Timeline of type B physicalism

From Timelines
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Year Event type Details
1956 Publication Ullin Place publishes "Is Consciousness a Brain Process?", helping establish mind-brain identity theory, a precursor to later Type-B physicalism.
1959 Publication J. J. C. Smart publishes "Sensations and Brain Processes", defending the identity theory while acknowledging the apparent distinctness of experience and brain states.
1965 Publication David Armstrong publishes A Materialist Theory of the Mind, developing a sophisticated scientific materialism that would influence later Type-B approaches.
1970 Publication David Lewis publishes "How to Define Theoretical Terms", providing a framework for psychophysical identifications through theoretical reduction.
1974 Thought experiment Saul Kripke publishes Naming and Necessity, arguing that identities such as "pain = C-fiber firing" appear contingent, creating a major challenge for materialist theories of mind.
1978 Publication David Lewis publishes "Mad Pain and Martian Pain", defending functionalist and physicalist approaches to mental states.
1980 Knowledge argument Frank Jackson introduces the Mary thought experiment in "Epiphenomenal Qualia", arguing that physical knowledge may be incomplete.
1982 Publication David Chalmers later identifies philosophers such as David Lewis and David Armstrong as exemplars of positions that would become Type-B materialism.
1983 Thought experiment Saul Kripke's arguments against psychophysical identity gain broad influence through the publication of Naming and Necessity in book form.
1990 Publication Brian Loar begins developing phenomenal concepts theory, a major Type-B strategy for explaining the explanatory gap.
1995 Publication Brian Loar publishes "Phenomenal States", arguing that the explanatory gap results from special concepts rather than non-physical properties.
1996 Classification introduced David Chalmers publishes The Conscious Mind, distinguishing Type-A, Type-B, and Type-C materialism. Type-B materialists accept an explanatory gap but deny any ontological gap.
1997 Publication Joseph Levine develops the explanatory gap argument, posing a central challenge for Type-B physicalists.
1998–2005 Theoretical development Phenomenal concepts strategies are developed by Brian Loar, Christopher Hill, David Papineau, and others as responses to conceivability and knowledge arguments.
2002 Publication David Papineau publishes Thinking About Consciousness, defending a Type-B physicalist account based on phenomenal concepts.
2003 Publication Ned Block and Robert Stalnaker publish "Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory Gap", defending physicalism while acknowledging explanatory difficulties.
2005 Publication David Papineau further develops the phenomenal concepts strategy in response to anti-physicalist arguments.
2007 Publication Daniel Stoljar publishes Ignorance and Imagination, arguing that explanatory gaps do not imply dualism.
2010s Research trend Type-B physicalism becomes one of the dominant positions in academic philosophy of mind, especially among physicalists responding to the hard problem.
2012 Publication David Papineau publishes The Philosophy of Consciousness, summarizing and extending contemporary Type-B physicalist arguments.
2010s–2020s Ongoing debate Philosophers including David Papineau, Brian Loar, Ned Block, Robert Stalnaker, Christopher Hill, and Daniel Stoljar continue refining responses to conceivability, knowledge, and explanatory-gap arguments.
2020s Research trend Type-B physicalism remains a leading position in consciousness studies, often combined with higher-order theories, global workspace models, and neuroscientific approaches to consciousness.