Difference between revisions of "Timeline of non-human animal intelligence"

From Timelines
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 47: Line 47:
 
| 2012 (September 17) || || || In a test on New Caledonian crows, crows were placed in an enclosure wherein a stick would emerge from a hide. They used two scenarios: in the first, a human was observed entering the hide before the stick moved, and leaving after. In the second, the human remained hidden. In the first, the crows were much more relaxed after the human left, correctly linking the movement of the stick to the presence of the human. They would forage for food, and behave normally. In the second, the crow had no other reference for the stick's presence, so they remained wary. "These results really seem to be showing that crows react in a very similar way to humans in a situation that requires them to reason about a hidden causal agent," says biologist Alex Taylor."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=Alex H. |last2=Miller |first2=Rachael |last3=Gray |first3=Russell D. |title=New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=2 October 2012 |volume=109 |issue=40 |pages=16389–16391 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |language=en |issn=0027-8424}}</ref>
 
| 2012 (September 17) || || || In a test on New Caledonian crows, crows were placed in an enclosure wherein a stick would emerge from a hide. They used two scenarios: in the first, a human was observed entering the hide before the stick moved, and leaving after. In the second, the human remained hidden. In the first, the crows were much more relaxed after the human left, correctly linking the movement of the stick to the presence of the human. They would forage for food, and behave normally. In the second, the crow had no other reference for the stick's presence, so they remained wary. "These results really seem to be showing that crows react in a very similar way to humans in a situation that requires them to reason about a hidden causal agent," says biologist Alex Taylor."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=Alex H. |last2=Miller |first2=Rachael |last3=Gray |first3=Russell D. |title=New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=2 October 2012 |volume=109 |issue=40 |pages=16389–16391 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |language=en |issn=0027-8424}}</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
| 2014 || {{w|dolphin}} ({{w|long-finned pilot whale}}) || || It is shown for the first time that a species of {{w|dolphin}}, the {{w|long-finned pilot whale}}, has more neocortical neurons than any mammal studied to date including humans.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mortensen |first1=Heidi S. |last2=Pakkenberg |first2=Bente |last3=Dam |first3=Maria |last4=Dietz |first4=Rune |last5=Sonne |first5=Christian |last6=Mikkelsen |first6=Bjarni |last7=Eriksen |first7=Nina |title=Quantitative relationships in delphinid neocortex |journal=Frontiers in Neuroanatomy |date=26 November 2014 |volume=8 |pages=132 |doi=10.3389/fnana.2014.00132 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244864/ |issn=1662-5129}}</ref>
+
| 2014 || {{w|Dolphin}} ({{w|long-finned pilot whale}}) || || It is shown for the first time that a species of {{w|dolphin}}, the {{w|long-finned pilot whale}}, has more neocortical neurons than any mammal studied to date including humans.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mortensen |first1=Heidi S. |last2=Pakkenberg |first2=Bente |last3=Dam |first3=Maria |last4=Dietz |first4=Rune |last5=Sonne |first5=Christian |last6=Mikkelsen |first6=Bjarni |last7=Eriksen |first7=Nina |title=Quantitative relationships in delphinid neocortex |journal=Frontiers in Neuroanatomy |date=26 November 2014 |volume=8 |pages=132 |doi=10.3389/fnana.2014.00132 |url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4244864/ |issn=1662-5129}}</ref>
 +
|-
 +
| 2017 (June) || {{w|Raven}} || || Researchers reveal that ravens are able to remember a human who cheated them out of a snack and were also more positive towards humans who exhibited fairer behaviour.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Müller |first1=J. J. A. |last2=Massen |first2=J. J. M. |last3=Bugnyar |first3=T. |last4=Osvath |first4=M. |title=Ravens remember the nature of a single reciprocal interaction sequence over 2 days and even after a month |journal=Animal Behaviour |date=1 June 2017 |volume=128 |pages=69–78 |doi=10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.004 |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347217301161 |language=en |issn=0003-3472}}</ref>
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2020 (December 10) || || || A study claims that by four months old, {{w|raven}}s have full-blown cognitive skills and before reaching full maturity they can rival adult {{w|great apes}}.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pika |first1=Simone |last2=Sima |first2=Miriam Jennifer |last3=Blum |first3=Christian R. |last4=Herrmann |first4=Esther |last5=Mundry |first5=Roger |title=Ravens parallel great apes in physical and social cognitive skills |journal=Scientific Reports |date=10 December 2020 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=20617 |doi=10.1038/s41598-020-77060-8 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77060-8 |language=en |issn=2045-2322}}</ref>
 
