Difference between revisions of "Talk:Timeline of Microsoft Copilot"
From Timelines
(→General standalone evaluation comments =) |
(→Partial review by Vipul on 2023-07-01) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* Consistency: use "Bing Chat" consistently rather than sometimes calling it "BingChat".✔ | * Consistency: use "Bing Chat" consistently rather than sometimes calling it "BingChat".✔ | ||
* Competition: Maybe add more rows for the launch of stuff such as Google Bard (Bard is mentioned, but not its launch).✔ | * Competition: Maybe add more rows for the launch of stuff such as Google Bard (Bard is mentioned, but not its launch).✔ | ||
| − | * More in terms of criticism/commentary: There's some, but there should be more criticism/commentary, and less of an exclusive focus on the changes/narrative announced by Microsoft (no need to remove any of the existing rows, just expand more of the other stuff). [https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/15/23599072/microsoft-ai-bing-personality-conversations-spy-employees-webcams], [https://www.pcmag.com/opinions/bings-ai-chat-marks-a-new-web-era-please-dont-kill-it]✔, [https://www.geekwire.com/2023/nasty-conversations-with-bing-chat/]✔ | + | * More in terms of criticism/commentary: There's some, but there should be more criticism/commentary, and less of an exclusive focus on the changes/narrative announced by Microsoft (no need to remove any of the existing rows, just expand more of the other stuff). [https://www.theverge.com/2023/2/15/23599072/microsoft-ai-bing-personality-conversations-spy-employees-webcams]✔, [https://www.pcmag.com/opinions/bings-ai-chat-marks-a-new-web-era-please-dont-kill-it]✔, [https://www.geekwire.com/2023/nasty-conversations-with-bing-chat/]✔ |
Revision as of 21:06, 19 December 2023
Contents
Review by Vipul on 2023-09-01
Version reviewed: https://timelines.issarice.com/index.php?title=Timeline_of_Bing_Chat&oldid=75666
Process used: Review process for timelines
General standalone evaluation comments
- Both the spellings "Sidney" and "Sydney" are used for Bing Chat's original name. Is it possible to figure out what the original name used for? If both names appear to have been used, it's worth highlighting both versions of the name upfront in the big picture.
Line-by-line comments
- The "Criticism/commentary" lines for February 16 and February 17 seem to be referring to the same thing. Consolidate? Also, it would be good to include the original reference.
Partial review by Vipul on 2023-07-01
This is not a full review! I did a quick pass of the timeline.
- There needs to be significant coverage of the "Sydney"-codenamed testing phase of Bing Chat, that happened prior to the official release of Bing Chat. As of now, it doesn't look like this phase is mentioned anywhere in the timeline page. In particular, the article https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WkchhorbLsSMbLacZ/ai-1-sydney-and-bing that I had originally recommended when seeking this timeline is still relevant and can help with fleshing out the Sydney phase.✔
- Consistency: use "Bing Chat" consistently rather than sometimes calling it "BingChat".✔
- Competition: Maybe add more rows for the launch of stuff such as Google Bard (Bard is mentioned, but not its launch).✔
- More in terms of criticism/commentary: There's some, but there should be more criticism/commentary, and less of an exclusive focus on the changes/narrative announced by Microsoft (no need to remove any of the existing rows, just expand more of the other stuff). [1]✔, [2]✔, [3]✔
