Timeline of type B physicalism
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Year | Event type | Details |
|---|---|---|
| 1956 | Publication | Ullin Place publishes "Is Consciousness a Brain Process?", helping establish mind-brain identity theory, a precursor to later Type-B physicalism. |
| 1959 | Publication | J. J. C. Smart publishes "Sensations and Brain Processes", defending the identity theory while acknowledging the apparent distinctness of experience and brain states. |
| 1965 | Publication | David Armstrong publishes A Materialist Theory of the Mind, developing a sophisticated scientific materialism that would influence later Type-B approaches. |
| 1970 | Publication | David Lewis publishes "How to Define Theoretical Terms", providing a framework for psychophysical identifications through theoretical reduction. |
| 1974 | Thought experiment | Saul Kripke publishes Naming and Necessity, arguing that identities such as "pain = C-fiber firing" appear contingent, creating a major challenge for materialist theories of mind. |
| 1978 | Publication | David Lewis publishes "Mad Pain and Martian Pain", defending functionalist and physicalist approaches to mental states. |
| 1980 | Knowledge argument | Frank Jackson introduces the Mary thought experiment in "Epiphenomenal Qualia", arguing that physical knowledge may be incomplete. |
| 1982 | Publication | David Chalmers later identifies philosophers such as David Lewis and David Armstrong as exemplars of positions that would become Type-B materialism. |
| 1983 | Thought experiment | Saul Kripke's arguments against psychophysical identity gain broad influence through the publication of Naming and Necessity in book form. |
| 1990 | Publication | Brian Loar begins developing phenomenal concepts theory, a major Type-B strategy for explaining the explanatory gap. |
| 1995 | Publication | Brian Loar publishes "Phenomenal States", arguing that the explanatory gap results from special concepts rather than non-physical properties. |
| 1996 | Classification introduced | David Chalmers publishes The Conscious Mind, distinguishing Type-A, Type-B, and Type-C materialism. Type-B materialists accept an explanatory gap but deny any ontological gap. |
| 1997 | Publication | Joseph Levine develops the explanatory gap argument, posing a central challenge for Type-B physicalists. |
| 1998–2005 | Theoretical development | Phenomenal concepts strategies are developed by Brian Loar, Christopher Hill, David Papineau, and others as responses to conceivability and knowledge arguments. |
| 2002 | Publication | David Papineau publishes Thinking About Consciousness, defending a Type-B physicalist account based on phenomenal concepts. |
| 2003 | Publication | Ned Block and Robert Stalnaker publish "Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap", defending physicalism while acknowledging explanatory difficulties. |
| 2005 | Publication | David Papineau further develops the phenomenal concepts strategy in response to anti-physicalist arguments. |
| 2007 | Publication | Daniel Stoljar publishes Ignorance and Imagination, arguing that explanatory gaps do not imply dualism. |
| 2010s | Research trend | Type-B physicalism becomes one of the dominant positions in academic philosophy of mind, especially among physicalists responding to the hard problem. |
| 2012 | Publication | David Papineau publishes The Philosophy of Consciousness, summarizing and extending contemporary Type-B physicalist arguments. |
| 2010s–2020s | Ongoing debate | Philosophers including David Papineau, Brian Loar, Ned Block, Robert Stalnaker, Christopher Hill, and Daniel Stoljar continue refining responses to conceivability, knowledge, and explanatory-gap arguments. |
| 2020s | Research trend | Type-B physicalism remains a leading position in consciousness studies, often combined with higher-order theories, global workspace models, and neuroscientific approaches to consciousness. |