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS PERSONAE |url=http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20081208_dignitas-personae_en.html |website=vatican.va |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Vatican issues new document on biotechnology |url=https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/all-things-catholic/vatican-issues-new-document-biotechnology |website=ncronline.org |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> ||
 
| 2008 || || The {{w|Catholic Church}} publishes a document entitled ''{{w|Dignitas Personae}}'', about a range of bioethical issues related to the areas of assisted reproduction and human genetics. The paper analizes and comments the bioethical thinking of the Catholic Church.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pastor |first1=LM |title=[Ethical analysis and commentary of Dignitas Personae document: from continuity toward the innovation]. |pmid=21692553 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21692553}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS PERSONAE |url=http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20081208_dignitas-personae_en.html |website=vatican.va |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Vatican issues new document on biotechnology |url=https://www.ncronline.org/blogs/all-things-catholic/vatican-issues-new-document-biotechnology |website=ncronline.org |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> ||
|-
 
| 2008 || Literature || {{w|International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics}} || {{w|Canada}}
 
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2009 || Organization || {{w|Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues}} is established by United States President {{w|Barack Obama}} to advise the president and the administration on bioethical issues arising from advances in biomedicine and related areas of science and technology.<ref>{{cite web |title=About the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hast.726 |website=onlinelibrary.wiley.com |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 2009 || Organization || {{w|Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues}} is established by United States President {{w|Barack Obama}} to advise the president and the administration on bioethical issues arising from advances in biomedicine and related areas of science and technology.<ref>{{cite web |title=About the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hast.726 |website=onlinelibrary.wiley.com |accessdate=17 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
Line 229: Line 295:
 
| 2009 || Organization || The {{w|Bangladesh Bioethics Society}} is established.<ref>{{cite web |title=Bangladesh Bioethics Society |url=https://www.ausn.info/worldwide_collaboration/bangladesh_bioethics_society_bbs |website=bioethics.org.bd/ |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> || {{w|Bangladesh}}
 
| 2009 || Organization || The {{w|Bangladesh Bioethics Society}} is established.<ref>{{cite web |title=Bangladesh Bioethics Society |url=https://www.ausn.info/worldwide_collaboration/bangladesh_bioethics_society_bbs |website=bioethics.org.bd/ |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> || {{w|Bangladesh}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 2009 || Policy || The Obama Administration announces it will significantly expand {{w|National Institutes of Health}} funding of human embryonic stem cell research which was restricted under the Bush Administration.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> || {{w|United States}}
+
| 2009 || Policy || The Obama Administration announces it will significantly expand {{w|National Institutes of Health}} funding of human embryonic stem cell research which was restricted under the Bush Administration.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Wolinsky |first1=Howard |title=The pendulum swung. President Barack Obama removes restrictions on stem-cell research, but are expectations now too high? |doi=10.1038/embor.2009.78 |pmid=19415078 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2680887/ |pmc=2680887}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
| 2010 || Literature || {{w|George Annas}} publishes ''Worst case bioethics: death, disaster, and public health''. || {{w|United States}}
+
| 2010 || Literature (book) || {{w|George Annas}} publishes ''Worst case bioethics: death, disaster, and public health''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Worst case bioethics: Death, disaster, and public health |url=https://www.jci.org/articles/view/43845 |website=jci.org |accessdate=13 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2010 || Literature (book) || {{w|Nicholas Agar}} publishes ''Humanity's End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement''. The book argues against the doctrine of radical enhancement sometimes identified with the [[w:Transhumanism|transhumanist movement]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Humanity's end : why we should reject radical enhancement.|last=Nicholas.|first=Agar|date=2013|publisher=Bradford Books|isbn=978-0262525176|location=[Place of publication not identified]|oclc=842500060}}</ref>
 
| 2010 || Literature (book) || {{w|Nicholas Agar}} publishes ''Humanity's End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement''. The book argues against the doctrine of radical enhancement sometimes identified with the [[w:Transhumanism|transhumanist movement]].<ref>{{Cite book|title=Humanity's end : why we should reject radical enhancement.|last=Nicholas.|first=Agar|date=2013|publisher=Bradford Books|isbn=978-0262525176|location=[Place of publication not identified]|oclc=842500060}}</ref>
Line 239: Line 305:
 
| 2012 || Organization || The {{w|Center for the Study of Bioethics}} is founded by Serbian American philosopher {{w|Vojin Rakić}} with the purpose to stimulate scientific debate on a variety of issues bioethics deals with. It is based in Belgrade, Serbia.<ref>{{cite web |title=Center for the Study of Bioethics |url=http://csb.eu.com/en/purpose/ |website=csb.eu.com/ |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> ||
 
| 2012 || Organization || The {{w|Center for the Study of Bioethics}} is founded by Serbian American philosopher {{w|Vojin Rakić}} with the purpose to stimulate scientific debate on a variety of issues bioethics deals with. It is based in Belgrade, Serbia.<ref>{{cite web |title=Center for the Study of Bioethics |url=http://csb.eu.com/en/purpose/ |website=csb.eu.com/ |accessdate=19 December 2019}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
| 2012 || Literature || The {{w|Canadian Journal of Bioethics}} is established. || {{w|Canada}}
+
| 2012 || Literature || The {{w|Canadian Journal of Bioethics}} is established.<ref>{{cite web |title=Launch of the Canadian Journal of Bioethics |url=https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/bioethics/1900-v1-n1-bioethics04468/1058305ar/abstract/ |website=erudit.org |accessdate=12 July 2020}}</ref> || {{w|Canada}}
 +
|-
 +
| 2013 || || "In Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that isolated and purified DNA cannot be patented. Only DNA that has been modified by human beings can be patented. The ruling invalidates Myriad’s patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and creates uncertainty concerning the legal validity of other types of patents on isolated and purified chemicals."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Cartwright-Smith |first1=Lara |title=Patenting Genes: What Does Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Mean for Genetic Testing and Research? |doi=10.1177/003335491412900311 |pmid=24790252 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3982540/#:~:text=During%20its%202013%20term%2C%20the,of%20breast%20and%20ovarian%20cancer.&text=The%20Court%20ruled%20that%20synthetically,isolated%20natural%20DNA%20is%20not. |pmc=3982540}}</ref> ||
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2014 || || Various funding agencies and journals, including the {{w|National Institutes of Health}}, [[W:Science (journal)|Science]], and [[w:Nature (journal)|Nature]], take steps to promote {{w|reproducibility}} in science in response to reports that many published studies in the biomedical, behavioral, and physical sciences are not reproducible.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
 
