Difference between revisions of "Timeline of non-human animal intelligence"
From Timelines
(→Full timeline) |
(→Full timeline) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1988 || || || "Wasserman says the pigeon experiment comes from a project published in 1988 and featured in the New York Times in which University of Iowa researchers discovered pigeons could distinguish among four categories of objects."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Agnew-Iowa |first1=Sara |title=Pigeons are smarter than you'd think |url=https://www.futurity.org/pigeons-intelligence-856552/ |website=Futurity |access-date=8 October 2022 |date=16 February 2015}}</ref> | | 1988 || || || "Wasserman says the pigeon experiment comes from a project published in 1988 and featured in the New York Times in which University of Iowa researchers discovered pigeons could distinguish among four categories of objects."<ref>{{cite web |last1=Agnew-Iowa |first1=Sara |title=Pigeons are smarter than you'd think |url=https://www.futurity.org/pigeons-intelligence-856552/ |website=Futurity |access-date=8 October 2022 |date=16 February 2015}}</ref> | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1995 || {{w|Dolphin}} || || "Marten and Psarakos used television to test dolphin self-awareness.<ref>Marten, Ken and Psarakos, Suchi "Using Self-View Television to Distinguish between Self-Examination and Social Behavior in the Bottlenose Dolphin (''Tursiops truncatus'')" (''Consciousness and Cognition'', Volume 4, Number 2, June 1995)</ref> They showed dolphins real-time footage of themselves, recorded footage, and another dolphin. They concluded that their evidence suggested self-awareness rather than social behavior. While this particular study has not been repeated since then, dolphins have since passed the mirror test.<ref name="Mirror">{{Cite journal |last=Reiss |first=D |last2=Marino |first2=L |date=8 May 2001 |title=Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: A case of cognitive convergence |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America |volume=98 |issue=10 |pages=5937–42|doi=10.1073/pnas.101086398 |pmc=33317 |pmid=11331768}}</ref> However, some researchers have argued that evidence for self-awareness has not been convincingly demonstrated."<ref>Gallup Jr, Gordon G., and James R. Anderson. "Self-recognition in animals: Where do we stand 50 years later? Lessons from cleaner wrasse and other species." Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice (2019).</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2012 (September 17) || || || In a test on New Caledonian crows, crows were placed in an enclosure wherein a stick would emerge from a hide. They used two scenarios: in the first, a human was observed entering the hide before the stick moved, and leaving after. In the second, the human remained hidden. In the first, the crows were much more relaxed after the human left, correctly linking the movement of the stick to the presence of the human. They would forage for food, and behave normally. In the second, the crow had no other reference for the stick's presence, so they remained wary. "These results really seem to be showing that crows react in a very similar way to humans in a situation that requires them to reason about a hidden causal agent," says biologist Alex Taylor."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=Alex H. |last2=Miller |first2=Rachael |last3=Gray |first3=Russell D. |title=New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=2 October 2012 |volume=109 |issue=40 |pages=16389–16391 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |language=en |issn=0027-8424}}</ref> | | 2012 (September 17) || || || In a test on New Caledonian crows, crows were placed in an enclosure wherein a stick would emerge from a hide. They used two scenarios: in the first, a human was observed entering the hide before the stick moved, and leaving after. In the second, the human remained hidden. In the first, the crows were much more relaxed after the human left, correctly linking the movement of the stick to the presence of the human. They would forage for food, and behave normally. In the second, the crow had no other reference for the stick's presence, so they remained wary. "These results really seem to be showing that crows react in a very similar way to humans in a situation that requires them to reason about a hidden causal agent," says biologist Alex Taylor."<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=Alex H. |last2=Miller |first2=Rachael |last3=Gray |first3=Russell D. |title=New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents |journal=Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |date=2 October 2012 |volume=109 |issue=40 |pages=16389–16391 |doi=10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |url=https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1208724109 |language=en |issn=0027-8424}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 15:39, 8 October 2022
This is a timeline of FIXME.
