Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline of Microsoft Copilot"
From Timelines
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* There needs to be significant coverage of the "Sydney"-codenamed testing phase of Bing Chat, that happened prior to the official release of Bing Chat. As of now, it doesn't look like this phase is mentioned anywhere in the timeline page. In particular, the article https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WkchhorbLsSMbLacZ/ai-1-sydney-and-bing that I had originally recommended when seeking this timeline is still relevant and can help with fleshing out the Sydney phase.✔ | * There needs to be significant coverage of the "Sydney"-codenamed testing phase of Bing Chat, that happened prior to the official release of Bing Chat. As of now, it doesn't look like this phase is mentioned anywhere in the timeline page. In particular, the article https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WkchhorbLsSMbLacZ/ai-1-sydney-and-bing that I had originally recommended when seeking this timeline is still relevant and can help with fleshing out the Sydney phase.✔ | ||
* Consistency: use "Bing Chat" consistently rather than sometimes calling it "BingChat".✔ | * Consistency: use "Bing Chat" consistently rather than sometimes calling it "BingChat".✔ | ||
| − | * Competition: Maybe add more rows for the launch of stuff such as Google Bard (Bard is mentioned, but not its launch). | + | * Competition: Maybe add more rows for the launch of stuff such as Google Bard (Bard is mentioned, but not its launch).✔ |
* More in terms of criticism/commentary: There's some, but there should be more criticism/commentary, and less of an exclusive focus on the changes/narrative announced by Microsoft (no need to remove any of the existing rows, just expand more of the other stuff). [https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/15/23599072/microsoft-ai-bing-personality-conversations-spy-employees-webcams], [https://www.pcmag.com/opinions/bings-ai-chat-marks-a-new-web-era-please-dont-kill-it], [https://www.geekwire.com/2023/nasty-conversations-with-bing-chat/] | * More in terms of criticism/commentary: There's some, but there should be more criticism/commentary, and less of an exclusive focus on the changes/narrative announced by Microsoft (no need to remove any of the existing rows, just expand more of the other stuff). [https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/15/23599072/microsoft-ai-bing-personality-conversations-spy-employees-webcams], [https://www.pcmag.com/opinions/bings-ai-chat-marks-a-new-web-era-please-dont-kill-it], [https://www.geekwire.com/2023/nasty-conversations-with-bing-chat/] | ||
Revision as of 11:05, 27 August 2023
Partial review by Vipul on 2023-07-01
This is not a full review! I did a quick pass of the timeline.
- There needs to be significant coverage of the "Sydney"-codenamed testing phase of Bing Chat, that happened prior to the official release of Bing Chat. As of now, it doesn't look like this phase is mentioned anywhere in the timeline page. In particular, the article https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WkchhorbLsSMbLacZ/ai-1-sydney-and-bing that I had originally recommended when seeking this timeline is still relevant and can help with fleshing out the Sydney phase.✔
- Consistency: use "Bing Chat" consistently rather than sometimes calling it "BingChat".✔
- Competition: Maybe add more rows for the launch of stuff such as Google Bard (Bard is mentioned, but not its launch).✔
- More in terms of criticism/commentary: There's some, but there should be more criticism/commentary, and less of an exclusive focus on the changes/narrative announced by Microsoft (no need to remove any of the existing rows, just expand more of the other stuff). [1], [2], [3]
