62,666
edits
Changes
no edit summary
| 2018 || {{Dts|31 January}} || Product || GitHub introduces Multiple Commit Authors, a new feature meant to improve collaboration from several developers on the same [[w:Commit (data management)|commits]] or pull requests and ensures every author gets attribution of their commits in their profile contributions graph and the repository’s statistics.<ref>{{cite web |title=GitHub Introduces Multiple Commit Authors |url=https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/01/github-multiple-author-commit |website=infoq.com |accessdate=30 April 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=GitHub Adds Crediting for Multiple Co-Authors on a Single Commit |url=https://thenewstack.io/github-adds-crediting-multiple-co-authors-single-commit/ |website=thenewstack.io |accessdate=30 April 2019}}</ref>
|-
| 2018 || {{Dts|7 February}} || || {{w|Uber}} stops using GitHub for in-house code, alleging that {{w|hacker}}s behind the 2016 data breach used credentials found on the platform to gain access to an Uber’s [[w:Amazon Web Services|AWS S3 ]] bucket.<ref>{{cite web |title=Uber stops using GitHub for 'private' code following 2016 mega-breach |url=https://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/3026182/uber-stops-using-github-for-private-code-following-2016-mega-breach |website=theinquirer.net |accessdate=30 April 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Uber is facing fresh, sharp rebukes from Congress for initially withholding details about a 2016 security breach |url=https://www.vox.com/2018/2/6/16980356/uber-congress-senate-commerce-committee-2016-security-breach |website=vox.com |accessdate=30 April 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Uber quits GitHub for in-house code after 2016 data breach |url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/02/07/uber_quit_github_for_custom_code_after_2016_data_breach/ |website=theregister.co.uk |accessdate=30 April 2019}}</ref>
|-
|}