Contents
Sample questions
The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:
Big picture
| Time period | Development summary | More details |
|---|---|---|
| 1950s | Cognitive revolution | |
| 1950s–1960s | "During the 1950s and 1960s, researchers started to suggest that large brains in primates were due to their complex social life."[1] |
Full timeline
| Year | Species/taxonomy | Event type | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1858 | General | "The word anthropomorphism existed for a long time, mainly to describe gods and celestial beings as humanlike, but its likely first usage for animals was made in 1858."[2] | |
| 1871 | Hominidae | "Darwin (1871) later published The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, which made the mind-blowing conclusion that millions of years ago, humans shared a common ancestor with the other great apes. By kicking humans off their pedestal and inserting them into the animal kingdom, Darwin boldly redefined the centuries-old relationship between humans and animals—and made a lot of people really mad in the process."[2] | |
| 1882 | Literature | "In his book Animal Intelligence, Romanes (1882) reported dozens of stories of complex cognitive behaviors in everything from scorpions to elephants." " Romanes’ publication of Animal Intelligence in 1882 marks one possible start of the field"[2] | |
| 1908 | American psychologist Margaret Floy Washburn publishes The Animal Mind, a collection of experimental data on topics like sensory systems, learning, tool use, motivation, and subjective experience.[2] | ||
| 1953 | "The full concept of the Social Intelligence Hypothesis were first proposed by Michael Chance and Allan Mead in 1953 (Chance and Mead 1953), as they linked social complexity and enlargement of the neocortex in primates."[1] | ||
| 1969 | Literature | Karen Pryor publishes The Creative Porpoise: Training for Novel Behavior. | |
| 1984 | Dolphin (bottlenose) | Scientists observe wild bottlenose dolphins in Shark Bay, Western Australia using a basic tool. When searching for food on the sea floor, many of these dolphins are seen tearing off pieces of sponge and wrapping them around their rostra, presumably to prevent abrasions and facilitate digging.[3] | |
| 1985 | "Gordon Burghardt coined the term critical anthropomorphism for the use of data from multiple sources—including anthropomorphic ones—but which could then be formed into appropriately testable hypotheses (Burghardt, 1985)."[2] | ||
| 1986 | Dolphin | "One hypothesis proposed by Jerison (1986) is that members of a pod of dolphins are able to share echolocation results with each other to create a better understanding of their surroundings."[4] | |
| 1988 | "Wasserman says the pigeon experiment comes from a project published in 1988 and featured in the New York Times in which University of Iowa researchers discovered pigeons could distinguish among four categories of objects."[5] | ||
| 1995 | Dolphin | "Marten and Psarakos used television to test dolphin self-awareness.[6] They showed dolphins real-time footage of themselves, recorded footage, and another dolphin. They concluded that their evidence suggested self-awareness rather than social behavior. While this particular study has not been repeated since then, dolphins have since passed the mirror test.[7] However, some researchers have argued that evidence for self-awareness has not been convincingly demonstrated."[8] | |
| 2012 (September 17) | In a test on New Caledonian crows, crows were placed in an enclosure wherein a stick would emerge from a hide. They used two scenarios: in the first, a human was observed entering the hide before the stick moved, and leaving after. In the second, the human remained hidden. In the first, the crows were much more relaxed after the human left, correctly linking the movement of the stick to the presence of the human. They would forage for food, and behave normally. In the second, the crow had no other reference for the stick's presence, so they remained wary. "These results really seem to be showing that crows react in a very similar way to humans in a situation that requires them to reason about a hidden causal agent," says biologist Alex Taylor."[9] | ||
| 2014 | dolphin (long-finned pilot whale) | It is shown for the first time that a species of dolphin, the long-finned pilot whale, has more neocortical neurons than any mammal studied to date including humans.[10] | |
| 2020 (December 10) | A study claims that by four months old, ravens have full-blown cognitive skills and before reaching full maturity they can rival adult great apes.[11] |
Meta information on the timeline
How the timeline was built
The initial version of the timeline was written by FIXME.
Funding information for this timeline is available.
Feedback and comments
Feedback for the timeline can be provided at the following places:
- FIXME
What the timeline is still missing
Timeline update strategy
See also
External links
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Vernouillet, Alizée (2018). "Social Intelligence Hypothesis". Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer International Publishing: 1–5. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1498-1.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 "Historical Perspective on Animal Cognition". connect.springerpub.com. Springer Publishing Company. 13 January 2021. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
- ↑ Smolker, Rachel; Richards, Andrew; Connor, Richard; Mann, Janet; Berggren, Per (26 April 2010). "Sponge Carrying by Dolphins (Delphinidae, Tursiops sp.): A Foraging Specialization Involving Tool Use?". Ethology. 103 (6): 454–465. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00160.x.
- ↑ "Do Dolphins Eavesdrop on the Echolocation Signals of Conspecifics?" (PDF). escholarship.org. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
- ↑ Agnew-Iowa, Sara (16 February 2015). "Pigeons are smarter than you'd think". Futurity. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
- ↑ Marten, Ken and Psarakos, Suchi "Using Self-View Television to Distinguish between Self-Examination and Social Behavior in the Bottlenose Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)" (Consciousness and Cognition, Volume 4, Number 2, June 1995)
- ↑ Reiss, D; Marino, L (8 May 2001). "Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: A case of cognitive convergence". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98 (10): 5937–42. PMC 33317
. PMID 11331768. doi:10.1073/pnas.101086398.
- ↑ Gallup Jr, Gordon G., and James R. Anderson. "Self-recognition in animals: Where do we stand 50 years later? Lessons from cleaner wrasse and other species." Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice (2019).
- ↑ Taylor, Alex H.; Miller, Rachael; Gray, Russell D. (2 October 2012). "New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109 (40): 16389–16391. ISSN 0027-8424. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208724109.
- ↑ Mortensen, Heidi S.; Pakkenberg, Bente; Dam, Maria; Dietz, Rune; Sonne, Christian; Mikkelsen, Bjarni; Eriksen, Nina (26 November 2014). "Quantitative relationships in delphinid neocortex". Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 8: 132. ISSN 1662-5129. doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00132.
- ↑ Pika, Simone; Sima, Miriam Jennifer; Blum, Christian R.; Herrmann, Esther; Mundry, Roger (10 December 2020). "Ravens parallel great apes in physical and social cognitive skills". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 20617. ISSN 2045-2322. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77060-8.
