Difference between revisions of "Timeline of chemical risk"
From Timelines
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
{| class="sortable wikitable" | {| class="sortable wikitable" | ||
! Year !! Risk type !! Event type !! Agent !! Details !! Country/location | ! Year !! Risk type !! Event type !! Agent !! Details !! Country/location | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | 1930s || || || || A German scientist created Tabun, the first nerve agent, while attempting to develop a more potent pesticide. The German army weaponized Tabun as a chemical weapon, and it was followed by the development of Sarin and Soman in the late 1930s to early 1940s. American scientists designated these agents as "G" agents, leading to Tabun being labeled GA, Sarin as GB, and Soman as GD. In the 1950s, more stable variants known as the V agents, including VX (Venom X) developed by the British in 1952, emerged. VX, characterized by increased stability, can persist in the environment for several weeks after release.<ref name="Melnick">{{cite book |last1=Melnick |first1=Alan |title=Biological, Chemical, and Radiological Terrorism: Emergency Preparedness and Response for the Primary Care Physician |date=3 December 2007 |publisher=Springer Science & Business Media |isbn=978-0-387-47232-4 |url=https://books.google.com.ar/books/about/Biological_Chemical_and_Radiological_Ter.html?id=JCU9KV00aCkC&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y |language=en}}</ref>{{rp|120-121}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 1975 || Intentional || Terrorism (state-sponsored) || {{w|Parathion}}, {{w|thallium}}, multiple || During the Rhodesian conflict, the minority white community in Rhodesia face challenges from native African nationalists. Stretched thin, Rhodesian forces adopt unconventional methods, employing commercially available poisons like {{w|parathion}} and {{w|thallium}}. They contaminate clothing, water sources, and food, resulting in an estimated 1,500–2,500 guerilla deaths, with numerous civilians affected. Facing native African nationalist insurgents, the Rhodesian forces struggled due to limited resources. Rhodesia's chemical warfare, marked by low-tech methods, demonstrate a brutal, yet unconventional approach to counter the growing power of the insurgent forces.<ref>{{cite web |title=Dirty War: Rhodesia and Chemical Biological Warfare 1975-1980 (Book Review) |url=https://cco.ndu.edu/News/Article/1506904/dirty-war-rhodesia-and-chemical-biological-warfare-1975-1980-book-review/ |website=PRISM {{!}} National Defense University |access-date=6 October 2023}}</ref> || {{w|Zimbabwe}} ({{w|Rhodesia}}) | | 1975 || Intentional || Terrorism (state-sponsored) || {{w|Parathion}}, {{w|thallium}}, multiple || During the Rhodesian conflict, the minority white community in Rhodesia face challenges from native African nationalists. Stretched thin, Rhodesian forces adopt unconventional methods, employing commercially available poisons like {{w|parathion}} and {{w|thallium}}. They contaminate clothing, water sources, and food, resulting in an estimated 1,500–2,500 guerilla deaths, with numerous civilians affected. Facing native African nationalist insurgents, the Rhodesian forces struggled due to limited resources. Rhodesia's chemical warfare, marked by low-tech methods, demonstrate a brutal, yet unconventional approach to counter the growing power of the insurgent forces.<ref>{{cite web |title=Dirty War: Rhodesia and Chemical Biological Warfare 1975-1980 (Book Review) |url=https://cco.ndu.edu/News/Article/1506904/dirty-war-rhodesia-and-chemical-biological-warfare-1975-1980-book-review/ |website=PRISM {{!}} National Defense University |access-date=6 October 2023}}</ref> || {{w|Zimbabwe}} ({{w|Rhodesia}}) | ||
Revision as of 18:00, 18 January 2024
This is a timeline of chemical risk.
Contents
Sample questions
The following are some interesting questions that can be answered by reading this timeline:
Big picture
| Time period | Development summary | More details |
|---|
Full timeline
| Year | Risk type | Event type | Agent | Details | Country/location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1930s | A German scientist created Tabun, the first nerve agent, while attempting to develop a more potent pesticide. The German army weaponized Tabun as a chemical weapon, and it was followed by the development of Sarin and Soman in the late 1930s to early 1940s. American scientists designated these agents as "G" agents, leading to Tabun being labeled GA, Sarin as GB, and Soman as GD. In the 1950s, more stable variants known as the V agents, including VX (Venom X) developed by the British in 1952, emerged. VX, characterized by increased stability, can persist in the environment for several weeks after release.[1]:120-121 | ||||
| 1975 | Intentional | Terrorism (state-sponsored) | Parathion, thallium, multiple | During the Rhodesian conflict, the minority white community in Rhodesia face challenges from native African nationalists. Stretched thin, Rhodesian forces adopt unconventional methods, employing commercially available poisons like parathion and thallium. They contaminate clothing, water sources, and food, resulting in an estimated 1,500–2,500 guerilla deaths, with numerous civilians affected. Facing native African nationalist insurgents, the Rhodesian forces struggled due to limited resources. Rhodesia's chemical warfare, marked by low-tech methods, demonstrate a brutal, yet unconventional approach to counter the growing power of the insurgent forces.[2] | Zimbabwe (Rhodesia) |
| 1999 | Dioxin affair | Belgium |
Meta information on the timeline
How the timeline was built
The initial version of the timeline was written by FIXME.
Funding information for this timeline is available.
Feedback and comments
Feedback for the timeline can be provided at the following places:
- FIXME
What the timeline is still missing
Timeline update strategy
See also
External links
References
- ↑ Melnick, Alan (3 December 2007). Biological, Chemical, and Radiological Terrorism: Emergency Preparedness and Response for the Primary Care Physician. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-47232-4.
- ↑ "Dirty War: Rhodesia and Chemical Biological Warfare 1975-1980 (Book Review)". PRISM | National Defense University. Retrieved 6 October 2023.