| 2014 || || Various funding agencies and journals, including the {{w|National Institutes of Health}}, [[W:Science (journal)|Science]], and [[w:Nature (journal)|Nature]], take steps to promote {{w|reproducibility}} in science in response to reports that many published studies in the biomedical, behavioral, and physical sciences are not reproducible.<ref name="Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)"/> ||
Line 246: Line 314:
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2016 || || The United States {{w|National Institutes of Health}} places a temporary moratorium on funding for experiments involving human-animal chimeras.<ref>{{cite web |title=NIH moves to lift moratorium on animal-human chimera research |url=http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/nih-moves-lift-moratorium-animal-human-chimera-research |website=sciencemag.org |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 
| 2016 || || The United States {{w|National Institutes of Health}} places a temporary moratorium on funding for experiments involving human-animal chimeras.<ref>{{cite web |title=NIH moves to lift moratorium on animal-human chimera research |url=http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/08/nih-moves-lift-moratorium-animal-human-chimera-research |website=sciencemag.org |accessdate=27 September 2018}}</ref> || {{w|United States}}
 +
|-
 +
| 2018 || || "In October, He Jiankui, a scientist of the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China, announces the birth of the world’s first gene edited babies, both girls. He claims that he used CRISPR-Cas 9 technology to modify the CCR5 gene to give the girls immunity to HIV. The announcement generates outrage around the world and many scientists and policymakers call for a ban on human germline, genome editing." || {{w|China}}
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 265: Line 335:
 
===What the timeline is still missing===
 
===What the timeline is still missing===
  
 +
* More from<ref name="Schwester, Richard W."/>
 +
* {{w|Right to die}}
 +
* [https://books.google.com.ar/books?id=MfWfBwAAQBAJ&pg=PA223&lpg=PA223&dq=1956%E2%80%931980+%22Saul+Krugman,+Joan+Giles+and+other+researchers+conduct+hepatitis+experiments+on+mentally+disabled+children+at+The+Willowbrook+State+School&source=bl&ots=7bYy9h4_VI&sig=ACfU3U0AUd0UJURoYFkBbGlMKV9dOvll8Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjXtrnJlcjqAhU7K7kGHWAXDmQQ6AEwB3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=1956%E2%80%931980%20%22Saul%20Krugman%2C%20Joan%20Giles%20and%20other%20researchers%20conduct%20hepatitis%20experiments%20on%20mentally%20disabled%20children%20at%20The%20Willowbrook%20State%20School&f=false]
 +
* {{w|Medical ethics}}
 +
* {{w|Category:Medical ethics}}
 +
* {{w|Category:Animals in space}}
 +
* {{w|Category:Bioethics}}
 
* {{w|List of medical ethics cases}}
 
* {{w|List of medical ethics cases}}
 
* {{w|Category:Bioethicists}}
 
* {{w|Category:Bioethicists}}
Line 270: Line 347:
 
* {{w|Clinical research ethics}}
 
* {{w|Clinical research ethics}}
 
* [https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/04/13/china-will-always-be-bad-at-bioethics/]
 
* [https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/04/13/china-will-always-be-bad-at-bioethics/]
 +
* [https://www.thehastingscenter.org/briefingbook/bioethics-and-policy-a-history/]
 +
* [https://jme.bmj.com/content/41/1/17]
 +
* [http://ethicsinhealth.org/?p=703]
 +
* [https://www.radford.edu/spj/Timelinepage.html]
  
 
===Timeline update strategy===
 
===Timeline update strategy===
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==
 +
 +
* [[Timeline of animal testing]]
  
 
==External links==
 
==External links==

Latest revision as of 20:57, 12 July 2020

This is a timeline of bioethics, listing significant events in the development of the field.

Sample questions

The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:

  • Literature (journal)
  • Literature (book)
  • Organization
  • Treaty
  • Study

Big picture

Time period Development summary
<1960s Discussions of moral issues in medicine already happen in ancient times, with early contributions by Hippocrates and Plato.[1] In the 20th century, German theologian Fritz Jahr publishes three articles in 1927, 1928, and 1934 using the German term “Bio-Ethik”, forcefully arguing an ethical approach to issues concerning human beings and the environment.[2]
1960s Bioethics as a distinct field of academic study is born in the United States, merging from a cluster of scientific and cultural developments in the country during that decade.[3]
1970s–1980s Many bioethics programs and degrees are established at universities in the United States in order to provide students – most notably medical, law, and public policy students – with some expertise in medical ethics to deal with complex cases.[2] Feminist bioethics develops from the early 1970s on and is initially focused on medical ethics; proponents later extend the areas of interest to issues in the fields of animal and environmental ethics.[2] In the late 1980s, the Russian school of bioethics originates.[4]
1990s In the last decade of the 20th century, the contributions of social scientists to bioethical research become particularly important. Work of this type involves surveys of public attitudes to advances in the life sciences, including xenotransplantation and genetic modification.[1]
2000s Ethics consultation begins to emerge as another, more enduring model of ethics and science interaction. The concept of research ethics consultation develops.[5]

