Talk:Timeline of OpenAI: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Partial unsolicited review by Vipul on 2024-10-04 == | == Partial unsolicited review by Vipul on 2024-10-04 == | ||
* [https://gwern.net/scaling-hypothesis The Scaling Hypothesis] by Gwern✔, as well as his [https://www.lesswrong.com/users/gwern LessWrong comments on the subject], in particular [https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/N6vZEnCn6A95Xn39p/are-we-in-an-ai-overhang?commentId=jbD8siv7GMWxRro43 this comment], basically Gwern's theory is that OpenAI believed in the scaling hypothesis and that others such as DeepMind didn't, and the success of GPT-3 etc. has been due to OpenAI's big bet on scaling paying off (so far). Please take a look at these and consider how to integrate them into the timeline. | * [https://gwern.net/scaling-hypothesis The Scaling Hypothesis] by Gwern✔, as well as his [https://www.lesswrong.com/users/gwern LessWrong comments on the subject], in particular [https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/N6vZEnCn6A95Xn39p/are-we-in-an-ai-overhang?commentId=jbD8siv7GMWxRro43 this comment]✔, basically Gwern's theory is that OpenAI believed in the scaling hypothesis and that others such as DeepMind didn't, and the success of GPT-3 etc. has been due to OpenAI's big bet on scaling paying off (so far). Please take a look at these and consider how to integrate them into the timeline. | ||
== Partial unsolicited review by Vipul on 2024-09-30 == | == Partial unsolicited review by Vipul on 2024-09-30 == | ||