| 2020 (December 10) || || || A study claims that by four months old, {{w|raven}}s have full-blown cognitive skills and before reaching full maturity they can rival adult {{w|great apes}}.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Pika |first1=Simone |last2=Sima |first2=Miriam Jennifer |last3=Blum |first3=Christian R. |last4=Herrmann |first4=Esther |last5=Mundry |first5=Roger |title=Ravens parallel great apes in physical and social cognitive skills |journal=Scientific Reports |date=10 December 2020 |volume=10 |issue=1 |pages=20617 |doi=10.1038/s41598-020-77060-8 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77060-8 |language=en |issn=2045-2322}}</ref>

Revision as of 15:52, 8 October 2022

This is a timeline of FIXME.

Sample questions

The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:

Big picture

Time period Development summary More details
1950s Cognitive revolution
1950s–1960s "During the 1950s and 1960s, researchers started to suggest that large brains in primates were due to their complex social life."[1]

Full timeline

Year Species/taxonomy Event type Details
1858 General "The word anthropomorphism existed for a long time, mainly to describe gods and celestial beings as humanlike, but its likely first usage for animals was made in 1858."[2]
1871 Hominidae "Darwin (1871) later published The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, which made the mind-blowing conclusion that millions of years ago, humans shared a common ancestor with the other great apes. By kicking humans off their pedestal and inserting them into the animal kingdom, Darwin boldly redefined the centuries-old relationship between humans and animals—and made a lot of people really mad in the process."[2]
1882 Literature "In his book Animal Intelligence, Romanes (1882) reported dozens of stories of complex cognitive behaviors in everything from scorpions to elephants." " Romanes’ publication of Animal Intelligence in 1882 marks one possible start of the field"[2]
1908 American psychologist Margaret Floy Washburn publishes The Animal Mind, a collection of experimental data on topics like sensory systems, learning, tool use, motivation, and subjective experience.[2]
1953 "The full concept of the Social Intelligence Hypothesis were first proposed by Michael Chance and Allan Mead in 1953 (Chance and Mead 1953), as they linked social complexity and enlargement of the neocortex in primates."[1]
1969 Literature Karen Pryor publishes The Creative Porpoise: Training for Novel Behavior.
1984 Dolphin (bottlenose) Scientists observe wild bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay, Western Australia using a basic tool. When searching for food on the sea floor, many of these dolphins are seen tearing off pieces of sponge and wrapping them around their rostra, presumably to prevent abrasions and facilitate digging.[3]
1985 "Gordon Burghardt coined the term critical anthropomorphism for the use of data from multiple sources—including anthropomorphic ones—but which could then be formed into appropriately testable hypotheses (Burghardt, 1985)."[2]
1986 Dolphin "One hypothesis proposed by Jerison (1986) is that members of a pod of dolphins are able to share echolocation results with each other to create a better understanding of their surroundings."[4]
1988 "Wasserman says the pigeon experiment comes from a project published in 1988 and featured in the New York Times in which University of Iowa researchers discovered pigeons could distinguish among four categories of objects."[5]
1995 Dolphin "Marten and Psarakos used television to test dolphin self-awareness.[6] They showed dolphins real-time footage of themselves, recorded footage, and another dolphin. They concluded that their evidence suggested self-awareness rather than social behavior. While this particular study has not been repeated since then, dolphins have since passed the mirror test.[7] However, some researchers have argued that evidence for self-awareness has not been convincingly demonstrated."[8]
2011 (June 29) John Marzluff records that crows can hold a grudge.[9]
2012 (September 17) In a test on New Caledonian crows, crows were placed in an enclosure wherein a stick would emerge from a hide. They used two scenarios: in the first, a human was observed entering the hide before the stick moved, and leaving after. In the second, the human remained hidden. In the first, the crows were much more relaxed after the human left, correctly linking the movement of the stick to the presence of the human. They would forage for food, and behave normally. In the second, the crow had no other reference for the stick's presence, so they remained wary. "These results really seem to be showing that crows react in a very similar way to humans in a situation that requires them to reason about a hidden causal agent," says biologist Alex Taylor."[10]
2014 Dolphin (long-finned pilot whale) It is shown for the first time that a species of dolphin, the long-finned pilot whale, has more neocortical neurons than any mammal studied to date including humans.[11]
2017 (June) Raven Researchers reveal that ravens are able to remember a human who cheated them out of a snack and were also more positive towards humans who exhibited fairer behaviour.[12]
2020 (December 10) A study claims that by four months old, ravens have full-blown cognitive skills and before reaching full maturity they can rival adult great apes.[13]