Full timeline

Year Event type Details Location
380 BC Field development The Republic of Plato advocates selective human breeding in anticipation of later programs of eugenics.[1]
1259 – 1265 Literature Italian philosopher Thomas Aquinas writes his Summa contra Gentiles, which briefly discusses the permissibility of abortion.[1] Italy
1588 "In 1588, Pope Sixtus V adopted a papal bull adopting the position of St. Thomas Aquinas that contraception and abortion were crimes against nature and sins against marriage. "[6]
1620 "Francis Bacon publishes The Novum Organon, in which he argues that scientific research should benefit humanity."[7]
1775 – 1780 Field development German philosopher Immanuel Kant in his lectures on ethics argues against the sale of human body parts.[1]
1796 "Edward Jenner inoculates eight-year-old James Phipps with fluid from a cowpox pustule to immunize him against smallpox."[8][9]
1847 The American Medical Association adopts its first code of ethics, with this being based in large part upon the work of Thomas Percival.[10] United States
1856 "Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace publish The Origin of Species, which proposes a theory of evolution of living things by natural selection. The book generates a great deal of controversy because it proposes that human beings were not created by God (as most religions claimed) but descended from apes"[11] United Kingdom
1874 "Robert Bartholomew inserts electrodes into a hole in the skull of Mary Rafferty caused by a tumor. He notes that small amounts electric current caused bodily movements and that larger amounts caused pain. Rafferty, who was mentally ill, fell into a coma and died a few days after the experiment."[12]
1885 "Louis Pasteur administers an experimental rabies vaccine to nine-year-old Joseph Meister without testing it on animals first."[13][14][15] France
1897 "Giuseppe Sanarelli injects the yellow fever bacteria into five patients without their consent. All the patients developed the disease and three died."[16][17][18] Italy
1900 "Walter Reed experiments to determine the cause of yellow fever. Thirty-three participants, including eighteen Americans and six Cubans, were exposed to mosquitoes infected with yellow fever or injected with blood from yellow fever patients. Six participants died, including two researcher-volunteers. The participants all signed consent forms, some of which were translated into Spanish."[19][20][21]
1920 Policy (reproductive rights) "Lenin legalized all abortions in the Soviet Union"[22][23]
1926 Literature German theologian Fritz Jahr, referring to European and Oriental traditions, publishes an article entitled Natural sciences and teaching ethics where he gives the subtitle “Old Knowledge in new clothes” describing the function of natural sciences for education and teaching biological research ethics.[4] Germany
1927 Literature Fritz Jahr publishes article using the German term “Bio-Ethik” (which translates as “Bio-Ethics”) and argues, both for the establishment of a new academic discipline, and for the practice of a new, more civilized, ethical approach to issues concerning human beings and the environment. Jahr would publish similar articles discussing bioethics in 1928, and 1934.[2] Germany
1931 Policy (reproductive rights) Mexico becomes the first country in the world to legalize abortion in cases of rape.[24] Mexico
1932 Literature The Linacre Quarterly[25] United States
1932 Tuskegee syphilis experiment.[26][27] United States
1932–1945 "Japanese scientists working at Unit 731 performed morally abominable experiments on thousands of Chinese prisoners or war, including biological and chemical weapons experiments, vaccination experiments, and wound-healing and surgical studies, including vivisections."[28]
1943–1944 Nazi human experimentation. "German scientists conducted morally abominable research on concentration camp prisoners, including experiments that exposed subjects to freezing temperatures, low air pressures, ionizing radiation and electricity, and infectious diseases; as well as wound-healing and surgical studies. " "The central leader of the experiments was Josef Mengele, who from 1943 to 1944 performed experiments on nearly 1,500 sets of imprisoned twins at Auschwitz. About 200 people survived these studies."[29]
1947 The Nuremberg Code is adopted as a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. It is set as a result of the Subsequent Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.[2] Germany
1948 Declaration of Geneva.[30][31] Switzerland
1948 "Alfred Kinsey publishes Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Five years later, he publishes Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. These books were very controversial, because they examined topics which were regarded as taboo at the time, such as masturbation, orgasm, intercourse, promiscuity, and sexual fantasies. Kinsey could not obtain public funding for the research, so he funded it privately through the Kinsey Institute."[32][33]
1954 Literature Joseph F. Fletcher publishes Morals and Medicine: The Moral Problems of the Patient’s Right to Know the Truth, Contraception, Artificial Insemination, Sterilization, and Euthanasia.[34][2]
1964 The Declaration of Helsinki is created in order to provide researchers and physicians with ethical guidelines. It is developed for the medical community by the World Medical Association.[2][35] Finland
1956–1980 "Saul Krugman, Joan Giles and other researchers conduct hepatitis experiments on mentally disabled children at The Willowbrook State School. They intentionally infected subjects with the disease and observed its natural progression. The experiments were approved by the New York Department of Health."[36][37]
1966 Organization The Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research is founded.[38][39] Israel
1966 Organization The first medical ethics committees in Europe emerge in the United Kingdom and Sweden.[40] United Kingdom, Sweden
1966 Field development American anesthesiologist Henry K. Beecher publishes an article in The New England Journal of Medicine exposing 22 unethical studies in biomedicine, including the Tuskegee syphilis experiment and the Willowbrook hepatitis study.[41][42][43] United States
1969 Organization The Hastings Center is founded as a bioethics research institute. It is located in Garrison, New York.[44][45] United States
1970 Literature Paul Ramsey publishes The Patient as Person: Explorations in Medical Ethics.[46][2]
1970 Organization The Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences (later Hastings Center) is founded. A freestanding bioethics center, it is the first institution devoted to the study of bioethical questions.[3][47] United States
1970 Literature American biochemist Van Rensselaer Potter publishes his article Bioethics, the Science of Survival, which suggests viewing bioethics as a global movement in order to foster concern for the environment and ethics.[2][47]
1971 Literature Van Rensselaer Potter publishes book Bioethics: Bridge to the Future.[47] United States
1971 Concept development Georgetown University researcher Andre Hellegers uses the term bioethics to refer to interdisciplinary research moral problems of biomedicine, primarily associated with the need to protect the dignity and rights of patients.[4] United States
1971 Organization The Joseph and Rose Kennedy Center for the Study of Human Reproduction and Bioethics (now known as Kennedy Center) opens at Georgetown University. With similar goals to those of The Hastings Center, the Kennedy Institute is however placed inside the traditional academy.[3][47] Founded by Andre Hellegers, it is the first in the world to establish an institute of bioethics on the basis of interdisciplinary research and approaches.[4] United States
1972 Organization National Catholic Bioethics Center.[48][49][50] United States
1973 Concept development Dan Callahan writes essay Bioethics as a Discipline, whose title is the first entry of the word "bioethics" in the catalogue of the National Library of Congress.[47] In the article, Callahan argues for the establishment of a new academic discipline.[2] United States
1973 "After conducting hearings on unethical research involving human subjects, including the Tuskegee study, Congress passes the National Research Act in 1973, which President Nixon signs in 1974. The Act authorizes federal agencies (e.g. the NIH and FDA) to develop human research regulations. The regulations require institutions to form Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to review and oversee research with human subjects."[51][52] United States
1975 Literature The Journal of Medical Ethics is launched.[53][54]
1975 Field development Peter Singer claims that human beings must consider the equal interests of human beings and animals alike.[2]
1975 Field development At a gathering at the Asilomar Conference on Recombinant DNA, scientists discuss the benefits and risks of recombinant DNA research; the NIH forms the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee." "Scientists gather at Asilomar, California to discuss the benefits and risks of recombinant DNA experiments and agree upon a temporary moratorium for this research until they can develop biosafety standards. The NIH forms the Recombinant DNA Advisory Committee to provide guidance for researchers and institutions. Research institutions form Institutional Biosafety Committees (IBCs) to review and oversee research involving hazardous biological materials." [41][55][56] United States
1978 Scientific development Louise Brown is born as the world's first test-tube baby.[41]
1978 "With its starting publication in 1978 (1st edition), the Encyclopedia of Bioethics became the first reference book to focus exclusively on the new and promising field of bioethics, helping to define the discipline"[57][4]
1978 "Louise Brown, the world’s first baby conceived by in vitro fertilization, is born in the U.K. She is currently alive and healthy."[58][59]
1979 "The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research publishes The Belmont Report: Principles of Ethical Research on Human Subjects. The Report provides the conceptual foundation for a major revision of the U.S. research regulations in 1981."[60][61]
1979 Literature IRB: Ethics & Human Research[62]
1979 Organization The Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences officially establishes its own private central ethical committee.[40] Switzerland
1979 Organization Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics[63][64] United States
1979 The Belmont Report is released by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Report becomes a key document in human research ethics regulations in the United States.[41][65] United States
1980 Policy In the Diamond v. Chakrabarty case the United States Supreme Court rules that a genetically modified bacterium can be patented because it is the product of human ingenuity. This sets a precedent for patents on other life forms and helps to establish solid intellectual property protection for the new biotechnology industry.[41] United States
1981 Organization Japan establishes its first ethics committee, at the Medical Institute of Tokyo University.[40] Japan
1981 Organization MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics[66][67] United States
1985 Literature Zhi-zheng Du's Outline of Medical Ethics is published in China as the first systematic textbook of medical ethics after the cultural revolution of the 1960s and 1970s.[68] China
1986 Literature Peer-reviewed academic journal Biology and Philosophy is launched.[69]
1987 Organization The European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care is founded by an international company of philosophers, physicians, ethicists and other interested professionals in the field.[70]
1987 Literature Ren-zong Qiu's Bioethics is published as the first bioethics book in China.[68] China
1987 Literature Bioethics.[71]
1988 Literature Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics is established.[72]
1988 Scientific development Harvard University and Dow Chemical Company patent a genetically engineered mouse used to study cancer.[73][74][75][41] United States
1988 Literature Zhao-xiong He's History of Chinese Medical Morality is published, providing material on medical ethics from ancient to current China.[68] China
1988 Literature Van Rensselaer Potter publishes Global bioethics.[4]
1989 Literature The United States National Academy of Sciences publishes On Being A Scientist, a free, short book on research ethics for scientists in training.[41] United States
1989 "The NAS publishes On Being A Scientist (revised in 1994 and 2009), which is a free, short book on research ethics for scientists in training."
1990 Legal Trends in Bioethics.[76]
1990 "The U.S. launches the Human Genome Project, a $20 billion effort to map and sequence the human genome."[77][78] United States
1990 "W. French Anderson begins the first human gene therapy clinical trial on patients with ADA deficiency, a genetic disease that affects the immune system."[79][80]
1991 Organization London-based Nuffield Council on Bioethics is established by the Nuffield Foundation to adress numerous bioethical issues in need of analysis.[81][82][83] United Kingdom
1991 Literature The Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal is launched.[84][85] United States
1992 "NAS publishes Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. The book estimates the incidence of misconduct, discusses some of the causes of misconduct, proposes a definition of misconduct, and recommends some strategies for preventing misconduct."
1992 Literature Quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics is launched.[86]
1992 Literature The United States National Academy of Sciences publishes Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. The book estimates the incidence of misconduct, discusses some of the causes of misconduct, proposes a definition of misconduct, and recommends some strategies for preventing misconduct.[41] United States