Meta information on the timeline

How the timeline was built

The initial version of the timeline was written by FIXME.

Funding information for this timeline is available.

Feedback and comments

Feedback for the timeline can be provided at the following places:

  • FIXME

What the timeline is still missing

Timeline update strategy

See also

External links

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Vernouillet, Alizée (2018). "Social Intelligence Hypothesis". Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer International Publishing: 1–5. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1498-1. 
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 "Historical Perspective on Animal Cognition". connect.springerpub.com. Springer Publishing Company. 13 January 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2022. 
  3. Smolker, Rachel; Richards, Andrew; Connor, Richard; Mann, Janet; Berggren, Per (26 April 2010). "Sponge Carrying by Dolphins (Delphinidae, Tursiops sp.): A Foraging Specialization Involving Tool Use?". Ethology. 103 (6): 454–465. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00160.x. 
  4. "Do Dolphins Eavesdrop on the Echolocation Signals of Conspecifics?" (PDF). escholarship.org. Retrieved 8 October 2022. 
  5. Agnew-Iowa, Sara (16 February 2015). "Pigeons are smarter than you'd think". Futurity. Retrieved 8 October 2022. 
  6. Marten, Ken and Psarakos, Suchi "Using Self-View Television to Distinguish between Self-Examination and Social Behavior in the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)" (Consciousness and Cognition, Volume 4, Number 2, June 1995)
  7. Reiss, D; Marino, L (8 May 2001). "Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: A case of cognitive convergence". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98 (10): 5937–42. PMC 33317Freely accessible. PMID 11331768. doi:10.1073/pnas.101086398. 
  8. Gallup Jr, Gordon G., and James R. Anderson. "Self-recognition in animals: Where do we stand 50 years later? Lessons from cleaner wrasse and other species." Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice (2019).
  9. Cornell, Heather N.; Marzluff, John M.; Pecoraro, Shannon (7 February 2012). "Social learning spreads knowledge about dangerous humans among American crows". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1728): 499–508. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0957. 
  10. Taylor, Alex H.; Miller, Rachael; Gray, Russell D. (2 October 2012). "New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (40): 16389–16391. ISSN 0027-8424. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208724109. 
  11. Mortensen, Heidi S.; Pakkenberg, Bente; Dam, Maria; Dietz, Rune; Sonne, Christian; Mikkelsen, Bjarni; Eriksen, Nina (26 November 2014). "Quantitative relationships in delphinid neocortex". Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 8: 132. ISSN 1662-5129. doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00132. 
  12. Müller, J. J. A.; Massen, J. J. M.; Bugnyar, T.; Osvath, M. (1 June 2017). "Ravens remember the nature of a single reciprocal interaction sequence over 2 days and even after a month". Animal Behaviour. 128: 69–78. ISSN 0003-3472. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.04.004. 
  13. Pika, Simone; Sima, Miriam Jennifer; Blum, Christian R.; Herrmann, Esther; Mundry, Roger (10 December 2020). "Ravens parallel great apes in physical and social cognitive skills". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 20617. ISSN 2045-2322. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77060-8.