1992 Literature Peer-reviewed academic journal Environmental Values is established.[87][88] United Kingdom
1993 Scientific development Researchers successfully clone human embryos.[41]
1993 Organization The International Bioethics Committee is established by UNESCO to provide guidance on ethical and legal issues raised by research in medicine, biological sciences and associated technologies, and to reinforce knowledge in ethics.[89][90]
1993 Journal The Indian Journal of Medical Ethics is launched.[91] India
1994 The United States Government declassifies information about secret human radiation experiments conducted from the 1940s-1980s and issues an apology.[41] United States
1994 Literature American philosophers Tom Beauchamp and James Childress publish The principles of biomedical ethics, in which they state their basic principles of bioethics as "the principle of respect for patient autonomy, which has grounded, in particular, the concept of informed consent; dates back to the Hippocratic principle of “do no harm,” which requires minimization of damage to the patient during the medical intervention; the principle of “do good” (beneficence), emphasizing the physician’s responsibility to take positive steps to improve the condition of the patient; and the principle of justice, emphasizing the need for fairness and equal treatment of patients, and equitable distribution of resources (which are always limited) in the provision of medical care".[4] United States
1994 "Harvard psychologist Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray publish The Bell Curve, a controversial book that reignites the centuries old debate about biology, race and intelligence"[92]
1994 "Roger Poisson admits to fabricating and falsifying patient data in NIH-funded breast cancer clinical trials in order allow his patients to qualify for enrollment and have access to experimental treatments."[93][94]
1995 About 200 religious leaders join in Washington, DC., with leading biotechnology critic Jeremy Rifkin in a press conference named the "Joint Appeal against Human and Animal Patenting", protesting the patenting of plants, animals, and human body parts.[41][95][96] United States
1995 Organization The Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics is established.[97][98] United States
1995 Organization University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics[99] Canada
1995 Concept development American philosopher Daniel Callahan defines bioethics as a science “which is the product of biomedical achievements related to the environment and social sciences”.[4] United States
1996 "Scientists and defense analysts become concerned about the use of chemical or biological weapons by a terrorist group after Aum Shinrikyo, a Japanese doomsday cult, releases sarin gas in a Tokyo subway, killing 12 people and sending 5,500 to hospitals. The group also attempted (unsuccessfully) to spray anthrax spores over Tokyo. In 1998, terrorism experts warn about the use of biological or chemical weapons by Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein."
1996 Scientific development Dolly is born as the first mammal ever to be cloned from another individual’s body cell. Her birth is announced in 1997, followed by several European nations banning human cloning. The United States Congress considers a bill to ban all human cloning but changes its mind after scientists argue that the bill would undermine biomedical research.[41][100][101] United Kingdom
1996 Organization The National Bioethics Advisory Commission is established.
1996 Literature (book) American philosopher David Abram publishes The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World. Abram coins the phrase "the more-than-human world" as a way of referring to earthly nature.
1996 Literature (book) American philosopher H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr. publishes The Foundation of Bioethics, in which he states “Moral diversity is real. It is real in fact and in principle. Bioethics and healthcare policy have yet to take this diversity seriously. Those who teach bioethics, those who engage in bioethics committees, even those who produced textbooks tend to discount the diversity of understanding regarding the morality of particular health care choices (e.g., regarding abortion, commercial surrogacy, euthanasia/ germline genetic engineering, inequalities in access to health care, infanticide, organ sales) or the nature of morality (e.g., theological, deontological, virtue-based)".[4] United States
1997 "On May 16, 1997, President Bill Clinton formally apologized on behalf of the United States to victims of the experiment" United States
1997 Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights
1998 "Scientists perfect methods for growing human embryonic stem cells. Some countries ban the research; others promote it."
1998 Literature (journal) Medicine Health Care and Philosophy is launched by the European Society For Philosophy Of Medicine And Healthcare.[70]
1998 Scientific development Methods for growing human embryonic stem cells are perfected. Some countries ban the research; others promote it.[41]
1998 Scientific development American biotechnologist Craig Venter forms Celera Genomics and begins a private effort to sequence the human genome, using dozens of automated sequencing machines.[41]
1999 Literature (journal) AMA Journal of Ethics is launched.[102] United States
1999 Literature The American Journal of Bioethics is launched.[103] United Sattes
1999 Organization Human Genetics Alert is founded in London.[104] It advocates against uses of reproductive technology and human genetics research that it considers harmful.[105]
1999 Policy The National Institutes of Health and the Office for Human Research Protections require all people conducting or overseeing human subjects research have some training in research ethics.[41] United States
1999 Literature Chinese bioethicist Lee Shui-chuen publishes Confucian Bioethics (in Chinese). China
1999 "The U.S. NIH and OHRP require all people conducting or overseeing human subjects research to have training in research ethics."
2000 Organization The Office for Human Research Protections is established.[106] United States
2001 Literature Peer-reviewed journal The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly is launched.[107] United States
2001 Field development The United States Congress starts debating legislation on human cloning.[41] United States
2001 Policy Several journals start requiring authors to describe their responsibilities when publishing research.[41]
2001 The United States Government announces that the National Institutes of Health will fund research on approximately 64 embryonic stem cell lines created from leftover human embryos.[41] United States
2001 "Congress debates legislation on human cloning."
2001 Organization The International Society for Stem Cell Research is established to promote the exchange and dissemination of information and ideas relating to stem cells.[108][109]
2001 Organization The President's Council on Bioethics is created by United States President George W. Bush to advice the President on bioethical issues that may emerge as a consequence of advances in biomedical science and technology.[110] United States
2001 Organization The Center for Genetics and Society is established.[111] United States
2001 "The Bush Administration announces that the NIH will only fund human embryonic stem cell research on approximately 64 cell lines created from leftover human embryos."[112][113]
2002 The President's Council on Bioethics recommends that the United States ban reproductive cloning and enact a moratorium on research cloning.[41] United States
2002 "Scientists publish several papers in prominent journals with direct implications for bioterrorism. A paper published in the Journal of Virology described a method for genetically engineering a form of mousepox virus that is much deadlier than the naturally occurring strain. A paper published in Science showed how to make the poliovirus by obtaining supplies from a mail-order company. A paper published in PNAS develop a mathematical model for showing how many people would be killed by infecting the U.S. milk supply with botulinum toxin."
2002 "The President's Council on Bioethics recommends that the U.S. ban reproductive cloning and enact a moratorium on research cloning."
2002 Organization The Toi Te Taiao: The Bioethics Council is established.[114][115] New Zealand
2003 " In 2003, the American Society for Microbiology (ASM), the National Academy of Sciences, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies held a meeting to discuss the censorship biological research that poses security risks. Journals agree to self-censor some research."[116][117]
2003 The United States invades Iraq with the stated purpose of eliminating its chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs. So far, evidence of weapons programs but no actual weapons would be found.[41] Iraq
2003 The International Bioethics Committee issues a second global instrument, the International Declaration on Human Genetic Data, which may be regarded as an extension of the Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights.[118][119]
2003 Organization The Regenerative Medicine Institute[120][121] Ireland
2004 Literature The Journal of Bioethical Inquiry is released by the University of Otago Bioethics Centre.[122] New Zealand
2004 Literature Medical ethicist James Hughes publishes Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future, which argues that technologies pushing the boundaries of humanness can radically improve our quality of life if they are controlled democratically.[123]
2004 Literature (book) Nicholas Agar publishes Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement[124][125]
2005 Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights [126][127]
2005 "In response to recommendations from a National Research Council report titled “Biotechnology in the Age of Terrorism,” the Department of Health and Human Services establishes the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) to provide advice and guidance to federal agencies, scientists, and journals concerning oversight and public of research in biotechnology or biomedicine which can be readily applied to cause significant harm to public health, agriculture, the economy, or national security (i.e. “dual use” research)."[128]
2005 Literature American professor George Annas publishes American bioethics: crossing human rights and health law boundaries.[129] United States
2006 Literature Quarterly peer-reviewed scientific journal BioSocieties is released.[130]
2006 Literature Quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal Clinical Ethics is launched.[131] United States
2008 Literature The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics is launched to encourage more work in feminist bioethics.[132][133]
2008 The Catholic Church publishes a document entitled Dignitas Personae, about a range of bioethical issues related to the areas of assisted reproduction and human genetics. The paper analizes and comments the bioethical thinking of the Catholic Church.[134][135][136]
2009 Organization Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues is established by United States President Barack Obama to advise the president and the administration on bioethical issues arising from advances in biomedicine and related areas of science and technology.[137] United States
2009 Organization The Bangladesh Bioethics Society is established.[138] Bangladesh
2009 Policy The Obama Administration announces it will significantly expand National Institutes of Health funding of human embryonic stem cell research which was restricted under the Bush Administration.[41][139] United States
2010 Literature (book) George Annas publishes Worst case bioethics: death, disaster, and public health.[140] United States
2010 Literature (book) Nicholas Agar publishes Humanity's End: Why We Should Reject Radical Enhancement. The book argues against the doctrine of radical enhancement sometimes identified with the transhumanist movement.[141]
2011 Literature Triannual academic journal Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics is first issued.[142]
2012 Organization The Center for the Study of Bioethics is founded by Serbian American philosopher Vojin Rakić with the purpose to stimulate scientific debate on a variety of issues bioethics deals with. It is based in Belgrade, Serbia.[143]
2012 Literature The Canadian Journal of Bioethics is established.[144] Canada
2013 "In Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. Myriad Genetics, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that isolated and purified DNA cannot be patented. Only DNA that has been modified by human beings can be patented. The ruling invalidates Myriad’s patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and creates uncertainty concerning the legal validity of other types of patents on isolated and purified chemicals."[145]
2014 Various funding agencies and journals, including the National Institutes of Health, Science, and Nature, take steps to promote reproducibility in science in response to reports that many published studies in the biomedical, behavioral, and physical sciences are not reproducible.[41]
2015 Literature American bioethicist Alice Dreger publishes Galileo's Middle Finger, which discusses the ethics of medical research.[146] United States
2016 The United States National Institutes of Health places a temporary moratorium on funding for experiments involving human-animal chimeras.[147] United States
2018 "In October, He Jiankui, a scientist of the Southern University of Science and Technology in Shenzhen, China, announces the birth of the world’s first gene edited babies, both girls. He claims that he used CRISPR-Cas 9 technology to modify the CCR5 gene to give the girls immunity to HIV. The announcement generates outrage around the world and many scientists and policymakers call for a ban on human germline, genome editing." China

Meta information on the timeline

How the timeline was built

The initial version of the timeline was written by User:Sebastian.

Funding information for this timeline is available.

Feedback and comments

Feedback for the timeline can be provided at the following places:

  • FIXME

What the timeline is still missing

Timeline update strategy

See also

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 "Bioethics". britannica.com. Retrieved 18 September 2018. 
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 "Bioethics". iep.utm.edu. Retrieved 1 September 2018. 
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 "Bioethics - History Of Bioethics". science.jrank.org. Retrieved 1 September 2018. 
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 "Russian School of Bioethics: History and the Present". intechopen.com. Retrieved 20 December 2019. 
  5. Kerasidou, Angeliki; Parker, Michael. "Does science need bioethicists? Ethics and science collaboration in biomedical research". PMC 4587541Freely accessible. PMID 26430467. doi:10.1177/1747016114554252. 
  6. Victory, Regardless. RDV'S INTERNET ANTHLOGY PLUS. 
  7. "Francis Bacon (1561—1626)". iep.utm.edu. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  8. "Early smallpox vaccine is tested". history.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  9. Riedel, Stefan. "Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination". PMC 1200696Freely accessible. PMID 16200144. doi:10.1080/08998280.2005.11928028. 
  10. Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'Module:Citation/CS1/Suggestions' not found.
  11. "Wallace and Darwin". jstor.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  12. "Historical Background". link.springer.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  13. "Louis Pasteur and the Development of the Attenuated Vaccine". vbivaccines.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  14. "July 6, 1885: Rabies Vaccine Saves Boy – and Pasteur". wired.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  15. "The Rabies Vaccine Backstory". the-scientist.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  16. "Historical Background". link.springer.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  17. "Case 5 Roots of Informed Consent". highschoolbioethics.georgetown.edu. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  18. Resnik, David B. The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Protecting People, Advancing Science, Promoting Trust. 
  19. "Major Walter Reed and the Eradication of Yellow Fever". armyhistory.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  20. "Politics of Participation: Walter Reed's Yellow-Fever Experiments". journalofethics.ama-assn.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  21. "Walter Reed and Yellow Fever". exhibits.hsl.virginia.edu. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  22. "ABORTION AND BIRTH CONTROL IN SOVIET RUSSIA". marxists.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  23. Savage, Mark. "The Law of Abortion in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the People's Republic of China: Women's Rights in Two Socialist Countries". doi:10.2307/1228777. 
  24. "Mexico City to Legalize Abortion Despite Protests". banderasnews.com. Retrieved 1 July 2020. 
  25. "The Linacre Quarterly". epublications.marquette.edu. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  26. Newton-Matza, Mitchell. Disasters and Tragic Events: An Encyclopedia of Catastrophes in American History [2 volumes]. 
  27. Suffering and Bioethics (Ronald Michael Green, Nathan J. Palpant ed.). 
  28. Brody, Howard; Leonard, Sarah E.; Nie, Jing-Bao; Weindling, Paul. "United States Responses to Japanese Wartime Inhuman Experimentation after World War II: National Security and Wartime Exigency". PMC 4487829Freely accessible. PMID 24534743. doi:10.1017/S0963180113000753. 
  29. Josef Mengele and Experimentation on Human Twins at Auschwitz Template:Webarchive, Children of the Flames; Dr. Josef Mengele and the Untold Story of the Twins of Auschwitz, Lucette Matalon Lagnado and Sheila Cohn Dekel, and Mengele: the Complete Story by Gerald Posner and John Ware.
  30. Fassin, Didier. A Companion to Moral Anthropology. 
  31. Advancing the Human Right to Health (José M. Zuniga, Stephen P. Marks, Lawrence O. Gostin ed.). 
  32. Charles Kinsey, Alfred; Baxter Pomeroy, Wardell; Eugene Martin, Clyde. Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. 
  33. "Sexual Behavior in the Human Male". britannica.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  34. "Morals and Medicine". press.princeton.edu. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  35. "DECLARATION OF HELSINKI". wma.net. Retrieved 27 September 2018. 
  36. Shamoo, Adil E.; Resnik, David B. Responsible Conduct of Research. 
  37. "Research Ethics: Where are we, How did we get here, and Where are we going?" (PDF). research.columbia.edu. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  38. "Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research". medethics.org.il. Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  39. "Partnership with the Dr. Falk Schlesinger Institute for Medical-Halachic Research and the International Responsa Project". israelrabbis.org. Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  40. 40.0 40.1 40.2 Have, Ten; Gordijn, Bert. Bioethics in a European Perspective. 
  41. 41.00 41.01 41.02 41.03 41.04 41.05 41.06 41.07 41.08 41.09 41.10 41.11 41.12 41.13 41.14 41.15 41.16 41.17 41.18 41.19 41.20 41.21 "Research Ethics Timeline (1932-Present)". niehs.nih.gov. Retrieved 18 September 2018. 
  42. "Ethics and clinical research / Henry K. Beecher". apps.who.int. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  43. "Henry Knowles Beecher and the Development of Informed Consent in Anesthesia Research". anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  44. "The Hastings Center". thehastingscenter.org. Retrieved 19 December 2019. 
  45. "About The Hastings Center". onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved 19 December 2019. 
  46. Ashley, Benedict M. Health Care Ethics: A Catholic Theological Analysis, Fifth Edition. 
  47. 47.0 47.1 47.2 47.3 47.4 Guinn, David E. Handbook of Bioethics and Religion. 
  48. "National Catholic Bioethics Center". ncbcenter.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  49. "NCBC - National Catholic Bioethics Center". inters.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  50. Curran, Charles E. Catholic Moral Theology in the United States: A History. 
  51. "The Tuskegee Timeline". cdc.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  52. "Tuskegee Experiment: The Infamous Syphilis Study". history.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  53. "Editor-in-Chief Journal of Medical Ethics". blogs.bmj.com. Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  54. VEATCH, ROBERT M. "How Philosophy of Medicine Has Changed Medical Ethics". Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  55. "Historical Events in the rDNA Debate". ndsu.edu. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  56. "Asilomar Conference on Laboratory Precautions When Conducting Recombinant DNA Research – Case Summary". scholarworks.umass.edu. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  57. "The new edition (4th) of the Encyclopedia of Bioethics" (PDF). saocamilo-sp.br. Retrieved 20 December 2019. 
  58. "THIS DAY IN HISTORY". history.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  59. "Louise Brown Biography". biography.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  60. Resnik, David B. Playing Politics with Science: Balancing Scientific Independence and Government Oversight. 
  61. Metcalf, Jacob; Crawford, Kate. "Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics divide". doi:10.1177/2053951716650211. 
  62. "Announcing Ethics & Human Research". thehastingscenter.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  63. "About the Center for Health Care Ethics". slu.edu. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  64. "Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics". catalog.slu.edu. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  65. "The Belmont Report". hhs.gov. Retrieved 27 September 2018. 
  66. "Dr. Steven Miles Wins MacLean Prize". macleanethics.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  67. Roberts, Laura Weiss; Siegler, Mark. Clinical Medical Ethics: Landmark Works of Mark Siegler, MD. 
  68. 68.0 68.1 68.2 Cherry, Mark J.; Peppin, John F. Annals of Bioethics: Regional Perspectives in Bioethics. 
  69. "Biology and Philosophy". link.springer.com. Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  70. 70.0 70.1 "The European Society For Philosophy Of Medicine And Healthcare". espmh.org. Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  71. "Bioethics". onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  72. Barnhill, Anne; Doggett, Tyler. The Oxford Handbook of Food Ethics. 
  73. "Bioethics and Patent Law: The Case of the Oncomouse". wipo.int. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  74. "Harvard Gets Mouse Patent, A World First". nytimes.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  75. "The Mouse That Changed Science". sciencehistory.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  76. "Legal trends in bioethics.". semanticscholar.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  77. "1990: Launch of the Human Genome Project". genome.gov. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  78. "The Human Genome Project (1990-2003)". embryo.asu.edu. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  79. "Making History with the 1990 Gene Therapy Trial". genengnews.com. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  80. Reprogenetics: Law, Policy, and Ethical Issues (Lori P. Knowles, Gregory E. Kaebnick ed.). 
  81. National bioethics committees in action. UNESCO. 
  82. Weir, Robert F.; Olick, Robert S.; Murray, Jeffrey C. The Stored Tissue Issue: Biomedical Research, Ethics, and Law in the Era of Genomic Medicine. 
  83. Global Bioethics: The Impact of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee. Alireza Bagheri, Jonathan D. Moreno, Stefano Semplici. 
  84. "Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal". muse.jhu.edu. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  85. Evans, John H. Playing God?: Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate. 
  86. "Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees". 
  87. "Environmental". environmentandsociety.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  88. Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics (Paul G. Harris ed.). 
  89. Global Bioethics: The Impact of the UNESCO International Bioethics Committee (Alireza Bagheri, Jonathan D. Moreno, Stefano Semplici ed.). 
  90. ten Have, Henk. Global Bioethics: An introduction. 
  91. Jesani, Amar. "In the 25th year of bioethics publishing: new challenges of the post-truth era". Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  92. "Intelligence, Genes, and Success". springerprofessional.de. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  93. "Doctor Says He Falsified Cancer Data to Help Patients". nytimes.com. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  94. "2019 Tri-I Responsible Conduct of Research Course RCR Case Studies" (PDF). mskcc.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  95. Hanson, MJ. "Religious voices in biotechnology: the case of gene patenting.". PMID 12962106. 
  96. Hanson, M J. "Religious Voices in Biotechnology: The Case of Gene Patenting". 
  97. "Berman Institute". bioethics.jhu.edu. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  98. "Bioethics". hopkinsmedicine.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  99. "About Us: The Joint Centre for Bioethics". jcb.utoronto.ca/. Retrieved 19 December 2019. 
  100. "Dolly the sheep dies young". newscientist.com. Retrieved 27 September 2018. 
  101. "Dolly the sheep: 15 years after her death, cloning still has the power to shock". independent.co.uk. Retrieved 27 September 2018. 
  102. "AMA Journal of Ethics". journalofethics.ama-assn.org. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  103. "American Journal of Bioethics". bioethics.net. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  104. "About Human Genetics Alert". hgalert.org. Retrieved 19 December 2019. 
  105. "Participant Detail". Within and Beyond the Limits to Human Nature. Retrieved 18 December 2019. 
  106. "OHRP History". hhs.gov. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  107. Curran, Charles E. Catholic Moral Theology in the United States: A History. 
  108. "About the ISSCR". closerlookatstemcells.org. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  109. Marzotto, Toni; Alt, Patricia M. Stem Cell Research: Hope or Hype?. 
  110. "President's Council on Bioethics". bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  111. "HISTORY OF THE CENTER FOR GENETICS AND SOCIETY". geneticsandsociety.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  112. Murugan, Varnee. "Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Decade of Debate from Bush to Obama". PMC 2744932Freely accessible. PMID 19774120. 
  113. "CRS Report for Congress" (PDF). fas.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  114. Religion and Biopolitics (Mirjam Weiberg-Salzmann, Ulrich Willems ed.). 
  115. Manning, Joanna. The Cartwright Papers: Essays on the Cervical Cancer Inquiry, 1987-88. 
  116. 116.0 116.1 Teaching Research Methods in Public Administration (Schwester, Richard W. ed.). 
  117. "Censoring science". PMC 156663Freely accessible. PMID 12796312. 
  118. "International Declaration on Human Genetic Data". en.unesco.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  119. "INTERNATIONAL DECLARATION ON HUMAN GENETIC DATA". who.int. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  120. "Regenerative Medicine Institute". nuigalway.ie. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  121. "Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine, and Tissue Engineering". fightaging.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  122. "Journal of bioethical inquiry". 
  123. "Citizen Cyborg: Why Democratic Societies Must Respond to the Redesigned Human of the Future". goodreads.com. Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  124. "Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement". onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  125. "Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement". link.springer.com. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  126. Langlois, Adèle. "The UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights: Perspectives from Kenya and South Africa". PMC 2226192Freely accessible. PMID 18240025. doi:10.1007/s10728-007-0055-7. 
  127. "Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights". en.unesco.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  128. "National Science Advisory Board on Biosecurity" (PDF). osp.od.nih.gov. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  129. "Worst case bioethics: Death, disaster, and public health". jci.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  130. "BioSocieties". andymiah.net. Retrieved 3 September 2018. 
  131. "Clinical Ethics". journals.sagepub.com. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  132. "Feminist Bioethics". stanford.library.sydney.edu.au. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  133. "International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics". researchgate.net. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  134. Pastor, LM. "[Ethical analysis and commentary of Dignitas Personae document: from continuity toward the innovation].". PMID 21692553. 
  135. "INSTRUCTION DIGNITAS PERSONAE". vatican.va. Retrieved 27 September 2018. 
  136. "Vatican issues new document on biotechnology". ncronline.org. Retrieved 27 September 2018. 
  137. "About the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues". onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  138. "Bangladesh Bioethics Society". bioethics.org.bd/. Retrieved 19 December 2019. 
  139. Wolinsky, Howard. "The pendulum swung. President Barack Obama removes restrictions on stem-cell research, but are expectations now too high?". PMC 2680887Freely accessible. PMID 19415078. doi:10.1038/embor.2009.78. 
  140. "Worst case bioethics: Death, disaster, and public health". jci.org. Retrieved 13 July 2020. 
  141. Nicholas., Agar (2013). Humanity's end : why we should reject radical enhancement. [Place of publication not identified]: Bradford Books. ISBN 978-0262525176. OCLC 842500060. 
  142. ""Reasonable Accommodation" for Families of 'Brain Dead' Patients". bioethics.georgetown.edu. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  143. "Center for the Study of Bioethics". csb.eu.com/. Retrieved 19 December 2019. 
  144. "Launch of the Canadian Journal of Bioethics". erudit.org. Retrieved 12 July 2020. 
  145. Cartwright-Smith, Lara. "Patenting Genes: What Does Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics Mean for Genetic Testing and Research?". PMC 3982540Freely accessible. PMID 24790252. doi:10.1177/003335491412900311. 
  146. "'Galileo's Middle Finger,' by Alice Dreger". nytimes.com. Retrieved 17 September 2018. 
  147. "NIH moves to lift moratorium on animal-human chimera research". sciencemag.org. Retrieved 27 September 2018.